Commons:Candidatas a imaxes destacadas

Candidatas a imaxes destacadas noutras linguas:

Shortcut: COM:FPC Estas son as imaxes candidatas para convérterse en imaxes destacadas. Por favor teña en conta que isto non é o mesmo que ser a imaxe do día.

Para consultar o arquivo de propostas vexa: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log

Hai unha lista das imaxes destacadas organizada por data.

Véxase tamén: quality image candidates e Photography critiques

Procedemento formal

Proposta

Se vostede cre que está en presenza dunha imaxe destacada ou creou unha imaxe que cumpre os requisitos para considerarse valiosa, que ademais dispón dunha descrición e licenza apropiada, copie o nome da imaxe na caixa do formulario (incluído o prefixo Image:), a continuación do texto que contén a caixa:

Deseguido, debe incluír de xeito manual un enlace á paxina que creou na cima da lista de propostas.

Votación

Pode usar os seguintes modelos para expresar o seu apoio:

{{Support}} ( Support) / {{Concordo}} ( Agree)

ou estoutros para expresar oposición:

{{Oppose}} ( Oppose) / {{Discordo}} ( Oppose),

Tamén pode usar:

{{Neutral}} ( Neutral) / {{Neutro}} ( Neutral)
{{Comment}} ( Comment)
{{Info}} ( Info)

Por favor intente incluír algunhas palabras que xustifiquen porque lle gusta ou disgusta a imaxe, en particular cando o voto sexa contrario. Lembre tamén asinar (~~~~).

Políticas e normas sobre candidatas a imaxes destacadas

Regras xerais

After the end of the voting period the result will be determined on day 15 after nomination (shown in the time-table below). So the voting period is two weeks (plus the hours until the end of day 14). Votes added on day 15 or after are not counted.
Nominations by anonymous contributors are welcome
Contributions to discussion by anonymous contributors are welcome
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
Nominations do not count as votes. Support must be explicitly stated.
Nominators can withdraw their nominated pictures at any time. This is done by simply writing "I withdraw my nomination".
Remember, the goal of the Wikimedia Commons project is to provide a central repository for free images to be used by all Wikimedia projects, including possible future projects. This is not simply a depository for Wikipedia images, so images should not be judged here on their suitability for that project.
Pictures can be taken from the list if they have no support (not counting the nominator's) on day number 7 (day of nomination + 7).

Regras para as imaxes candidatas

A imaxe pode convérterse nunha imaxe destacada se cumpre as seguintes condicións:

Dispor dunha licenza apropiada (por suposto)
Contar como mínimo con 5 votos de apoio
A relación entre apoio/oposición debe ser de 2/1 como mínimo (unha maioría de dous terzos)
Non poden ser imaxes destacadas dúas versiións diferentes da mesma imaxe, só aquela co maior número de votos.

Para as instrucións sobre como proceder coas propostas antigas, vexa Template talk:Featured pictures candidates#What to do after voting is finished.

Featured picture delisting candidates

Over time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. These require 2/3 majority (and a minimum of 5 votes) agreeing to delist from featured pictures. If there is not 2/3 agreeing to delist it, it stays as a featured picture. For these, vote {{Keep}} Keep (it deserves to be a featured picture) or {{Delist}} Delist (it doesn't deserve to be a featured picture). Please provide a link to the original FP nomination (it will appear under "Links" on the image description page). Otherwise the same rules as above apply. Please use this link to add a new removal candidate.

Guidelines for nominators

Below you can find some informal rules picture should match:

Resolution - graphics located on Commons may be used not only for viewing them on a screen. They may be also used for printing or for viewing on very high resolution monitors. We can't predict what devices would be used in the future neither, so it is important that pictures being nominated have a resolution as high as possible. A resolution of at least 2 million pixel (e.g. 2000 x 1000) seems reasonable right now.
Focus - every important object on the picture should be sharp.
Foreground and background - foreground and background objects may be pretty distracting. You should check if something in front of the subject doesn't hide some important elements and if something in background doesn't spoil the composition (for example if the streetlight doesn't "stand" on someone's head).
General quality - pictures being nominated should have good technical quality.
Value - our main goal is to feature most valuable pictures from all others. Pictures should be in some way special, so please be aware that:
- almost all sunsets are pretty, and most of such pictures are not different in the essence from others,
- nightshots are pretty but normally more details can be shown on pictures taken at daytime,
- beautiful does not always mean valuable.

Not every rule has to be matched, e.g. a picture may have a low resolution, because higher resolution photos cannot be taken (subject may be dead), or the event is not going to occur again.

Guidelines for Evaluating Photographs

There are several criteria for evaluating images.

On the technical side, we have exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.

Exposure refers to the shutter diaphragm combination that renders an image with a tonal curve that ideally is able to represent in acceptable detail shadows and highlights within the image. This is called latitude. Images can be on the low side of the tonal curve (low range), the middle (middle range) or high side (upper range). Digital cameras (or images) have a narrower latitude than film. Lack of shadow detail is not necessarily a negative characteristic. In fact, it can be part of the desired effect. Burned highlights in large areas are a distracting element.

Composition refers to the arrangement of the elements within the image. The “Rule of Thirds” is a good guideline for composition and is an inheritance from the painting school. The idea is to divide the image with two imaginary horizontal and two vertical lines, thus dividing the image into thirds horizontally and vertically. Centering the subject is almost always considered a negative practice. Subjects of interest are placed in one of the “interest points”, where horizontal and vertical lines intersect (4 interest points are created). Horizons are never places in the middle, for they “cut” the image in half. They are placed either in the upper or lower horizontal line. Main idea here is NOT to center subject.

Movement control refers to the manner in which motion is represented in the image. Motion can be frozen or blurred. Neither one is better over the other. It is the intention of representation. Movement is relative within the objects of the image. For example, photographing a race car that appears frozen in relation to the background does not give us a sense of speed or motion, so technique dictates to represent the car in a frozen manner but with a blurred background, thus creating the sense of motion, this is called "panning". On the other hand, representing a basketball player in a high jump frozen in relation to everything else, due to the “unnatural” nature of the pose would be a good photograph.

Depth of field (DOF) refers to the area in focus in front of and beyond main subject. Depth of field is chosen according to the specific needs of every picture. Large or small DOF can either way add or subtract to the quality of the image. Low depth of field can be used to bring attention to the main subject, separating it from the general environment. High depth of field can be used to emphasize space. Short focal length lenses (wide angles) yield large DOF, and viceversa, long focal lenses (telephotos) have shallow DOF. Small apertures yield large DOF and conversely, large apertures yield shallow DOF.

On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, etc.

Shape refers to the contour of the main subjects.

Volume refers to the three dimensional quality of the object. This is accomplished using side light. Contrary to general belief, front lighting is not the best light. It tends to flatten subject. Best light of day is early morning or late afternoon.

Color is important. Over saturated colours are not good.

Texture refers to the quality of the surface of the subject. It is enhanced by side lighting… it is the “feel” to the touch….

Perspective refers to the “angle” accompanied by lines that disappear into a vanishing point that may or may not be inside the image.

Balance refers to the arrangement of subjects within the image that can either give equal weight or appear to be heavier on one side.

Proportion refers to the relation of size of objects in picture. Generally, we tend to represent small objects small in relation to others, but a good technique is to represent small objects large contrary to natural size relationship. For example, a small flower is given preponderance over a large mountain…. This is called inversion of scales.

Not all elements must be present. Some photographs can be judged on individual characteristics, that is, an image can be about color or texture, or color AND texture, etc.

Symbolic meaning or relevance…. Well, this is where opinion wars start…. A bad picture of a very difficult subject is a better picture than a good picture of an ordinary subject. A good picture of a difficult subject is an extraordinary photograph.

Images can be culturally biased by the photograher and/or the observer. The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image “speaks” to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, hapiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensations….

Above all, Be polite

Please don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone elses. Choose your words with care.

Happy judging… and remember.... all rules can be broken

Page refresh: purge this page's cache

To add your nomination to the list: Open this & add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list: {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:FILENAME}}

Featured Picture Candidates

Featured picture candidates

File:Hollywood-1923-Poster-restored.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 21:13:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Poster for the 1923 film, Hollywood with Hope Drown as Angela.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Entertainment#Film
Info created by Paramount Pictures - uploaded by WFinch - restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 21:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ezarateesteban 21:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There seems to be a weird join in the middle of the poster. Is that accurate to the source material? Cmao20 (talk) 23:31, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's in the original Ezarateesteban 00:10, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bottrop (DE), Tetraeder -- 2022 -- 0402.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 19:52:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Germany
Info created, uploaded and nominated by me. I'm not sure if it also could fit into the FP gallery "Sculptures", as the Tetrahedron is somehow both – one and a tower. -- A. Öztas 19:52, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- A. Öztas 19:52, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great motif and good light Cmao20 (talk) 23:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:27, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan Kekek and Daniel Case here. And it should be mentioned somewhere that it is the third nomination of this structure after this one and that one -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:59, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Вид на Мурманск с горы Горелой.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 19:49:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Russia
Info: view of Murmansk from the Gorelaya Mountain; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:49, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:49, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting Cmao20 (talk) 23:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:26, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cheops Mountain seen the Sir Donald Trail.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 19:33:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Canada#British Columbia
Info: Cheops Mountain seen from the Sir Donald Trail, Glacier National Park; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:33, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:33, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very pretty Cmao20 (talk) 23:29, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 01:14, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Crop too tight at the bottom, in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:49, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bruco di Sfinge dell'Euforbia 3.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 16:27:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
Info Spurge Hawk-moth caterpillar - created by Maurizio Carlini - uploaded by Maurizio Carlini - nominated by Civvì -- Civvì (talk) 16:27, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Civvì (talk) 16:27, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good to see such good images by uploaders who are not regulars on this page. Thanks for bringing this here, Civvì! --Kritzolina (talk) 18:37, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Kritzolina; excellent work! As I've mentioned before, not everything has to be focus-stacked. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:29, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Je-str (talk) 22:10, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:46, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. Focus stacking might have improved it but it remains superb for FP Cmao20 (talk) 23:28, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice light, good focus -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:48, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 05:05, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Black-capped chickadee (41417).jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 15:10:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Paridae_(Tits)
Info Diminutive black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus) hanging on a plant, feasting on some seeds. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:10, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:10, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charming, educational, excellent quality --Kritzolina (talk) 18:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ezarateesteban 21:16, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:46, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great stuff Cmao20 (talk) 23:28, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:مستشفى بن صميم يعلوه مطار إفران.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 14:07:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Morocco>
Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 14:07, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 14:07, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Interesting place but I miss a great composition here and the sky is very pale and uninteresting Cmao20 (talk) 23:27, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:45, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:زاوية بن صميم.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 13:45:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Morocco>
Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 13:45, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 13:45, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Good composition and colours but just not sufficient image quality Cmao20 (talk) 23:27, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cmao20. Also it was declined as QI. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:20, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mimetismo - Camouflage.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 13:37:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida
Info created by Maurizio Carlini - uploaded by Maurizio Carlini - nominated by Maurizio Carlini -- Maurizio Carlini (talk) 13:37, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Maurizio Carlini (talk) 13:37, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great timing and very high quality. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:05, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow, really cool photo. Arguably DoF could be better but FP nevertheless for such an interesting subject Cmao20 (talk) 23:26, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Extraordinary camouflage. The prey might have been fooled, as I was at first sight, confusing the flower and the spider! -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:43, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per supporters above. -- Radomianin (talk) 02:50, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bremer Hütte 2024.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 10:53:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Tyrol
Info Nice composition of an Alpine hut. Note that I've put the category as 'natural', as I see the subject as being the hut in its wider natural context rather than just the hut, but if anyone can suggest improvements, that's all good with me. created by Milseburg - uploaded by Milseburg - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 10:53, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 10:53, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful shot capturing a wonderful and truly lively atmosphere, with people bringing the mountain hut to life. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:40, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:46, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:26, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition, mirror image -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:34, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cañon del Río Sil desde el mirador de Vilouxe.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 09:57:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Spain
Info all by me -- Fernando (talk) 09:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Fernando (talk) 09:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I realise this may have been unavoidable, but the out of focus rocks in the foreground bother me a little, especially because they are not symmetrical. Cmao20 (talk) 10:45, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ventral Golden Orb Weaver Spider Sasatgre Oct24 A7CR 03892.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 05:12:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Family_:_Nephilidae_(Nephilids)
Info Ventral view (underside) of a female Giant golden orb-weaver in Meghalaya, India. No FPs of this species. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 05:12, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 05:12, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not very high DoF, but outweighed by striking composition for me Cmao20 (talk) 10:43, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:37, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Poco a poco (talk) 14:11, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 16:15, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Je-str (talk) 22:12, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:44, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sharpness could be a little bit better, but nethertheless it's a great shot. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:25, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Indian White-eye Sasatgre Meghalaya Oct24 A7CR 03698.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 04:30:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Zosteropidae_(White-eyes)
Info A small song-bird (8–9 cm (3.1–3.5 in)) strains to reach food. No FPs of this species. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 04:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 04:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
SupportErmell (talk) 05:52, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:01, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fernando (talk) 09:07, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I wish more of the bird was in focus, but good nonetheless. Cmao20 (talk) 10:42, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:37, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Per Cmao20 and also a bit of a strange pose Poco a poco (talk) 14:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The unusual pose: caught in the act of reaching for insects/berries. To me, the pose is part of the appeal. --Tagooty (talk) 15:55, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:46, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rode wegslak (Arion rufus), 07-09-2024. (actm.).jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 04:28:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Other lifeforms#Class : Arion rufus
Info Mating red slugs (Arion rufus). Focus stack of 3 photos.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:28, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:28, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual subject! Excellent detail. --Tagooty (talk) 04:33, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:01, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fernando (talk) 09:07, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:29, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 10:42, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:38, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:42, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:10, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:31, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree with Tagooty -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:32, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 05:13, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tui (Prosthemadera novaeseelandiae) Tiritiri Matangi.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 20:42:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family: Meliphagidae (Honeyeaters)
Info A New Zealand endemic. Both males and females have two distinctive white throat tufts which often appear to be just one tuft. No FPs. of the species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:42, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:42, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:21, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Crown is blurry. White feathers near neck overexposed. --Tagooty (talk) 04:14, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't think it's overexposed. I'm not a big fan of reducing bright white highlights so that they are a dull grey. There is a tiny bit of colour fringing around that area that you could work on but really a very minor point. Cmao20 (talk) 10:41, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:38, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I agree with Tagooty Poco a poco (talk) 14:09, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Australasian swamphen (Porphyrio melanotus) Tiritiri Matangi.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 21:01:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Rallidae (Coots, Rails and Crakes)
Info No FPs of this species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:01, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:01, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support High resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:07, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Exceptional quality --Tagooty (talk) 04:16, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 06:09, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:02, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fantastic! --Fernando (talk) 09:06, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice to see you back, Charles. Good as ever. Cmao20 (talk) 10:40, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:38, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:42, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:09, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Assisi - Chiesa di San Pietro - Crocifisso - 2023-09-05 01-25-30 001.jpg (delist)

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 16:37:46

Info - Reason to delist and replaceː Last year I took some photos in this very dark abbey from the year 1000 located in Assisi, but in the past I had no idea how to stitch two pictures into one. Only recently have I been able to propose what I really had in mind: to see great part of the austere medieval internal apse of the Abbey of St. Peter (Assisi, Italy). (Original nomination)
Delist and replace -- Terragio67 (talk) 16:37, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace Really better. --Yann (talk) 09:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace Cmao20 (talk) 10:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace --SHB2000 (talk) 12:43, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace --GRDN711 (talk) 05:17, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Keir Hardie by George Grantham Bain.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 16:54:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1900-1909
Info created by George Grantham Bain - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:54, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:54, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:31, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:51, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 03:25, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Agricultural terraces in Anti-Atlas mountains near Tafraoute, Morocco.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 12:44:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Morocco
Info created by Tupungato - uploaded by Tupungato - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 12:44, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tupungato (talk) 12:44, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:52, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The subject doesn' really stand out, I'd have probably cropp a chunk at the bottom. Pretty but I don't consider that architecture extraordinary Poco a poco (talk) 17:09, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Nice weather but according to the shadows of the bushes at the right, and my overall impression, the orientation of the light was not so cooperative, like a bit dull or hazy. Also the bottom-up viewpoint is highlighting a lot of the foreground with shadowy sides and not so much of the buildings. The houses at the right are in the shadow, hard to distinguish. I think another viewpoint, more from the left, and perhaps also higher in altitude, would have improved content enhancement -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:04, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As per Poco a Poco. --Fernando (talk) 09:05, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Basile Morin –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The so called "foreground" is what this image is about - for me this is an excellent documentation of an agricultural method for arid climates. --Kritzolina (talk) 15:19, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grand Mosque at Constantine (15676686960).jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 12:09:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings
Info The ceiling adornment at the Emir Abdelkader Mosque (built in 1994). It's the second-largest mosque in Algeria. Created by Dan Sloan - uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 12:09, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 12:09, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very cool, although I wish it was more perfectly centered. Cmao20 (talk) 13:16, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Indeed really cool, quality degrades a bit towards the borders, but all in all very impressive. I took the liberty to change the gallery link to our special gallery for ceilings of religious buildings. I will add a section for Algeria there if this nomination succeeds. – Aristeas (talk) 15:57, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Below the quality bar I'd expect for FP and the bottom crop is unfortunate causing also a lack of symmertry. If the subject would be complete I'd have gone for a square crop Poco a poco (talk) 17:07, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas.--Ermell (talk) 22:25, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A tripod would have helped, here. Unfortunately, a hand shot with high ISO and low depth of field impacts the quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:50, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Poco a poco. If you don't have a tripod at hand, simply place the camera on the floor, select ISO100 and a medium aperture. Je-str (talk) 11:02, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support crop sucks but this will do. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:43, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:48, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose In addition to the technical problems caused by the absence of tripod, the viewpoint was not in the center. As a consequence, the circles are not concentric. And the crop is tighter at the bottom than at the top, making the composition unbalanced -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:18, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rabat, old and new (Mausoleum of Mohammed V and new Mohammed VI Tower behind; ضريح محمد الخامس).jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 09:24:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Morocco
Info Rabat, old and new - Mausoleum of Mohammed V and new Mohammed VI Tower behind. My shot. --Mile (talk) 09:24, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 09:24, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment {{NoFoP-Morocco}}, right? --A.Savin 10:39, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @A.Savin first learn some basics. Main object is Mausoleum, despite what i write in description. So probably, by you, you cant shot Masouleum till new Tower is in the back, molodec. Just Tower in whole shot thats diferent. --Mile (talk) 08:40, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but you don't need to teach me basics. According to the article en:Mausoleum of Mohammed V, this mausoleum was built in 1971 "by Vietnamese architect Cong Vo Toan". --A.Savin 08:44, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Ohh good, its landmark - even on WLM Marocco. UNESCO World Heritage Site. So you would erase all category, or just my shot !? --Mile (talk) 08:51, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't "erase". But it's actually you who is responsible of what you shot, upload, and nominate. Thanks --A.Savin 09:10, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I don't know about the FOP concerns but if they are resolved then the photo should be FP Cmao20 (talk) 10:53, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment According to this deletion request, images from this building were deleted as it's copyrighted. You can upload it to Wikipedia in EN. --Fernando (talk) 09:05, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination till this get clear. Thank you for observation. --Mile (talk) 11:22, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Château du Haut-Koenigsbourg (755 m) (Orschwiller) (19).jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 09:12:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#France
Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 09:12, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 09:12, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice compo but unsharp. Probably f/11 is a bit to much for 1 inch. --Mile (talk) 09:31, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I agree with Mile, but the composition is great Cmao20 (talk) 10:52, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate version (sharpness)

Support Better sharpness. Gzen92 (talk) 12:05, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:40, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leaning trees over the grassy hillock of Nodong-ri tombs clouds and blue sky in Gyeongju South Korea.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2024 at 22:29:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#South Korea
Info Leaning trees over the grassy hillock of Nodong-ri tombs, in Daereungwon Tomb Complex, Tumuli park, Gyeongju, South Korea. Created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking and well composed Cmao20 (talk) 00:32, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 06:02, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 06:04, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual perspective -- Wikisquack (talk) 09:00, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 09:29, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:32, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful site, good composition, light and colours. – Aristeas (talk) 16:02, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice Poco a poco (talk) 17:11, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas Terragio67 (talk) 17:27, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:24, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:10, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:32, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Shadows a bit strong, but overall nice composition and interesting shot. --Fernando (talk) 09:33, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:40, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:44, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Fernando. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:44, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:L'Exposition universelle de Paris, 1889.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2024 at 20:29:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed#Posters and advertisements
Info created by GTC, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Info Poster for the Exposition Universelle (1889) in Paris, France
Support -- Yann (talk) 20:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Breathtaking level of detail. Significant year for this recurring event -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:43, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! Cmao20 (talk) 00:32, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wikisquack (talk) 09:03, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 16:02, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support super Terragio67 (talk) 17:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm getting a really bad-quality view when I view it in browser, like it's been upscaled naively. I'll check in GIMP. Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:44, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just a quirk of the browser view. Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:31, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Might D&R this later, after a restoration Adam Cuerden (talk) 04:08, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fernando (talk) 09:33, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:40, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:47, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Human running gait - terminal swing to heel strike (runner with Asics Metaspeed Edge "Paris"; 2024 Ljubljana Marathon).jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2024 at 12:20:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual_sports
Info Human running gait - terminal swing to heel strike (runner with Asics Metaspeed Edge "Paris"; 2024 Ljubljana Marathon). My shot. --Mile (talk) 12:20, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info 2 I had luck with this shot. Showing running gait: runner going from terminal swing to heel strike. Hard part was to get at this focal, right angle in perfect background-foreground, fluorescent colors of (new ?!) footwear. Actually croped OOC, AdobeRGB (⇔ Uncalibrated). Good Educational value.
Support --Mile (talk) 12:39, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment
- Is the picture free of any copyright issue concerning the Asics logo on the shoes?
- What gender and what age is the runner? I think you should include these kind of details in the file description. -- Wikisquack (talk) 17:55, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Male, but those Asics are Unisex. De minimis and its logo on 3D, shoes. Gender and runner, perhaps for winner, here is about tehnic. --Mile (talk) 09:28, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:31, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good focus, colour/brightness contrast etc. – Aristeas (talk) 16:02, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Terragio67 (talk) 18:43, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 08:21, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:40, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I rarely oppose, but I don't want FPC to become QIC. This image is technically well made, nothing to complain here, but it does not give me any kind of wow. --Granada (talk) 14:32, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Вид на Крестовоздвиженский собор из-под купола.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2024 at 12:18:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Russia
Info created by Ted.ns - uploaded and nominated by FBilula -- FBilula (talk) 12:18, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- FBilula (talk) 12:18, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 17:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 22:09, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support An unusual angled perspective that fascinates. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:25, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:32, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool perspective, beautiful contrast between the white upper walls and the rich decoration of the iconostasis etc. – Aristeas (talk) 16:01, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:14, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above comments... Terragio67 (talk) 18:45, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:23, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual perspective that works. --Fernando (talk) 09:34, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:40, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Diver or chaman in Tin Tazarift.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2024 at 11:24:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others#Frescos and murals
Info all by me -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 11:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 11:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:29, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 12:12, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:59, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too small, level of detail not the best, the paintings here are not so interesting like in the last candidate. Poco a poco (talk) 17:16, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Light, contrasts and drawings were better here in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Close wing moisture sucking of Delias pasithoe (Linnaeus, 1767) - Red-base Jezebel (Male) WLB.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2024 at 10:38:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by TAPAN1412 -- TAPAN1412 (talk) 10:38, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- TAPAN1412 (talk) 10:38, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:29, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:42, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:47, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:38, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Solar System collage.svg

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 22:46:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Science#Astronomy
Info created by WhatisMars - uploaded by WhatisMars - nominated by WhatisMars -- WhatisMars (talk) 22:46, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support, this is an updated version of the old nomination. This is an 8K image wrapped in SVG and available for translation. Texts have a large padding to accommodate all languages. -- WhatisMars (talk) 22:46, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Why❕️in "The Solar System!"? -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:36, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, why are the moons of Mars missing? Zzzs (talk) 03:57, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
After a further look, I detected more faults in this image. On top of the problem already mentioned in this nomination, the image is quite unorganised. There are random dots under some of the text and I don't know what their purpose is. The text placement doesn't make it very clear which natural satellites are which and they're kind of messy. I, personally, am not a fan of the font. It somehow makes the image look less professional. Not only are the main, and only, natural satellites of Mars are missing, but the natural satellites for the dwarf planets are missing too. Zzzs (talk) 07:34, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The font is due to MediaWiki's limitations. This is the original nomination and I specifically used the raster format because it can display the font. Now people are complaining about that and wanting to use SVG to be easily translated to other languages, this is the only way that I can do so. WhatisMars (talk) 12:28, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is a visible rectangular crop on the Jupiter's moons and on the Mercury. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 07:08, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is weird. I cannot see it in my Photoshop project file but it seems that it has trouble rendering pixels at the edge of the layer. WhatisMars (talk) 12:30, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The exclamation mark looks a bit silly, IMO. I think it's okay to have the moons of Mars missing though. As far as I understand you've used a size cutoff somewhere roughly around the 100km radius mark, and the moons of Mars are tiny, they are just little asteroids. Cmao20 (talk) 10:23, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly. I hate this vector format so much. It doesn't serve any actual purpose but because people were calling me to use it to wrap the raster image, I have to use it. WhatisMars (talk) 12:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how any of that relates to the exclamation mark. Cmao20 (talk) 20:28, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The least they can do is mention the moons of Mars rather than depict it. It can misinform users into thinking they don't exist. I wouldn't want to have a factually incorrect image as a featured picture. Zzzs (talk) 21:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lorch (W.) - Kloster Lorch - Klosterkirche - Ansicht von SO (1).jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 21:47:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany
Info created by Aristeas - uploaded by Aristeas - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 21:47, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 21:47, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great light, composition, and quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:32, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great, I love it. --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:40, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:26, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 07:09, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:57, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you very much for the nomination, Cmao20, and everybody for your support! – Aristeas (talk) 09:21, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:01, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:02, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Radomianin --Terragio67 (talk) 16:16, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:45, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fernando (talk) 19:03, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:23, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light and climbing vines -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:35, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:42, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brown creeper at a banding station (90455).jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 21:37:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Order_:_Passeriformes_(Passerines)
Info Brown creeper (Certhia americana) in hand at a bird banding station in the northeastern USA, about to be released. Note: precise location intentionally omitted per request. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:37, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support By weight, these are some of the tiniest birds in North America (other than hummingbirds), but they have a big tail they use to support themselves as they walk up tree trunks looking for insects. Because most of their time is spent rubbing up against evergreen trees, the handler pointed out they actually smell quite good, which is not something I realized I wanted to know. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:37, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:06, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Convincing in my opinion. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:38, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:19, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The worn out nail polish is distracting IMO. Otherwise it has a great focus and I like the idea of the photo. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 07:11, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I didn't even realise the nail polish was there until you mentioned it. -- Zzzs (talk) 07:36, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 08:56, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful, cute, excellent quality. – Aristeas (talk) 09:12, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 12:31, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:46, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fernando (talk) 19:03, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:42, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dudek chocholatý při krmení mláďat.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 19:06:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Upupidae (Hoopoes)
Info created by Luckhy86 – uploaded by Luckhy86 – nominated by Draceane — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 19:06, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 19:06, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is oversharpened but I don't mind when the composition and subject are so good Cmao20 (talk) 22:05, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support agree with cmao20. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:49, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:18, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 07:46, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 09:00, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Cmao20 (“weak” just because of the weird oversharpening, sorry). – Aristeas (talk) 09:10, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:10, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support That pink bellow tail, i would remove it. Feel like bird carried some... --Mile (talk) 12:30, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 17:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't find it oversharpened, and I really like the fact that we can see the insect carried by the bird. -- Wikisquack (talk) 18:07, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 20:47, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 13:01, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Definitely overprocessed (too much sharpening) but hell of a scene. Possible POTY Poco a poco (talk) 17:17, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Poco Terragio67 (talk) 20:11, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:22, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:42, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Po dešti ve Středohoří.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 19:03:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Czech Republic#Ústí nad Labem (no photos of this region yet)
Info created by Crutch1973 – uploaded by Crutch1973 – nominated by Draceane — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 19:03, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 19:03, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Crutch1973 and Draceane: A stunning drone capture, in my opinion a great landscape scene. The technical quality is a bit too noisy for my taste. Hence my suggestion of an improvement via a SwissTransfer link. Feel free to use it for an update if you like the edit. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:59, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think the technical quality is okay but the colours seem a bit weird to me Cmao20 (talk) 22:04, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the inspiration, Cmao20. As for the colors, I had a similar vibe, but still a tolerable one. I reduced the overall saturation by 15% and updated the transfer link above. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 22:44, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Overprocessed -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:30, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Saturation, level and dynamics adjusted to a more acceptable level, transfer link above updated. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 07:50, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Radomianin’s version is a big improvement and I would suggest to use it, Crutch1973. I would certainly support that version. If you do not like it, Radomianin should upload it as a separate image under a new filename and I would be happy to nominate it here. – Aristeas (talk) 09:06, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- On hold I've contacted Crutch1973, so I will wait with overwriting the photo a bit (one/two days). — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 11:35, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Draceane, thank you in advance for the upcoming update. Funny coincidence: I also informed the user about this nomination in a very polite way by email shortly after 10:00 UTC today. So thank you for your efforts to rescue this nomination to give this great image a fair chance. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 22:35, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree Radomianin's version is an improvement, and potential FP -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:50, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pellasimnia angasi 01.JPG

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 13:25:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Ovulidae
Info A small (1,5 cm) unusual shell of a representative of the gastropod family Olividae (False Cowries); created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 13:25, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 13:25, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 19:35, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:39, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:03, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:15, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 09:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:04, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Terragio67 (talk) 16:21, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:47, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:22, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:56, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Narrentag-Oberndorf 2024-Nachtumzug-07985.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 12:42:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created by Rainer Halama - uploaded by Rainer Halama - nominated by Wikisquack -- Wikisquack (talk) 12:42, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wikisquack (talk) 12:42, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BugWarp (talk) 18:13, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment "and if it had a better description and categorization. Because it lacks a detailed description, and I believe it can be better categorized." I guess that what is good for the goose is not good for the gander. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:00, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the photo would profit from a more detailed description, stating what exactly we see in this photo. Hallo Rainer, das ist eine wunderbare Aufnahme. Könntest Du die Beschreibung noch ein bisschen erweitern, sodass sie sagt, was wir in dieser Aufnahme sehen? Danke! – Aristeas (talk) 08:49, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is categorized to the specific event and to the "Narrenzunft" (the specific group it belongs to). I even took out just now one over-categorization. What further categorizations do you miss. I know there are all kinds of categorizations, like "XYZ facing left or right" and what else not. But that is something that should be left to those needing an wanting such categories and not necessarily to the uploader. A description in English could be provided. But it will not be as descriptive since there are no articles in English to the Event or the specific guilds. Wuselig (talk) 08:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tomascastelazo You are right, I put it too soon and should have asked for this work to be done before nominating it. I am still quite new to Commons so I'm happy to learn. -- Wikisquack (talk) 15:34, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank für die superschnelle Ergänzung der Beschreibung, Rainer! – I think the categories are fine, and Wuselig has expanded the description so that we now know that we see a Schuttig, the traditional carnival figure/mask from Elzach.

Support Beautiful, well-composed portrait of a typical traditional carnival mask, the torch makes clear that this is from the night parade. Atmospheric and good quality (espec. when we consider the difficult circumstances: moving people at night). – Aristeas (talk) 08:59, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 09:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:19, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Terragio67 (talk) 16:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 08:20, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fernando (talk) 09:34, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special mood, nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:21, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Open wing position of Lexias dirtea (Fabricius, 1793) - Dark Archduke (Female) puddling on rotten Neolamarckia cadamba flowerWLB.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 12:38:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 12:38, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atudu (talk) 12:38, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good Quality --SVKMBFLY (talk) 13:50, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tupungato (talk) 14:02, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:23, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support this one is FP to me Cmao20 (talk) 22:02, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:10, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 08:47, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Terragio67 (talk) 16:25, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:48, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:21, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Open wing nutrient sucking position of Lexias dirtea (Fabricius, 1793) - Dark Archduke.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 12:14:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info created by Sarpitabose - uploaded by Sarpitabose - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 12:14, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atudu (talk) 12:14, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Don't get me wrong, it's a very good photo. Better than any butterfly photo I have ever taken. But Featured Pictures should be best of the best, and here the head and eyes are a little out of focus. Your other nominated picture is better in this aspect. --Tupungato (talk) 14:08, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very beautiful but sadly the head being out of focus is IMO a deal breaker at FP. Cmao20 (talk) 22:01, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monument to Genghis Khan.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 11:59:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
Info created and uploaded by Bernard Gagnon - nominated by AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:59, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Genghis Khan as ruler not warlord; the monument is the focal point of the Government Palace in Ulaanbaatar. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:59, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:00, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:17, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:58, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Calavera of Frida Kahlo.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 01:36:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Figurines and statuettes
Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 01:36, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 01:36, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The visible portion of skull on the right is annoying. I would support this candidate if it was cropped on the right, and if it had a better description and categorization. Because it lacks a detailed description, and I believe it can be better categorized (it's not even in the Frida Kahlo category). -- Wikisquack (talk) 13:37, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This one has a great composition Cmao20 (talk) 21:49, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Weird and special. – Aristeas (talk) 09:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 17:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:17, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support But I would support a crop on the right. --Yann (talk) 09:34, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Wikisquack. --Fernando (talk) 09:36, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:58, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Calaveras of day of the dead in mexico.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 01:16:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Figurines and statuettes
Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 01:16, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 01:16, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's not a bad photo, and it is a valuable addition to Commons. But it doesn't have the wow factor. The focus is somewhat shaky, it might be better (the other candidate image is sharp). The cropping seems somewhat random (the cropped top right skull and the right skull. It also has deficiencies in description, there is no proper category and no proper description: are these products in a store, or something else? --Tupungato (talk) 10:53, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Request (@Tomascastelazo) Please write a more detailed description and categorize this picture. I would then support this picture. (The croppings don't shock me because it's a kind of photo where you don't mind, it's like photographing a bunch of oranges.)
Comment If you google Calaveras of day of the dead in mexico you will be surprised by the results. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:03, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What I wanted to say is maybe the description could be a bit more detailed. You can explain for example where was this photo taken (in Mexico, right, but more precisely) : a shop, in a street, ...

It would also ease the categorization. Because for now, there is only 1 category to this file. And this category doesn't even exist... -- Wikisquack (talk) 15:41, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Fine picture of an interesting motif but I miss a great composition in this one and it's a bit noisy. Cmao20 (talk) 21:49, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:12, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:17, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:59, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gordon Parks - American Gothic.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2024 at 18:53:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1940-1949
Info American Gothic. Portrait of government cleaning woman Ella Watson. August 1942.
Info created by Gordon Parks, uploaded by Davepape, nominated by Yann
Support Notable historical picture. Included in List of photographs considered the most important. -- Yann (talk) 18:53, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Gnosis (talk) 21:23, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:39, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wikisquack (talk) 13:46, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Photographic work of historical significance. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:10, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:09, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support And still a stunning photo, at least to me. – Aristeas (talk) 08:44, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Terragio67 (talk) 16:27, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:10, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:49, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:59, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Llao Llao Peninsula.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2024 at 18:11:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Argentina
Info All by me -- Fernando (talk) 18:11, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Fernando (talk) 18:11, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:09, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I see too much of a bluish tint in the photo. Otherwise it's a great shot. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 19:16, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:15, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fernando, could you check whether shifting the white balance a bit more towards warm/yellowish improves the photo, as Draceane suggests? This could make your beautiful shot even better. – Aristeas (talk) 09:02, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the input @Aristeas, @Basile Morin, @Draceane. I uploaded a new one with a slight warmer tone. Fernando (talk) 14:29, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The problem probably comes more from your chosen color profile ProPhoto RGB, see this nomination with similar color problem, that has been fixed by converting the format into sRGB. See also this case -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:21, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting, I didn't know about this! I reuploaded with the different colour profile. Fernando (talk) 09:26, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Much better! -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:48, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 17:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for editing. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:27, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition, interesting viewpoint -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:48, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 09:50, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:59, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cesena - Piazza della Libertà e Campanile del Duomo - 2024-09-30 19-34-16 001.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2024 at 15:18:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Italy
Info Since 2018, this place (Piazza della Liberta - Liberty square) in Cesena has become pedestrian, having previously been a car-park. It is certainly a great result for children who have space to play and for architecture lovers who will be able to freely enjoy the rear view of the Renaissance Cathedral (Duomo di Cesena). In 1408 the apse was built and subsequently the 72 meter high bell tower (1456) for which I took a vertical overview of 7 photos. Created, uploaded and nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 15:18, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 15:18, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:06, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual narrow composition which nicely emphasizes the height of the bell tower, and the people on the piazza add life to the scene. Question @Terragio67: The main subject is IMHO the church with its bell tower, and most similar FPs are listed on the “Religious buildings” gallery page. Shouldn’t we change the gallery link to that page? Best, – Aristeas (talk) 09:20, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The square described does not belong to the church, but since the church is enormous in height, it necessarily occupies the main scene, putting everything on the edge. Furthermore, the interesting part is certainly the apse (XIV sec) and also the upper part of the bell tower (XV sec) because they straddle the Romanesque-Gothic period and the Renaissance period.. For these reasons, in my opinion it is possible to make the change you suggested without great doubts. Thanks for your interest. Terragio67 (talk) 11:46, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:17, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Aristeas. I took the liberty of adjusting the gallery link as discussed above. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:57, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Terragio67 (talk) 16:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:50, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:19, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:21, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:59, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:044 Olive baboon with baby on the back in the Serengeti National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2024 at 14:23:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:23, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:23, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 15:58, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:04, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fernando (talk) 18:14, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:39, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 08:17, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:24, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:15, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 19:35, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:43, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The light is not so good (we can see from the shadows that it's almost a contrejour), but the action is great (included the leaves in the mother's mouth) and the focus on the baby, looking at viewer, successful -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:13, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I suppose you could do this at half lower ISO. 1/1000 s would be more than enough. --Mile (talk) 12:34, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:51, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:00, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:54, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pararescueman fast ropes out of a U.S. Air Force HH-60G Pave Hawk.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2024 at 13:40:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Helicopters
Info created by Airman 1st Class Joseph Bartoszek - uploaded & nominated by ToprakM --ToprakM ^✉ 13:40, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ToprakM ^✉ 13:40, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Unsure how to vote on this one. A very dramatic and wow-y composition but the left crop is very tight and the image quality is only okay (noise, Jpeg artefacts). Cmao20 (talk) 16:03, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:32, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wikisquack (talk) 13:50, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:25, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 11:27, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support 1st USA Airman who left f/64 group. Left crop could be a bit wider. Fine colors, sharp, --Mile (talk) 12:38, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 17:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LoMit ^talk 11:37, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:00, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Woman centaur.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2024 at 10:52:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others#Frescos and murals
Info all by me -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 10:52, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 10:52, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Not as good a composition as the last one of these you nominated but nonetheless sharp and good quality + interesting subject Cmao20 (talk) 16:01, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Cmao20 thank you and i will try to do better compositions next time. IssamBarhoumi (talk) 16:57, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 08:40, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:15, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fernando (talk) 09:37, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:01, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:34, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Catedral, Segovia, España, 2024-06-14, DD 32-34 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2024 at 17:23:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Spain
Info Chapter house full of tapestries (work of Gerard Peemans, Flemish weaver, ca. 1625-1700) in the cathedral of Segovia, Spain. The temple was built in the Flamboyant style and was dedicated in 1768, constituting one of the latest Gothic cathedrals in Europe. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 17:23, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:23, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool art on the walls, good quality, and nice to get an off-centre viewpoint for once - symmetrical is usually the way to go but it can be repetitive after a while and off-centre helps show more of the art here. Cmao20 (talk) 19:15, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The blurry wooden board at the left is out of focus, and the odd angle of view creates an unbalanced perspective. Also the fence in the foreground could perhaps have been avoided with a few steps forward. I think a centered composition would have been better here -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:12, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It would be hard to have everythiing in focus without possibility to use a tripod and with very poor light, but ok, I cropped the wooden board on the left. I'd rather have no fence, but then I'd show much less of the room Poco a poco (talk) 17:04, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per Basile Morin. --Tagooty (talk) 14:51, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Basile. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:40, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support considerig the pro and contra arguments. It’s still an impressive photo to me. – Aristeas (talk) 08:36, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:27, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive for me, too, even if the unusual perspective is against the norm at first. But when the "wow" effect is there, the rule should apply: Exceptions prove the rule. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile. -- Karelj (talk) 09:59, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tour-Alty, a monument of architecture of the Altai Republic 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2024 at 16:57:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
Info created and uploaded by Alexandr frolov - nominated by AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:57, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support An ancient steppe megalith, a wonderful example of the deer stones that dot Mongolia and southern Siberia. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:57, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agree, cool motif. Maybe not the best light but good image quality. Cmao20 (talk) 19:14, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I'm pretty sure it's tilted to the right by approx. 1°. --Tupungato (talk) 10:50, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:33, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love the simplicity combined with the vast open landscape. But I cannot forget Tupungato’s hint – the horizon indeed suggests that the photo may be tilted to the right. It would be no problem to correct this, but is it tilted or not? Alexandr frolov, can you help by any chance? – Aristeas (talk) 08:39, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:52, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Close wing puddling of Libythea lepita Moore, 1858 - Common Beak WLB MG 3212.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2024 at 11:16:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info created by SVKMBFLY - uploaded by SVKMBFLY - nominated by SVKMBFLY -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 11:16, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 11:16, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:35, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Head oof, disturbing element in the bottom left, the threshold for FP of Lepidoptera is higher, Poco a poco (talk) 16:48, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Sorry but agree with Poco on this one. It's generally good but that big blurry areas is just too distracting and the quality is just okay. Cmao20 (talk) 19:10, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Open wing basking of Chersonesia risa (Doubleday, 1848) - Common Maplet WLB MG 4406.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2024 at 11:06:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info created by SVKMBFLY - uploaded by SVKMBFLY - nominated by SVKMBFLY -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 11:06, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 11:06, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Colours seem slightly oversaturated compared to other images in the category, but good nevertheless Cmao20 (talk) 12:01, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 12:39, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Better than the other candidate, detail and compo could be better but it's an interesting species Poco a poco (talk) 16:49, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Flash fired, unfortunately, harsh shadows and unappealing light. Also not a breathtaking level of detail, in my opinion. Good documenting picture, but the background is too average -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:40, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I am also not preferred using flashes but can you suggest me the process or how to captured some moments when you are in dense forest like north east India, where sunlight is not entered properly and as it's a forest dwelling species how can I take a clear shot without flash in such tropical rainforests like habitats? can you suggest me what to do in this situation? SVKMBFLY (talk) 12:40, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Excellent detail etc. Oh yes, the flash … I dislike it due to the reasons mentioned by Basile, but I must admit that not long ago the use of the flash for such photos was completely a matter of course for some butterfly photographers who emphasized the documentary value of their images. (I knew a man who travelled all over the world to take photos of rare butterflies with his Leica and – the flash, and many nature lovers loved his photos. When a few people questioned that procedure and suggested to him to take some photos with soft flash or just with natural light, he did not understand that at all. “They are sharp, what’s the problem?“) – Aristeas (talk) 09:33, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
When You are entered in such deep and dense forest there is no chance to take a clear shot without using body flash or external flash. Due to sunlight hardly entered such forests of north east India, as well as it is like tropical rain forest habitat rest of the time weather is dull you can't imagine to click them without flash. It's a big problem after all and really challenging to snap some moments from such habitat. SVKMBFLY (talk) 12:49, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your statement, SVKMBFLY. Now we have a clear viewpoint. – Aristeas (talk) 12:56, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:32, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:54, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:32, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Myeongjeongjeon seen through the wooden Gate Hyehwamun at Changgyeonggung Palace in Seoul.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2024 at 01:36:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#South Korea
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:36, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:36, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:12, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Clever use of framing Cmao20 (talk) 10:59, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 12:39, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perception is disoriented by sunlight on the door in the foreground. The image seems tilted, but is is not. Nice effect. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:33, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support It's a very nice photo, but I'm not a big fan of blown highlights. If any RGB color reaches 255 on a largish area, it becomes noticeable. I'll try to create notes for the file in a moment, to mark the areas. --Tupungato (talk) 15:00, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will improve this part. Thanks for your note -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:07, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks for your review -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:27, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose This kind of pictures with frames shout IMHO for symmetry and it isn't (the temple is closer to the right frame). Poco a poco (talk) 16:59, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info The buildings next to the one in the center, red and white, are completely different. I don't think the shift is really important, due to the dominating foreground. Thanks everyone for the feedbacks. -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:50, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 05:27, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:17, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:26, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition, nice framing effect. – Aristeas (talk) 14:42, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wikisquack (talk) 13:56, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:11, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:55, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:28-2 Kalâa de Beni Hammad (2).jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2024 at 13:18:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Algeria
Info Qal'at Bani Hammad was a fortified palatine city in Algeria. Now in ruins, in the 11th century, it served as the first capital of the Hammadid dynasty. Created by R hakka - uploaded by R hakka - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 13:18, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 13:18, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 17:11, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Great atmosphere and mood but IMO not an outstanding composition and also spoilt a little by the cars Cmao20 (talk) 00:33, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice mood but lacking in technical quality, imo. Specifically in terms of noise and level of detail.--Peulle (talk) 09:05, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Noise removed. Thanks. Riad Salih (talk) 20:18, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support excellent atmosphere—cars improve the image, it's a human structure part of the human and natural worlds. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:00, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Peulle, the fence at the bottom is also a minus and the dark areas look too dark to me (overprocessed) Poco a poco (talk) 17:02, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this, mistic. --Mile (talk) 18:00, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Poco a poco the dark areas look too dark (overprocessed) -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:59, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support It’s a pity about all the fences and maybe the contrast is a bit high, but I love the special light and the deep clouds (mist?). – Aristeas (talk) 14:40, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wikisquack (talk) 13:58, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:31, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Overprocessed. Per others. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 19:11, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 17:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Fernando (talk) 09:38, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monasterio de Curchi, Curchi, Moldavia, 2023-11-01, DD 105-107 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2024 at 12:57:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Moldova
Info Curchi Monastery, Curchi, Moldova. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 12:57, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 12:57, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent detail, harmonious colours. --Tagooty (talk) 13:45, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting place and atmospheric photo Cmao20 (talk) 13:50, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 17:25, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:59, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent quality, interesting weather/lighting setting.--Tupungato (talk) 15:03, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:13, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 14:38, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:30, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I guess I'm not going to sway the result, but sorry, I've been looking at this one for the past few days and I can't get myself to like it. The tree covering the subject is too distracting and it's a bit cropped at the bottom. Light is too dim and flat. The yellowish halo at the bottom, I guess it's inevitable, but it also works against. It also bothers me a bit that it's not centred. --Fernando (talk) 09:46, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:56, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose agree with Fernando. --GRDN711 (talk) 05:20, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Basilica dos Congregados (10).jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2024 at 10:57:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Portugal
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:57, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info a few days ago I nominated this picture without succes. I think this one is better, so I present it for you. -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:57, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 10:57, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support As I did last time. Cmao20 (talk) 11:22, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think its still oversaturated and colors... --Mile (talk) 16:39, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done, I changed the colors. Tournasol7 (talk) 06:09, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:12, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as the last time. – Aristeas (talk) 14:38, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe the white dot in the sky can be removed.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:52, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:30, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:56, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delisting candidates

Featured picture candidates

File:Hollywood-1923-Poster-restored.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 21:13:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Entertainment#Film
Info created by Paramount Pictures - uploaded by WFinch - restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 21:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ezarateesteban 21:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There seems to be a weird join in the middle of the poster. Is that accurate to the source material? Cmao20 (talk) 23:31, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's in the original Ezarateesteban 00:10, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bottrop (DE), Tetraeder -- 2022 -- 0402.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 19:52:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Germany
Info created, uploaded and nominated by me. I'm not sure if it also could fit into the FP gallery "Sculptures", as the Tetrahedron is somehow both – one and a tower. -- A. Öztas 19:52, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- A. Öztas 19:52, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great motif and good light Cmao20 (talk) 23:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:27, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan Kekek and Daniel Case here. And it should be mentioned somewhere that it is the third nomination of this structure after this one and that one -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:59, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Вид на Мурманск с горы Горелой.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 19:49:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Russia
Info: view of Murmansk from the Gorelaya Mountain; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:49, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:49, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting Cmao20 (talk) 23:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:26, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cheops Mountain seen the Sir Donald Trail.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 19:33:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Canada#British Columbia
Info: Cheops Mountain seen from the Sir Donald Trail, Glacier National Park; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:33, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:33, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very pretty Cmao20 (talk) 23:29, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 01:14, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Crop too tight at the bottom, in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:49, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bruco di Sfinge dell'Euforbia 3.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 16:27:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
Info Spurge Hawk-moth caterpillar - created by Maurizio Carlini - uploaded by Maurizio Carlini - nominated by Civvì -- Civvì (talk) 16:27, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Civvì (talk) 16:27, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good to see such good images by uploaders who are not regulars on this page. Thanks for bringing this here, Civvì! --Kritzolina (talk) 18:37, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Kritzolina; excellent work! As I've mentioned before, not everything has to be focus-stacked. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:29, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Je-str (talk) 22:10, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:46, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. Focus stacking might have improved it but it remains superb for FP Cmao20 (talk) 23:28, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice light, good focus -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:48, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 05:05, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Black-capped chickadee (41417).jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 15:10:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Paridae_(Tits)
Info Diminutive black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus) hanging on a plant, feasting on some seeds. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:10, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:10, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charming, educational, excellent quality --Kritzolina (talk) 18:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ezarateesteban 21:16, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:46, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great stuff Cmao20 (talk) 23:28, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:مستشفى بن صميم يعلوه مطار إفران.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 14:07:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Morocco>
Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 14:07, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 14:07, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Interesting place but I miss a great composition here and the sky is very pale and uninteresting Cmao20 (talk) 23:27, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:45, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:زاوية بن صميم.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 13:45:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Morocco>
Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 13:45, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 13:45, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Good composition and colours but just not sufficient image quality Cmao20 (talk) 23:27, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cmao20. Also it was declined as QI. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:20, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mimetismo - Camouflage.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 13:37:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida
Info created by Maurizio Carlini - uploaded by Maurizio Carlini - nominated by Maurizio Carlini -- Maurizio Carlini (talk) 13:37, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Maurizio Carlini (talk) 13:37, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great timing and very high quality. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:05, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow, really cool photo. Arguably DoF could be better but FP nevertheless for such an interesting subject Cmao20 (talk) 23:26, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Extraordinary camouflage. The prey might have been fooled, as I was at first sight, confusing the flower and the spider! -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:43, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per supporters above. -- Radomianin (talk) 02:50, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bremer Hütte 2024.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 10:53:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Tyrol
Info Nice composition of an Alpine hut. Note that I've put the category as 'natural', as I see the subject as being the hut in its wider natural context rather than just the hut, but if anyone can suggest improvements, that's all good with me. created by Milseburg - uploaded by Milseburg - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 10:53, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 10:53, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful shot capturing a wonderful and truly lively atmosphere, with people bringing the mountain hut to life. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:40, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:46, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:26, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition, mirror image -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:34, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cañon del Río Sil desde el mirador de Vilouxe.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 09:57:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Spain
Info all by me -- Fernando (talk) 09:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Fernando (talk) 09:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I realise this may have been unavoidable, but the out of focus rocks in the foreground bother me a little, especially because they are not symmetrical. Cmao20 (talk) 10:45, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ventral Golden Orb Weaver Spider Sasatgre Oct24 A7CR 03892.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 05:12:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Family_:_Nephilidae_(Nephilids)
Info Ventral view (underside) of a female Giant golden orb-weaver in Meghalaya, India. No FPs of this species. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 05:12, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 05:12, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not very high DoF, but outweighed by striking composition for me Cmao20 (talk) 10:43, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:37, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Poco a poco (talk) 14:11, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 16:15, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Je-str (talk) 22:12, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:44, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sharpness could be a little bit better, but nethertheless it's a great shot. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:25, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Indian White-eye Sasatgre Meghalaya Oct24 A7CR 03698.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 04:30:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Zosteropidae_(White-eyes)
Info A small song-bird (8–9 cm (3.1–3.5 in)) strains to reach food. No FPs of this species. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 04:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 04:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
SupportErmell (talk) 05:52, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:01, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fernando (talk) 09:07, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I wish more of the bird was in focus, but good nonetheless. Cmao20 (talk) 10:42, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:37, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Per Cmao20 and also a bit of a strange pose Poco a poco (talk) 14:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The unusual pose: caught in the act of reaching for insects/berries. To me, the pose is part of the appeal. --Tagooty (talk) 15:55, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:46, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rode wegslak (Arion rufus), 07-09-2024. (actm.).jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 04:28:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Other lifeforms#Class : Arion rufus
Info Mating red slugs (Arion rufus). Focus stack of 3 photos.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:28, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:28, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual subject! Excellent detail. --Tagooty (talk) 04:33, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:01, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fernando (talk) 09:07, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:29, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 10:42, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:38, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:42, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:10, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:31, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree with Tagooty -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:32, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 05:13, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tui (Prosthemadera novaeseelandiae) Tiritiri Matangi.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 20:42:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family: Meliphagidae (Honeyeaters)
Info A New Zealand endemic. Both males and females have two distinctive white throat tufts which often appear to be just one tuft. No FPs. of the species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:42, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:42, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:21, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Crown is blurry. White feathers near neck overexposed. --Tagooty (talk) 04:14, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't think it's overexposed. I'm not a big fan of reducing bright white highlights so that they are a dull grey. There is a tiny bit of colour fringing around that area that you could work on but really a very minor point. Cmao20 (talk) 10:41, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:38, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I agree with Tagooty Poco a poco (talk) 14:09, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Australasian swamphen (Porphyrio melanotus) Tiritiri Matangi.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 21:01:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Rallidae (Coots, Rails and Crakes)
Info No FPs of this species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:01, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:01, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support High resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:07, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Exceptional quality --Tagooty (talk) 04:16, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 06:09, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:02, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fantastic! --Fernando (talk) 09:06, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice to see you back, Charles. Good as ever. Cmao20 (talk) 10:40, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:38, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:42, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:09, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Assisi - Chiesa di San Pietro - Crocifisso - 2023-09-05 01-25-30 001.jpg (delist)

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 16:37:46

Info - Reason to delist and replaceː Last year I took some photos in this very dark abbey from the year 1000 located in Assisi, but in the past I had no idea how to stitch two pictures into one. Only recently have I been able to propose what I really had in mind: to see great part of the austere medieval internal apse of the Abbey of St. Peter (Assisi, Italy). (Original nomination)
Delist and replace -- Terragio67 (talk) 16:37, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace Really better. --Yann (talk) 09:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace Cmao20 (talk) 10:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace --SHB2000 (talk) 12:43, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace --GRDN711 (talk) 05:17, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Keir Hardie by George Grantham Bain.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 16:54:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1900-1909
Info created by George Grantham Bain - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:54, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:54, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:31, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:51, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 03:25, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Agricultural terraces in Anti-Atlas mountains near Tafraoute, Morocco.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 12:44:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Morocco
Info created by Tupungato - uploaded by Tupungato - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 12:44, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tupungato (talk) 12:44, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:52, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The subject doesn' really stand out, I'd have probably cropp a chunk at the bottom. Pretty but I don't consider that architecture extraordinary Poco a poco (talk) 17:09, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Nice weather but according to the shadows of the bushes at the right, and my overall impression, the orientation of the light was not so cooperative, like a bit dull or hazy. Also the bottom-up viewpoint is highlighting a lot of the foreground with shadowy sides and not so much of the buildings. The houses at the right are in the shadow, hard to distinguish. I think another viewpoint, more from the left, and perhaps also higher in altitude, would have improved content enhancement -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:04, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As per Poco a Poco. --Fernando (talk) 09:05, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Basile Morin –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The so called "foreground" is what this image is about - for me this is an excellent documentation of an agricultural method for arid climates. --Kritzolina (talk) 15:19, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grand Mosque at Constantine (15676686960).jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 12:09:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings
Info The ceiling adornment at the Emir Abdelkader Mosque (built in 1994). It's the second-largest mosque in Algeria. Created by Dan Sloan - uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 12:09, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 12:09, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very cool, although I wish it was more perfectly centered. Cmao20 (talk) 13:16, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Indeed really cool, quality degrades a bit towards the borders, but all in all very impressive. I took the liberty to change the gallery link to our special gallery for ceilings of religious buildings. I will add a section for Algeria there if this nomination succeeds. – Aristeas (talk) 15:57, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Below the quality bar I'd expect for FP and the bottom crop is unfortunate causing also a lack of symmertry. If the subject would be complete I'd have gone for a square crop Poco a poco (talk) 17:07, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas.--Ermell (talk) 22:25, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A tripod would have helped, here. Unfortunately, a hand shot with high ISO and low depth of field impacts the quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:50, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Poco a poco. If you don't have a tripod at hand, simply place the camera on the floor, select ISO100 and a medium aperture. Je-str (talk) 11:02, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support crop sucks but this will do. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:43, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:48, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose In addition to the technical problems caused by the absence of tripod, the viewpoint was not in the center. As a consequence, the circles are not concentric. And the crop is tighter at the bottom than at the top, making the composition unbalanced -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:18, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rabat, old and new (Mausoleum of Mohammed V and new Mohammed VI Tower behind; ضريح محمد الخامس).jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 09:24:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Morocco
Info Rabat, old and new - Mausoleum of Mohammed V and new Mohammed VI Tower behind. My shot. --Mile (talk) 09:24, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 09:24, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment {{NoFoP-Morocco}}, right? --A.Savin 10:39, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @A.Savin first learn some basics. Main object is Mausoleum, despite what i write in description. So probably, by you, you cant shot Masouleum till new Tower is in the back, molodec. Just Tower in whole shot thats diferent. --Mile (talk) 08:40, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but you don't need to teach me basics. According to the article en:Mausoleum of Mohammed V, this mausoleum was built in 1971 "by Vietnamese architect Cong Vo Toan". --A.Savin 08:44, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Ohh good, its landmark - even on WLM Marocco. UNESCO World Heritage Site. So you would erase all category, or just my shot !? --Mile (talk) 08:51, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't "erase". But it's actually you who is responsible of what you shot, upload, and nominate. Thanks --A.Savin 09:10, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I don't know about the FOP concerns but if they are resolved then the photo should be FP Cmao20 (talk) 10:53, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment According to this deletion request, images from this building were deleted as it's copyrighted. You can upload it to Wikipedia in EN. --Fernando (talk) 09:05, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination till this get clear. Thank you for observation. --Mile (talk) 11:22, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Château du Haut-Koenigsbourg (755 m) (Orschwiller) (19).jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 09:12:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#France
Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 09:12, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 09:12, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice compo but unsharp. Probably f/11 is a bit to much for 1 inch. --Mile (talk) 09:31, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I agree with Mile, but the composition is great Cmao20 (talk) 10:52, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate version (sharpness)

Support Better sharpness. Gzen92 (talk) 12:05, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:40, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leaning trees over the grassy hillock of Nodong-ri tombs clouds and blue sky in Gyeongju South Korea.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2024 at 22:29:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#South Korea
Info Leaning trees over the grassy hillock of Nodong-ri tombs, in Daereungwon Tomb Complex, Tumuli park, Gyeongju, South Korea. Created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking and well composed Cmao20 (talk) 00:32, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 06:02, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 06:04, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual perspective -- Wikisquack (talk) 09:00, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 09:29, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:32, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful site, good composition, light and colours. – Aristeas (talk) 16:02, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice Poco a poco (talk) 17:11, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas Terragio67 (talk) 17:27, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:24, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:10, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:32, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Shadows a bit strong, but overall nice composition and interesting shot. --Fernando (talk) 09:33, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:40, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:44, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Fernando. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:44, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:L'Exposition universelle de Paris, 1889.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2024 at 20:29:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed#Posters and advertisements
Info created by GTC, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Info Poster for the Exposition Universelle (1889) in Paris, France
Support -- Yann (talk) 20:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Breathtaking level of detail. Significant year for this recurring event -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:43, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! Cmao20 (talk) 00:32, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wikisquack (talk) 09:03, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 16:02, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support super Terragio67 (talk) 17:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm getting a really bad-quality view when I view it in browser, like it's been upscaled naively. I'll check in GIMP. Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:44, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just a quirk of the browser view. Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:31, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Might D&R this later, after a restoration Adam Cuerden (talk) 04:08, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fernando (talk) 09:33, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:40, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:47, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Human running gait - terminal swing to heel strike (runner with Asics Metaspeed Edge "Paris"; 2024 Ljubljana Marathon).jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2024 at 12:20:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual_sports
Info Human running gait - terminal swing to heel strike (runner with Asics Metaspeed Edge "Paris"; 2024 Ljubljana Marathon). My shot. --Mile (talk) 12:20, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info 2 I had luck with this shot. Showing running gait: runner going from terminal swing to heel strike. Hard part was to get at this focal, right angle in perfect background-foreground, fluorescent colors of (new ?!) footwear. Actually croped OOC, AdobeRGB (⇔ Uncalibrated). Good Educational value.
Support --Mile (talk) 12:39, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment
- Is the picture free of any copyright issue concerning the Asics logo on the shoes?
- What gender and what age is the runner? I think you should include these kind of details in the file description. -- Wikisquack (talk) 17:55, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Male, but those Asics are Unisex. De minimis and its logo on 3D, shoes. Gender and runner, perhaps for winner, here is about tehnic. --Mile (talk) 09:28, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:31, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good focus, colour/brightness contrast etc. – Aristeas (talk) 16:02, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Terragio67 (talk) 18:43, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 08:21, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:40, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I rarely oppose, but I don't want FPC to become QIC. This image is technically well made, nothing to complain here, but it does not give me any kind of wow. --Granada (talk) 14:32, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Вид на Крестовоздвиженский собор из-под купола.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2024 at 12:18:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Russia
Info created by Ted.ns - uploaded and nominated by FBilula -- FBilula (talk) 12:18, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- FBilula (talk) 12:18, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 17:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 22:09, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support An unusual angled perspective that fascinates. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:25, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:32, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool perspective, beautiful contrast between the white upper walls and the rich decoration of the iconostasis etc. – Aristeas (talk) 16:01, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:14, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above comments... Terragio67 (talk) 18:45, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:23, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual perspective that works. --Fernando (talk) 09:34, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:40, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Diver or chaman in Tin Tazarift.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2024 at 11:24:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others#Frescos and murals
Info all by me -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 11:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 11:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:29, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 12:12, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:59, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too small, level of detail not the best, the paintings here are not so interesting like in the last candidate. Poco a poco (talk) 17:16, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Light, contrasts and drawings were better here in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Close wing moisture sucking of Delias pasithoe (Linnaeus, 1767) - Red-base Jezebel (Male) WLB.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2024 at 10:38:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by TAPAN1412 -- TAPAN1412 (talk) 10:38, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- TAPAN1412 (talk) 10:38, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:29, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:42, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:47, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:38, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Solar System collage.svg

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 22:46:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Science#Astronomy
Info created by WhatisMars - uploaded by WhatisMars - nominated by WhatisMars -- WhatisMars (talk) 22:46, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support, this is an updated version of the old nomination. This is an 8K image wrapped in SVG and available for translation. Texts have a large padding to accommodate all languages. -- WhatisMars (talk) 22:46, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Why❕️in "The Solar System!"? -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:36, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, why are the moons of Mars missing? Zzzs (talk) 03:57, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
After a further look, I detected more faults in this image. On top of the problem already mentioned in this nomination, the image is quite unorganised. There are random dots under some of the text and I don't know what their purpose is. The text placement doesn't make it very clear which natural satellites are which and they're kind of messy. I, personally, am not a fan of the font. It somehow makes the image look less professional. Not only are the main, and only, natural satellites of Mars are missing, but the natural satellites for the dwarf planets are missing too. Zzzs (talk) 07:34, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The font is due to MediaWiki's limitations. This is the original nomination and I specifically used the raster format because it can display the font. Now people are complaining about that and wanting to use SVG to be easily translated to other languages, this is the only way that I can do so. WhatisMars (talk) 12:28, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is a visible rectangular crop on the Jupiter's moons and on the Mercury. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 07:08, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is weird. I cannot see it in my Photoshop project file but it seems that it has trouble rendering pixels at the edge of the layer. WhatisMars (talk) 12:30, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The exclamation mark looks a bit silly, IMO. I think it's okay to have the moons of Mars missing though. As far as I understand you've used a size cutoff somewhere roughly around the 100km radius mark, and the moons of Mars are tiny, they are just little asteroids. Cmao20 (talk) 10:23, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly. I hate this vector format so much. It doesn't serve any actual purpose but because people were calling me to use it to wrap the raster image, I have to use it. WhatisMars (talk) 12:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how any of that relates to the exclamation mark. Cmao20 (talk) 20:28, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The least they can do is mention the moons of Mars rather than depict it. It can misinform users into thinking they don't exist. I wouldn't want to have a factually incorrect image as a featured picture. Zzzs (talk) 21:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lorch (W.) - Kloster Lorch - Klosterkirche - Ansicht von SO (1).jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 21:47:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany
Info created by Aristeas - uploaded by Aristeas - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 21:47, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 21:47, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great light, composition, and quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:32, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great, I love it. --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:40, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:26, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 07:09, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:57, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you very much for the nomination, Cmao20, and everybody for your support! – Aristeas (talk) 09:21, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:01, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:02, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Radomianin --Terragio67 (talk) 16:16, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:45, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fernando (talk) 19:03, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:23, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light and climbing vines -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:35, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:42, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brown creeper at a banding station (90455).jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 21:37:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Order_:_Passeriformes_(Passerines)
Info Brown creeper (Certhia americana) in hand at a bird banding station in the northeastern USA, about to be released. Note: precise location intentionally omitted per request. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:37, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support By weight, these are some of the tiniest birds in North America (other than hummingbirds), but they have a big tail they use to support themselves as they walk up tree trunks looking for insects. Because most of their time is spent rubbing up against evergreen trees, the handler pointed out they actually smell quite good, which is not something I realized I wanted to know. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:37, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:06, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Convincing in my opinion. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:38, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:19, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The worn out nail polish is distracting IMO. Otherwise it has a great focus and I like the idea of the photo. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 07:11, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I didn't even realise the nail polish was there until you mentioned it. -- Zzzs (talk) 07:36, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 08:56, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful, cute, excellent quality. – Aristeas (talk) 09:12, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 12:31, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:46, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fernando (talk) 19:03, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:42, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dudek chocholatý při krmení mláďat.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 19:06:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Upupidae (Hoopoes)
Info created by Luckhy86 – uploaded by Luckhy86 – nominated by Draceane — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 19:06, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 19:06, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is oversharpened but I don't mind when the composition and subject are so good Cmao20 (talk) 22:05, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support agree with cmao20. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:49, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:18, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 07:46, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 09:00, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Cmao20 (“weak” just because of the weird oversharpening, sorry). – Aristeas (talk) 09:10, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:10, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support That pink bellow tail, i would remove it. Feel like bird carried some... --Mile (talk) 12:30, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 17:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't find it oversharpened, and I really like the fact that we can see the insect carried by the bird. -- Wikisquack (talk) 18:07, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 20:47, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 13:01, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Definitely overprocessed (too much sharpening) but hell of a scene. Possible POTY Poco a poco (talk) 17:17, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Poco Terragio67 (talk) 20:11, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:22, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:42, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Po dešti ve Středohoří.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 19:03:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Czech Republic#Ústí nad Labem (no photos of this region yet)
Info created by Crutch1973 – uploaded by Crutch1973 – nominated by Draceane — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 19:03, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 19:03, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Crutch1973 and Draceane: A stunning drone capture, in my opinion a great landscape scene. The technical quality is a bit too noisy for my taste. Hence my suggestion of an improvement via a SwissTransfer link. Feel free to use it for an update if you like the edit. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:59, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think the technical quality is okay but the colours seem a bit weird to me Cmao20 (talk) 22:04, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the inspiration, Cmao20. As for the colors, I had a similar vibe, but still a tolerable one. I reduced the overall saturation by 15% and updated the transfer link above. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 22:44, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Overprocessed -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:30, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Saturation, level and dynamics adjusted to a more acceptable level, transfer link above updated. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 07:50, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Radomianin’s version is a big improvement and I would suggest to use it, Crutch1973. I would certainly support that version. If you do not like it, Radomianin should upload it as a separate image under a new filename and I would be happy to nominate it here. – Aristeas (talk) 09:06, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- On hold I've contacted Crutch1973, so I will wait with overwriting the photo a bit (one/two days). — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 11:35, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Draceane, thank you in advance for the upcoming update. Funny coincidence: I also informed the user about this nomination in a very polite way by email shortly after 10:00 UTC today. So thank you for your efforts to rescue this nomination to give this great image a fair chance. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 22:35, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree Radomianin's version is an improvement, and potential FP -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:50, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pellasimnia angasi 01.JPG

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 13:25:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Ovulidae
Info A small (1,5 cm) unusual shell of a representative of the gastropod family Olividae (False Cowries); created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 13:25, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 13:25, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 19:35, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:39, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:03, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:15, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 09:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:04, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Terragio67 (talk) 16:21, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:47, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:22, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:56, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Narrentag-Oberndorf 2024-Nachtumzug-07985.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 12:42:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created by Rainer Halama - uploaded by Rainer Halama - nominated by Wikisquack -- Wikisquack (talk) 12:42, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wikisquack (talk) 12:42, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BugWarp (talk) 18:13, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment "and if it had a better description and categorization. Because it lacks a detailed description, and I believe it can be better categorized." I guess that what is good for the goose is not good for the gander. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:00, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the photo would profit from a more detailed description, stating what exactly we see in this photo. Hallo Rainer, das ist eine wunderbare Aufnahme. Könntest Du die Beschreibung noch ein bisschen erweitern, sodass sie sagt, was wir in dieser Aufnahme sehen? Danke! – Aristeas (talk) 08:49, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is categorized to the specific event and to the "Narrenzunft" (the specific group it belongs to). I even took out just now one over-categorization. What further categorizations do you miss. I know there are all kinds of categorizations, like "XYZ facing left or right" and what else not. But that is something that should be left to those needing an wanting such categories and not necessarily to the uploader. A description in English could be provided. But it will not be as descriptive since there are no articles in English to the Event or the specific guilds. Wuselig (talk) 08:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tomascastelazo You are right, I put it too soon and should have asked for this work to be done before nominating it. I am still quite new to Commons so I'm happy to learn. -- Wikisquack (talk) 15:34, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank für die superschnelle Ergänzung der Beschreibung, Rainer! – I think the categories are fine, and Wuselig has expanded the description so that we now know that we see a Schuttig, the traditional carnival figure/mask from Elzach.

Support Beautiful, well-composed portrait of a typical traditional carnival mask, the torch makes clear that this is from the night parade. Atmospheric and good quality (espec. when we consider the difficult circumstances: moving people at night). – Aristeas (talk) 08:59, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 09:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:19, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Terragio67 (talk) 16:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 08:20, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fernando (talk) 09:34, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special mood, nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:21, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Open wing position of Lexias dirtea (Fabricius, 1793) - Dark Archduke (Female) puddling on rotten Neolamarckia cadamba flowerWLB.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 12:38:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 12:38, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atudu (talk) 12:38, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good Quality --SVKMBFLY (talk) 13:50, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tupungato (talk) 14:02, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:23, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support this one is FP to me Cmao20 (talk) 22:02, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:10, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 08:47, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Terragio67 (talk) 16:25, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:48, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:21, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Open wing nutrient sucking position of Lexias dirtea (Fabricius, 1793) - Dark Archduke.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 12:14:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info created by Sarpitabose - uploaded by Sarpitabose - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 12:14, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atudu (talk) 12:14, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Don't get me wrong, it's a very good photo. Better than any butterfly photo I have ever taken. But Featured Pictures should be best of the best, and here the head and eyes are a little out of focus. Your other nominated picture is better in this aspect. --Tupungato (talk) 14:08, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very beautiful but sadly the head being out of focus is IMO a deal breaker at FP. Cmao20 (talk) 22:01, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monument to Genghis Khan.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 11:59:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
Info created and uploaded by Bernard Gagnon - nominated by AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:59, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Genghis Khan as ruler not warlord; the monument is the focal point of the Government Palace in Ulaanbaatar. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:59, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:00, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:17, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:58, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Calavera of Frida Kahlo.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 01:36:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Figurines and statuettes
Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 01:36, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 01:36, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The visible portion of skull on the right is annoying. I would support this candidate if it was cropped on the right, and if it had a better description and categorization. Because it lacks a detailed description, and I believe it can be better categorized (it's not even in the Frida Kahlo category). -- Wikisquack (talk) 13:37, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This one has a great composition Cmao20 (talk) 21:49, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Weird and special. – Aristeas (talk) 09:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 17:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:17, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support But I would support a crop on the right. --Yann (talk) 09:34, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Wikisquack. --Fernando (talk) 09:36, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:58, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Calaveras of day of the dead in mexico.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 01:16:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Figurines and statuettes
Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 01:16, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 01:16, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's not a bad photo, and it is a valuable addition to Commons. But it doesn't have the wow factor. The focus is somewhat shaky, it might be better (the other candidate image is sharp). The cropping seems somewhat random (the cropped top right skull and the right skull. It also has deficiencies in description, there is no proper category and no proper description: are these products in a store, or something else? --Tupungato (talk) 10:53, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Request (@Tomascastelazo) Please write a more detailed description and categorize this picture. I would then support this picture. (The croppings don't shock me because it's a kind of photo where you don't mind, it's like photographing a bunch of oranges.)
Comment If you google Calaveras of day of the dead in mexico you will be surprised by the results. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:03, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What I wanted to say is maybe the description could be a bit more detailed. You can explain for example where was this photo taken (in Mexico, right, but more precisely) : a shop, in a street, ...

It would also ease the categorization. Because for now, there is only 1 category to this file. And this category doesn't even exist... -- Wikisquack (talk) 15:41, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Fine picture of an interesting motif but I miss a great composition in this one and it's a bit noisy. Cmao20 (talk) 21:49, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:12, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:17, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:59, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gordon Parks - American Gothic.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2024 at 18:53:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1940-1949
Info American Gothic. Portrait of government cleaning woman Ella Watson. August 1942.
Info created by Gordon Parks, uploaded by Davepape, nominated by Yann
Support Notable historical picture. Included in List of photographs considered the most important. -- Yann (talk) 18:53, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Gnosis (talk) 21:23, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:39, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wikisquack (talk) 13:46, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Photographic work of historical significance. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:10, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:09, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support And still a stunning photo, at least to me. – Aristeas (talk) 08:44, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Terragio67 (talk) 16:27, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:10, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:49, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:59, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Llao Llao Peninsula.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2024 at 18:11:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Argentina
Info All by me -- Fernando (talk) 18:11, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Fernando (talk) 18:11, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:09, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I see too much of a bluish tint in the photo. Otherwise it's a great shot. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 19:16, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:15, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fernando, could you check whether shifting the white balance a bit more towards warm/yellowish improves the photo, as Draceane suggests? This could make your beautiful shot even better. – Aristeas (talk) 09:02, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the input @Aristeas, @Basile Morin, @Draceane. I uploaded a new one with a slight warmer tone. Fernando (talk) 14:29, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The problem probably comes more from your chosen color profile ProPhoto RGB, see this nomination with similar color problem, that has been fixed by converting the format into sRGB. See also this case -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:21, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting, I didn't know about this! I reuploaded with the different colour profile. Fernando (talk) 09:26, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Much better! -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:48, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 17:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for editing. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:27, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition, interesting viewpoint -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:48, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 09:50, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:59, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cesena - Piazza della Libertà e Campanile del Duomo - 2024-09-30 19-34-16 001.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2024 at 15:18:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Italy
Info Since 2018, this place (Piazza della Liberta - Liberty square) in Cesena has become pedestrian, having previously been a car-park. It is certainly a great result for children who have space to play and for architecture lovers who will be able to freely enjoy the rear view of the Renaissance Cathedral (Duomo di Cesena). In 1408 the apse was built and subsequently the 72 meter high bell tower (1456) for which I took a vertical overview of 7 photos. Created, uploaded and nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 15:18, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 15:18, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:06, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual narrow composition which nicely emphasizes the height of the bell tower, and the people on the piazza add life to the scene. Question @Terragio67: The main subject is IMHO the church with its bell tower, and most similar FPs are listed on the “Religious buildings” gallery page. Shouldn’t we change the gallery link to that page? Best, – Aristeas (talk) 09:20, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The square described does not belong to the church, but since the church is enormous in height, it necessarily occupies the main scene, putting everything on the edge. Furthermore, the interesting part is certainly the apse (XIV sec) and also the upper part of the bell tower (XV sec) because they straddle the Romanesque-Gothic period and the Renaissance period.. For these reasons, in my opinion it is possible to make the change you suggested without great doubts. Thanks for your interest. Terragio67 (talk) 11:46, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:17, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Aristeas. I took the liberty of adjusting the gallery link as discussed above. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:57, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Terragio67 (talk) 16:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:50, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:19, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:21, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:59, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:044 Olive baboon with baby on the back in the Serengeti National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2024 at 14:23:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:23, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:23, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 15:58, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:04, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fernando (talk) 18:14, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:39, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 08:17, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:24, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:15, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 19:35, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:43, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The light is not so good (we can see from the shadows that it's almost a contrejour), but the action is great (included the leaves in the mother's mouth) and the focus on the baby, looking at viewer, successful -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:13, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I suppose you could do this at half lower ISO. 1/1000 s would be more than enough. --Mile (talk) 12:34, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:51, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:00, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:54, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pararescueman fast ropes out of a U.S. Air Force HH-60G Pave Hawk.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2024 at 13:40:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Helicopters
Info created by Airman 1st Class Joseph Bartoszek - uploaded & nominated by ToprakM --ToprakM ^✉ 13:40, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ToprakM ^✉ 13:40, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Unsure how to vote on this one. A very dramatic and wow-y composition but the left crop is very tight and the image quality is only okay (noise, Jpeg artefacts). Cmao20 (talk) 16:03, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:32, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wikisquack (talk) 13:50, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:25, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 11:27, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support 1st USA Airman who left f/64 group. Left crop could be a bit wider. Fine colors, sharp, --Mile (talk) 12:38, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 17:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LoMit ^talk 11:37, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:00, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Woman centaur.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2024 at 10:52:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others#Frescos and murals
Info all by me -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 10:52, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 10:52, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Not as good a composition as the last one of these you nominated but nonetheless sharp and good quality + interesting subject Cmao20 (talk) 16:01, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Cmao20 thank you and i will try to do better compositions next time. IssamBarhoumi (talk) 16:57, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 08:40, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:15, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fernando (talk) 09:37, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:01, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:34, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Catedral, Segovia, España, 2024-06-14, DD 32-34 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2024 at 17:23:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Spain
Info Chapter house full of tapestries (work of Gerard Peemans, Flemish weaver, ca. 1625-1700) in the cathedral of Segovia, Spain. The temple was built in the Flamboyant style and was dedicated in 1768, constituting one of the latest Gothic cathedrals in Europe. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 17:23, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:23, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool art on the walls, good quality, and nice to get an off-centre viewpoint for once - symmetrical is usually the way to go but it can be repetitive after a while and off-centre helps show more of the art here. Cmao20 (talk) 19:15, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The blurry wooden board at the left is out of focus, and the odd angle of view creates an unbalanced perspective. Also the fence in the foreground could perhaps have been avoided with a few steps forward. I think a centered composition would have been better here -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:12, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It would be hard to have everythiing in focus without possibility to use a tripod and with very poor light, but ok, I cropped the wooden board on the left. I'd rather have no fence, but then I'd show much less of the room Poco a poco (talk) 17:04, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per Basile Morin. --Tagooty (talk) 14:51, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Basile. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:40, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support considerig the pro and contra arguments. It’s still an impressive photo to me. – Aristeas (talk) 08:36, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:27, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive for me, too, even if the unusual perspective is against the norm at first. But when the "wow" effect is there, the rule should apply: Exceptions prove the rule. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile. -- Karelj (talk) 09:59, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tour-Alty, a monument of architecture of the Altai Republic 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2024 at 16:57:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
Info created and uploaded by Alexandr frolov - nominated by AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:57, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support An ancient steppe megalith, a wonderful example of the deer stones that dot Mongolia and southern Siberia. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:57, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agree, cool motif. Maybe not the best light but good image quality. Cmao20 (talk) 19:14, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I'm pretty sure it's tilted to the right by approx. 1°. --Tupungato (talk) 10:50, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:33, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love the simplicity combined with the vast open landscape. But I cannot forget Tupungato’s hint – the horizon indeed suggests that the photo may be tilted to the right. It would be no problem to correct this, but is it tilted or not? Alexandr frolov, can you help by any chance? – Aristeas (talk) 08:39, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:52, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Close wing puddling of Libythea lepita Moore, 1858 - Common Beak WLB MG 3212.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2024 at 11:16:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info created by SVKMBFLY - uploaded by SVKMBFLY - nominated by SVKMBFLY -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 11:16, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 11:16, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:35, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Head oof, disturbing element in the bottom left, the threshold for FP of Lepidoptera is higher, Poco a poco (talk) 16:48, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Sorry but agree with Poco on this one. It's generally good but that big blurry areas is just too distracting and the quality is just okay. Cmao20 (talk) 19:10, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Open wing basking of Chersonesia risa (Doubleday, 1848) - Common Maplet WLB MG 4406.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2024 at 11:06:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info created by SVKMBFLY - uploaded by SVKMBFLY - nominated by SVKMBFLY -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 11:06, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 11:06, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Colours seem slightly oversaturated compared to other images in the category, but good nevertheless Cmao20 (talk) 12:01, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 12:39, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Better than the other candidate, detail and compo could be better but it's an interesting species Poco a poco (talk) 16:49, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Flash fired, unfortunately, harsh shadows and unappealing light. Also not a breathtaking level of detail, in my opinion. Good documenting picture, but the background is too average -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:40, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I am also not preferred using flashes but can you suggest me the process or how to captured some moments when you are in dense forest like north east India, where sunlight is not entered properly and as it's a forest dwelling species how can I take a clear shot without flash in such tropical rainforests like habitats? can you suggest me what to do in this situation? SVKMBFLY (talk) 12:40, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Excellent detail etc. Oh yes, the flash … I dislike it due to the reasons mentioned by Basile, but I must admit that not long ago the use of the flash for such photos was completely a matter of course for some butterfly photographers who emphasized the documentary value of their images. (I knew a man who travelled all over the world to take photos of rare butterflies with his Leica and – the flash, and many nature lovers loved his photos. When a few people questioned that procedure and suggested to him to take some photos with soft flash or just with natural light, he did not understand that at all. “They are sharp, what’s the problem?“) – Aristeas (talk) 09:33, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
When You are entered in such deep and dense forest there is no chance to take a clear shot without using body flash or external flash. Due to sunlight hardly entered such forests of north east India, as well as it is like tropical rain forest habitat rest of the time weather is dull you can't imagine to click them without flash. It's a big problem after all and really challenging to snap some moments from such habitat. SVKMBFLY (talk) 12:49, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your statement, SVKMBFLY. Now we have a clear viewpoint. – Aristeas (talk) 12:56, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:32, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:54, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:32, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Myeongjeongjeon seen through the wooden Gate Hyehwamun at Changgyeonggung Palace in Seoul.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2024 at 01:36:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#South Korea
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:36, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:36, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:12, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Clever use of framing Cmao20 (talk) 10:59, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 12:39, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perception is disoriented by sunlight on the door in the foreground. The image seems tilted, but is is not. Nice effect. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:33, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support It's a very nice photo, but I'm not a big fan of blown highlights. If any RGB color reaches 255 on a largish area, it becomes noticeable. I'll try to create notes for the file in a moment, to mark the areas. --Tupungato (talk) 15:00, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will improve this part. Thanks for your note -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:07, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks for your review -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:27, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose This kind of pictures with frames shout IMHO for symmetry and it isn't (the temple is closer to the right frame). Poco a poco (talk) 16:59, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info The buildings next to the one in the center, red and white, are completely different. I don't think the shift is really important, due to the dominating foreground. Thanks everyone for the feedbacks. -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:50, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 05:27, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:17, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:26, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition, nice framing effect. – Aristeas (talk) 14:42, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wikisquack (talk) 13:56, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:11, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:55, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:28-2 Kalâa de Beni Hammad (2).jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2024 at 13:18:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Algeria
Info Qal'at Bani Hammad was a fortified palatine city in Algeria. Now in ruins, in the 11th century, it served as the first capital of the Hammadid dynasty. Created by R hakka - uploaded by R hakka - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 13:18, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 13:18, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 17:11, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Great atmosphere and mood but IMO not an outstanding composition and also spoilt a little by the cars Cmao20 (talk) 00:33, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice mood but lacking in technical quality, imo. Specifically in terms of noise and level of detail.--Peulle (talk) 09:05, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Noise removed. Thanks. Riad Salih (talk) 20:18, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support excellent atmosphere—cars improve the image, it's a human structure part of the human and natural worlds. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:00, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Peulle, the fence at the bottom is also a minus and the dark areas look too dark to me (overprocessed) Poco a poco (talk) 17:02, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this, mistic. --Mile (talk) 18:00, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Poco a poco the dark areas look too dark (overprocessed) -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:59, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support It’s a pity about all the fences and maybe the contrast is a bit high, but I love the special light and the deep clouds (mist?). – Aristeas (talk) 14:40, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wikisquack (talk) 13:58, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:31, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Overprocessed. Per others. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 19:11, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 17:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Fernando (talk) 09:38, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monasterio de Curchi, Curchi, Moldavia, 2023-11-01, DD 105-107 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2024 at 12:57:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Moldova
Info Curchi Monastery, Curchi, Moldova. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 12:57, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 12:57, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent detail, harmonious colours. --Tagooty (talk) 13:45, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting place and atmospheric photo Cmao20 (talk) 13:50, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 17:25, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:59, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent quality, interesting weather/lighting setting.--Tupungato (talk) 15:03, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:13, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 14:38, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:30, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I guess I'm not going to sway the result, but sorry, I've been looking at this one for the past few days and I can't get myself to like it. The tree covering the subject is too distracting and it's a bit cropped at the bottom. Light is too dim and flat. The yellowish halo at the bottom, I guess it's inevitable, but it also works against. It also bothers me a bit that it's not centred. --Fernando (talk) 09:46, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:56, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose agree with Fernando. --GRDN711 (talk) 05:20, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Basilica dos Congregados (10).jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2024 at 10:57:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Portugal
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:57, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info a few days ago I nominated this picture without succes. I think this one is better, so I present it for you. -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:57, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 10:57, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support As I did last time. Cmao20 (talk) 11:22, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think its still oversaturated and colors... --Mile (talk) 16:39, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done, I changed the colors. Tournasol7 (talk) 06:09, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:12, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as the last time. – Aristeas (talk) 14:38, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe the white dot in the sky can be removed.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:52, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:30, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:56, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Timetable (day 15 after nomination)

Sat 12 Oct → Sun 27 Oct
Sun 13 Oct → Mon 28 Oct
Mon 14 Oct → Tue 29 Oct
Tue 15 Oct → Wed 30 Oct
Wed 16 Oct → Thu 31 Oct
Thu 17 Oct → Fri 1 Nov
Fri 18 Oct → Sat 2 Nov
Sat 19 Oct → Sun 3 Nov
Sun 20 Oct → Mon 4 Nov
Mon 21 Oct → Tue 5 Nov
Tue 22 Oct → Wed 6 Nov
Wed 23 Oct → Thu 7 Nov
Thu 24 Oct → Fri 8 Nov
Fri 25 Oct → Sat 9 Nov
Sat 26 Oct → Sun 10 Nov
Sun 27 Oct → Mon 11 Nov