Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2010/06/24
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_underway_during_builder's_trials.jpg){kind=link}
It seems doubtful that the museum holds copyright over this cover Eusebius (talk) 11:25, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Confirmed through OTRS. Eusebius (talk) 14:10, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Not in public domain. Copyright is owned by Netflix. --Joe Chill 2 (talk) 01:24, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Keep That logo is too simple to be eligible for copyright. See the enwiki file page for the logo: [1] (public domain). See COM:LICENSING#Simple_design. Jujutacular T · C 20:16, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
![[1]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Netflix_Logo.svg){kind=link}
Withdrawn [2]. Jujutacular T · C 20:23, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Fehler im Dateinamen richtig: Rail COCKERILL - 98.jpg Arnoldius (talk) 22:17, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete speedied. fetchcomms☛ 23:51, 24 June 2010 (UTC)- speedy delete per uploader. This is an obvious case for a speedy delete. --Leoboudv (talk) 01:24, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader request. Kameraad Pjotr 15:08, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Personal, unused, unnotable person. ■ MMXX talk 20:01, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. bad quality too. Amada44 talk to me 20:58, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - privy.--E8 (talk) 23:08, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ■ MMXX talk 17:48, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Out of project scope and completetly useless. fetchcomms☛ 23:46, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete ^ Mono (talk) 00:14, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - the image is not educational and has no foreseeable use in any projects. ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 00:16, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 20:17, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
category name misspelled, corrected category created at Category:Sennott Square --Crazypaco (talk) 19:05, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Common Good (talk) 19:21, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
out of scope Amada44 talk to me 15:05, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - no apparent educational use - out of scope.--E8 (talk) 22:54, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope per E8. --Leoboudv (talk) 01:29, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:36, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
unused personal image Amada44 talk to me 15:11, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete - out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 19:20, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete - privy.--E8 (talk) 22:59, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:37, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
unused personal image Amada44 talk to me 15:11, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete per nom Cholo Aleman (talk) 19:49, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete - privy.--E8 (talk) 22:59, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:37, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
unused personal image Amada44 talk to me 15:13, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete per nom Cholo Aleman (talk) 19:23, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete - privy.--E8 (talk) 22:59, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:38, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
unused, out of scope Amada44 talk to me 15:26, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete per nom Cholo Aleman (talk) 19:35, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:38, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
logo of a website [3] promoting free music; no related article exists in Spanish or other wikimedia projects, unused and out of scope Santosga (talk) 16:15, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete unused, out of scope. Amada44 talk to me 11:08, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:39, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
unused a bit strange drawing (of a saxophone) - not really useful, out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 18:54, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:51, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
unused private image - out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 19:01, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete - privy; unused.--E8 (talk) 23:04, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:41, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
unused private image - out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 19:18, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete - privy; unused.--E8 (talk) 23:02, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:42, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
unused private image - out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 19:36, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete unused, per nom. Amada44 talk to me 21:01, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Only picture by absent uploader and its not used anywhere. The resolution is very low too. --Leoboudv (talk) 01:22, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:42, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
unused private image - out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 19:41, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Amada44 talk to me 21:00, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - privy.--E8 (talk) 23:07, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:42, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
unused private drinking image - out of scope (sure two are better than one, but not for the commons....) Cholo Aleman (talk) 19:48, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Amada44 talk to me 20:59, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - privy.--E8 (talk) 23:08, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:43, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
unused strange drawing - looks like an advertisement for a party - other files of this user (similar content) ware already deleted Cholo Aleman (talk) 20:21, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- PS: argument: Out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 20:21, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete definitely out of scope! Amada44 talk to me 21:22, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:43, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Jujutacular T · C 20:46, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete - privy.--E8 (talk) 23:14, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:44, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
File marked (c) Kelly Trang Tran. com... Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:38, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 18:56, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. No foreseeable use. Jujutacular T · C 20:50, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:44, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
unused personal image Amada44 talk to me 20:53, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete - privy.--E8 (talk) 23:12, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:44, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Jujutacular T · C 21:01, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete - privy.--E8 (talk) 23:12, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:44, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
unused personal image Amada44 talk to me 21:02, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - privy.--E8 (talk) 23:13, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Unused personal image. Only image by this uploader too. --Leoboudv (talk) 01:23, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:45, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
unused personal image Amada44 talk to me 21:08, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete - privy.--E8 (talk) 23:13, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:50, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
unused personal image Amada44 talk to me 21:15, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete - privy.--E8 (talk) 23:15, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:45, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
unused personal image Amada44 talk to me 21:19, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete - privy.--E8 (talk) 23:15, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:45, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
unused personal image Amada44 talk to me 21:26, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete - privy.--E8 (talk) 23:15, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:46, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
out of scope Amada44 talk to me 21:31, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:46, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
unused personal image Amada44 talk to me 21:41, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete - privy.--E8 (talk) 23:16, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:46, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
unused personal image Amada44 talk to me 21:42, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete - privy.--E8 (talk) 23:17, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:46, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
unused personal image Amada44 talk to me 21:43, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete - privy.--E8 (talk) 23:17, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:47, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
unused personal image Amada44 talk to me 21:43, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete - privy; very low quality.--E8 (talk) 23:18, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:47, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Jujutacular T · C 21:48, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete - privy.--E8 (talk) 23:18, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:47, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Unused personal photo Jujutacular T · C 21:50, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete - privy.--E8 (talk) 23:22, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:48, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Jujutacular T · C 21:52, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:48, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
unused personal image Amada44 talk to me 21:57, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete - privy.--E8 (talk) 23:21, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:48, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
unused personal image Amada44 talk to me 21:58, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete - privy.--E8 (talk) 23:20, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:48, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
unused personal image Amada44 talk to me 21:59, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete - privy.--E8 (talk) 23:20, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:49, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
unused personal image Amada44 talk to me 22:08, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete - privy.--E8 (talk) 23:19, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:49, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
unused personal image Amada44 talk to me 22:10, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete - privy.--E8 (talk) 23:19, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 01:50, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Image is from here: http://www.pbase.com/puleza/image/82855275 . No evidence for license given. --Ytoyoda (talk) 06:11, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Not because of the copy vio but because there is no COM:FOP in South Africa and this is a modern work of architecture that cannot be 70 years old. --Leoboudv (talk) 01:33, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Not because of FOP but because of bad uploader. Non-free photographic work. --Martin H. (talk) 07:45, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
This file contains a symbol prohibited by german law. It is neither art nor teaching-material. It insults a whole nation. -Rillke (talk) 08:21, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete +1. No foreseeable use, too. --PaterMcFly (talk) 09:26, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Swastika is irrelevant, but there is no foreseeable use for this. Jujutacular T · C 14:15, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Kyro (talk) 22:46, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
per discussion + bad quality Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 13:24, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
No sign that it was first published in Egypt before 1981. Eusebius (talk) 12:25, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Permission sent by the author (says the uploader), OTRS pending. Eusebius (talk) 09:28, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
unused private image - out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 18:37, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 13:23, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
unused private image - out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 19:21, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete - privy.--E8 (talk) 23:04, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 13:22, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
unused, I don't see this being useful Amada44 talk to me 21:33, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 13:21, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Not in public domain. Copyright is owned by Netflix and the company that made the movie. --Joe Chill 2 (talk) 01:07, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- I would say De minimis for the DVD and the logo => picture can be free so Keep Kyro (talk) 22:51, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Keep per Kyro. Willking1979 (talk) 11:34, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned, Low Quality, used in a now deleted advert on en.wikipedia - likely copyvio, no foreseeable use. FASTILY (TALK) 00:30, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Very low resolution image and use in an ad hints at a copy vio, I'm afraid. --Leoboudv (talk) 01:28, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 01:22, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned, Low Quality, used in a now deleted advert on en.wikipedia - likely copyvio, no foreseeable use. FASTILY (TALK) 00:30, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Very low resolution suggests a possible copy vio. --Leoboudv (talk) 04:22, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 01:22, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
out of scope, corresponding article was twice deleted from en wikipedia for no notability [4] Santosga (talk) 00:38, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete The article seems to have been deleted twice in 2008 and this photo doesn't even have a proper title. I'd say its lack of notability suggests it is out of Common's scope. --Leoboudv (talk) 04:24, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 01:23, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
band with no notability, no related article exists in Spanish or any other wikimedia project - out of scope Santosga (talk) 00:50, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete - per nom Cholo Aleman (talk) 19:41, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 01:23, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned, Low Quality, used in a now deleted advert on en.wikipedia - likely copyvio, no foreseeable use. FASTILY (TALK) 05:29, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 01:24, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
out of scope Amada44 talk to me 15:21, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 01:26, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
unused screenshot - out of scope, missing context = unusable Cholo Aleman (talk) 18:32, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 01:39, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
unused strange logo with a nice description and name - out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 18:33, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 01:40, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
not notable sports group - out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 19:13, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 01:42, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
png was created after the svg. therefor the png was made of the svg. Amada44 talk to me 19:14, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 01:43, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Unused image, replaced by File:Civil Ensign of Switzerland.svg or File:Civil Ensign of Switzerland (Pantone).svg User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 19:35, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted. ZooFari 01:44, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
unused, out of scope Amada44 talk to me 19:36, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 01:44, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
out of scope - unused screenshot of a french website; related article was deleted in fr wikipedia for no notability fr:Utilisateur:Salebot/Journal/2008-08-13#R.C3.A9vocation_de_Tigidi_sur_Tigidi Santosga (talk) 19:44, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 01:48, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Seems to be a studio photo. Copright holder most likely Eric Scot per metadata on image. No evidence permission has been released. Jujutacular T · C 20:54, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 01:50, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
most likely out of scope Amada44 talk to me 21:07, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 01:32, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
The uploader, Campariroma, claims to be the copyright holder of what is supposedly a self-portrait by Louis Bouquet, who lived between 1885 and 1952, but authored by Philippe Dufieux (is it a self portrait or not?) in 1999. None of this makes any sense. —LX (talk, contribs) 12:12, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Dufiuex may still be alive too and it was not made 70 years ago. --Leoboudv (talk) 01:26, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 11:25, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
because it's vulgar, not educational. 24.150.25.80 14:32, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 11:27, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
image from a Chilean fansite of heavy metal band Iron Maiden; unused, no foreseable use - out of scope Santosga (talk) 15:24, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete per nom.-E8 (talk) 23:01, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 11:27, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
logo from a Chilean fansite of heavy metal band Iron Maiden; unused, no foreseable use - out of scope Santosga (talk) 15:25, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 11:26, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
unused private image - out of scope (no real value) Cholo Aleman (talk) 18:31, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 11:28, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
unused private image - out of scope (notable person?) Cholo Aleman (talk) 18:59, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete per nom.--E8 (talk) 23:05, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Comment http://www.jeffschweitzer.com/ perhaps it is this man? --Mbdortmund (talk) 01:41, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Kept. See Jeff Schweitzer. Having two images of a notable person seems OK to me. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:37, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
small and not good unused advertisement for a garden architect (or similar) - out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 19:38, 24 June 2010 (UTC) This is not an advertisement for a garden architect. It is simply a view of White Oaks Bed and Breakfast and the valley below.
Comment - so please add categories and the image can be useful (despite the bad quality) Cholo Aleman (talk) 04:18, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
quality too bad Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 11:29, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
unused e-book in vietnamese - out of scope, several similar files of this user Cholo Aleman (talk) 20:24, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 11:29, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
not useful without description Amada44 talk to me 22:04, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Probably related to other uploads, figures in use in v:User:Egm6322.s09.mafia/HW4. The project seems to have stalled. Not useful without a description, easily reproduced for someone familiar with the subject. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:06, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 11:30, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Just text, not in scope. Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:09, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 11:30, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
logo of a website [5] promoting free music; no related article exists in Spanish or other wikimedia projects, unused and out of scope Santosga (talk) 16:15, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:08, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
The postage stamp on this envelope was issued in 1987 and is still covered by crown copyright per {{PD-UKGov}}, therefore the OTRS ticket should have been disallowed. Ww2censor (talk) 17:41, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Add the following from later in today's log:
I have removed their entries from the log. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:57, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
- As a member of the team producing these covers, I request this deletion request be put on hold, as we try to establish true copyright situation. The comment of PD-UKGov does seem incorrect by the description given. The OTRS ticket system I know nothing of, and make no comment upon it. --Keith (talk) 21:04, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- All British stamps are copyright for 50-years per en:crown copyright and per Stamps/Public domain#United Kingdom, so even if you produced the covers, and the local stamps, and agree to licence them under a free licence, you have no rights over the Royal Mail stamps affixed to the cover, so your permission cannot cover those stamps. The whole items copyright status is covered by the most restrictive copyright. I suggest you find a per-1960 cover, or if such a cover does not exist, that you move one of the nominated image to the en wiki and claim fair-use but you will likely only be permitted to use one image under the non-free content criteria. I can assist you with that if you wish. Ww2censor (talk) 21:24, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Point taken re comment and moved to here. There is a slight problem on the pre 1960 suggestion - Production didn't start till 1969!! Considering the RM stamp occupies less than 5% of the actual item, and is not the focus of the item, I have some doubts on the rationale. However, the copyright situation will be queried as stated and the result will be noted here. --Keith (talk) 21:57, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Well I think 1969 is a problem and I doubt that de minimus would apply here. Ww2censor (talk) 00:50, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
- Enquiries are being made to :-
Royal Mail Stamps and Philatlic Department UK Marketing 35-50 Rathbone Place London W1T 1HQ
So please hold any action until a reply can be recieved --Keith (talk) 10:28, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
- Comment I agree that we should wait a reasonable period for a reply -- say until July 25? Also, if the reply is not helpful, then we could blur the offending stamps and keep the covers. I'd be willing to do that, so please don't delete them without notifying me and allowing time to do it. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:03, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
- No problems in waiting and if the reply is not in keeping with commons licencing a blurred image would seem like a good compromise solution. Ww2censor (talk) 16:17, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Prior to making enquiries, a decision was made to remove all FRLS graphic material from wikipedia. Please delete files from this subset, as they are no longer needed. --Keith (talk) 15:10, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Personally I think that as the stamps in question (on each of the files) are not reproduced at "same size" nor at "same quality", then there is no case to answer re copyright. Since you accept that a "lower quality" image is acceptable, then why make the decision to request deletion --Keith (talk) 20:00, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
- That's not the way copyright works -- if the stamps are recognizable, they are an infringement. My suggestion was to blur them sufficiently so they can not be recognized. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:09, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:21, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
File:US_Navy_090712-N-0000G-005_The_littoral_combat_ship_Independence_(LCS_2)_underway_during_builder's_trials.jpg
edit_underway_during_builder%27s_trials.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_underway_during_builder%27s_trials.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo is "courtesy Dennis Griggs General Dynamics". Not taken by employee of the US Government Schlendrian (talk) 14:22, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Same reasoning, same series:
- File:US Navy 090702-N-XXXXG-008 The littoral combat ship Independence (LCS 2) underway during builder's trials.jpg
- File:US Navy 090702-N-XXXXG-006 The littoral combat ship Independence (LCS 2) underway during builder's trials.jpg
- File:US Navy 090712-N-0000G-007 The littoral combat ship Independence (LCS 2) underway during builder's trials.jpg
- File:US Navy 090712-N-0000G-004 The littoral combat ship Independence (LCS 2) underway during builder's trials.jpg
- File:US Navy 090712-N-0000G-002 The littoral combat ship Independence (LCS 2) underway during builder's trials.jpg
- File:US Navy 090702-N-XXXXG-007 The littoral combat ship Independence (LCS 2) underway during builder's trials.jpg
- File:US Navy 090702-N-XXXXG-005 The littoral combat ship Independence (LCS 2) underway during builder's trials.jpg
- File:US Navy 090712-N-0000G-006 The littoral combat ship Independence (LCS 2) underway during builder's trials.jpg
- File:US Navy 090712-N-0000G-003 The littoral combat ship Independence (LCS 2) underway during builder's trials.jpg
- File:US Navy 090712-N-0000G-001 The littoral combat ship Independence (LCS 2) underway during builder's trials.jpg
_underway_during_builder%27s_trials.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_underway_during_builder%27s_trials.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_underway_during_builder%27s_trials.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_underway_during_builder%27s_trials.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_underway_during_builder%27s_trials.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_underway_during_builder%27s_trials.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_underway_during_builder%27s_trials.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_underway_during_builder%27s_trials.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_underway_during_builder%27s_trials.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_underway_during_builder%27s_trials.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- +other pictures of the user:
- File:US Navy 050429-O-0000X-001 The U.S. Navy^rsquo,s newest amphibious ship, pre commissioning unit San Antonio (LPD 17), underway in the Gulf of Mexico for the first time during her initial at-sea testing.jpg
- File:US Navy 050627-O-0000X-001 The Pre-Commissioning Unit guided missile destroyer Forrest Sherman (DDG 98) underway in the Gulf of Mexico during sea trial exercises.jpg
,_underway_in_the_Gulf_of_Mexico_for_the_first_time_during_her_initial_at-sea_testing.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_underway_in_the_Gulf_of_Mexico_during_sea_trial_exercises.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- There are serveral more same pictures uploaede via the Bot. Please refer to Special:WhatLinksHere/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:US_Navy_090712-N-0000G-005_The_littoral_combat_ship_Independence_(LCS_2)_underway_during_builder's_trials.jpg, which lists about 50 pictures --Schlendrian (talk) 14:45, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
_underway_during_builder%27s_trials.jpg){kind=link}
Several more tagged with this DR:
- LRLAP Test.jpg
- USS Seawolf (SSN-21)-sea trials ,sep.16 1996 .jpg
- US Navy 020712-N-0000O-001 Texas Keel authentication.jpg
- US Navy 050119-O-0000X-001 The Pre-Commissioning Unit Kidd (DDG 100) is guided to the pier by tugboats in Pascagoula, Miss.jpg
- US Navy 070406-O-0000X-005 Virginia-class submarine North Carolina (SSN 777) is rolled out prior to her christening ceremony.jpg
- Waesche Sea Trials.jpg
- US Navy 030719-O-9999X-002 The amphibious transport dock ship Pre-Commissioning Unit San Antonio (LPD 17) floats along the Mississippi River at Northrop Grumman Ship Systems Avondale Operations in New Orleans.jpg
- US Navy 041006-N-9999X-001 Designated N-1, the first Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) slated for the Navy^rsquo,s Global Hawk Maritime Demonstration (GHMD) program, took flight for the first time on Oct. 6, 2004.jpg
- US Navy 050308-N-0000X-001 The 700-ton bow unit, the final keel section of the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier George H. W. Bush (CVN 77).jpg
- US Navy 050308-N-0000X-002 The 700-ton bow unit, the final keel section of the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier George H. W. Bush (CVN 77).jpg
- US Navy 050308-N-0000X-003 The 700-ton bow unit, the final keel section of the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier George H. W. Bush (CVN 77).jpg
- US Navy 050409-N-0775O-001 The U.S. Navy launches its second Virginia-class attack submarine, Pre Commissioning Unit (PCU) Texas (SSN 775).jpg
- US Navy 050725-O-0000X-001 Northrop Grumman's RQ-8A Fire Scout Vertical Takeoff and Landing Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (VTUAV) System test fires the second of two Mark-66 2.75-inch unguided rockets during weapons testing.jpg
- US Navy 050811-O-0000W-001 The first piece of steel, a 15-ton plate for a side shell unit of CVN 78, the first ship of the CVN 21 program, is cut at the Northrop Grumman Newport News shipyard.jpg
- US Navy 050811-O-0000W-002 The participates of the cutting for the first piece of steel for CVN 78, the first ship of the CVN 21 program, pose during a ceremony at Northrop Grumman Newport News shipyard.jpg
- US Navy 050811-O-0000W-003 Commander, Operational Test and Evaluation Force and Program Executive Officer for Aircraft Carriers, Rear Adm. David Architzel, signs the first steel plate cut for CVN 78, the first ship of the CVN 2.jpg
- US Navy 051026-0-0000B-001 Northrop Grumman rigger Albert McCoy assists in mounting the MK46 Mod 1 weapon system aboard the amphibious transport dock USS San Antonio (LPD 17).jpg
- US Navy 051026-0-0000B-002 Northrop Grumman rigger Albert McCoy assists in mounting the MK46 Mod 1 weapon system aboard the amphibious transport dock USS San Antonio (LPD 17).jpg
- US Navy 060810-O-9999B-010 A bow view of the Pre Commissioning Unit (PCU) Makin Island (LHD 8), which is currently under construction in Pascagoula.jpg
- US Navy 060819-O-0000X-001 Ship^rsquo,s sponsor Silke B. Hagee, wife of U.S. Marine Corps Commandant, Gen. Michael Hagee, smashed a champagne bottle against the hull of the Pre Commissioning Unit (PCU) Makin Island (LHD 8).jpg
- US Navy 060913-O-0000X-003 Virginia-class submarine North Carolina (SSN 777) reaches an important construction milestone as the final hull welds are completed.jpg
- US Navy 061010-O-0000X-004 Shipyard personnel work to build Virginia-class submarine North Carolina (SSN 777) while the boat is under contruction in Newport News.jpg
- US Navy 070322-O-0000X-006 Shipyard personnel complete the ceremonial bow cover for the christening of Virginia-class submarine North Carolina (SSN 777).jpg
- US Navy 070421-O-0000X-001 Sponsor Linda Anne Rich Bowman Christens the submarine North Carolina (SSN 777) during a ceremony at Northrop Grumman Newport News shipyard.jpg
- US Navy 070421-O-0000X-002 Approximately 2,500 people sit in attendance of the christening ceremony for the Navy^rsquo,s newest Virginia-class submarine USS North Carolina (SSN 777).jpg
- US Navy 090204-N-0000X-001 The amphibious assault ship Pre-Commissioning Unit (PCU) Makin Island (LHD 8) conducts builder's trials in the Gulf of Mexico.jpg
- US Navy 090204-N-0000X-002 The amphibious assault ship Pre-Commissioning Unit (PCU) Makin Island (LHD 8) conducts builder's trials in the Gulf of Mexico.jpg
- US Navy 090717-N-0000X-001 ponsor of the amphibious assault ship America (LHA 6), and Irwin F. Edenzon thank Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding welder James Sumlin Jr. for welding Pace's initials onto the keel plate during a keel au.jpg
- US Navy 091126-N-0000X-001 The Virginia-class attack submarine Pre-Commissioning Unit New Mexico (SSN 779) undergoes Bravo sea trials Nov. 26, 2009 in the Atlantic Ocean.jpg
- US Navy 100507-N-9999E-001 The amphibious transport dock ship Pre-Commissioning Unit (PCU) San Diego (LPD 22) is escorted by tugboats from Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding Ingalls shipyard.jpg
-sea_trials_,sep.16_1996_.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_is_guided_to_the_pier_by_tugboats_in_Pascagoula,_Miss.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_is_rolled_out_prior_to_her_christening_ceremony.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_floats_along_the_Mississippi_River_at_Northrop_Grumman_Ship_Systems_Avondale_Operations_in_New_Orleans.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_slated_for_the_Navy%5Ersquo,s_Global_Hawk_Maritime_Demonstration_(GHMD)_program,_took_flight_for_the_first_time_on_Oct._6,_2004.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Texas_(SSN_775).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_System_test_fires_the_second_of_two_Mark-66_2.75-inch_unguided_rockets_during_weapons_testing.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Makin_Island_(LHD_8),_which_is_currently_under_construction_in_Pascagoula.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Makin_Island_(LHD_8).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_reaches_an_important_construction_milestone_as_the_final_hull_welds_are_completed.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_while_the_boat_is_under_contruction_in_Newport_News.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_during_a_ceremony_at_Northrop_Grumman_Newport_News_shipyard.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Makin_Island_(LHD_8)_conducts_builder%27s_trials_in_the_Gulf_of_Mexico.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Makin_Island_(LHD_8)_conducts_builder%27s_trials_in_the_Gulf_of_Mexico.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_and_Irwin_F._Edenzon_thank_Northrop_Grumman_Shipbuilding_welder_James_Sumlin_Jr._for_welding_Pace%27s_initials_onto_the_keel_plate_during_a_keel_au.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_undergoes_Bravo_sea_trials_Nov._26,_2009_in_the_Atlantic_Ocean.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_San_Diego_(LPD_22)_is_escorted_by_tugboats_from_Northrop_Grumman_Shipbuilding_Ingalls_shipyard.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Wknight94 talk 11:55, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
- Delete yup, not free, should be deleted. Multichill (talk) 09:58, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
- Deleted: whatever one might think, Northrop Grumman is not the US federal government. Rama (talk) 10:01, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
AGM-65 looks all wrong. Source take me to blank page.. Marcus Aurelius (talk) 16:54, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Enlarged, it looks consistent with File:AGM-65 Maverick MG 1382.jpg and other images at Category:AGM-65 Maverick. Note that the fins are painted black in some of the images, including this one. The "exact source" link takes me to a defenseimagery.mil site and it seems very unlikely that a civilian took have taken this photograph. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:24, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Kept, source is ok, per Jameslwoodward. Kameraad Pjotr 17:21, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Unsure who "the great Robert Bayot" is, but seems to be out of COM:SCOPE. Jujutacular T · C 21:43, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete Also unused and the uploader's only contribution. Wknight94 talk 16:13, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Deleted, out of project scope. Kameraad Pjotr 19:22, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted drawing. Diego Grez return fire 00:16, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Keep See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Spanish Town Mardi Gras -The vp even made it into the parade.jpg Belgrano (talk) 00:46, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete the deletion request above was due to de minimis, which is not the case right here. ZooFari 01:35, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
- What leads the nominator to believe the drawing is copyrighted? If no reason, Keep. Infrogmation (talk) 01:57, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Come on, Infrogmation, you're an admin2, not a naive newbie. All art has a copyright, as you well know. I'd like to keep it, and it's in use in several places, but you need to give us a good reason why it's not a derivative work. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:26, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Deleted, derivative work of a copyrighted image. Kameraad Pjotr 20:46, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
kein amtliches Werk Ralf Roletschek (talk) 18:36, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted, per nominator. Kameraad Pjotr 20:33, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Files of User:MrABlair23
edit- File:W8nasf beg000005p.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:W8nafs beg000009p popup.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:W8nafs beg000010p popup.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:W8nafs beg000012p popup.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:W8nafs beg000014p popup.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:W8nafs begmap016aa.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:W8nafs beg000017p.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:W8nafs beg000018p.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:W8nafs beg000019p popup.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bulls In Africa.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:W8nafs begopn001p.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Reasons for deletion request: On request of uploader (see following dialog from User_talk:MrABlair23#Source_and_Other_versions and User_talk:Jan_Arkesteijn#Photos_on_Wikimedia_Commons)
- Hello MrABlair23, you mix up the fields Own work and Other versions. The link in Other versions should be in the field Source. Since these images are supposedly not your own work you can not license them with the text I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby release it into the public domain. Please go through your uploads and correct them. From the source it should be clear under which license you are allowed to publish them here. If there are any images that should be deleted, you can simply click the link at the left Report copyright violation. If you have any questions feel free and contact me. Kind regards, Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 20:19, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
- Hello! I see that you sent me a few messages saying that I did not have the correct permission for those images. Please delete those images as I don't want any trouble here. Thank you very much for your cooperation and time! MrABlair23 (talk) 21:50, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
--Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 08:57, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
InfoI have added two more files of User:MrABlair23 which had hrw.com as source. I always get an error when clicking on the link so I can't check the images. Would be interesting to ask hrw.com for permission. Amada44 (talk) 12:39, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Comment File:Bulls In Africa.jpg and File:W8nafs begopn001p.jpg are no copyright violations. Althoug the source is not accessible it is clear that these are older than 70 years. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 16:29, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- This image File:W8nafs_beg000017p.jpg is also older than 70 years. Amada44 talk to me 17:49, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- I think it's not, because of the explanatory text. That is probably to recent. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 18:10, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- This image File:W8nafs_beg000017p.jpg is also older than 70 years. Amada44 talk to me 17:49, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Hello! I know that I have caused some trouble here, but if you could please just delete these images, then that would really help me out. I have decided that with my contributions on here, I will just use a regular lecture format as I do not need photographs. Thank you very much for your time and cooperation and I do apologize for any confusion of any sort. --MrABlair23 (talk) 16:39, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Hi MrABlair. Don't worry, you are not causing any trouble! Well, the images are quite good. It would be nice if we could keep them. Are the images you have uploaded really in Public Domain? Could you maybe provide us with a valid url to the images? Amada44 talk to me 17:49, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Let's close this. The uploader asked to delete these files: "...but if you could please just delete these images, then that would really help me out." (See just a few lines before.) Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 20:23, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
All deleted (except for the rock art) as copyright violations. Kameraad Pjotr 21:01, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
This image has not been released to public domain. Quite an abuse!!! Please take it off. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.246.163.181 (talk • contribs)
- Comment outrage and complaints are not particularly helpful. What would help is to know who you are (if you are claiming personal knowledge), when this was made and by whom. Is this a modern image? If the seal dates back to the 1802 printed in the image in a substantially unchanged form, then it's not copyrighted any more.--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:11, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Comment I found this at the official webpage: © Grande Oriente Lusitano 2010Português: (missing text)Todos os textos podem ser publicados, desde que na íntegra e revelada a origem.English: (missing text)Only text and "all text" can be copied as long as you mention the origin. hope this is helpful — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.246.163.181 (talk • contribs)
- Keep First of all, the person who nominated it left this unsigned. That's our first reason to not delete it. Second, it dates back to 1802, so clearly copyright doesn't exist for this. Fry1989 (talk) 05:17, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- I would not like to reveal my name if i can. Thank you.! The G:.O:.L:.U:. Grande Oriente Lusitano Unido was the name back to 1802. The "U" of "united" was decreted and ceased by the organization from 1985. However it compete to you the proof of copyright image.
Kept, image from 1802 is in the public domain; also not signing a deletion request has no influence on the result of the debate. Kameraad Pjotr 20:31, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
The non-current version (19:54, 1 May 2009) was taken without permission by cornell.edu from goeasteurope.about.com. It has been on about.com for several years prior (as far back as April 7, 2006--see http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://goeasteurope.about.com/od/introtoeasteuropetravel/ig/Maps-of-Eastern-Europe/Map-of-Eastern-Europe.htm ). This map was obtained by the about.com editor for Eastern Europe Travel from Mountain High Maps ( http://mountainhighmap.com/ ), a company that sells maps for commercial purposes. This map was purchased, then it was edited specifically for Eastern Europe Travel at About.com. I helped the editor adjust some text in '06 so it was current for the time and to de-emphasize Turkey since it's not part of About's coverage of Eastern Europe. Obviously, it is no longer current, since Serbia and Montenegro are no longer one political unit. So, the non-current version of this map should be deleted as it was taken without permission and is not in the public domain. The current version can stay, for all I know. 134.53.219.194 20:29, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. - already processed by somebody else - Jcb (talk) 18:02, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
out of scope - unused logo of an amateur web game, related article was deleted in Dutch wikipedia for no notability nl:Wikipedia:Te_verwijderen_pagina's/Toegevoegd_20071123 Santosga (talk) 20:12, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
out of scope - unused logo of an amateur web game, related article was deleted in Dutch wikipedia for no notability nl:Wikipedia:Te_verwijderen_pagina's/Toegevoegd_20071123 Santosga (talk) 20:13, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete - per nom Cholo Aleman (talk) 04:07, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted by Mbdortmund (talk · contribs). ZooFari 01:45, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Files of User:EnG77
edit
Photo / logo of an out of scope band. Unused. --Jujutacular T · C 21:38, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:07, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Mario images from User:Dwayne
edit- File:Ani smb3 raccoonmario.gif
- File:Ani smb3 tanookimariospin.gif
- File:Ani smb3qblock.gif
- File:Tanooki.gif
Flickrwashing and copyrighted images from the Mario video games. fetchcomms☛ 23:49, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- I've gone ahead and tagged the three images that depict Mario for speedy deletion as copyright violations, as they are quite clearly such. As for the File:Ani smb3qblock.gif, I've left that be, as I'm not really sure about the status of the question block in terms of copyright. Thanks, ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 00:08, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Straight ahead copyvios IMO. Tabercil (talk) 02:11, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Blurpeace 07:14, 26 June 2010 (UTC)