Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/06/21
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
It is not educational, so it should be censored just like the other censored images. 67.238.157.247 08:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Heavily used image. No valid reason for deletion. Sreejith K (talk) 08:59, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Magazine cover. Carrousel 06:23, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:24, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
The file is too big and inspite of that, is not shown in large format (because of tif-Format?). I will upload in jpg again, if the three tif-Formats are deleted. ArishG (talk) 06:43, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Wvk (talk) 19:27, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
out of project scope Trex2001 (talk) 06:54, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 19:28, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
out of project scope Trex2001 (talk) 06:57, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 19:29, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 16:52, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
- Also:
- File:JermaineTroublezModelingSuit.jpg
- File:I Have To Be Famous Blaaad Clothing.jpg
- File:Jermaine Troublez.jpg
- File:Jermaine Troublez With Chrissy.jpg
- File:Jermaine Troublez Adidas.jpg
- File:Jermaine Troublez Modeling Clothing.jpg
- File:Jermaine Troublez Adidas Gold.jpg
- --Art-top (talk) 16:54, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Spam Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 18:13, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Unused private photo - out of project scope. See also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jermaine Troublez Modeling Adidas.jpg. Art-top (talk) 08:52, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted -- Leaving this after the last DR was my oversight -- no reason to take this further. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:39, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 09:04, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 19:31, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Sreejith K (talk) 09:11, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 19:32, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 09:16, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 19:33, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 09:23, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Also unused duplicate: File:Kumaran.c.pondicherry.jpg. --Art-top (talk) 09:24, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 19:34, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 09:27, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 19:35, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 09:28, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 19:36, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Personal photo, promotional, not reasonably useful for educational purposes. – JBarta (talk) 09:53, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 19:38, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio from here http://japanesephotolog.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/forest.jpg or other simolar web-sites BIT1982 (talk) 13:24, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio from here http://holisticwords.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/dark-hidden-universe.jpg or other Web-sites BIT1982 (talk) 13:26, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
No evidence of copyright permission by true owner ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 13:37, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio from here http://holisticwords.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/dark-hidden-universe.jpg or other Web-sites BIT1982 (talk) 13:52, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio from Web-site: http://nevseoboi.com.ua/uploads/posts/2012-04/1333393684-1803075-0059456_www.nevseoboi.com.ua.jpg or another BIT1982 (talk) 13:53, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio from Web-site http://www.win7wallpapers.com/wallpapers/rainbow_nature-2560x1600.jpg or another BIT1982 (talk) 13:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio from Web-site http://www.hdpixer.com/index.php/Nature/Nature_Images_Nature_HD_Wallpapers_-30 or another BIT1982 (talk) 13:56, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio from Web-site: http://nevseoboi.com.ua/uploads/posts/2012-04/1333393684-1803075-0059456_www.nevseoboi.com.ua.jpg or another BIT1982 (talk) 13:56, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio from Web-site http://wallpapers5.com/images/wallpapers/51802045/Photography/Vista-Lake-New-Hampshire.jpg or another BIT1982 (talk) 13:58, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio from Web-site http://img6.xooimage.com/files/2/d/7/paysage_paradisiaque-4211a5.jpg or another BIT1982 (talk) 13:59, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio from Web-site http://img6.xooimage.com/files/2/d/7/paysage_paradisiaque-4211a5.jpg or another BIT1982 (talk) 14:00, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio from Web-site http://wall-pack.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Nature-Wallpapers-Part-10-8.jpg or another BIT1982 (talk) 14:05, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio from Web-site http://wall-pack.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Nature-Wallpapers-Part-10-8.jpg or another BIT1982 (talk) 14:21, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio from Web-sites according to Google image search BIT1982 (talk) 14:31, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Jin S. Chun requests that we delete this photo please. Anotherdannylee (talk) 15:27, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Wvk (talk) 19:41, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 15:37, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 19:42, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized, bad quality photo. Probably not famous group - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 16:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 19:44, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0) Moros y Cristianos 16:43, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Be careful, the picture's website is BY-NC-SA 3.0 but cleary indicates "sauf mention contraire" in french ("unless otherwise stated"). And if you look under the picture here (http://evasas2012.fr/photo-wiki/), you'll see that the picture is CC BY-SA 3.0. So this request should be closed and this picture should be kept. Vinz1789 (talk) 16:53, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- You are correct. I overlooked, sorry. Moros y Cristianos 17:02, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Unused private picture - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 16:49, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: test page without valid content Wvk (talk) 19:46, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
private album picture, out of project scope Motopark (talk) 18:04, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 19:53, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
The image is of low resolution and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 18:48, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio Sreejith K (talk) 19:06, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Breach of copyright this is my image. can you please give me details of the person who has breached the copyright so that I can pursue the matter. Thank you. Bigwhitto (talk) 19:00, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio to http://www.flickr.com/photos/whitto/6116049657/ Sreejith K (talk) 19:05, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Fake, blocked user in german Wikipedia Ralf Roleček 20:05, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted, due to improper file description. --32X (talk) 20:45, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Fake, blocked user in german Wikipedia Ralf Roleček 20:06, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted, due to improper file description. --32X (talk) 20:45, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
The model requested so. Torres Ibarzo 20:54, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:04, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
no permission by photographer, not covered by license Polarlys (talk) 22:00, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Same angle as in dhm.de. The DHM is just a foundation of the FRG, thus Template:PD-GermanGov is not valid here. --32X (talk) 12:44, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
I think it is obvious that the flickr user satin_shirt is not the copyright holder of this uploads . Its just a fan of the series who created a fan album and klicked some wrong buttons so that his/her uploads are now under a Creative Commons license... an invalid license. A case of flickrvio and a case for the list of bad flickr users. here is a collection of this promo photos in large quality, Martin H. (talk) 22:33, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
So do i delete all the files i uploaded now???Boseritwik (talk) 22:33, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Sure.
- File:Alyson Hannigan as Lily Aldrin (4).jpg is (C) by CBS as written in the EXIF
- File:Alyson Hannigan as Lily Aldrin (2).jpg says © 2008-2009 Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation in the EXIF data
- The portraits with the yellow background are taken from a website such as fanpop, give the files a google similarity search and you will find them all over the web, even in large size.
- File:How I Met Your Mother Season 5 photoshoot (6).jpg and your other 'photoshoot' uploads have also EXIF information saying Photo: Monty Brinton/CBS©2005 CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved
- And I think thats already all uploads. Step one of uploading files from Flickr: Please critically evaluate if the flickr uploder is the copyright holder. Regretably there are so many people on flickr who just upload what they like or what they found on the web but not what they created themself. I will remove the How I Met Your Mother photos coming from that flickr user quickly, if you not disagree. --Martin H. (talk) 22:44, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Clear copyvios. Yann (talk) 18:21, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
I doubt that the uploader has the copyright of this image. ALE! ¿…? 08:54, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Like all (!!) other photos uploaded by this user: grabbed from the web. Martin H. (talk) 12:25, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope: a private research project Mootros (talk) 08:45, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Keep - File in use. So not {{Out of scope}} --Sreejith K (talk) 08:47, 21 June 2012 (UTC)- Why do you think this is out of scope? -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 18:49, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Withdrawn by nominator: Keep pls, after review of situation. Mootros (talk) 01:58, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Comes from File:F-16XL Scamp Flow Visualization Test - GPN-2000-001935.jpg and is definitely not "own work". Ariadacapo (talk) 08:48, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:F-16XL-WindTunnel.jpg Mys 721tx (talk) 00:16, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
promotional image used only for promotional page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 03:34, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:36, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:21, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:37, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:26, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:39, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:26, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:38, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:26, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:39, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Unused logo of not significant organization. Doubtful authorship. Art-top (talk) 15:16, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:41, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Questionable relevance to the project this unused scheme. Art-top (talk) 15:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:02, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
uploaded as part of admitted hoax page that is now deleted DS (talk) 15:30, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:02, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Overindulgence, compare. Out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 16:02, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom, not the logo of the company --AtelierMonpli (talk) 02:13, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:03, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Logo of not famous organization - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 16:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:04, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized, without descripiton. Unknown destination - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 18:15, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:04, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope; no encyclopedic use possible High Contrast (talk) 20:12, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:04, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 20:13, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:05, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album; this image is not used on any wikimedia project High Contrast (talk) 20:17, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:05, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 22:15, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:07, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 22:16, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:07, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
All files uploaded by Johanekensjo (talk · contribs)
editImages are derivative works of sculptures/figurines/etc. by Lisa Larson (website), who is still alive (i.e. PD/CC0 license would require permission from her). Nominated for deletion instead of speedy due to sheer volume which would clog the speedy category - special:nuke function would be necessary.
- File:VäggplattorRyttare1959.jpg
- File:LillaZooBison-2-1955.jpg
- File:SpottedSpanielKG.jpg
- File:BullterrierKG.jpg
- File:TigerKG.jpg
- File:Ansiktsvas.jpg
- File:Vänner.jpg
- File:Gustavsberg Boat.jpg
- File:1978NoaksArkLejon.jpg
- File:VäggplattorÄppelträd1977.jpg
- File:AfganF.jpg
- File:PudelKG.jpg
- File:Teater.jpg
- File:Garderob.jpg
- File:SkulpturerSyskon1977.jpg
- File:AllVärldensBarnVäst1974.jpg
- File:Tekanna elefant.jpg
- File:PomonaJordgubbar1971.jpg
- File:SköldpaddorSköldpaddaA1963.jpg
- File:NoaksArkPingvin1978.jpg
- File:BassetVov.jpg
- File:Vikingar på häst.jpg
- File:Änglar.jpg
- File:Kungaparet.jpg
- File:SvanJie.jpg
- File:BulldogKG.jpg
- File:Skolpojke.jpg
- File:SekelskifteGustav1973.jpg
- File:SkulpturerSommarklädd1977.jpg
- File:KattMoses.jpg
- File:1973SekelskifteViktoria.jpg
- File:BurkMedLock2.jpg
- File:UtrotningshotadeDjurUtter1980.jpg
- File:UtrotningshotadeDjurIgelkott1979.jpg
- File:UtrotningshotadeDjurVisent1978.jpg
- File:UtrotningshotadeDjurSäl1977.jpg
- File:UtrotningshotadeDjurKungsörn1976.jpg
- File:UtrotningshotadeDjurLodjur1975.jpg
- File:Fotbollsspelare1979.jpg
- File:LillskansenBjörn1978.jpg
- File:LillskansenPonny1978.jpg
- File:LillskansenIsbjörn1978.jpg
- File:Advent1978.jpg
- File:NoaksArkSjölejon1978.jpg
- File:NoaksArkEkorre1978.jpg
- File:NoaksArkDromedar1978.jpg
- File:SkulpturerThailändska1977.jpg
- File:VäggplattorGlädjehus1977.jpg
- File:SkansenRen1976.jpg
- File:SkansenFjällhare1976.jpg
- File:SkansenBjörn1976.jpg
- File:SkansenIsbjörn1976.jpg
- File:KattMurre1975-2-.jpg
- File:AllVärldensBarn1974-75.jpg
- File:Sträng1972.jpg
- File:Adam&Evaa21972.jpg
- File:Adam&EvaB1972.jpg
- File:KennelSpaniel1972.jpg
- File:KennelFläckigSpaniel1972.jpg
- File:KennelSkyeterrier1972.jpg
- File:KennelPekinges1972.jpg
- File:KennelAfgan1972.jpg
- File:KennelTax1972.jpg
- File:KennelSkotte1972.jpg
- File:KennelBulldogA1972.jpg
- File:KennelBulldogC1972.jpg
- File:KennelBulldogB1972.jpg
- File:KennelBoxer1972.jpg
- File:JuraKamel1971.jpg
- File:JuraNoshörning1971.jpg
- File:JuraStoraKatten1971.jpg
- File:PomonaNypon1971.jpg
- File:PomonaPlommon1971.jpg
- File:FjärilsplattorFjärilsplattaA1971.jpg
- File:TrafficLuftballongB1970.jpg
- File:TrafficLuftballongA1970.jpg
- File:TrafficElefant1970.jpg
- File:TrafficBil1970.jpg
- File:GuldträdA1968.jpg
- File:TrippTrappTrullTrull1968.jpg
- File:PudlarPudelB1963.jpg
- File:LeghornKyckling1968.jpg
- File:LeghornHöna1968.jpg
- File:Samhällsdebatten1968.jpg
- File:Fågelskrämma1968.jpg
- File:DrabantD1967.jpg
- File:DrabantA1967.jpg
- File:PippiLångstrump1967.jpg
- File:StrongLjusstakeA1967.jpg
- File:VäggplattorGarden1966.jpg
- File:VäggplattorAlbertina1959.jpg
- File:HarlekinVäggplattaB1960.jpg
- File:VäggplattorJubileum1966.jpg
- File:VäggplattorDrillsnäppa1966.jpg
- File:RundelFjäril1966.jpg
- File:BiskoparBiskopA1963.jpg
- File:MenageriDromedar1965.jpg
- File:MenageriSpökmus1965.jpg
- File:MenageriFlodhäst1965.jpg
- File:MenageriKatt1965.jpg
- File:FåglarFågelB1964.jpg
- File:FåglarFågelA1964.jpg
- File:AfrikaTiger1964.jpg
- File:AfrikaLejonB1964.jpg
- File:KarolinVasA1964.jpg
- File:AfrikaElefant1964.jpg
- File:VäggplattorSolros1963.jpg
- File:VäggplattorGamlaStan1963.jpg
- File:VäggplattorFågelB1963.jpg
- File:VäggplattorFågelA1963.jpg
- File:VäggplattorFisk1963.jpg
- File:MiniatyrerSjöjungfru1963.jpg
- File:MiniatyrerFiskare1963.jpg
- File:MatildaAdventsgris1963.jpg
- File:LarsonsUngarSusanna1961.jpg
- File:LarsonsUngarJohanna1961.jpg
- File:LarsonsUngarMalin1961.jpg
- File:LarsonsUngarPelle1961-2-.jpg
- File:LarsonsUngarPelle1961.jpg
- File:LarsonsUngarLotta1961.jpg
- File:LarsonsUngarKalle1961.jpg
- File:UnikSolros1961.jpg
- File:UnikSkepp1961.jpg
- File:UnikRyttare1961.jpg
- File:UnikKattB1961.jpg
- File:UnikKattA1961.jpg
- File:UnikElefant1961.jpg
- File:UnikFåglar1961.jpg
- File:UnikDam1961.jpg
- File:UnikBlad1961.jpg
- File:ThaliaVasB1960.jpg
- File:ThaliaSpegel1960.jpg
- File:ThaliaAskfatB1960.jpg
- File:JosefinTekopp1960.jpg
- File:HarlekinVäggplatta1960.jpg
- File:HarlekinSpegel1960.jpg
- File:GranadaGolvvas1959.jpg
- File:SkulpturerStinaMedKatt1958.jpg
- File:SkulpturerJapanska1958.jpg
- File:StoraZooFlodhäst1965.jpg
- File:StoraZooKatt1957.jpg
- File:StoraZooÄlg1957.jpg
- File:StoraZooIsbjörn1957.jpg
- File:StoraZooÅsna1959.jpg
- File:StoraZooKänguru1965.jpg
- File:StoraZooKatt1965.jpg
- File:StoraZooZebra1957.jpg
- File:StoraZooBulldog1959.jpg
- File:StoraZooGiraff1957.jpg
- File:StoraZooFlodhäst1957.jpg
- File:StoraZooKo1959.jpg
- File:VarietéFatA1956.jpg
- File:LillaZooSittandeKatt1955.jpg
- File:LillaZooTax1955.jpg
- File:LillaZooHäst1955.jpg
- File:LillaZooStåendeKatt1955.jpg
- File:LillaZooLiggandeKatt1955.jpg
- File:LillaZooRäv1955.jpg
- File:LillaZooBison1955.jpg
- File:ABC-flickorEmma1958.jpg
- File:ABC-flickorDora1958.jpg
- File:ABC-flickorCharlotta1958.jpg
- File:ABC-flickorBeata1958.jpg
- File:ABC-flickorAmalia1958.jpg
- File:KattMurre1975.jpg
- File:Matilda Adventsgris.jpeg
- File:LisaLarson3.jpg
- File:LisaLarson2.jpg
- File:LisaLarsonBurk1.jpg
- File:LisaLarsonEkorrar.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 00:10, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted as derived works of copyrighted art by en:Lisa Larson. We need a documented permission by the copyright holder sent to our OTRS team to keep them. Note that all pictures can be restored once such a permission is given. --AFBorchert (talk) 04:33, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Not clear if those screenshots contents really "own work". Who is the photographer of the shown images and videos? Please see Commons:Screenshots.
Saibo (Δ∇) 02:08, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted as derived works of other copyrighted pictures and logos. --AFBorchert (talk) 05:03, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by EdouardDeloin (talk · contribs)
editOut of Commons:Project scope: Marketing diagrams. Not used.
- File:ADSAS Communication Référencement Wikipedia Images Prévisionnel&Budget.jpg
- File:ADSAS Communication Référencement Wikipedia Images ERP.jpg
- File:ADSAS Communication Référencement Wikipedia Images DPO.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:40, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Amia Miley Exxxotica Miami 2009
edit- File:Amia_Miley_Exxxotica_Miami_2009_(1).jpg
- File:Amia_Miley_Exxxotica_Miami_2009_(2).jpg
- File:Amia_Miley_Exxxotica_Miami_2009.jpg
There was a simple mistake done when the files were tagged, this is not Ameia Miley. She is an event model that happen to be working at Exxxotica Miami that year. Due to her face being tagged as this pornstar media outlets are using her images when a story of Ameia Miley comes up. The most recent the Kanye West incident. I personally know the model in the pictures, and she has asked me to do everything I can to have her pictures removed in any place that connects her to the porn star Ameia Miley.
I am asking if you can please delete the images, or edit them so they do not say Amia Miley and instead a Model at Exxxotica Miami.
I am the duly authorized representative of the exclusive rights holder for [1] Modeling Material for online publication.
I have a good faith belief that the use of this material in such a fashion is not authorized by the copyright holder, the copyright holder's agent, or the law; Under penalty of perjury in a United States court of law, I state that the information contained in this notification is accurate, and that I am authorized to act on the behalf of the exclusive rights holder for the material in question; I hereby request that you remove or disable access to this material as it appears on your service in as expedient a fashion as possible. Thank you. Ramon Perez
--98.203.23.44 13:57, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Kept:Files renamed and removed all references to Amia Miley by User:Mattbuck. --Sreejith K (talk) 16:47, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PinkyWinklet (talk · contribs)
editOut of scope, personal photos. Commons is not Facebook.
- File:Pinky Winklet 2.jpg
- File:Focused Winkle.jpg
- File:Hit up Winkle.jpg
- File:Winkle Works.jpg
- File:Pinky Winklet Collage.jpg
- File:Winkle at her best.jpg
- File:Pinky Winklet.jpg
– JBarta (talk) 17:54, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 19:52, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Appear to be random personal photos lacking any educational usefulness.
– JBarta (talk) 21:53, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:06, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Commons:Screenshots not obeyed (unless my zh-0 is not enough to understand the desc. text). Who is the photographer of the thumbnail photo inside the screenshot? Who wrote the texts? Those people's permission would be needed. Note: In use in article zh:皮尔卡卡洛 which is/was up for deletion: zh:Wikipedia:頁面存廢討論/記錄/2012/06/21#.E7.9A.AE.E5.B0.94.E5.8D.A1.E5.8D.A1.E6.B4.9B.
Saibo (Δ∇) 22:07, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
also:
Delete - Out of scope. Personal stuff, screenshots and collectively appears to be an attempt to defame. – JBarta (talk) 22:42, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - Personal photo for File:皮卡自爆照.jpg, not free licensed. File:皮卡米兰吧首贴.JPG, File:皮卡在米兰吧的首贴.JPG and File:毛左.JPG are copyright violation because it include a website screenshot and the license of the website is Copyright Reserved. (I am a ZH-n user)--Waihorace (talk) 13:54, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
- Just out of curiosity, can you offer a rough summary translation of the messages/filenames? Are all four images connected and what's the story with them? – JBarta (talk) 18:23, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. JuTa 07:07, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Doubtful authorship - see (c) on picture. Art-top (talk) 03:54, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Indeed, this is doubtful and it is also questionable how this fits into our scope. AFBorchert (talk) 05:11, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Tagged on enwiki as "This image is believed to be non-free or possibly non-free in its home country, the United Kingdom." Bulwersator (talk) 06:35, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - Just plain text --Sreejith K (talk) 07:16, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Kept as this is not an infringement of copyright per Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, section 54 (1) (c). --AFBorchert (talk) 05:21, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
modern painting with details of no author or date http://kumarmohit.com/2008/09/12/shrimad-bhagwad-gita-in-pictures/ Napoleon 100 (talk) 07:11, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: For {{PD-Art}} to be applied we need the author of this artwork, its first publication etc. AFBorchert (talk) 05:27, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
File:Desarrollo e Implementación de la Gestión del Conocimiento en el Parlamento de Finlandia.pdf
editOut of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 07:12, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- What is your conception of the scope of this project? This book can (and will) be used in Spanish Wikisource. --B1mbo (talk) 03:35, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
- Commons has an official "conception" of scope: COM:PS. Text articles do not belong to Commons. 07:07, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
- Then, you should start reading that page. It doesn't say that "text" do not belong to Commons... it says "raw text" or text not containing educational material, something that doesn't apply here. Even in that case, there is an exception when it can be used for other project like Wikisource. --B1mbo (talk) 00:40, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- Commons has an official "conception" of scope: COM:PS. Text articles do not belong to Commons. 07:07, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Kept: We keep copies of published books at Commons. This is within the scope and serves the Wikisource projects. AFBorchert (talk) 05:34, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
no copyrigt status given http://www.bhagavata.org/images/pictures/picturesc12-2.html Napoleon 100 (talk) 07:14, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: {{PD-Art}} cannot be used without considering the first publication of the artwork and its author. AFBorchert (talk) 05:38, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
all uploads from this user: copyvio McZusatz (talk) 19:47, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 09:12, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
SVG at File:Bear Brotherhood flag.svg Fry1989 eh? 21:38, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 09:12, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
full or partially copyvio - see http://www.bfoto.ru/bfoto_ru_1690.php Kaganer (talk) 09:33, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 18:40, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
Listed as copyright 2011 to Silver Screen Collection at Getty Images. We hope (talk) 00:59, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- It's unlikely that she would have signed, in 2011, a photo of herself in 1970. This is an obvious publicity photo given to the press and fans, like others. A boilerplate notice posted online by a stock photo supplier would have no bearing - they have hundreds of thousands of various images which they resell only, and rarely, if ever, claim "true" copyright ownership. If it was created and/or signed as a current photo, publication would have been at that time, not 2011. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 01:20, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- There's nothing stopping someone from not publishing a photo taken in 1970 until now and also nothing stopping someone from signing a photo which was taken years before. We hope (talk) 01:35, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- There is plenty stopping a person from doing those things: common sense. A singer still performing would not logically give someone a 40-year-old picture instead of a current one. If the image was published around 1970, there is nothing related to Streisand that was renewed during the 10 years before or after the required renewal date. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 01:40, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- There's nothing stopping someone from not publishing a photo taken in 1970 until now and also nothing stopping someone from signing a photo which was taken years before. We hope (talk) 01:35, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
The photo is listed with a 2011 copyright and it is possible that it was not published until then, but taken in 1970. There's nothing said about who had the photo and asked for the signature, which the person had every right to refuse to do if desired. We hope (talk) 01:53, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- The law goes by what's reasonable, not what's physically "possible." --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 02:20, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- And both premises are reasonable given the information at hand. There is a 2011 copyright notice, and it's up to the individual whether he/she wishes to sign an older photo. We hope (talk) 02:46, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 23:42, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
No proof given that it was published "without a copyright notice" as claimed in the copyright indication tag. Saibo (Δ∇) 01:24, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- The original photo uploaded shows the full photo and border without any copyright. See film still to understand why publicity images were traditionally not copyrighted. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 01:31, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- What about the backside of the photo? Was it not enough to note the © there? Cheers --Saibo (Δ∇) 02:14, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Extremely rare for publicity photos. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 02:23, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- "Extremely rare" chance that it is copyrighted is not satisfying COM:PRP. --Saibo (Δ∇) 13:28, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- It seems to satisfy it: "to the best of our knowledge are free or freely-licensed. . . where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file it should be deleted." Per film still, there is essentially no doubt. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 03:13, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- "Extremely rare" chance that it is copyrighted is not satisfying COM:PRP. --Saibo (Δ∇) 13:28, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Extremely rare for publicity photos. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 02:23, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- What about the backside of the photo? Was it not enough to note the © there? Cheers --Saibo (Δ∇) 02:14, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: failure to comply with license requirements - no verification possible without having access to uncropped front and back side of the image Denniss (talk) 23:36, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
not fro real source P. Sridhar Babu (talk) 07:21, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 10:38, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
http://www.bhagavata.org/images/pictures/picturesc10-part4-1.html nocopyright status given Napoleon 100 (talk) 07:17, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted as {{PD-Art}} cannot be used without an associated proof that it applies, i.e. who created the artwork, where was it published first etc. --AFBorchert (talk) 05:43, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Tagged on enwiki as "This image is believed to be non-free or possibly non-free in its home country, Canada." Bulwersator (talk) 06:34, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:13, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Tagged on enwiki as "This image is believed to be non-free or possibly non-free in its home country, India. " Bulwersator (talk) 06:37, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:17, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Doubtful authorship, license. Art-top (talk) 09:05, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:12, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
File:Bespreking ANDERSON CHRIS FREE Hoe het nieuwe Gratis de markt radicaal verandert Nieuw Amsterdam Amsterdam 2009.pdf
editOut of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:09, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:20, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
SVG at File:Flag of Peru.svg Fry1989 eh? 21:37, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:19, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
"The Boeing Company" should be US gov't? Not really, huh? Saibo (Δ∇) 21:50, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:16, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
No evidence of permission for {{PD-user}}. Possibly {{PD-USGov}} but there is no useful source. Stefan4 (talk) 01:02, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:55, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Bogus copyright tag. Where did the author publish that into the public domain? If he did not: when was this first published? It may be old enough to be public domain due to age. Saibo (Δ∇) 01:36, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:19, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely self-release; logo is of an international group, not likely that the uploader owns it. Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:58, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:37, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Doubtful authorship - low resolution for own work. Art-top (talk) 03:50, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:53, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
i dont see the purpose, out of scope Trex2001 (talk) 06:56, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:59, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
For copyright notices concerning the individual images please look at the bottom of the chapter they belong to. This page was last modified: September 17, 111 But nothing found Napoleon 100 (talk) 07:20, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:38, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
It is a non-free MTR ticket picture.-- 寿司猫 (talk) 07:37, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:06, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
This file is a duplicate of File:Ayahuasca -19.jpg but the files has different authors. One of these is a copyrigth violation. Sreejith K (talk) 07:39, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:38, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
I tagged this with {{subst:npd}} but the uploader removed the tag. This still doesn't have any evidence of permission. Stefan4 (talk) 09:04, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:24, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no FOP in Belgium. True, but has this building enough originality to be copyrightable? -- Túrelio (talk) 09:05, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:35, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
- What??? Why is this image deleted? This is just destroying wikipedia.
This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no FOP in Belgium. True, but has this building enough originality to be copyrightable? -- Túrelio (talk) 09:06, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:09, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Doubtful educational use (who is DAR?). Doubtful authorship - professional photo in low resolution, a single image, uploaded by user. Art-top (talk) 09:16, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:01, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Derivative work of complex printing on an ashtray. Stefan4 (talk) 09:19, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:24, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio. Art-top (talk) 09:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:23, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Doubtful authorship - derivative work without original author permission. Art-top (talk) 09:27, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:33, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Doubtful authorship - low resolution for own work, no original exif. Art-top (talk) 09:29, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:56, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
This picture is copyrighted by the author as stated in its original page http://www.panoramio.com/photo/24133408 Sentausa (talk) 09:40, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:30, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:10, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:52, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:10, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:58, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:11, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:44, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. No permission, see second page of the file. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:11, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:44, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope, no permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:12, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:44, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:12, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:16, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope, no permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:18, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:19, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:05, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:20, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:59, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:20, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:04, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:20, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:11, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:20, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:37, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:20, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:37, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:27, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:24, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:44, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 17:22, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:57, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Mit der Lizenz nicht vereinbare Nebenbedingungen des Uploaders im Beschreibungstext. Jergen (talk) 11:48, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:16, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
This copy of image has many impurities so I have to upload another one. Shaivya1998 (talk) 13:00, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:41, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Speedy copyvio tag removed by uploader however clearly a copyright violation as it stands based on http://www.seenmag.co.uk/news-and-features/homotopia.phuse Herby talk thyme 16:31, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:17, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
I don't think this falls under Freedom of Panorama, it doesn't look very permanent. Vera (talk) 16:46, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:00, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Doubtful authorship - low resolution for own work, rare photo. Art-top (talk) 18:06, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Scrinshot without permission. Art-top (talk) 18:10, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:54, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Unused logo of organization of questionable significance. Dubious value to the project. Art-top (talk) 18:20, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:16, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: non-permanent art Sreejith K (talk) 18:49, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:25, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: derivative of works by living artist; due to inside-location, not covered by FOP. -- Sreejith K (talk) 19:03, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:55, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
The image is of quite low resolution and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 20:16, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:14, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
no freedom of panorama in us FunkMonk (talk) 20:21, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:17, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Th uploader set {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} but used a actual date. The named source website does not exist or is not reachable. JuTa 22:41, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:55, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
This file is an edit of a previously deleted file. See a similar fulfilled request here. Scarce2 (talk) 23:06, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:22, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
tagged on enwiki as "This image is believed to be non-free or possibly non-free in its home country, Australia." Bulwersator (talk) 06:33, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Delete Definitely could be copyrightable. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 18:18, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion. MBisanz talk 02:49, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Image is a gif file that has been added to infoboxes on several articles Wikipedia articles. Not educationally useful and of poor quality. Wesley☀Mouse 15:36, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Einspruch! Würden Sie mir genau erklären welche qualität parameter nicht passt? Das ist nur eine Animation über Beleuchtung. Welche Bedeutungserklärung sollte das File noch haben? Ich wollte nicht unhöflich sein. Das ist doch lächerlich.--Mr (talk) 17:24, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Baku Crystall Hall lights up the night sky normal appearance. At present, there is not any alternative to Commons. --►Safir yüzüklü Ceklimesaj 03:46, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason to delete has been given. File is in use on other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation, so it is useful for an educational purpose.--Melikov Memmed (talk) 04:01, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Baku Crystall Hall lights up the night sky normal appearance. At present, there is not any alternative to Commons.--Acategory (talk) 11:42, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep There is no need to delete this file that is in use on WMF projects--Orartu (talk) 16:19, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep I think quality is not so bad, and image is very useful to show how Crystal Hall lights on the night. --Interfase (talk) 08:23, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
- Comment - It may be "lovely" as it "lights up the night sky", but is it relevant to articles within the scope of Wikipedia policies? Gif images such as this, shouldn't be mass-added into infoboxes on article, per Manual of Style policies; something which the same editor seems to be doing regardless of manual of style preferences. A GIF image is supposed to be placed within the article itself, not the sidebar boxes of the article. It is also obvious the image itself has been self-produced by an editor using gif-making software. And if that is the case, we would also need to establish if the original frame-by-frame images are copyright or not. If the user has used several copyright-protected images to produce a gif like this, then the entire file alone will be in violation of copyright. Wesley☀Mouse 17:32, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
- Antwort:Ihre Argumentation ist nicht Nachvollziehbar. 1.Wie GIF File verwendet sein soll das überlasse ich für User . User soll selbst entscheiden wo will GIF- File benutzen.
2.Für dieses GIF-File herzustellen ist von mir 3 Bilder verwendet wurde (editor using gif-making software-Photoscape). Alle 3 Bilder wurde von mir aufgenommen (direkt fotografiert - intervallaufnahme mit Pentax K5). Die gehören nur mir und veröffentliche die gerne. Ich kann das jeder Zeit beweisen. (Sollte ich alle 3 Bilder Hochladen? Kein Problem.;;)--Mr (talk) 06:06, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Leider gilt in Aserbaidschan keine Panoramafreiheit. Delete. -- File:Robert Weemeyer (talk) 15:22, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- Dann sollte die Bilder:(Z.B. ,
, , , ...) auch gelöscht werden?--Mr (talk) 15:38, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Ich find's auch schade, aber dieses Problem dürfte für die meisten Bilder in der Kategorie:Baku Crystal Hall gelten. Wenn die Bilder nach de.wikipedia.org hochgeladen worden wären statt nach Commons, sähe es wohl anders aus. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 16:00, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- Wie können wir diese problem lösen?--Mr (talk) 16:37, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Wenn die Bilder auf Commons bleiben sollen, braucht man a) eine Änderung der Commons-Regeln, b) eine Änderung des aserbaidschanischen Gesetzes oder c) eine Genehmigung es Architekten. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 21:14, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- And in English!? Not everyone knows German, so you should at least provide an English translation to your comment, otherwise English speakers will think something ignorant is taking place. Thank you, Wesley☀Mouse 10:40, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for the translation. So technically, the way around FoP, would be to open arbitration, would that be correct? Then a community-wide discussion can take place in order to review FoP issues on these and other images currently prohibited and in violation of commons policies. Wesley☀Mouse 23:03, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
- Keep This picture does not have any problem.--Ebrahimi-amir (talk) 06:43, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion. MBisanz talk 02:50, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Source website says "El material de esta web está bajo una licencia Creative Commons y puede ser redistribuido bajo ciertas condiciones. Bajo licencia GNU/GPL", but does not state which CC license, so it may also be CC-NC or CC-ND, which are not allowed on Commons. In addition, the true photographer is unknown (to us). I don't want to delete this image, but currently the true license status is unclear. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:36, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- GNU/GPL not CC. But the problem is that the website holds the copyright on their own texts, but not on photos that the reproduce from elsewhere. In this case the newspaper scanned at http://jacintoconvitcic.blogspot.de/2010/11/revista-exceso.html. So the GNU/GPL from the website not applies to this third party content. --Martin H. (talk) 10:44, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 09:17, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
No explanation given why this photo is no DW of the sculpture by artist Evgeniy Vuchetich. Saibo (Δ∇) 01:20, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Isn't it published in the US legally-speaking and without a copyright notice?--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:17, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
This is a two-dimensional representation of a copyrighted sculpture, statue or any other three-dimensional work of art. As such it is a derivative work of art, and per US Copyright Act of 1976, 106(2) who owns copyright of the original has the exclusive right to authorize derivative works. Per 107 it is believed that reproduction for criticism, comment, teaching and scholarship constitutes fair use and does not infringe copyright.
- We don't do fair use. The question is, is does there persist copyright in the original?--Prosfilaes (talk) 06:51, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
3 other images of this statue have been on Wikimedia for some time... http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=swords+to+plowshares&title=Special%3ASearch
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that this file is indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host it on Commons FASTILY (TALK) 07:53, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
This art is not a Vladimir Makovsky. This art pain by Konstantin Makovsky. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Konstantin_Makovsky_-_Children_running_from_a_thunderstorm_-_1872.jpg&oldid=64932216 193.93.122.6 10:26, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- The description of the file could be corrected, but as File:Konstantin Makovsky - Children running from a thunderstorm - 1872.jpg is a better alternative, this file could be deleted altogether. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 23:08, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:52, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Poor quality - striped. Corrupted? Lymantria (talk) 08:31, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - This is the original file from the source. The bug was identified and the image should probably be re-uploaded after it has been processed per Help:JPEG#Color_model. --Bensin (talk) 20:29, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: after uploading an uncorrupted version of the file SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 13:59, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
I don't think mynewsdesk.com can give a license for this file, as it is not the creator. Yann (talk) 12:00, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - The nominator's statement is correct, but the permission is not given by mynewsdesk.com. The permission is given by the copyright owner Sony Music, who manages the account at mynewsdesk.com. Neither does flickr grant us permission to use images. The flicker users do. This is the same thing. --Bensin (talk) 14:06, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Comment If it's Sony that manages the account then the cover is properly licenced (and Flickr is not a good example, because you cannot always be sure that the uploader on Flickr is actually the copyright owner. In this case we might be reasonably sure it's actually Sony who release their own material). -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 21:54, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
- Comment I guess your point is that the license issued by Sony's account at mynewsdesk.com is at least as reliable as a license issued by a random flickr user's account. In that case I agree and thank you for pointing out that distinction. --Bensin (talk) 00:55, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Delete Several people listed as the Sony BMG Sweden contacts on the MyNewsDesk pages have been sent a number of emails requesting confirmation of the copyright status of the Sony images on MyNewsDesk but they have failed to respond one way or the other. See COM:VPC#MyNewsDesk images. Without an OTRS confirmation this must go. Ww2censor (talk) 20:27, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Comment The discussion on VPC linked above is already archived [2], it would be interesting, if there are any news from MyNewsDesk by now. --Funfood ␌ 18:11, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Comment if there is permission given, where is the OTRS request? PumpkinSky talk 22:02, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that this file is indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host it on Commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fastily (talk • contribs)
and File:Markoolio - Borta bra men hemma bäst cover.jpg
I don't think mynewsdesk.com can give a license for this file, as it is not the creator. Yann (talk) 12:08, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - Per arguments for similar case at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Chris_Medina_-_What_Are_Words_cover.jpg#File:Chris_Medina_-_What_Are_Words_cover.jpg. --Bensin (talk) 14:17, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Delete Several people listed as the Sony BMG Sweden contacts on the MyNewsDesk pages have been sent a number of emails requesting confirmation of the copyright status of the Sony images on MyNewsDesk but they have failed to respond one way or the other. See COM:VPC#MyNewsDesk images. Without an OTRS confirmation this must go. Ww2censor (talk) 20:29, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that this file is indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host it on Commons FASTILY (TALK) 07:54, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
I don't think mynewsdesk.com can give a license for this file, as it is not the creator. Yann (talk) 12:10, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - Per arguments for similar case here. (The nominator's statement is correct, but the permission is not given by mynewsdesk.com. The permission is given by Sony Music, who manages the account at mynewsdesk.com. Flickr does not grant us permission to use images. Their users do. This is the same thing.) --Bensin (talk) 14:19, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Delete Several people listed as the Sony BMG Sweden contacts on the MyNewsDesk pages have been sent a number of emails requesting confirmation of the copyright status of the Sony images on MyNewsDesk but they have failed to respond one way or the other. See COM:VPC#MyNewsDesk images. Without an OTRS confirmation this must go. Ww2censor (talk) 20:29, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that this file is indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host it on Commons FASTILY (TALK) 07:52, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
I don't think mynewsdesk.com can give a license for this file, as it is not the creator. Yann (talk) 12:11, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - Per arguments for similar case here. (The nominator's statement is correct, but the permission is not given by mynewsdesk.com. The permission is given by Sony Music, who manages the account at mynewsdesk.com. Flickr does not grant us permission to use images. Their users do. This is the same thing.) --Bensin (talk) 14:20, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Delete Several people listed as the Sony BMG Sweden contacts on the MyNewsDesk pages have been sent a number of emails requesting confirmation of the copyright status of the Sony images on MyNewsDesk but they have failed to respond one way or the other. See COM:VPC#MyNewsDesk images. Without an OTRS confirmation this must go. Ww2censor (talk) 20:31, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that this file is indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host it on Commons FASTILY (TALK) 07:54, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
I don't think mynewsdesk.com can give a license for this file, as it is not the creator. Yann (talk) 12:13, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - Per arguments for similar case here. (The nominator's statement is correct, but the permission is not given by mynewsdesk.com. The permission is given by Sony Music, who manages the account at mynewsdesk.com. Flickr does not grant us permission to use images. Their users do. This is the same thing.) --Bensin (talk) 14:20, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Delete Several people listed as the Sony BMG Sweden contacts on the MyNewsDesk pages have been sent a number of emails requesting confirmation of the copyright status of the Sony images on MyNewsDesk but they have failed to respond one way or the other. See COM:VPC#MyNewsDesk images. Without an OTRS confirmation this must go. Ww2censor (talk) 20:30, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that this file is indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host it on Commons FASTILY (TALK) 07:54, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
I don't believe this is "own work". We need a source, author, and publication date. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:56, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- This is my a file! I took a picture with photos of him - it's a copy! This is a brigadier-general Polish counterintelligence...he graduated from Graduate school of the KGB. His photo is no even in the Polish Wikipedia (but there is an article about him there). What source do you want? Krupski Oleg (talk) 16:08, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- This man was born in 1919. He looks no more than 40 in this image, so it was taken sometime around 1960. Are you telling us that you are the photographer from 1960? IF you are not the actual photographer, then we must know when and where this photo was taken and by whom and where it was first published. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:34, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- He began working in the in the USSR in 1941, and this photo from his personal affairs. In Poland, he began work in 1944! Always such photographs did in the officer's personal file. You not do delete my file - I've changed license template. --Krupski Oleg (talk) 09:48, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
- Do you clearing your templates "delete" from my files or I do it? --Krupski Oleg (talk) 16:38, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Lacks permission from the copyright holder.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:58, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Comment. PereslavlFoto, владелец авторских прав КГБ??? Это фото из его личного дела офицера 1919 года рождения поступившего на службу в 1940 г. (загружено фото для иллюстрации статьи о нём), сделано чёрно-белое фото размером 3 на 4 см при его поступлении на службу. --Krupski Oleg (talk) 08:12, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
- The main reason is, we do not know who keeps the rights. But someone does keep, and this issue violates his rights. Мы не знаем, кто владеет правами, поэтому такое использование нарушает его права.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 09:56, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that this file is indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host it on Commons FASTILY (TALK) 07:53, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
It does not look like a photograph taken by the uploader, May be initiated for pulling the uploader's image to wiki. Please provide more information (source) for the female's image ...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 17:34, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- This image was used to illustrate w:en:Paradesi Jews. It is an apparent falsehood. It is documented by Indian newspapers and by books that there is exactly one female Paradesi Jew of marriageable age left in the world, out of a total of less than a dozen people. The female in this photograph is not her. Uncle G (talk) 13:24, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:54, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
- photo not old enough for the given public domain rationale (photographer died some years before the image was taken?)
- "This work was never published prior to January 1, 2003" is questionable/wrong, image appeared in Josef Grabler: Helmut Wick: Das Leben eines Fliegerhelden. Verlag Scherl Berlin, 1943 p. 13 and in Ringlstetter, Major Helmut Wick. Motorbuch-Verlag 2000, p. 13) Polarlys (talk) 21:52, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. By the way, I have replaced the {{PD-US-unpublished}} license tag with {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 23:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- It is a personal photo from Wick himself, they just used it for the book of Grabler. And he died 11-28-1940, so he´s dead for more than 70 years. But actually I do not care whether it is deleted. Just wanted to share a bit of material to people who are interested. Have a nice weekend. -- Mememe2222 (talk) 12:16, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
- The problem is that it doesn't depend on whether Wick died more than 70 years ago; it does depend on whether the person who took the photo of Wick died more than 70 years ago. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 17:45, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:53, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
photo of 1959. No clear explanantion why this is public domain. Also see help desk discussion. Saibo (Δ∇) 22:43, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Please see the source listed, which states the following "Possible copyright status: NOT_IN_COPYRIGHT." This is not a magazine. The photos are part of the document, and the document does not claim a copyright within its text. Eagletennis (talk) 21:50, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:53, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Das ist nicht dein Werk nur weil du es eingescannt hast. Wer sind die Orignal-Künstler/Urheber? Saibo (Δ∇) 23:35, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Guten Tag die Fotos habe ich von Herrn Heinz Drenseck erhalten da ich einen Artikel über Frau Else Drenseck in Wikipedia einstellen soll. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bindbeutel92 (talk • contribs) 2012-06-25T08:03:42 (UTC)
- Danke für die Antwort. Okay, bitte gebe dann nicht an, dass es dein "eigenes Werk"/"own work" ist - das heißt nämlich, dass du der Autor/Urheber/Künstler bist. Bitte gib in solchen Fällen als Quelle "selbst eingescannt" oder ähnliches an. Du weißt also auch nicht, ob der Künstler der Verzierung sowie der Textschreiber schon länger als 70 Jahre verstorben sind? Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ∇) 14:20, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- Oben rechts gibt es eine Signatur: "HR v. V."; das könnte de:Hans Richard von Volkmann (1860–1927) sein - die Grafik wäre damit gemeinfrei. Die handschriftlichen Verse stammen von de:Ludwig Bechstein (1801–1860) - das Urheberrecht ist ebenfalls abgelaufen. Der restliche Text hat keine Schöpfungshöhe.
Also:-- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 14:44, 29 June 2012 (UTC) Keep.- Leider stelle ich gerade fest, dass das Schmuckblatt zwar in Deutschland gemeinfrei sein dürfte, nicht aber in den USA, weil das Urheberrecht des Grafikers dort auf 95 Jahre verlängert wurde. Anders wäre es nur, wenn die Grafik bereits vor 1923 erschienen wäre. Dazu ist aber nichts bekannt. So also: Delete auf Commons - aber auf de.wikipedia.org hochladen, wo das US-Urheberrecht kein Problem ist. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 14:57, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- Angenommen der Urheber stimmt, dann ist sein Urheberrecht 1927+71=1998 abgelaufen - das ware also 2 Jahre nach 1996. Interessiert mich aber nicht sonderlich, was die USler da für einen Unfug machen. Wenn die Urheber stimmen (ja, der Text ausßer den Versen, die ich nicht lesen kann, hat wohl keine Schöpfungshöhe), würde ich es also behalten wollen. Man könnte auch den Schmuck abschneiden - dann wäre es gar kein Problem - aber halt nicht schön. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ∇) 16:41, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- Behalten wollen würde ich es auch - deshalb der Vorschlag, die Datei nach de.wikipedia.org zu verschieben. Aber auf Commons muss jede Datei eben auch nach US-Recht frei sein - und das ist diese nicht, jedenfalls solange man nicht eine Genehmigung der Erben des Grafikers einholt. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 21:16, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- Ich meinte das "wollen" schon mit Nachdruck. Keep. Ich akzeptiere diese US-Zentriertheit nicht. Wenn wir sie akzeptieren würden, dann sähe es mit vielen Künstlern (wie etwa Paul Klee) hier schlecht aus. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ∇) 22:19, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- Ich meinte das "wollen" schon mit Nachdruck.
- Leider stelle ich gerade fest, dass das Schmuckblatt zwar in Deutschland gemeinfrei sein dürfte, nicht aber in den USA, weil das Urheberrecht des Grafikers dort auf 95 Jahre verlängert wurde. Anders wäre es nur, wenn die Grafik bereits vor 1923 erschienen wäre. Dazu ist aber nichts bekannt. So also:
Kept: Keep? FASTILY (TALK) 07:53, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Doubtful autorship - derivative work without original author permission. Art-top (talk) 07:00, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Also nominated: File:2tony.png. --Art-top (talk) 07:04, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- See also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:1tony.png. All files uploaded by User:Dirty tony12. --Art-top (talk) 07:04, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 20:31, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:26, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. Street names now and then - I think this is of educational value. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 23:11, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- At least not as a PDF at Commons. Plain text belongs to Wikipedia, not to Commons. Ices2Csharp (talk) 07:09, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 20:29, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Since this book has an ISBN number, it is almost certainly still under copyright. There is no evidence of permission or the CC-BY-SA license which the uploader used. It appears that someone has erased material, including, very likely, a copyright notice, from this scan.
From the same book:
- File:Титул.стр..jpg This is probably not eligible for copyright, but is useless without the other pages.
- File:Стр.4-5.jpg
- File:Стр.6-7.jpg
- File:Посл.стр..jpg
Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:37, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- I have a copy of the author (from scanner)! I am the author of this file! I am not the author of the book! Leave this file! Or changed my license - I trust you! --Krupski Oleg (talk) 11:58, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Comment I am not sure I understand your point. This is a scan of a copyrighted book. Except, perhaps, for the title page (as I say above), we must have permission of the person who owns the copyright for the book in order to keep these. That may be the author of the book or the publisher. You say you are not the author, so why do you think you have the right to copy the book for Commons? Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:48, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- I do not copy all the pages of book, articles and text books! I copied only the name book with the ISBN, "Index" (title). You are in Russian read it, for your analyzing it. It can be, because this is not the text of the articles autor. Krupski Oleg (talk) 16:17, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Again. If you yourself do not own the copyright to this book, then we cannot keep it here without permission from the copyright owner. The law does not allow people to freely copy pages from books, even just indexes. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:37, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Not scan all pages texts book! Only name and Index, table of Contents (name items). Find a person who knows the Russian language, that he analyzes. You are not logical. This book has 700 pages... Do you understand? --Krupski Oleg (talk) 10:32, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
- I understand the law and Commons rules, while apparently you do not. Without permission of the copyright holder, we cannot keep any copyrighted work -- even one page out of 700 is a copyright violation. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:56, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
- Here is the author of this book has made this book public domain!
|
This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Кандыба Виктор Михайлович. This applies worldwide. In some countries this may not be legally possible; if so: Кандыба Виктор Михайлович grants anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.
|
- Do you clearing your templates "delete" from my files or I do it? --Krupski Oleg (talk) 16:41, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete While there is no copyright violation against the book author, it's the obvious violation against the publisher's rights. I also cannot see the educational value.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 18:00, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Not in PD yet. Anatoliy (talk) 16:09, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
I don't think mynewsdesk.com can give a license for this file, as it is not the creator. Yann (talk) 12:06, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - Per arguments for similar case at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Chris_Medina_-_What_Are_Words_cover.jpg#File:Chris_Medina_-_What_Are_Words_cover.jpg. --Bensin (talk) 14:16, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Delete Several people listed as the Sony BMG Sweden contacts on the MyNewsDesk pages have been sent a number of emails requesting confirmation of the copyright status of the Sony images on MyNewsDesk but they have failed to respond one way or the other. See COM:VPC#MyNewsDesk images. Without an OTRS confirmation this must go. Ww2censor (talk) 20:30, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 20:30, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
I don't think mynewsdesk.com can give a license for this file, as it is not the creator. Yann (talk) 12:13, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - Per arguments for similar case here. (The nominator's statement is correct, but the permission is not given by mynewsdesk.com. The permission is given by Sony Music, who manages the account at mynewsdesk.com. Flickr does not grant us permission to use images. Their users do. This is the same thing.) --Bensin (talk) 14:21, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Delete Several people listed as the Sony BMG Sweden contacts on the MyNewsDesk pages have been sent a number of emails requesting confirmation of the copyright status of the Sony images on MyNewsDesk but they have failed to respond one way or the other. See COM:VPC#MyNewsDesk images. Without an OTRS confirmation this must go. Ww2censor (talk) 20:31, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 20:30, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
As the StarWars-Poster was not installed permanently, the image is not covered by Commons:FOP#Sweden. We should discuss whether the StarWars-Poster is acceptable per de minimis or whether it is required to be blanked out. I have no intent to remove the whole image. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:54, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep In my opinion it is acceptable per de minimis. Yoda rooms only ca 1/20 space of the image, even maybe less. The main topic of the photo is the building of Örnsköldsvik Museum, actually. Electron ツ ➧☎ 13:07, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Kept: DM FASTILY (TALK) 20:30, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Incorrect title. 84.61.173.236 21:12, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- In fact, there is no trigraph “aeu” in French; “eau” would be correct. Furthermore, the circumflex over the first “a” is missing. --84.61.173.236 21:45, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Comment: File:Fr-château.ogg already exists, but it has a different content. --84.61.173.236 11:26, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- The File:Fr-chataeu.ogg should be moved to File:Fr-chateau.ogg. --84.61.173.236 17:53, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
-2.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Make a move request. Wrong forum FASTILY (TALK) 07:53, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Scan from a book published in 1994, which is most certainly copyrighted. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 23:42, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Not scan all pages texts book! Only name and Index, table of Contents (name items). Find a person who knows the Russian language, that he analyzes. You are not logical. This book has 700 pages... Do you understand? Krupski Oleg (talk) 09:16, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete This file is listed at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Стр.3.jpg. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:48, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- Here is the author of this book has made this book public domain!
- The text of the book is on a web page now. But did the author make it public domain? This would mean that anyone would be allowed to print all of the text in a new book and make money with it, while the original author would receive nothing. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 19:31, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- The web page states all the rights belong to the author of the text. Nothing is free there.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 10:01, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
- The text of the book is on a web page now. But did the author make it public domain? This would mean that anyone would be allowed to print all of the text in a new book and make money with it, while the original author would receive nothing. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 19:31, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- Do you clearing your templates "delete" from my files or I do it? --Krupski Oleg (talk) 16:42, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- This should not be done by the uploader, so not by you, but by someone else - if it's clear that the book is really in the public domain. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 19:31, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- Where is the proof of the author's decision? Any OTRS letter from Виктор Михайлович Кандыба?--PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:57, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Comment Весь текст книги (!) с её обложкой и его личным фото в общественном достоянии на сайте (http://svitk.ru/004_book_book/2b/309_kandiba-tehnika_gipnoza_sk.php) - мною отсканировано исключительно только "Оглавление"
(названия глав книги). --Krupski Oleg (talk) 08:52, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
- The link leads to some violating site, the text is published there not legally. This means, you cannot use its scans freely.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 10:01, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Not in PD yet. Anatoliy (talk) 16:11, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
"сканеркопия" means "scanner copy". This is most certainly a copyright violation. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 23:53, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
It's means - scanner copy. Yes. You can change the license. But leave this picture. I trust you. I personally have been corresponding with this man! His surname is Krupski and my surname Krupski. I'm writing a story about our family. Do you understand? Krupski Oleg (talk) 09:11, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Delete That may all be true, but it does not change the fact that this scan infringes on the copyright of the photographer of the original image. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:04, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Delete I cannot see the proof of PD; also the «Uknown Author» could not make such a decision. Нет подтверждения передачи в ОД (общественное достояние); кроме того, «неизвестный автор» не мог принять такого решения.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:55, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Comment. PereslavlFoto, в общественное достояние мне передал лично этот мастер спорта (изображённый на фотографии), о чём сохранил переписку с ним. Фото из его домашнего альбома. Предназначено для иллюстрации публикации о нём в Русской Википедии. Он даже его вывесил в социальной сети "Одноклассники-РУ" в его личном профиле. --Krupski Oleg (talk) 08:25, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
- Он не является правообладателем снимков из домашнего альбома, потому что фотограф не передавал ему никаких прав. Будь это иначе, у спортсмена был бы письменный договор с фотографом.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 09:55, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 20:30, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
"сканеркопия" means "scanner copy". This is most certainly a copyright violation. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 23:53, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
It's means - scanner copy. Yes. You can change the license. But leave this picture. I trust you. I personally have been corresponding with this man! His surname is Krupski and my surname Krupski. I'm writing a story about our family. Do you understand? Krupski Oleg (talk) 09:11, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete That may all be true, but it does not change the fact that this scan infringes on the copyright of the photographer of the original image. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:58, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Comment. В общественное достояние мне передал лично этот мастер спорта (изображённый на фотографии), о чём сохранил переписку с ним. Фото из его домашнего альбома. Предназначено для иллюстрации публикации о нём в Русской Википедии. Он даже его вывесил в социальной сети "Одноклассники-РУ" в его личном профиле. --Krupski Oleg (talk) 08:26, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
- Delete The photographer and the publisher didn't set the image free.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 10:09, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 20:31, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Duplicate with smaller resolution of file:Catherine Alexandrowna Arkharoff-RusPortraits.jpg. Not used. ShinePhantom (talk) 08:25, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Comment: Tag removed to {{duplicate|Catherine Alexandrowna Arkharoff-RusPortraits.jpg}} --Kaganer (talk) 12:30, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: unused redirect . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:26, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
188.254.231.37 20:50, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Speedy-closed of this vandal-DR as keep due to perfectly correct license on http://www.flickr.com/photos/jerone2/5348081691/. Túrelio (talk) 21:11, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Bgwhite as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://quages.com/others/Bridgette-B..html -mattbuck (Talk) 09:28, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Copyviol? This file was cropped from File:Bridgette B. at AVN Awards 2011.jpg! Maybe quages.com made copyviol. Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 08:32, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination -mattbuck (Talk) 17:50, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Copyrighted character from Avatar movie Morning Sunshine (talk) 05:24, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Image was uploaded under a cc-by 3.0 license here by Viasat, one of the largest DBS distributors and TV broadcasters in Sweden, so I'm assuming they are within their rights to release the image. --Bensin (talk) 12:26, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
- Is there any weblink available to prove that Viasat is related to the producers of Avatar? Generally, all movie images are copyrighted by the producers of the movie and I see no reason why this movie should be different. To me, this image is a {{Copyvio}} --Sreejith K (talk) 10:18, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
- There certainly is a business relation as Viasat is broadcasting the film Avatar[3] and is also using the image in question in their own promotional material[4]. --Bensin (talk) 15:53, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
- See also the umbrella discussion for all images from mynewsdesk on the Village pump here. --Bensin (talk) 22:22, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
- ... or the now archived discussion here. Summing up all the arguments I vote Keep. --Bensin (talk) 03:59, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
- ... or the now archived discussion here. Summing up all the arguments I vote
- See also the umbrella discussion for all images from mynewsdesk on the Village pump here. --Bensin (talk) 22:22, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
- There certainly is a business relation as Viasat is broadcasting the film Avatar[3] and is also using the image in question in their own promotional material[4]. --Bensin (talk) 15:53, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
- Keep The free release is correct. If they are making a mistake, then it is a big one for them to sort out rather than for Commons volunteers to second guess. --Fæ (talk) 08:25, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Uploaded on MyNewsdesk by Viasat as a part of a press release. Clearly tagged as CC-BY-3.0. /Esquilo (talk) 10:18, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete They're just a license taker, not owner of the copyrights. --Grunpfnul (talk) 10:10, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Power of attorney? Viasat is a respectable company whose business since 25 years[5] is broadcasting and intellectual property. Today they are broadcasting to 33 countries reaching 125 million viewers.[6] If they are releasing an image under a free license, there is no reason to doubt they are within their rights to do so. There is absolutely no way they can claim "we had no clue about copyright". --Bensin (talk) 17:38, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete We can't just make assumptions, even if we really want to. Viasat isn't the copyright holder, it's not theirs to release. Sven Manguard Wha? 13:39, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - assuming that Viasat understands copyright is very reasonable. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:52, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: No reasonable doubt that this image couldn't be published licensed cc-by-3.0 at the source Lymantria (talk) 23:04, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
I don't think mynewsdesk.com can give a license for this file, as it is not the creator. Yann (talk) 12:04, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep for the same reasons given at the last DR. --Fæ (talk) 12:07, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- The producer is 20th Century Fox, and it has certainly an authority about giving or not a free license. And it don't think Fox would agree about a commercial use of this file. Yann (talk) 12:41, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- True, we know who the producer is. As for second guessing the opinion of Fox versus reading the credible licence available at the source given, I would rather just read the licence and as I understand that's all we at Wikimedia Commons are obliged to do. Pretty much as stated before in the last DR. You could always write to both organizations to clarify if a mistake was made, rather than guessing that one might have been and deleting a file based on a guess. There is insufficient doubt here for the precautionary principle to apply. --Fæ (talk) 13:52, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- The producer is 20th Century Fox, and it has certainly an authority about giving or not a free license. And it don't think Fox would agree about a commercial use of this file. Yann (talk) 12:41, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - The nominator's statement is correct, but the permission is not given by mynewsdesk.com. The permission is given by Viasat Sverige, who manages the account at mynewsdesk.com. Flickr does not grant us permission to use images. Their users do. This is the same thing. As for the question if Viasat Sverige is within their right to grant this permission, see discussion above. --Bensin (talk) 14:13, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted 04:03, 12 September 2012 by Fastily. I agree with the deletion. I find it very unlikely that a distributor has the rights to freely license movie images -- much more likely that this is a mistake. Closed by . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:31, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:42, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Simboli i Diellit (talk · contribs)
editUnlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Restorant ne Vain (Ishull Lezhe).jpg
- File:Pjate Peshku (ishull Lezhe) .jpg
- File:Hoteli i Gjuetise Ishull Lezhe.jpg
- File:Shetitorja Lezhe.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:45, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Camilo.calle (talk · contribs)
editTables are out of scope and the logos, graphs, diagrams unlikely own work in contrary to the uploader's claims.
- File:Telecsa.JPG
- File:Regulacion mintel.JPG
- File:Otecel.JPG
- File:Conatellogo.jpg
- File:Conecel.JPG
- File:Cronotoachi.JPG
- File:Cronosopladora.JPG
- File:Cronovillo.JPG
- File:Cronoquijos.JPG
- File:Cronominas.JPG
- File:Cronomazar.JPG
- File:Cronomandu.JPG
- File:Cronodelsi.JPG
- File:Cronococa.JPG
- File:Hibridos1.jpg
- File:ERNCfoto.jpg
- File:Tabla hidraulica.JPG
- File:Tabla geotermica.JPG
- File:Tabla eolica.JPG
- File:Tabla solar.JPG
- File:Irradación Solar Diaria.jpg
- File:Tabla ahorros.JPG
- File:Eficiencia energetica.JPG
- File:CAN 536.JPG
- File:Precio medio.JPG
- File:Modelo de Libertad de Eleccion para todos los Consumidores.jpg
- File:Modelo de Monopolio.jpg
- File:Modelo de Comprador Unico.jpg
- File:Modelo de Competencia Mayorista y Minorista.jpg
- File:Ejemplo Generadores y costo de Energia.JPG
- File:Unifilar Ecuador Colombia.JPG
- File:Interconexiones Mayores.JPG
- File:Tabla de Generacion 3.jpg
- File:Tabla de Generacion 2.jpg
- File:Tabla de Generacion 1.jpg
- File:Modelo de Monopolio Verticalmente Integrado.jpg
- File:Tabla de distribucion.jpg
- File:Evolucion de la electrificacion Ecuador.jpg
RE rillke questions? 15:57, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:14, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Ana Perez dancing Ochun.jpg
- File:Dr. Eugene Novotney.jpg
- File:Pastels on the plaza by ParkerJones Family.jpg
- File:Francisco Aguabella.jpg
- File:Ana Perez & Jose Francisco Barroso.jpg
- File:Samba parade 1994 B.jpg
- File:Samba parade 2011.jpg
- File:Samba 1994.jpg
- File:Rumba at the beach.jpg
- File:Percussion-accompaniment-instructors.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Who is SAM CAMP? For files uploaded from third paries, permission has to be confirmed through license-review (file available in the web) or COM:OTRS. -- RE rillke questions? 18:04, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion. MBisanz talk 02:50, 21 August 2012 (UTC)