Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/10/29

Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 29th, 2014
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque este pc e de uso infantil okkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk 179.209.177.61 04:45, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Commons is not censored. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:24, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/File:AdultFilmdatabase.png

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete this appear to be a personal photo and the uploader removed all information two months after upload. It appear out of scope and is unused, so we might assume it is appropriate to delete it. His only other upload File:Roy Bjarne Rakkenes.JPG is also a personal unused image, so it should propbably be deleted also. Ww2censor (talk) 16:09, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 17:35, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Rodrigolopes as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://rafamendez.es/imagenes/ Steinsplitter (talk) 19:00, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: ticket #2012080310003418 -- Steinsplitter (talk) 19:01, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Despite the OTRS ticket, this is still a purely promotional image, unused and unusable, out of scope. . P 1 9 9   16:13, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:16, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:09, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: SNOW Jcb (talk) 21:35, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:10, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: SNOW Jcb (talk) 21:35, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:10, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: SNOW Jcb (talk) 21:40, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE and likely not own work: https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZisZxRQRif8hgklOOQRFTHyHn-wEuHx-ejVxsQ8w4IxRSBTj-eCd0eAnC2BXfVJKlb51PEgyANRKt6UmsaKJU-1xp5SlgMigOn6A20BTOamr-QysXJKNlNXtSkh1hn20Q0uHksp33V_1b0vff7tKMxCMviA2Oo3ZCNgwAtLW5FU-5CvL0WHly-ytirY54cB3qgpc06mqZaFaD-wgUMyvDLEk9yZO2wBgRV4qMOVEP2PKFSELnhALYfKU3kqCXsXQpFw4GhZXDBFsaYaBPcK_1nrPpt4N2grPUM2tjb7zBDmAYRHrzQSaQoCGKLvUMiFaRPqVojOgeCjJIe8ryUi4BYWq7f1LIteoty269e2S3e7gpeE8ba34yEory2H9vlDCRN5WsOmqhLSsI1keC3MmDLKD7I1wdjLWW2m3P6_14qIrd4zfzl-1duE-2MSQEg6OfOnvfIhEV2gjCE6uLl-_1aBNmPbsBncUZ26WlxfDytgMYIvwqopTANxCYdtVj0ATtRg9Lq2xQPpN_1m8OYDwDLyawxWYOudMsZwCCK2cNtq7MRGUwdHEFYWcI6n148vRftqt-lWwuZkU2b-HtRPxKVdgbGg5uQ3bFA7EvkOU5Nb7c1hXQppUEP1GSCsSHKhPxnYgyiAVfWfzYab3DP7l41q5Y9AGVmNrlVnqtJX3e0c5OGDI1lLfl2IIAcuimPthYkcSIm8yzh0aMG4J1mFhSoJ25Pgc7g3cdNSM7b6iyE1tUKRwhsrsfyzwocvJ23PpD6yNPQsJYw_1fszopT7iqKHtMCX9_1gkWeatTRc7UYwuLpmjpZ0c2y8opaxm3dicwKuuyu_1nucM8_1CucFCnuZF4PrvFXAC27C6cywPbjznGIBOj_1d3xHw_1XjyWfNC5OSCOtHJlr9TXN3142Z96OngpBeaLceiE5taN38UV9Vk7RfOF1sgiLou9Jv2Ia8UMsCSj7iB3S35FncZmGMdaOKY1oCFCDG5Uut30saVu7jfSvrD7lOZewtHEZ0Sa_1RgrrBMYgXQNKuHXabyVIozuA40a8UwoesoKGMHbcvoIjFCOk-Ov82UwK-yhc_1T-ZrPTpQ1JcKiI2wUXhVxGlzfOhm8xjb65pZNT3zeVj_1L6U6ZNkUcoOwd30v6abRMxeh6UF0_1QtD4waa4ys2f_1GbbBeH9eRHa9qxEJTiRsNPmqsSk4FYjVQWcxcZCp0VGyBfW65fqV3xZg5l4YpUD2xrNfuLfsBCj9qvT0mr-I9urVQDF7l9Lv8-xkBqbgZxtBQyJh05WDi6RPb3jIt3kGL6FApFj2DOlSx2x56_19rvIyP6LdvG5pjPYKN1EJGdahf2PKsSm83uWBC0yQy8xoavm9hsFupxrFwmp7e_1YvFrIM7xFPkntgMFobU-Zdb60JN6lawEKnmVHKYJKZZYARIcCoTHBkJZN2jEFdz_1fcLe-hO8839eOGelLMnaOi_1r4CW0Q1_1uAVdexdBWjCT8Dq9RPtjQNOPteucjmZ2K16ctxg. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:11, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: SNOW Jcb (talk) 21:36, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:13, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: SNOW Jcb (talk) 21:40, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:13, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: SNOW Jcb (talk) 21:41, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:13, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: SNOW Jcb (talk) 21:42, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:13, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: SNOW Jcb (talk) 21:42, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:13, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: SNOW Jcb (talk) 21:42, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:14, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: SNOW Jcb (talk) 21:43, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:14, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and probably copyvio Jcb (talk) 21:44, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

missing information about the photographer - copyright? Gouwenaar (talk) 18:32, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1955 no copyr Ardeidaeraiger (talk) 18:36, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Photos made in 1955 are copyright protected. Gouwenaar (talk) 21:05, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no source, no license. JuTa 20:48, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

missing information about the photographer - copyright? Gouwenaar (talk) 18:32, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1955 no copyr Ardeidaeraiger (talk) 18:39, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Photos made in 1955 are copyright protected. Gouwenaar (talk) 21:04, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no source, no license. JuTa 20:47, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque eu não gostei da foto Jonasse102 (talk) 21:55, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no license at all. JuTa 20:41, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Leyo 13:29, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 11:06, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not the own work.OTRS-permission from "LostinSound.org" is needed. see here. Y.haruo (talk) 14:30, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 19:23, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's nothing on the source website indicating what year the photo was created, or that the image is in the public domain. Diannaa (talk) 00:25, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a book cover.    FDMS  4    01:15, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission from Inter Island Air russavia (talk) 05:36, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is of the uploader as a newborn, taken by hospital staff or friends/family from whom permission is needed (I'm assuming that the subject, being a newborn in the photo, cannot claim the photo as their own work) ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 06:45, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not the own work. OTRS-permission from author is needed. see here. Y.haruo (talk) 07:43, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One of the displayed people on this picture is also the uploader of the picture. No proof that she's the author of the picture, permission of the photographer would be needed. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 07:53, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some homepage material, fairuse material, promotional Motopark (talk) 09:13, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Martin G. Flores (talk · contribs)

edit

Promo/self-promo (see w:es:Elias Cañete).

Juggler2005 (talk) 09:48, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 10:14, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal vanity photo of non-notable person. Out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 10:19, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Rodrigolopes (talk) 10:47, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image. Out of scope. Richard Avery (talk) 10:48, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image Rodrigolopes (talk) 10:50, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused poor quality image Rodrigolopes (talk) 10:51, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Rodrigolopes (talk) 10:55, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Rodrigolopes (talk) 10:59, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Elder99 (details available). Last remaining file as all other uploads by this user from 12.2011 (always related to en:Guatemala City) were grabbed from Flickr/Panoramio/etc. Gunnex (talk) 11:09, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating also (derivated)

Gunnex (talk) 20:36, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, del. on de Nolispanmo 11:10, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, del. on de Nolispanmo 11:31, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, blurry image that is undescribed and not showing any educative value. Richard Avery (talk) 11:35, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful if uploader took the photo, No metadata. Richard Avery (talk) 11:37, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional or vanity image. Out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 11:39, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like promotion, out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 11:44, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:DW of copyrightposters, this is not covered by com:FOP in The Netherlands. Natuur12 (talk) 11:52, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:52, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Exoxahah (talk · contribs)

edit

Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, inconsistent photographic styles, lack of metadata, and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 11:55, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not taken by Marco Borggreve, who according to the EXIF-data of his other photos (search 'Borggreve' on Commons) consistently uses a Canon camera and Photoshop on Macintosh. There seems to have been some sort of confusion. Buxtehude (talk) 12:06, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Requested by uploader, accidentally uploaded, virtually identical to File:Vidampark-EntranceArt2.JPG Illustratedjc (talk) 13:05, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violations Wikifido (talk) 13:27, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete this is now out of scope because the associated article was deleted on the enwiki for notability concerns Ww2censor (talk) 14:27, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Annafaridaku (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Keine enzyklopädische Verwendung denkbar Eingangskontrolle (talk) 14:56, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Out of scope - blatant advertising. Ww2censor (talk) 15:03, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image of unknown person Richard Avery (talk) 15:06, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image of unknown and unrecognisable person, out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 15:08, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in US FunkMonk (talk) 15:34, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only by promotional page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 15:44, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission 91.64.223.139 15:51, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per the source, Baggz is not the author of the photo. It was sent to him by a fan; does he really have the rights to the photo to be able to release it into the public domain? C.Fred (talk) 16:25, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With an unknown artist and a date of June 2007, this image cannot be PD, source is also missing, although location says "private collection'. Probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:18, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:14, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A blurry small gif version of File:Merchant_Marine_DSM.jpg which shows both front and back of medal. I moved all the links from this blurry version to the better larger version because the system would not let me upload a new version of a *gif file with a *jpg file. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:14, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With no source data it is impossible to tell if the license is correct. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:59, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 01:15, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 18:02, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ARTISTA JORGE VACA (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope: unused files, self-created artworks, self-promotion

BrightRaven (talk) 18:04, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No author given, source page has not got licence infomation 31.174.209.125 18:07, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Painting of en:Jacobo Árbenz (1913 – 1971, President of Guatemala from 1951 to 1954) with unknown author. The painting is signed but I can't retrieve any infos. Taken from (as indicated) this blog (2013, .jpg), unlikely "own work". May be in public domain but relevant info must be provided. Gunnex (talk) 18:10, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful that this files is PD-old or PD at all in the US. Starting this discussion instead of a {{Copyvio}}. Josve05a (talk) 18:27, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source/license and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. No related uploads by user. Gunnex (talk) 18:38, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 18:45, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused, undescribed, unsourced, undated, and lacking author image... out os COM:SCOPE as it must be realistically useful for some educational purpose. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:53, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 18:55, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that uploader was photographer of this image in the 1950s, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:56, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that uploader was photographer of this image, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:56, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1964 doesn't seem to be old enough to give free license to a picture from a movie set in Italy, likely not own work of uploader, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:57, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 18:57, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused product shot, out of COM:SCOPE and possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:59, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Product shot of various forms of recording media in a store, no source, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:01, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hfma elmejor (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP. Uploaded mostly in 07.2008, 5 different digicams were used and considering the creation date the uploader wasted these cams between 04.09.2007 to 06.04.2008 (= 7 month). Per logs the uploader was blocked indefinite in 11.2008.

Additional infos:


Gunnex (talk) 19:21, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PS: The uploader cleared several times his user discussion. Gunnex (talk) 19:26, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted photos:

=====
edit
  • File:Nutrecul Agroforestry.jpg
  • File:AWDF Flag.jpg
  • File:Northern White Rhino cows Najin & Fatu (left) and Southern White Rhino cows (right) at The Ol Pejeta Conservancy..jpg
  • File:Northern White Rhino male Sudan in boma at The Ol Pejeta Conservancy.jpg
  • File:Northern White Rhino cows Najin & Fatu at The Ol Pejeta Conservancy..jpg
  • File:Northern White Rhino cows Najin & Fatu at the Ol Pejeta Conservancy..jpg
  • File:Jean with a Northern White Rhino female at the Ol Pejeta Conservancy..jpg
  • File:Renée Kempen at her studio.jpg

All these photos listed above are made by the AWDF or directly by JEAN DB. On their request we uploaded the photos. Please republish the photos. and verify with rangers@africanwildlifedefenceforce.com

Guy lemal


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Guy lemal (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. Other images by this user were identified as copright violations.

JuTa 20:22, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted several clear copyright violation files uploaded by the user (cars / planes /persons). Sinds the trust is gone, I think we can not keep the pictures where the uploader claims to be the creator (like the old army picture of 5kb filesize). I suggest to delete all the pictures.

Best regards --Neozoon (talk) 22:47, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted photos:

=====[edit] File:Nutrecul Agroforestry.jpg File:AWDF Flag.jpg File:Northern White Rhino cows Najin & Fatu (left) and Southern White Rhino cows (right) at The Ol Pejeta Conservancy..jpg File:Northern White Rhino male Sudan in boma at The Ol Pejeta Conservancy.jpg File:Northern White Rhino cows Najin & Fatu at The Ol Pejeta Conservancy..jpg File:Northern White Rhino cows Najin & Fatu at the Ol Pejeta Conservancy..jpg File:Jean with a Northern White Rhino female at the Ol Pejeta Conservancy..jpg File:Renée Kempen at her studio.jpg All these photos listed above are made by the AWDF or directly by JEAN DB. On their request we uploaded the photos. Please republish the photos. and verify with rangers@africanwildlifedefenceforce.com

Guy lemal

Guy lemal

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence that any of these photos are the actual works of the FBI. For example, Mogilevich's photo most certainly is not an FBI photo. Authorship of the photos is basically unknown so COM:PRP applies.

russavia (talk) 20:27, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Agreed. The FBI and other law enforcement agencies take "wanted" photos wherever they can find them and more or less ignore copyright. By definition, if the FBI was able to take the photograph, then the person is no longer one of the "Ten Most Wanted Fugitives". .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:04, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No OTRS ticket, so impossible to verify that the permission is authentic. The claim that the Belgian royal mint is the copyright holder contradicts with the copyright notice on one of the coins: "© HERGE/ML".

Stefan4 (talk) 20:27, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source/license and author information of 2-3 images (2x fresh copyvios, 1x in DR) used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. Gunnex (talk) 20:37, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Встречаетя в Интернете до загрузки файла на Викисклад (см. http://freedom.livejournal.com/1520979.html) Dogad75 (talk) 20:46, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:24, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нет разрешения автора на публикацию под свободной лицензией Dogad75 (talk) 20:48, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:24, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нет разрешения автора на публикацию под свободной лицензией Dogad75 (talk) 20:48, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:24, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нет разрешения автора на публикацию под свободной лицензией Dogad75 (talk) 20:49, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:24, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculpture made in 2012. Belgium has no FOP Ronn (talk) 20:51, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:24, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Attack image, possibly libel Mcmatter (talk) 22:04, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:24, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work considering the historic of the uploader Rodrigolopes (talk) 22:40, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work considering the historic of the uploader Rodrigolopes (talk) 22:42, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Derivated work of a photo of en:Guillermo Meneses (1911—1978) by unknown photographer, taken by uploader during a related exhibition hosted in Venezuela, failing also COM:FOP#Venezuela. Gunnex (talk) 23:17, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 23:24, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1979 monument INeverCry 00:00, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. AFBorchert (talk) 06:47, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1968 monument INeverCry 00:02, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. AFBorchert (talk) 06:48, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be the same statue as the one stated at w:uk:Пам'ятники Вінниці#Колишні пам'ятники. Again, its removal in 2022 does not take away sculptors' posthumous copyrights. The list article claims the artists behind this monument are Нікогосян and Мурадян. As commercial freedom of panorama is not granted in Ukraine, images of this statue cannot be freely licensed under commercial Creative Commons licenses. Therefore, these images are violations of sculptural copyrights.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:58, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:35, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1977 monument

INeverCry 00:05, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. AFBorchert (talk) 06:52, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1956 monument INeverCry 00:07, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. AFBorchert (talk) 06:53, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1975 monument INeverCry 00:08, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. AFBorchert (talk) 06:53, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1977 monument INeverCry 00:09, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. AFBorchert (talk) 06:54, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1993 monument

INeverCry 00:11, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. AFBorchert (talk) 06:55, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1967 monument INeverCry 00:12, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. AFBorchert (talk) 06:56, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ane wiki (talk · contribs)

edit

Apparently Flickrwashing by flickruser:128964602@N07.

   FDMS  4    00:12, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I wrote "Elaine King" page (paid edition). Mrs. King has uploaded her pictures to Flickr so they can be included in the text, since previous pictures were erased (at that time, Mrs. Elaine King wrote to OTRS authorizing the use of her images, but OTRS requested a permission of each photographer. It was not possible, since Mrs. King did not know who are two of the photographers, that were circumstantial people whom she had asked to take a picture with her camera.
File:King Notimujer.jpg and File:King Bayly.jpg were taken with her ​​camera, and File:EKing.jpg is a studio picture taken by a professional photographer. Donna Victor whom she bought the pictures in 2013. All the photos are her property. Please tell me if I need to do more.--Ane wiki (talk) 15:53, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Ane wiki: Please contact OTRS anyway. These pictures were also published here. I think a declaration of consent sent with an @elainekingcfp.com eMail address would be sufficient.    FDMS  4    00:25, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect!--Ane wiki (talk) 22:29, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: When the photographers are unknown, we cannot keep this as we would need a permission from the photographers. Ownership does not imply copyright. In the case of the professional photographer, we would likewise need a permission by the photographer, not by the depicted person. AFBorchert (talk) 06:59, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ane wiki (talk · contribs)

edit

Appears to be (bonus) footage of a movie.

   FDMS  4    00:20, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rodaje23segundos300.jpg and File:Rodaje23segundos300.jpg are the same photo: it was taken by the movie crew. File:23segparque.jpg and File:23seg.jpg are movie footage; the owner is the director of the film, who asked me to write the Wikipedia page, and he gave me the permission to use all his photos. It was one of my first pages, and at this moment, I thought that would be fine, since I knew the owner of the pictures would not make any claims. Of course, now I understand that I must ask the director to write OTRS ceding their rights, right? I must upload the photos again?--Ane wiki (talk) 15:53, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Ane wiki: Yes, please contact OTRS and let me know as soon as you have done so. The files will not get deleted if you contact OTRS in the next six days.    FDMS  4    21:39, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I wrote to the director of the film to make the statement (in Spanish). I'll let you know when I have news. I hope he can do it within these days. We have only six days?--Ane wiki (talk) 22:29, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
At least seven days from 2014-10-29. Should these files get deleted they could easily get restored again.    FDMS  4    14:08, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: All these photographs need a documented permission through COM:OTRS. As soon as the permission is given, these files can be restored. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:07, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1991 monument INeverCry 00:14, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 07:49, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1970 monument INeverCry 00:19, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 07:49, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1983 monument INeverCry 00:21, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 07:49, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1983 monument INeverCry 00:21, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 07:49, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 2001 monument INeverCry 00:22, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 07:49, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1980 monument

INeverCry 00:28, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:48, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1986 monument INeverCry 00:30, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:48, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1959 monument INeverCry 00:32, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's a monument from Soviet Union times. --Visem (talk) 20:51, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:51, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1972 monument INeverCry 00:33, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:51, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1970 monument INeverCry 00:34, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:51, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1974 monument

INeverCry 00:36, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's a monument from Soviet Union times. --Visem (talk) 20:56, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:52, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1961 monument INeverCry 00:37, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:52, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1973 monument

INeverCry 00:39, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's a monument from Soviet Union times. --Visem (talk) 20:59, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:52, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1973 monument INeverCry 00:40, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:52, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1993 monument INeverCry 00:44, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:52, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1978 monument INeverCry 00:45, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's a monument from Soviet Union times. --Visem (talk) 21:05, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:52, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1973 monument INeverCry 00:46, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's a monument from Soviet Union times. --Visem (talk) 21:11, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:52, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1958 monument INeverCry 00:47, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's a monument from Soviet Union times. --Visem (talk) 12:47, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:52, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1970 monument INeverCry 00:48, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's a monument from Soviet Union times. --Visem (talk) 12:48, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:52, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1968 monument INeverCry 00:48, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's a monument from Soviet Union times. --Visem (talk) 12:52, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:52, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1967 monument INeverCry 00:50, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's a monument from Soviet Union times. --Visem (talk) 15:38, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:52, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1967 monument INeverCry 00:50, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's a monument from Soviet Union times. --Visem (talk) 15:39, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:52, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1970 monument INeverCry 00:51, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's a monument from Soviet Union times. --Visem (talk) 15:40, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:52, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1966 monument INeverCry 00:53, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:53, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong name Tommyy882 (talk) 21:04, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Yann as "author request". Green Giant (talk) 07:38, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recently uploaded photos which are out of scope of Commons.

russavia (talk) 02:17, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How exactly is the photo with the chick in scope again? :) russavia (talk) 17:03, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Krd 09:24, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image (there's a redirect as well) INeverCry 08:19, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:25, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 08:20, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:25, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 08:22, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:25, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:23, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:25, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:24, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:25, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:25, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:25, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Safi ullah sabir (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 08:26, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:26, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:27, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:26, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:29, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:26, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:30, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:26, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:30, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:26, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:31, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:26, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:36, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:26, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:37, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:26, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:38, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:26, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:39, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:26, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saleemelamin22 (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 08:40, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:26, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:41, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:26, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:42, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:26, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sammyoo77 (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 08:45, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:27, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:48, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:27, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 08:49, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:27, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:51, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:27, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:52, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:27, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:53, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:27, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:53, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:27, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:54, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:27, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:55, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:56, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:58, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:00, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:01, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:02, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:03, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:03, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:05, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:05, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:06, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:06, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:07, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:07, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:08, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:09, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:10, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:10, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:11, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mrsanmibright (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 09:21, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:29, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:22, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:29, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:22, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:29, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:23, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:29, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:24, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:29, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:25, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:29, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:26, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:29, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:28, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:29, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:28, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:29, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aygül1998 (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope - plain text in jpgs - unused

INeverCry 09:30, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:29, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:31, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:30, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:32, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:30, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, unexplained or described image. Little educational value. Richard Avery (talk) 10:30, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Krd 09:30, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Rodrigolopes (talk) 10:35, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Krd 09:30, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Rodrigolopes (talk) 10:40, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Krd 09:30, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Rodrigolopes (talk) 10:43, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Krd 09:30, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, small image with insufficient information to be useful Richard Avery (talk) 10:46, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Krd 09:30, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The architects of Palais de Chaillot have not been dead for at least 70 years: Léon Azéma, †1978; Louis-Hippolyte Boileau † 1948, Jacques Carlu, † 1976. There is no freedom of panorama in France. P e z i (talk) 00:28, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This photo is not intended to portray the Palais but is rather a segment of a view of the 16e arr. from the Eiffel Tower. The fact that the Palais appears in the photo does not make it the subject of the photograph and we can treat it as a case where the architectural work only serves as a complement. I hope we can be pragmatic here. PrinceGloria (talk) 07:11, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 16:59, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deleting copyright text Uivelo (talk) 06:53, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to put the (c) katriina könönen in the File:Alderia_modesta(c)_katriina_könönen.jpg file name, better put it in the information part as author=katriina_könönen instead of author=you. Apparently you say that you are katriina könönen, check out Commons:OTRS to verify this. In theory you could have uploaded the cropped version as a new version for this image, but now after you uploaded it with another name deleting this image with the watermark make sense. –Be..anyone (talk) 17:11, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 17:00, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dupliate of File:Piscina Manara1.jpg Yiyi (talk) 09:11, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Same file. INeverCry 17:02, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Sorry, duplicate of File:Piscina Manara.jpg. --Yiyi (Dimmi!) 22:17, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:36, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nakim02 (talk · contribs)

edit

After today identifying around 10 uploads as copyvio (grabbed from Panoramio/Flickr, official sites, blogs etc.) it´s difficult to believe that these remaining files would be own work: IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (small/inconsistent resolutions, missing or multiple different exif: 8 in total, 5 remaining) so these ones (per COM:PRP) can't be believed either. All files related to en:Sunchon National University and uploaded in a row in 01.2014. Some files authored/sourced with "Sunchon National University" or "Jang yung-sik", needing permissions.

Gunnex (talk) 15:16, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:03, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nakim02 (talk · contribs)

edit

Non-tirvial logo?

Juggler2005 (talk) 09:43, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 17:03, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a contradiction in the description. User:Derzsi_Elekes_Andor is presented as the author, but in the same time Norden1990 calls it a "own work" and affirms that he is the copyright holder. Iaaasi (talk) 11:48, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I RETRACT THE DELETION REQUEST, I THOUGHT THE UPLOADER WAS NORDEN1990 Iaaasi (talk) 13:25, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 17:05, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously a professional photo uploaded without consent from photographer (indicated as "unknown") Kotivalo (talk) 14:17, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture is giving by Ruotsala for me and he asks me to put it to Wikipedia. I'm not sure how it could be marked.--LCHawk (talk) 14:21, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
With unknown author, delete--Motopark (talk) 18:36, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 17:06, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 18:53, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, unused at the moment, but this is fine. –Be..anyone (talk) 17:46, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If u provide us with link of the pic with higher quality then I can directly delete it. And for the future use the template:duplicate.--Sanandros (talk) 06:44, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
These 2 are similar and have got the status of Quality Image:
File:Regimiento Primero de Infantería de la Guardia Real, Gran Palacio, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 03.JPG
File:Regimiento Primero de Infantería de la Guardia Real, Gran Palacio, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 04.JPG
The one I nominate for deletion has a bad crop at the top and a significant area of the sky is overexposed Poco2 08:13, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The quality image is only similar, and your version is also good. Maybe crop a part of the bottom, the stones aren't interesting. Do you consider "not tagged as 'quality image'" as "poor quality"? –Be..anyone (talk) 08:50, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This discussion guides nowhere. We can keep the picture, fine to me, but I am convinced that the others are better, for different reasons and pretty similar (btw I updated the link to the second one, which is even more similar to the one I was proposing for deletion). In the past I made the mistake of uploading too many pictures of the same topic or subject independently whether there was already good material in Commons, and that's my motivation to clean up. Poco2 10:38, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
For the quality is also fine enough. Consider that other users see some details which they will find in this picture which they can't find in another pic so.--Sanandros (talk) 15:35, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, DD 04 is very similar, it also has the flags and CoA (unlike DD 03). –Be..anyone (talk) 17:27, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yep but they hold the weapon diffrently.--Sanandros (talk) 14:05, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 17:10, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no source (No source since)... the image is of a Banksy graffiti. I'm sorry but I don't understand this nomination, the image file contains a claim of own work with nothing obvious to contradict that. Graffiti works are not copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:10, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I uploaded this image. I did not know that it was a Banksy work. I took the photo a few years ago while visiting university of Bristol. In the sense that I took the photo, it was my own work and indicated that in description. I did not claim that I made the graffiti myself. For people who are concerned about the copy right issue, could you educate me with the relevant legal framework? That I can't take a photo of some graffiti work and upload it? I by no means mean to violate law in any way. I do have a lot of photos of interesting graffiti work taken while travelling in South America. If I am not allowed to upload them, I won't. Thanks.--Xlc (talk) 22:04, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Notice other images of same wall painting in Category:Adultery graffiti in Bristol by Banksy as additional reasons to  Keep this image, the photographer is certainly saying own work, there's nothing to contradict that and the wall painting is not copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:10, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 17:12, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque eu não sei usar o wiki Novah ConexaÕh (talk) 22:01, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: kept Krd 16:59, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nsgaeverine (talk · contribs)

edit

Unused personal images -- Commons is not Facebook. Also the subject claims to be the author, and none of them appear to be selfies, so we probably would need licenses from the actual photographers if, for some reason, we decided to keep them.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:42, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ava Zinn in 2014.jpg and File:AvaZinn2012.jpg are now in use. I agree that they do not look like selfies, perhaps self-timer? Don't know. -- Rillke(q?) 13:37, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:AvaZinn2000.jpg, File:Ava Zinn in 2014.jpg, and File:AvaZinn2012.jpg are indeed author and self-photographed and already sent the ORTS licenses from the actual photographer (Ava Zinn.) The files are licensed content from Ava Zinn herself, stated as follows: "I, Ava Zinn, would like to make sure I am represented appropriately in all online ventures and are submitted the correct images and/or logos owned and/or operated by Aeverine Zinn Holdings to that end. For questions on use, contact Ava Zinn at webmaster (at) avazinn (dot) com.". Nsgaeverine (talk) 15:59, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The only OTRS message received until now, ticket # 2014102910026392, covers only the two images which I have marked above. All of the others are unlicensed. Even for those two, there remains the question of notability. I have read the draft article on WP:EN at User:Nsgaeverine/sandbox/Ava_Zinn and there does not appear to be sufficient third part sources to confirm notability. Creating YouTube videos does not create notability. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:34, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Nsgaeverine (talk · contribs)

edit

These logos and screenshots appear to be copyvios. There is no evidence of permission from their copyright holders.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:43, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the copyright holder is from Ava Zinn and already sent the ORTS licenses from the copyright holder (Ava Zinn.) The files are licensed content from Ava Zinn herself, stated as follows: "I, Ava Zinn, would like to make sure I am represented appropriately in all online ventures and are submitted the correct images and/or logos owned and/or operated by Aeverine Zinn Holdings to that end. For questions on use, contact Ava Zinn at webmaster (at) avazinn (dot) com.". Nsgaeverine (talk) 15:59, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept for the moment, per OTRS permission --Krd 17:01, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible COM:DM issue with the background picture (sorry Poco). -mattbuck (Talk) 22:31, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If possible can this image be reverted to the one uploaded on 17 November 2012 which shows little of the background picture rather then be deleted Oxyman (talk) 22:09, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that seems more likely to meet DM. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:54, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Reverted and possible DW version deleted. INeverCry 17:17, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" 91.64.223.139 09:21, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: changed source to {{Own scan}} as I couldnt find an external source in the same resolution. JuTa 21:46, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of male holding up certificate out of COM:SCOPE for lack of source and lack of educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:58, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Au contraire: The image shows an important person of Hannover, and shows furthermore the first real document "here" with its date from the world record of the greates float in menhood. Thank you for your kindly request, --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 12:56, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment as in the other upload the source given is reflexive to a Wiki page, not a real source. I modify this nomination to no source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:39, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 KeepYou realize that your argument is wrong and there is no source, this is your new argument. But see summary Author Foto: Bernd Schwabe in Hannover and the uploader name. Don´t waste the time of other users, thank you. Regards--Jean11 (talk) 21:55, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: . JuTa 21:33, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of man in hat, outside of COM:SCOPE unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:58, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Au contraire: The image shows an important person, Manfred Kindel. Thank you for your kindly request, --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 12:58, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The "source" given is reflexive to a wikipedia page, so I change this nomination to no source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:37, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep He is Graduate educator, composer, author, artist, singer, songwriter and conductor children of different children's choirs. Out of scope is a bad joke. And see in Summary "Author Foto: Bernd Schwabe in Hannover" and the uploader name. --Jean11 (talk) 21:43, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: . JuTa 21:36, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken svg, unused anyway. Yikrazuul (talk) 18:34, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment See if the replacement fixes the firefox problem. I use Chrome so have no idea. --Fred the Oyster (talk) 23:39, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep On my (OS X/x11) Firefox, the previous version did appear to have the problem whereas the new version displays correctly. It's not standard to have the two CF3 groups different sizes (the mere use of the wedged vs dotted lines to them is how 3D perspective goes in w:skeletal diagrams). But it's not used anywhere, so we don't need to match standard style, and we don't have any other image of this structure-fragment. DMacks (talk) 09:20, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've equalised the text and simplified the code/shapes so it should no longer be broken with any browser and looks, to me, to be perfectly standard based on your comments. So given that it's no longer broken, and being unused is not a valid deletion rationale... Keep --Fred the Oyster (talk) 11:22, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Fixed by Fred the Oyster. Leyo 21:27, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable COPYVIO. This version of the Swedish Greater Coat of Arms is copyrighted material. While the publisher may have been granted permission for use in the book, I seriously doubt it extends to Commons publication. RicJac (talk) 19:40, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Frivlous nomímation out of spite. The drawings are all by the author. The nominating editor is on a revenge campagn because I've asked h on enWP to be more careful with Swenglish and to stop attacking me personally for asking h to be more careful. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 11:27, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have now seen all the original artwork by the author, on file with the Ristesson organization, as covered by the OTRS. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:58, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: There is even a OTRS confirmation. JuTa 21:30, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete the file I uploaded in 2013. This is because now I have uploaded a new version of it. I have uploaded an "update", but the file name seems to not change plus the old file still exists. Maybe best to remove the whole page and then I upload a new one instead. Fajri.matahati (talk) 10:26, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: doubtfull own work. JuTa 22:58, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear German copyright situation (Emil Bieber died 1962) - needs check at Bundesarchiv GermanJoe (talk) 18:04, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: the request would also affect File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-2004-0105-500, Walther v. Brauchitsch color.jpg as derivative image. GermanJoe (talk) 18:19, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll crosspost this at Commons:Bundesarchiv/Questionable licensing. Although the image is widely in use, another portrait photo is available in Category:Walther von Brauchitsch, if the check at Bundesarchiv should fail. If the copyright of the original photo still belongs to the photographer, it can't be used (p.m.a. + 70). GermanJoe (talk) 18:08, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep, this image has detailed licensing information and is also attributed to an agency. The Bundesarchiv asserts that they have the required rights to release the images they uploaded under the given license. This is also attributed to an agency so my guess would be that the photographer transferred some of his rights to the agency which then licensed the image to the Bundesarchiv. I do not see any reason to doubt the licensing of this image. Regards, -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 09:29, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment It would be great, if the image could be kept. But some (admittedly very few) of the Bundesarchiv images already had copyright problems, and Commons should double-check any questionable cases. There is no clear evidence, that the copyright was transferred from E. Bieber to the ADN. Atleast the original photo was not intended for any kind of free usage (see stamp). GermanJoe (talk) 14:49, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unclear copright status. JuTa 22:48, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 18:57, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment, unused at the moment, but not "poor quality". –Be..anyone (talk) 17:43, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: IMHO goo quality. JuTa 22:59, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image appears to show data derived from Google Earth/Maps. As such, Google Earth and/or DigitalGlobe and/or others own copyright over a portion of the material, and it cannot be released as CC-BY-SA. Further information: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikimapia#Licensing Comparison: http://wikimapia.org/#lang=de&lat=36.869734&lon=38.375158&z=14&m=b&show=/31565686/Mount-Mishtenur Archer90 (talk) 19:14, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimapia 4.0 shapes only ...--Bux123 (talk) 22:39, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: even the shapes might be coprighted. JuTa 23:02, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnötige Weiterleitung Master-davinci (talk) 22:02, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vermutlich meinst Du File:DIN 4844-2 P030 Nicht abdecken.svg (English: Wikilinked allegedly unnecessary redirection.) –Be..anyone (talk) 18:21, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: redirect doesnt hurt JuTa 23:04, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnötige Weiterleitung. Die Datei soll in DIN 4844-2 WSP001 umbenannt werden. Master-davinci (talk) 22:12, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: its not a redirect (anymore). JuTa 23:06, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Это не Зуев, это фотография конца XIX века. Зуев жил во времена до фотографий 217.26.6.102 09:55, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: please recrop File:Alexander von Middendorff.jpg if needed, as it is free from watemarks and is of better quality (pixel resolution doesn't matter, as this file was upscaled). Materialscientist (talk) 02:30, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationaly useful as per COM:D: "Private image collections, e.g. private party photos, photos of yourself and your friends, your collection of holiday snaps and so on. There are plenty of other projects on the Internet you can use for such a purpose, such as Flickr. Such private image collections do not become educational even if displayed as a gallery on a user page on Commons or elsewhere." RicJac (talk) 18:10, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Frivlous nomímation out of spite. The editor is on a revenge campagn because I've asked h on enWP to be more careful with Swenglish and to stop attacking me personally for asking h to be more careful. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 11:22, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Demitz was in Rome for 2 days to photograph the tomb of Queen Christina. While there he took a walk and chose this spectacular monument to salute, as en example of the city's architectural treasures. If that's not considered relevant to Commons, then by all means delete the photo! The donor would rather see it deleted than argued about. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:48, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: . Materialscientist (talk) 02:19, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Файл загружен по ошибке. Igor hamper (talk) 18:44, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 02:18, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nicht mehr benötigte Weiterleitung. Bild war ursprünglich nach falscher Adresse benannt. Benutzer:HOPflaume (talk) 18:56, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: fresh erroneous redirect. Materialscientist (talk) 02:18, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mögliche urheberlichtliche Probleme könnten entstehen Rosa-Maria Rinkl (talk) 19:13, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Insufficient information to confirm PD status. Materialscientist (talk) 02:15, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status: As indicated an indoor shot of a painting by unknown painter with unknown copyright status, failing also COM:FOP#Guatemala. May be in public domain by other means but relevant info must be provided. Gunnex (talk) 21:10, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating also the following derivated works by same uploader Nerdoguate (talk · contributions · Statistics) (mostly undated)

Gunnex (talk) 21:35, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the licensing information for the following files: all of them are pictures made from images that were published/painted/made in Guatemala before 1923 and therefore are OK to share per US and Guatemala copyright law:
All other files were made after 1944 and are still under Guatemalan copyright law. Please delete them.
--Nerdoguate (talk) 22:54, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: deleted photos made after 1944. Materialscientist (talk) 02:13, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

soy la propietaria de la foto y quiero que se deje de usar 80.28.131.44 10:02, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

a ver si es esta la ip, aunque estoy identificada y creo que asi ya saben que es mi foto, que soy la propietaria por eso quiero que se deje de usar. No se si he de solicitarlo de otra forma. Gracias


Deleted: Small size, no exif, likely to be a copyrightviolation. Natuur12 (talk) 13:22, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not entirely convinced that the OSCE PA actually has the right to issue a valid copyright license to this file. A "photo courtesy of" statement generally indicates a non-transferrable permission without sublicensing rights. (In other words, the OSCE PA had the right to publish the photo, but presumably not under a license that lets other people use it freely.) As for the author field, OSCE PA is not the author of this photo; according to http://photo.unian.net/eng/detail/579066.html, it was taken by Sirotkina Anastasia (which should probably be Anastasia Sirotkina). She works for Ukraine's Paliamentary Press Service, which unfortunately does not appear to be in the habit of releasing their works under a free license. LX (talk, contribs) 11:44, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I object to the deletion request. The photo is 1. On the OSCE PA's own Flickr Page 2. It is of OSCE PA principle personnel (secretary general and president) 3. It has a license in line with Wikipedia policy. The concerns of the editor requesting the deletion shows an excellent understanding of legal questions and issues, the issues the editor raises may well be valid, however it is speculative as the sentence "Ukraine's Paliamentary Press Service, which unfortunately does not appear to be in the habit of releasing their works under a free license" clearly indicates. As long as the photograph adheres to Wikipedia standards and is under the correct licence there is no case for deletion. In regards to the astute observation by User LX as to the person who took the photo "Anastasia Sirotkina" then it would be correct to change the name of the author to Ms. Sirotkina's. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BierInTrout (talk • contribs) 15:03, 30 October 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that if the OSCE PA does not have the authority to issue a valid license to the photo (and there is no real reason to believe that they do, because they're not the ones who created it; in reality, it would be more speculative to assume that they do have that authority) and the actual copyright holders of the photo (Anastasia Sirotkina/Ukraine's Paliamentary Press Service) haven't agreed to publication under a free license (and again, it would be speculative to assume that they have), then it does not in fact have a license that's in accordance with Commons policy. LX (talk, contribs) 17:15, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"The problem is that if the OSCE PA does not have the authority to issue a valid license to the photo" What factual evidence is there that the OSCE PA does not have the licence it proclaims? —BierInTrout


Deleted: Per LX. Natuur12 (talk) 13:28, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not educationally useful, poor quality. 217.21.43.22 16:28, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Es una reconocida fotografia del autor. No pretende ser educativa sino artística — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fernandacosentino (talk • contribs)

If the author insists I would not advocate the removal of the file. However OTRS permission would be fine.--217.21.43.22 13:23, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:28, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It looks to me as if this diagram is likely to be copyright the PERICLES project, an EU project. We need the deployment of it here to be validated via the OTRS system Timtrent (talk) 16:40, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:29, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

THere is a very small probablity that the uploader was standing outside the ESA to take this picture. OTRS verification is required Timtrent (talk) 16:43, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:29, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this is from the Tate Gallery then the copyright is unlikely to be that of the uploader. OTRS verification is required Timtrent (talk) 16:42, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:30, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logos tend to be the copyright of the artist. OTRS verification is required for this one Timtrent (talk) 16:44, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:30, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It looks to me as if this diagram is likely to be copyright the PERICLES project, an EU project. We need the deployment of it here to be validated via the OTRS system Timtrent (talk) 16:44, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:30, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 18:57, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment, unused at the moment, but not "poor quality". –Be..anyone (talk) 17:44, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Courtesy deletion. Natuur12 (talk) 13:30, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image appears to show data derived from Google Earth/Maps. As such, Google Earth and/or DigitalGlobe and/or others own copyright over a portion of the material, and it cannot be released as CC-BY-SA. Further information: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikimapia#Licensing Comparison: http://wikimapia.org/#lang=de&lat=36.888065&lon=38.353271&z=14&m=b&show=/1844382/de/Koban%C3%AA-%28Ain-al-Arab%29 Archer90 (talk) 19:00, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimapia 4.0 ...--Bux123 (talk) 22:39, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
ok, better version is online
miniatur--Bux123 (talk) 07:50, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: It's now redundant. Natuur12 (talk) 13:32, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]