Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/07/30
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
I did not know it would be publicly visible Zamand Karim Kurdi (talk) 10:49, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:58, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as Logo Yann (talk) 08:53, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Clearly above COM:TOO UK, which is very low, for me.Jonteemil (talk) 09:22, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:37, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as Logo Yann (talk) 08:57, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Above COM:TOO UK, which is very low, for me.Jonteemil (talk) 09:54, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:37, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France. Cjp24 (talk) 17:32, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The poster is the unique element in the picture. --Yann (talk) 20:35, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France. Cjp24 (talk) 17:34, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The poster is the unique element in the picture. --Yann (talk) 20:34, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France. Cjp24 (talk) 17:39, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The poster is the unique element in the picture. --Yann (talk) 20:33, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France. Cjp24 (talk) 17:40, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The poster is the unique element in the picture. --Yann (talk) 20:32, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:23, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:08, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:56, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Commercial logo unlikely to be uploader's. Pierre cb (talk) 03:45, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Unused JPEG logo, should be SVG if useful. --Yann (talk) 10:12, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Poor quality, little public interest. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:00, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Delete Nah, definitely in scope; it's just that the picture quality is low. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:35, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:54, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Private snapshot or screenshot of a minor and completely out of project scope. LexICon (talk) 01:46, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:55, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Armageddonsaltar (talk · contribs)
editOut-of-scope artworks. COM:SCOPE specifically lists Artwork without obvious educational use, including non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills as being out of the scope of Commons.
- File:Alabama armageddons altar.webm
- File:Alaska armageddons altar.webm
- File:Arizona armageddons altar.webm
- File:Arkansas armageddons altar.webm
- File:California armageddons altar.webm
- File:Colorado armageddons altar.webm
- File:Connecticut armageddons altar.webm
- File:Delaware armageddons altar.webm
- File:Florida armageddons altar.webm
- File:Georgia armageddons altar.webm
- File:Hawaii armageddons altar.webm
- File:Idaho armageddons altar.webm
- File:Illinois armageddons altar.webm
- File:Indiana armageddons altar.webm
- File:Iowa armageddons altar.webm
- File:Kansas armageddons altar.webm
- File:Kentucky armageddons altar.webm
- File:Lousiana armageddons altar.webm
- File:Maine armageddons altar.webm
- File:Maryland armageddons altar.webm
- File:Massachusetts armageddons altar.webm
- File:Michigan armageddons altar.webm
- File:Minnesota armageddons altar.webm
- File:Mississippi armageddons altar.webm
- File:Missouri armageddons altar.webm
- File:Montana armageddons altar.webm
- File:Nebraska armageddons altar.webm
- File:Nevada armageddons altar.webm
- File:New Hampshire armageddonsaltar.webm
- File:New Jersey armageddons altar.webm
- File:NewMexicoforwikimedia.webm
- File:New York armageddons altar.webm
- File:North Carolina armageddons altar.webm
- File:North Dakota armageddons altar.webm
- File:Ohio armageddons altar.webm
- File:Oklahoma armageddons altar.webm
- File:Oregon armageddons altar.webm
- File:Pennsylvania armageddons altar.webm
- File:Rhode Island armageddons altar.webm
- File:South Carolina armageddons altar.webm
- File:South Dakota armageddons altar.webm
- File:Tennessee armageddons altar.webm
- File:Texas armageddons altar.webm
- File:Utah armageddons altar.webm
- File:Vermont armageddons altar.webm
- File:Virginia armageddons altar.webm
- File:Washington armageddons altar.webm
- File:West Virginia armageddons altar.webm
- File:Wisconsin armageddons altar.webm
- File:Wyoming armageddons altar.webm
Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:13, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Having watched the first two videos, I agree with you. Delete. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:21, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:57, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
No indication of importance (people). Kun Kipcsak (talk) 07:19, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:59, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. Zafer (talk) 07:47, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:59, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Harassment or joke, unusable material Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 08:01, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:00, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused logo. Lymantria (talk) 08:32, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:00, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gs Sani YT (talk · contribs)
editCommons is not your personal free web host. No contributions to wm projects.
- File:Gs Sani YT2.jpg
- File:প্রতিটা কষ্টকর অভিজ্ঞতাই আমাদের জন্য নতুন শিক্ষা !.jpg
- File:Gs Sani YT ,.jpg
- File:Gs.Sani.YT.jpg
- File:Gs Sani YT 22-06-19 06-31-56-829.jpg
- File:Arafat Sani.jpg
- File:Gs Sani YT 2.jpg
- File:547A2611.jpg
- File:Gs Sani YT.jpg
- File:Arafat sani.jpg
Achim55 (talk) 09:26, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete In addition, the two photos I looked at both had watermarks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:28, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:01, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 10:35, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:02, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rafahedhosen (talk · contribs)
editOut of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin Balashighat.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin Balashighat Gaibandha Sador.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin Balashighat Gaibandha.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin.jpg
—MdsShakil (talk) 10:36, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:02, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rafahedhosen (talk · contribs)
editUnused personal photos, out of scope
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin 5.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin 4.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin 3.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin Borodaho Bridg, Gobindaganj, Gaibandha 18.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin Borodaho Bridg, Gobindaganj, Gaibandha 17.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin Borodaho Bridg, Gobindaganj, Gaibandha 16.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin Borodaho Bridg, Gobindaganj, Gaibandha 15.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin Borodaho Bridg, Gobindaganj, Gaibandha 14.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin Borodaho Bridg, Gobindaganj, Gaibandha 13.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin Borodaho Bridg, Gobindaganj, Gaibandha 12.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin Borodaho Bridg, Gobindaganj, Gaibandha 11.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin Borodaho Bridg, Gobindaganj, Gaibandha 10.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin Borodaho Bridg, Gobindaganj, Gaibandha 9.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin Borodaho Bridg, Gobindaganj, Gaibandha 8.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin Borodaho Bridg, Gobindaganj, Gaibandha 7.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin Borodaho Bridg, Gobindaganj, Gaibandha 6.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin Borodaho Bridg, Gobindaganj, Gaibandha 5.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin Borodaho Bridg, Gobindaganj, Gaibandha 4.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin Borodaho Bridg, Gobindaganj, Gaibandha 3.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin Borodaho Bridg, Gobindaganj, Gaibandha 2.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin Borodaho Bridg, Gobindaganj, Gaibandha.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin 2.jpg
Afifa Afrin (talk) 10:57, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:29, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rafahedhosen (talk · contribs)
editUnused personal photo, out of scope
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin 11.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin 10.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin 9.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin 8.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin 7.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin 6.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin 5.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin 4.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin 3.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin 2.jpg
Afifa Afrin (talk) 13:30, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom —MdsShakil (talk) 10:57, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:21, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rafahedhosen (talk · contribs)
editPersonal photos by a non-contributor. Commons is not a web host for personal photos. Has no educational value. Out of project scope.
- File:Gaibandha District Rafahed hosen alamin rafahed hosen alamin.jpg
- File:Gaibandha District.jpg
- File:Rafahed hoden alamin rafahed hosen alamin আশুরিয়ার বিল , নবাবগঞ্জ, দিনাজপুর dinajpur r.jpg
- File:Rafahed hoden alamin rafahed hosen alamin আশুরিয়ার বিল , নবাবগঞ্জ, দিনাজপুর dinajpur.jpg
- File:Rafahed hoden alamin rafahed hosen alamin আশুরিয়ার বিল , নবাবগঞ্জ, দিনাজপুর.jpg
- File:Police cafe Gaibandha City পুলিশ ক্যাফে গাইবান্ধা শহর Rafahed hosen alamin.jpg
- File:Police cafe Gaibandha City পুলিশ ক্যাফে গাইবান্ধা শহর Rafahed hosen alamin rafahed hosen alamin.jpg
- File:Police cafe Gaibandha City পুলিশ ক্যাফে গাইবান্ধা শহর Rafahed hosen alamin Gaibandha.jpg
- File:Love with tea. There is no deception in this love Rafahed hosen alamin Gaibandha City.jpg
- File:Love with tea. There is no deception in this love Rafahed hosen alamin Gaibandha District.jpg
- File:Love with tea. There is no deception in this love Rafahed hosen alamin Gaibandha District coffee.jpg
- File:Love with tea. There is no deception in this love Rafahed hosen alamin gaibandha.jpg
- File:Love with tea. There is no deception in this love Rafahed hosen alamin.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin Zeo Point Border Check Point, Bangladesh,Tetulia Gaibandha To Zero Point Border Check Point Bangladesh Teltulia.jpg
- File:The most beautiful place Balashi ghat at Gaibandha in Bangladesh Rafahed hosen alamin Rafahed hosen alamin BalashiGhat-,বালাশীঘাট-Gaibandha Balashi Ghat , Gaibandha Sadar, Rangpur,Dhaka, Bangladesh.jpg
- File:The most beautiful place Balashi ghat at Gaibandha in Bangladesh Rafahed hosen alamin rafahed hosen alamin BalashiGhat-,বালাশীঘাট-Gaibandha Balashi Ghat , Gaibandha Sadar, Rangpur,Dhaka, Bangladesh Rafahed.jpg
- File:The most beautiful place Balashi ghat at Gaibandha in Bangladesh Rafahed hosen alamin rafahed hosen alamin BalashiGhat-,বালাশীঘাট-Gaibandha Balashi raGhat , Gaibandha Sadar, Rangpur,Dhaka, Bangladesh.jpg
- File:The most beautiful place Balashi ghat at Gaibandha in Bangladesh Rafahed hosen alamin rafahed hosen alamin BalashiGhat-,বালাশীঘাট-Gaibandha Balashi Ghat , Gaibandha Sadar, Rangpur,Dhaka, Bangladesh Rafahed hosen.jpg
- File:The most beautiful place Balashi ghat at Gaibandha in Bangladesh Rafahed hosen alamin rafahed hosen alamin BalashiGhat-,বালাশীঘাট-Gaibandha Balashi Ghat , Gaibandha Sadar, Rangpur,Dhaka, Bangladesh. Gaiban.jpg
- File:The most beautiful place Balashi ghat at Gaibandha in Bangladesh Rafahed hosen alamin rafahed hosen alamin BalashiGhat-,বালাশীঘাট-Gaibandha Balashi Ghat , Gaibandha Sadar, Rangpur,Dhaka, Bangladesh. Gaibandha in.jpg
- File:The most beautiful place Balashi ghat at Gaibandha in Bangladesh Rafahed hosen alamin rafahed hosen alamin BalashiGhat-,বালাশীঘাট-Gaibandha Balashi Ghat , Gaibandha Sadar, Rangpur,Dhaka, gaibandha Bangladesh.jpg
- File:The most beautiful place Balashi ghat at Gaibandha in Bangladesh Rafahed hosen alamin rafahed hosen alamin BalashiGhat-,বালাশীঘাট-Gaibandha Balashi Ghat , Gaibandha Sadar, Rangpur,Dhaka, Bangladesh.jpg
- File:The most beautiful place Balashi ghat at Gaibandha in Bangladesh Rafahed hosen alamin rafahed hosen alamin BalashiGhat-,বালাশীঘাট-Gaibandha Balashi Ghat , Gaibandha Sadar, Rangpur,Dhaka, Bangladesh gai.jpg
- File:The most beautiful place Balashi ghat at Gaibandha in Bangladesh Rafahed hosen alamin rafahed hosen alamin BalashiGhat-,বালাশীঘাট-Gaibandha Balashi Ghat , Gaibandha Sadar, Rangpur,Dhaka, Bangladesh gaib.jpg
- File:The most beautiful place Balashi ghat at Gaibandha in Bangladesh Rafahed hosen alamin Gaibandha.jpg
- File:The most beautiful place Balashi ghat at Gaibandha in Bangladesh Rafahed hosen alamin.jpg
- File:Balashi Ghat (বালাসী ঘাট) is one of the most beautiful tourist spots of Gaibandha District.It stands beside the bank of Jamuna River and is not very far from Gaibandha Sadar Upazila Trawlers & boats are available.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin জাতীয় স্মৃতিসৌধ নবীনগর সাভার ঢাকা national martyrs memorial rafah.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin জাতীয় স্মৃতিসৌধ নবীনগর সাভার ঢাকা national martyrs memorial Rafa.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin Gaibandha Pauro Park গাইবান্ধা পৌর পার্ক গাইবান্ধা শহর গাইবান্ধা Rafa.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin Gaibandha Pauro Park গাইবান্ধা পৌর পার্ক গাইবান্ধা শহর গাইবান্ধা Raf.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin Gaibandha Pauro Park গাইবান্ধা পৌর পার্ক গাইবান্ধা শহর গাইবান্ধা Ra.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin Gaibandha Pauro Park গাইবান্ধা পৌর পার্ক গাইবান্ধা শহর গাইবান্ধা R.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin Gaibandha Pauro Park গাইবান্ধা পৌর পার্ক গাইবান্ধা শহর গাইবান্ধা.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin জাতীয় স্মৃতিসৌধ নবীনগর সাভার ঢাকা national martyrs memorial F.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin জাতীয় স্মৃতিসৌধ নবীনগর সাভার ঢাকা national martyrs memorial R.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin জাতীয় স্মৃতিসৌধ নবীনগর সাভার ঢাকা national martyrs memorial A.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin জাতীয় স্মৃতিসৌধ নবীনগর সাভার ঢাকা national martyrs memorial.jpg
- File:Rafahed hosen alamin Gaibandha Sadar Upazila.jpg
_is_one_of_the_most_beautiful_tourist_spots_of_Gaibandha_District.It_stands_beside_the_bank_of_Jamuna_River_and_is_not_very_far_from_Gaibandha_Sadar_Upazila_Trawlers_%26_boats_are_available.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 17:18, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:13, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 10:44, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:04, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 10:44, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:04, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 10:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:04, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 10:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:04, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 10:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:04, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 10:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:03, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 10:51, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:03, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 10:51, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:05, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 10:51, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:06, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 10:52, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:06, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
COMMONS:SCOPE. Sahaib (talk) 12:34, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:07, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure; opaque (white) background & colored atom labels. We have File:2-propoxyethanol 200.svg as high-quality replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 13:18, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:08, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo of a random company/website, out of COM:SCOPE. Might exceed COM:TOO and there's no evidence that the company/website has released it under a CC license. -M.nelson (talk) 15:29, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:09, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused photo of a non-notable individual, from frequently-declined draft en:Draft:Kangjam Jibai Singh. Out of COM:SCOPE. -M.nelson (talk) 15:42, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:07, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 17:35, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:10, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 17:36, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:10, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
curved line without educational use Drakosh (talk) 17:38, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:10, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Curwed line without educational use Drakosh (talk) 17:38, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:11, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
self created artwork? not used, not in scope Avron (talk) 18:08, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:11, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
copyvio https://www.facebook.com/pravin.pawar140281/photos/5250835051619998 (Copyright @Pravingraphy_official. All right reserved) AwkwardChester (talk) 15:51, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: source -> "Instagram", unlikely to be free licensed. --Strakhov (talk) 19:58, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
from instagram https://www.instagram.com/p/CWSp0pRjhFG/ AwkwardChester (talk) 16:01, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: not own work. --Strakhov (talk) 19:59, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope material (?). Εὐθυμένης (talk) 16:58, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Keep Why would an English association football club's logo be out of scope? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:51, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: Because it doesn't seem to meet notability criteria guideline. Same situation would be for me to upload a selfie of mine. 🤷♂️ Εὐθυμένης (talk) 07:35, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- It is a semi-professional team. Do we need to be as strict as Wikipedia? I think not, because if there were a decision to start a new article, which doesn't seem entirely implausible to me, it would be good for there to be existing, usable photos. But the decision is up to an admin. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:43, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per Ikan Kekek. --Strakhov (talk) 20:01, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
unsourced. copyright. no permission Miha2020 (talk) 01:36, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 19:58, 7 August 2022 UTC: per COM:SPEEDY --Krdbot 01:54, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by VateGV as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyrighted work beyond the threshold of originality Yann (talk) 09:01, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 08:27, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Xwiki promotion; see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:AkilbekAllan.jpg.
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:02, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 14:18, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Appears to be a screenshot of a television show. discospinster (talk) 18:05, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:06, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Appears to be a screenshot of a television program discospinster (talk) 18:07, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:06, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Licencia erronea Alogsh (talk) 17:23, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, licensed on flickr as NonCommercial and NoDerivs which are non-compliant. --Royalbroil 23:59, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Atteinte aux droits d'auteurs de Marvel Studios. Les logos des films et séries sont généralement placés sous Copyright en tant que "Marque déposée" MrFaabz (talk) 15:19, 30 July 2022 (UTC) Alors pourquoi tous les autres logos sont partout sur internet et wikiédia/wikipédia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ARNPIC3101 (talk • contribs) 19:08, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Parce que les logos de films et séries sont soumis aux droits d'auteur et n'ont rien a faire sur Commons. Il faut les téléverser sur Wikipédia directement.MrFaabz (talk) 19:46, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko (Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo). (non-admin closure). Marbletan (talk) 18:52, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MrFaabz as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non-free logo. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:37, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko (Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo). (non-admin closure). Marbletan (talk) 18:53, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Personal "artwork" lacking COM:EDUSE. Achim55 (talk) 18:15, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:54, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation of cake pictures Headlock0225 (talk) 06:56, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 19:31, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
first timer TheMichaelLlana (talk) 10:22, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:31, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate by error Peli (talk) 05:24, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 21:37, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Self request, incorrectly named file (should be File:BSicon_tKRWgr+r_blue.svg). LuciferianThomas 16:35, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 21:41, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Being used inappropriately for commercial purposes without my permission. Tinydog015 (talk) 23:13, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: The author generously released this picture under a CC BY-SA 2.0 licence, which permits commercial re-use subject to some conditions. If some people are failing to honour those conditions (assuming that's what "inappropriately" means, that's a matter between the author and those people, and doesn't affect whether Commons should keep the picture. The picture is widely used on Wikipedias, so I don't think a courtesy deletion would be appropriate. --bjh21 (talk) 09:37, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 21:44, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Source YouTube, need permission. Pierre cb (talk) 13:14, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:14, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
VRT required. In Japan, copyright is an exception to incorporated administrative agencies, but national university corporations are not incorporated administrative agencies. The National University Corporation is a corporation established by the National University Corporation Law[1], not the Incorporated Administrative Agency Law[2]. In addition, according to the regulations of Tohoku University, it is prohibited to use it without the permission of Tohoku University.[3] 春春眠眠 (talk) 06:39, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: is well above TOO. --Yasu (talk) 15:18, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
In Japan, copyright is an exception to incorporated administrative agencies, but national university corporations are not incorporated administrative agencies. The National University Corporation is a corporation established by the National University Corporation Law, not the Incorporated Administrative Agency Law. In addition, according to the regulations of Tohoku University, it is prohibited to use it without the permission of Tohoku University. 2400:2652:882:B500:A143:C1E2:400B:87FC 21:04, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per the previous DR. --Yasu (talk) 15:18, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
In Japan, copyright is an exception to incorporated administrative agencies, but national university corporations are not incorporated administrative agencies. The National University Corporation is a corporation established by the National University Corporation Law, not the Incorporated Administrative Agency Law. In addition, according to the regulations of Tohoku University, it is prohibited to use it without the permission of Tohoku University. 2400:2652:882:B500:A143:C1E2:400B:87FC 21:06, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:東北大学ロゴ.svg. --Yasu (talk) 15:20, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Taken from https://deadline.com/2020/05/l-a-county-coronavirus-dr-barbara-ferrer-1202933922/ reppoptalk 01:00, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:47, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Apparent screen grab from YouTube video. [4] Source does not indicate a Creative Commons license. Ixfd64 (talk) 01:53, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:11, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Above COM:TOO Hong Kong --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:40, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:12, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 185.172.241.184 as Fair use (fair use). COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:40, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no indication of free license offered. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:12, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Invalid license: the {{GODL-India}} license is only applicable to some works of the central government of India, and not to works by the Goa state assembly, see COM:TAG India. Verbcatcher (talk) 03:40, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- See also:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Shri-Viresh-Borkar.jpg, for a file from the same source from the same uploader.
- Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Images from the website of the Goa Legislative Assembly
- Verbcatcher (talk) 03:44, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Smt-jennifer-monserrate 5220220316.1351.jpg. Verbcatcher (talk) 03:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:54, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination Run n Fly (talk) 17:45, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:13, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Invalid license: the {{GODL-India}} license is only applicable to some works of the central government of India, and not to works by the Goa Legislative Assembly, see COM:TAG India. Verbcatcher (talk) 03:48, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- See also:
- Verbcatcher (talk) 03:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
GODL-India isn't even applicable to works by the central government for the most part, I don't think. I don't see a license statement on the source website here. Delete Carl Lindberg (talk) 21:50, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:13, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:14, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Cannot find this image on the source, please specify 116.48.225.194 04:35, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. I have updated the link to the image source. - Chien (talk) 22:47, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:14, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Cannot find this image on the source, please specify 116.48.225.194 04:35, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. I have updated the link to the image source. - Chien (talk) 14:07, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:14, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Cannot find this image on the source, please specify 116.48.225.194 04:35, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. I have updated the link to the image source. - Chien (talk) 23:26, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:15, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
copyrighted movie poster 2A02:810B:580:11D4:A879:9D2B:8AF8:64EC 05:41, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; COM:DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:15, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Artifact of a file move. SHB2000 (talk) 05:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; file page with no media. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:17, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
The fact that the photo was stolen is indicated by a Google search on the image (the photo was previously posted on the Official website of the Russian Imperial House: google), as well as the contribution of the participant who uploaded the file (he no longer has any edits). Wasa Kawasaker (talk) 06:05, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:17, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Above COM:TOO Australia --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:17, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:18, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ductwork as Logo (above threshold of originality |source=https://www.diopa.org) Yann (talk) 08:57, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The coat of arms in the logo have been in use since the 1800s. --RAN (talk) 19:40, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per RAN. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:18, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Little Kari, from the Norwegian of Ingrid Kittelsen Treider; (IA littlekarifromno00trei).pdf
editTranslation of work by Ingrid Kittelsen Treider (1890-1961), which would not be out of copyright in its origin country(Norway) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:06, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The Library of Congress has made their own appraisal, and is, that The English translation is in the public domain because of non renewal, even though the original Norwegian language version is under an active copyright. --RAN (talk) 20:42, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: As far as I can tell, RAN seems to be correct; seems that the Norwegian original is under copyright, but the US translation/adaptation is PD-US. This is a rather strange case; if anyone is aware of detail of US law that makes this incorrect please bring it to our attention. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:22, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Selfie eines 16jährigen, der Köln besuchte. Siehe https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_policy/de#Nicht_n%C3%BCtzlich_f%C3%BCr_Bildungszwecke Benutzer:WvB (talk) 09:58, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unused personal photo. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:23, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Craiyon
editThese are the currently-unused images from the category. They are all AI-generated images which are far too low quality to ever be used to illustrate their depicted subject, and which do not appear to be illustrating any particular aspects of Craiyon output. As "Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality" these fall under COM:SPAM, and it's not great that they're filling up biographical categories, some appearing superficially useful at thumbnail size.
If a human was drawing similarly strange, low-res portraits by hand and uploading them to Commons under a generous public domain licence, we would delete them. Commons should host some Craiyon output images to give a fair illustration of the range and quirks of the software's output, but only when, again, "educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject".
- File:A Female hiker with black bra (Craiyon).jpg
- File:AI Generated Images of a Persian Vampire Queen.png
- File:Bill clinton dall-e.jpg
- File:Bob marley dall-e.jpg
- File:Cleanwhale logo.jpg
- File:Conjoined Gros Michel Banana (CrAIyon).jpg
File:CRAIYON-REALESRGAN-Dalmatian bench.jpg- no longer unused, added to a Signpost article a week into the discussionFile:CRAIYON-REALESRGAN-Golden gate bridge.jpg- dittoFile:CRAIYON-REALESRGAN-Gorilla with rifle and army helmet.jpg- ditto- File:Crungus DALL-E Flow.png
- File:Crungus, DALL-E Mini.png
- File:Cthulhu-vs-flying-spaghetti-monster.jpg
- File:David beckham dall-e.jpg
- File:Dwayne johnson dall-e.jpg
- File:Elon musk dall-e.jpg
- File:Eminem dall-e.jpg
- File:Happy woman wearing taupe jacket (Craiyon).jpg
- File:Jk rowling dall-e.jpg
- File:King playing football in space.png
- File:Malala dall-e.jpg
- File:Mannequin with bra in the fire background (Craiyon).jpg
- File:Marie curie dall-e.jpg
- File:Martin luther king dall-e.jpg
- File:Sailor Moon fighting against Cthulhu.jpg
- File:Salvador dali dall-e.jpg
- File:Shirtless man with taupe jacket (Craiyon).jpg
- File:Stephen hawking dall-e.jpg
- File:Todos teman al todopoderoso Cthulhu.jpg
- File:Vlad dracula dall-e.jpg
- File:Wikipedia blocked user by Craiyon.png
- File:Woman wearing red bra and taupe jacket (Craiyon).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Lord Belbury (talk) 13:12, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Discussion
edit- Delete, images without interest. Moreover, the category "Craiyon" should not be a subcategory of DALL-E but a category of its own (subcategory of computer generated image). Due to the fact that Dalle-mini has nothing to do with Dall-E.--Madelgarius (talk) 11:21, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Some dozen or so of these images were specifically created as illustrations for the July 31 Signpost, which is due to publish in three hours. As such, I am currently editing the issue and preparing it for publication, and do not have the time to properly articulate myself here, but I can assure you that many of these are directly relevant to a project. The ones I have made are not being put into file categories for their subjects (i.e. "Dalmatian bench" is not in any categories for benches or Dalmatians). JPxG (talk) 19:36, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- None of these images were or are in use. This is not a nomination of every image in the category, only those which were not in use at the time of nomination - I skipped those which were in use in Signpost drafts. It looks like none of the images above have been added to Signpost pages in the time since nomination. --Lord Belbury (talk) 06:54, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Lord Belbury: Well, they are all currently in use in the August issue (wikipedia:WP:SIGNPOST) -- there are a couple others I uploaded that are for use in future issues. As for the rest, I am not sure what the concern is about someone using these to illustrate, say, an actual article on Salvador Dali -- it's obvious that they would be used to illustrate an article about the capabilities of the software. JPxG (talk) 17:41, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
- @JPxG: Sorry but I'm still not seeing which images you're referring to as being in use. The three of your uploads that are nominated here - File:CRAIYON-REALESRGAN-Dalmatian bench.jpg, File:CRAIYON-REALESRGAN-Golden gate bridge.jpg, File:CRAIYON-REALESRGAN-Gorilla with rifle and army helmet.jpg - all say "There are no pages that use this file." at the bottom. Are they embedded in some other way? To be very clear, I am not proposing to delete all files in this category, only the specific 31 files which are listed above - the ones that are not in use. --Lord Belbury (talk) 18:00, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Lord Belbury: They're in File:CRAIYON-REALESRGAN-Collage-newsandnotes.jpg. JPxG (talk) 02:37, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- @JPxG: That's a 3x3 grid collage that includes three of these images at the same resolution, and which wouldn't be affected if the three standalone images were deleted? Neither the collage nor the Signpost page appear to include direct links to any of your three images, so I don't understand how you consider these three images (or all 31 images?) to be "in use". Are there direct links I can't find, and is that enough reason to keep hosting an otherwise unused image? --Lord Belbury (talk) 08:05, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Lord Belbury: Okay, what do you want me to do? JPxG (talk) 21:33, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Just be a bit clearer about which images you believe to be in use. Are you still concerned that these 31 images are "all currently in use in the August issue" of your Signpost page, or only "some dozen or so", or have we been talking at cross purposes?
- I see you've now added your three uploads to the Signpost page after all, so I'll strike those from the list above. --Lord Belbury (talk) 06:40, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Lord Belbury: Okay, what do you want me to do? JPxG (talk) 21:33, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- @JPxG: That's a 3x3 grid collage that includes three of these images at the same resolution, and which wouldn't be affected if the three standalone images were deleted? Neither the collage nor the Signpost page appear to include direct links to any of your three images, so I don't understand how you consider these three images (or all 31 images?) to be "in use". Are there direct links I can't find, and is that enough reason to keep hosting an otherwise unused image? --Lord Belbury (talk) 08:05, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Lord Belbury: They're in File:CRAIYON-REALESRGAN-Collage-newsandnotes.jpg. JPxG (talk) 02:37, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- @JPxG: Sorry but I'm still not seeing which images you're referring to as being in use. The three of your uploads that are nominated here - File:CRAIYON-REALESRGAN-Dalmatian bench.jpg, File:CRAIYON-REALESRGAN-Golden gate bridge.jpg, File:CRAIYON-REALESRGAN-Gorilla with rifle and army helmet.jpg - all say "There are no pages that use this file." at the bottom. Are they embedded in some other way? To be very clear, I am not proposing to delete all files in this category, only the specific 31 files which are listed above - the ones that are not in use. --Lord Belbury (talk) 18:00, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Lord Belbury: Well, they are all currently in use in the August issue (wikipedia:WP:SIGNPOST) -- there are a couple others I uploaded that are for use in future issues. As for the rest, I am not sure what the concern is about someone using these to illustrate, say, an actual article on Salvador Dali -- it's obvious that they would be used to illustrate an article about the capabilities of the software. JPxG (talk) 17:41, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete most of them - Commons is not free webhosting for Craiyoncruft. I would Keep File:Bill clinton dall-e.jpg and File:AI Generated Images of a Persian Vampire Queen.png as these two are good examples of the software and potentially useful in an article somewhere. --B (talk) 12:36, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete all (unused ones) per failing COM:SCOPE. There is no educational value nor any reasonable scenario when these can be useful unless specifically made to illustrate AI generation. These are just random images that we could literally generate an infinite number of. One could just type random words and keep uploading these to Commons forever. As noted above, Commons is not a repository/webhost for generated images. — HELLKNOWZ ∣ TALK ∣ enWiki 16:27, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep File:AI Generated Images of a Persian Vampire Queen.png, as the whole image was not generated by Craiyon, but rather, the image is a collage consisting of the outputs of four different AIs when given the same command. Because of this, I believe the image could be useful for illustrating the differences between different AI art programs. Delete the other unused files, as they are too low-quality to be educationally useful. Chiolite (talk) 17:41, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
- Closed, most deleted as OOS; a few kept per individual requests &/or in use above. (Note: This is not intended to be a ruling on if the kept images might have other problems, such as being derivative works or otherwise copyright problems.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:08, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Com:PORN, nothing we don’t have Dronebogus (talk) 11:02, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Human sexuality is with scope, adequately illustrative of common reproductive and recreational human activity. No requirement to delete that I see. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:27, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Page content is gibberish, user’s only edit was also nonsense crap I reverted. Dronebogus (talk) 11:04, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
User page blanked -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:30, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Antholgy, Each poem has a seperate copyright, Not a work of US gov. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:56, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Have any of them been renewed separately from the entire anthology? --RAN (talk) 19:08, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- That would need be to determined. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 06:02, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Absent an allegation against a specific poem, I do not believe that this anthology (which is not itself copyrighted) should be deleted because of a fear that a poem may be copyrighted. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 01:50, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted. While not implausible that every poem in the collection might be out of copyright, that has not been demonstrated. The only reason for free status offered on file page is {{PD-US-Gov}}, which the nominator notes is false; no alternative license has been offered in the more than 2 months since deletion was proposed. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:32, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
This photo is personal and has nothing to do with this name, and I request you to delete this photo as soon as possible. Rezabeshghi (talk) 11:57, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader request; unused personal photo. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:38, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
COMMONS:SCOPE. Sahaib (talk) 12:35, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- I'd recommend keeping, because this is a decent portrait. The other one can go. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:55, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: No requirement for deletion, no consensus to delete. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:40, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Christian faith and the modern state,an ecumenical approach, (IA christianfaithmo00ehre).pdf
editThis is a translation of a work by 'Nils Ehrenstrom(1903-1894) and they did not move to the US until 1955. Therfore the original of this is not necessarily out of copyright in it's origin country. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:46, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:40, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Logo of a UK company which exceeds COM:TOO UK. No evidence of free license at the source https://www.fusionpos.co.uk/. -M.nelson (talk) 12:46, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Delete way above TOO UK. Sennecaster (talk) 20:20, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:40, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
it is old nariman milanfar (talk) 13:15, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: "It is old" is not a reason to delete (indeed in some cases may be a reason to keep), but this is an unused personal photo requested for deletion by uploader. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:42, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1). (for example: this, this and this, since 14 November 2021) --Karim talk to me :)..! 13:19, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:43, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
It is old nariman milanfar (talk) 13:31, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: CV false license claims. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:44, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
it is not mine and it is old nariman milanfar (talk) 13:34, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: CV. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:44, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
The American Edition has no-renewal, However this seems to be republication of 1937 work first published in the UK? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:43, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Looking at it, the copyright statement and printing statements are US. It looks like the UK notice was physically added after to a US manufactured book by UK seller - does not affect original US copyright. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:48, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
I'm not sure that this is own work Mr. Fake Tor (talk) 15:04, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep PD-RusEmpire. --RAN (talk) 21:29, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Well, after the changes, it can be remove from the nomination, just add the source. Mr. Fake Tor (talk) 12:28, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
And indicate who the author is. Mr. Fake Tor (talk) 12:30, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Like most images before cameras stored exif data, it is anonymous. --RAN (talk) 20:47, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per above, license has been corrected. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:49, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:26, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:57, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:27, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- 97 years ago Baratiiman (talk) 15:34, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- This would be considered a derivative of File:Emblem of Iran.svg. Surely the same license would apply. Fry1989 eh? 19:01, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per above; licensing info corrected. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:58, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
This flag design has some mistakes that need to be corrected Tinydancer57 (talk) 16:18, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- I'd support deletion, as there's no foreseeable prospect of the U.S. having 70 states. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:52, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep It isn't a fictional flag with new speculative artwork, but a representation of what the current flag would like if we expanded to 70 states. We have different versions of the EU flag under the same premise. --RAN (talk) 21:35, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Question The premise of an EU with 70 members? Why are these non-reality-based things of educational value? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:14, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader request, unused, probably OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:00, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope material (?). Εὐθυμένης (talk) 16:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Question If it's a real football club, why would its logo be out of scope? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: Because it doesn't seem to meet notability criteria guideline. Same situation would be for me to upload a selfie of mine. 🤷♂️ Εὐθυμένης (talk) 07:35, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- It is an amateur club, so if that's the judgment, OK. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:40, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:01, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
If this was privately filmed by German cameraman Willy Wist as claimed, why would it be in the public domain? German Urheberrecht lasts for 70 years after the death of the author, and Wist was definitively still alive in 1972 [5]. So this is still copyrighted for quite some time and should be deleted. The file can then be restored either 70 years after the year in which Wist died (if someone can find it) or with {{PD-old-assumed}} 120 years after the film was made in 2063. Rosenzweig τ 15:10, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: “Film Provenance: The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum purchased this from the Bundesarchiv in Berlin, Germany in April 2002. [...] Copyright: Public Domain” (Source: ushmm.org). --Treck08 (talk) 15:25, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- So? A museum purchasing a film from an archive does not invalidate copyrights. They also don't say why they think the film is in the public domain (and where, because they don't say if this applies to the US or anywhere else), so I severely doubt they really know what they're writing there. Reading further about this film, I also doubt their attribution of this film to Willy Wist is correct. Numerous articles about this 1942 Ghetto film project like [6] (and also the one already linked above) attribute a 106 m film shot on 16 mm color film material (which should be this file, 120 meters of 16 mm film is 10,7 minutes [7], while this file is 8 minutes 55 seconds) to another cameraman named Hans Juppenlatz. I could not find out when he died, so {{PD-old-assumed}} would apply. --Rosenzweig τ 15:38, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- And also, that file was not uploaded with one of the several "PD" (public domain) license tags we have, but with the {{Cc-zero}} tag. Where did that come from? The USHMM does not use it. --Rosenzweig τ 16:04, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- You're right, it should correctly be public domain. --Treck08 (talk) 16:47, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Interesting: We first met at the discussion of “Commons:Deletion requests/File:UNRA sl.jpg” and directly afterwards you are trying to delete my upload, with the argument, you don't trust the legal department of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum and know it better. Spooky. Maybe it's coincidence that's both files are about nazi-stuff. At other files, you apparently trust the declarations and don't look for possibly problems to delete the files. You seem to be an admin, so it is is how it is. Good luck, --Treck08 (talk) 16:47, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- I'm trying to still think with my own head, apply plausibility criteria if necessary and not blindly believe anything some institution claims. And I don't care if it's about Nazis, communists or Bhagwan disciples. --Rosenzweig τ 17:27, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Summary: A German is trying to sow mistrust against the declaration of the legal department of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, only to delete a document about nazi-stuff. And you are calling this “think with my own head”. Interesting. --Treck08 (talk) 20:54, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- So you've started with ad hominem attacks now. Which means you've run out of objective arguments. --Rosenzweig τ 11:18, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Summary: A German is trying to sow mistrust against the declaration of the legal department of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, only to delete a document about nazi-stuff. And you are calling this “think with my own head”. Interesting. --Treck08 (talk) 20:54, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- I'm trying to still think with my own head, apply plausibility criteria if necessary and not blindly believe anything some institution claims. And I don't care if it's about Nazis, communists or Bhagwan disciples. --Rosenzweig τ 17:27, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- The author seems not to be dead for 70 years so the file is not public domain in this sense but the museum could have declared it as CC0 or public domain if they got the rights to do so. --GPSLeo (talk) 07:10, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- They purchased a copy from the Bundesarchiv (German Federal Archive) in 2002. The original film is still in the Bundesarchiv per [8] (footnote 84). And they do not declare anything, use a CC license or such, but only write "To the best of the Museum's knowledge, this material is in the public domain." Which sounds like a standard boilerplate assessment not specifically tailored to this film. It also does not say if this assessment is restricted to the US or if it also extends to other countries (like Germany, which for Commons is the source country of the work per Commons:Licensing and other policies). --Rosenzweig τ 11:02, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep We usually assume copyright status from GLAMs and reliable sources. Trying to be more clever than these institutions is the wrong way to deal with copyright. Yann (talk) 09:20, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- This is basically a statement that we should blindly believe anything such an institution says and not think ourselves. Now that is the wrong way to deal with copyright. If statements are implausible (like in this case, they say a work is in the PD but also name an author who is not dead for at least 70 years) we should and must apply plausibility criteria. --Rosenzweig τ 11:02, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- We have done that since 2004, and you are not going to change that. Yann (talk) 12:16, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- This is basically a statement that we should blindly believe anything such an institution says and not think ourselves. Now that is the wrong way to deal with copyright. If statements are implausible (like in this case, they say a work is in the PD but also name an author who is not dead for at least 70 years) we should and must apply plausibility criteria. --Rosenzweig τ 11:02, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep unless any indication can be found that Willy Wist or his heirs have ever tried to assert any copyright/ownership rights. I do not advocate "blindly" accepting "such an institution says", but tend to give them a benefit of doubt that they know what they're talking about unless we have contrary evidence that they got something wrong in a particular case. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:56, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: I already mentioned (above) that accd. to numerous articles, the film was actually not shot by Wist, but by another cameraman called Hans Juppenlatz and that I could not find a date for his death. Now I did find one: Accd. to [9], he was killed by a mine on August 31, 1942, a few months after this film was shot. So if the author died in 1942, we can determine the film to be in the public domain in Germany since 2013. (Is that the reason why the USHMM declared the film to be in the PD? Hardly, because they attribute the film to Wist, who was still alive in 1972. So I still don't think they knew what they were writing.) Copyright status in the US: Accd. to [10], the film was acquired by the Bundesarchiv (German Federal Archive) in 1998. The USHMM got their copy from the Bundesarchiv in 2002. I could not find any publication of the film by the Bundesarchiv, and any publication by the USHMM (on their web site) was most likely after 2002. So {{PD-US-unpublished}} would fit for a known author who died over 70 years ago. --Rosenzweig τ 07:37, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Per Exif data, the photographer is "JUAN JOSE CASTRO SANCHEZ" and apparently not identical with the uploader. So we'd need a COM:VRT permission to keep this file. Rosenzweig τ 19:21, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
These don't look like "own work" at all, rather like they were grabbed from the web or a live stream. I've already deleted a few uploads of this user as copyvios; these are the rest.
Rosenzweig τ 18:35, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete all per nom. --Paul_012 (talk) 17:17, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Varying sizes/quality/camera. Doubtful own work. See w:Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2022_July_30. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:58, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Image of the cover of a 2009 book, which was sold by the Mises Institute on their website. No indication that the image is licensed as stated or otherwise freely licensed. Vermont (talk) 23:18, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:14, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Comment If it is outdated, add that it shows as of 2018 (or whatever date). Commons documents historical as well as current situations. If it was in scope when uploaded, it still is. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:20, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Per comment - If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:35, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:48, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Question Admins, do you think this user should be blocked for repeatedly nominating all the images they uploaded for deletion for no good reason? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:06, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment FYI, they're indefinitely blocked on Wikipedia. Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:34, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:15, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- If outdated, add dates when it was accurate to the description. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:21, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:36, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:15, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:36, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:46, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:15, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:36, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:15, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:36, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:16, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:36, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:19, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:07, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, per above; inappropriate renomination. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:31, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
The 'French Infantry Command' is not a thing Coldstreamer20 (talk) 17:07, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Speedy keep INUSE and no valid reason for deletion. Taylor 49 (talk) 20:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 06:15, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:19, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:08, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:20, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:31, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion in use. Ruthven (msg) 11:53, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:31, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:19, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:31, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:22, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Who is Arthur Discretion, and do you plan on requesting deletion again in a few months when your request is shot down again? It looks to me like you are requesting the deletion of every image you uploaded. Why do you think that's fine to do? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:04, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:31, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:22, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:08, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep In use on en.wikipedia. Can you give a substantive reason why it would serve the cause of knowledge to delete this diagram? Also, why are you nominating it again after having given another non-explanatory reason (see above) in January that was shot down? Will you nominate it for deletion again early next year? -- Ikan Kekek (talk)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:31, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
see metadata. Rwzi (talk) 07:17, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:29, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
see metadata. Rwzi (talk) 07:21, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:29, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
bbc tv screenshot likely to be copyright Darrelljon (talk) 07:31, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:30, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JAUNE D'EAU (talk · contribs)
editPortraits of various people, dates, and sources. Wrong licenses. Please correct that, or the files will be deleted.
- File:Honka-titel-hochformat-entwurf-750x1333.jpg
- File:Niels Hogel.jpg
- File:Jurgen bartsch.jpg
- File:Jack Powers .webp
- File:Chris Madsen.jpg
- File:William Lay.webp
- File:Josie Basset.jpg
- File:Cord Widderich.gif
- File:Renato Beluche.webp
- File:Charlotte de Berry .webp
- File:John Nutt.jpg
- File:Claes Gerritszoon Compaen.jpg
- File:Magomed Touchaïev.jpg
- File:Sir Thomas Whitmore by Peter Lely.jpg
Yann (talk) 07:38, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Keep the following
edit- File:Jack Powers .webp (PD by age circa 1860) --RAN (talk) 20:07, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- File:John Nutt.jpg (PD by age 1600s painting) the source is in the metadata
- I changed the license of the later. For both, the source is missing. Yann (talk) 20:25, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- More people should be aware of Template:Art Photo where you can have a date/license/creator for the original object and date/license/creator for the new derivative-copy made when it is rephotographed/scanned. --RAN (talk) 20:55, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- If it is scanned by the uploader, we have the template {{Self-scanned}}, but then the question of publication may arise. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:42, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- More people should be aware of Template:Art Photo where you can have a date/license/creator for the original object and date/license/creator for the new derivative-copy made when it is rephotographed/scanned. --RAN (talk) 20:55, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- File:Sir Thomas Whitmore by Peter Lely.jpg (PD by age 1600s painting) the source is in the metadata
- File:William Lay.webp (PD by age circa 1900)
- File:Renato Beluche.webp there are several copies online, I added one, so far no name to the original creator
Kept: Kept some per RAN, deleted others. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:36, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Same rationale as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Metro Atlalilco pictogram.svg from the same user, of which this is a colour version. "Iconography and typography are registered through Mexican Institute of Industrial Property. Its use, reproduction, modification, and commercialization are forbidden without written permission." Lord Belbury (talk) 11:57, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, along with File:19.-Metro Olivos pictogram.svg, File:3.-Metro Tacuba pictogram.svg and File:ANTIGUO PICTOGRAMA DE LA ESTACIÓN BASÍLICA.svg. Inverting the colors and recoloring the white frames doesn't remove the original copyrights. Tbhotch™ 22:45, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:39, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sharjah Mosque
editNo COM:FOP in the UAE per COM:FOP UAE. Mosque was completed only in 2019.
howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 06:35, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:42, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Al-Noor Mosque, Sharjah
editNo COM:FOP in the UAE per COM:FOP UAE. Mosque completed only in 2005.
- File:Al majaz mosque.jpg
- File:AL NOOR MOSQUE.jpg
- File:Al Noor Mosque.png
- File:Al Noor.jpg
- File:Al-Noor Mosque.jpg
- File:Al-NoorMosque.jpg
- File:Gold Blue (104780293).jpeg
- File:IMG 1592 Mosques.jpg
- File:Light Festival.jpg
- File:Noor Mosque Front View.jpg
- File:Noor Mosque.jpg
- File:Sharjah Corniche - panoramio.jpg
- File:Sharjah in picture 22 20111016 1017003507.jpg
- File:Shrrjsh Mosque - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Shrrjsh Mosque - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Shrrjsh Mosque - panoramio.jpg
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 07:16, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:43, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in the UAE per COM:FOP UAE. Mosque completed only in 2005. howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 07:19, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:44, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
I would like to delete the file. Aloyferns (talk) 14:28, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:54, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in the UAE per COM:FOP UAE. Church opened in 2011. Needs permission from architect Yury Kirs.
- File:Orthodox Christians in Sharjah.jpg
- File:Russian Church UAE.jpg
- File:Russian Iconostasis UAE.jpg
- File:Церковь ап. Филиппа в Шардже..JPG
- File:Церковь апостола Филиппа в Шардже..JPG
howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 07:12, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:50, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Bulstrad Arena, Rousse
editNo COM:FOP in Bulgaria per COM:FOP Bulgaria. Subject is a building designed by en:Tanko Serafimov who died in 2013, thus can be undeleted in 2084 (2013+70+1).
- File:Arena Monbat Ruse.jpg
- File:Bulstrad Arena in Rousse.jpg
- File:Bulstrad Arena in Ruse, Bulgaria.png
- File:Bulstrad Arena.jpg
- File:Bulstradarena.jpg
- File:East view of Arena Ruse in Ruse, Bulgaria.jpg
howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 10:02, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:51, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Same rationale as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Metro Atlalilco pictogram.svg from the same user, for this complex-art Mexico City Metro icon. "Iconography and typography are registered through Mexican Institute of Industrial Property. Its use, reproduction, modification, and commercialization are forbidden without written permission." Lord Belbury (talk) 11:56, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:52, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:11, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, seems own image of uploader. Is in use on the projects. The nomination is too late for a COM:COURTESY deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 08:57, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Crown Copyright, incorrect copyright information, needs to be removed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:46, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, does not seem to be own work. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:55, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Privacy concerns Wolfslr (talk) 05:40, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment No privacy issues here. Place is identified, in my opinion quality is acceptable. Taivo (talk) 13:19, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 10:58, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Please delete this photo. I do not want it kept on Wikimedia Commons. Wolfslr (talk) 21:30, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Question Previously closed as kept in 2020. Why do you want it to be deleted? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:54, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep It looks to me like you're nominating all your uploads for deletion. That's not going to fly, and I'm almost tempted to say we should speedy keep them all. If these were photographs of you or family members, you'd be given courtesy deletions, but they're not. File:Shadowgeese.jpg is particular nice and a QI. I'd suggest you recognize that you agreed to a perpetual Creative Commons Copyleft license when you uploaded these photos, and move on. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:58, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:54, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Arena Armeets, Sofia
editNo COM:FOP in Bulgaria per COM:FOP Bulgaria. Subject is a building completed in 2011 and designed by architect Zheko Tilev who died in 2019, thus can be undeleted in 2090 (2019+70+1).
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 10:08, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:36, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Bulgaria per COM:FOP Bulgaria. Subject is a building completed in 2006. Needs permission from architects Constantin Peev and Stoyan Yanev via COM:VRT.
- File:Cathedral of St Joseph, Sofia.jpg
- File:Cathedral st joseph sofia-5.JPG
- File:Catholic cathedral Sofia-2.jpg
- File:Catholic cathedral Sofia.jpg
- File:Catholic Church - panoramio.jpg
- File:Saint Joseph Sofia.jpg
- File:Saint Joseph.jpg
- File:Sofia Center walk with free sofia tour 2012 PD 017.jpg
- File:Sofia Center, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria - panoramio (28).jpg
- File:The catholic cathedral "St. Joseph" - panoramio.jpg
- File:The newest catholic church saint josif 02a.jpeg
- File:Католическа църква, София - panoramio.jpg
- File:София 19 October 2012 (The Cathedral of St Joseph) - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:София 19 October 2012 (The Cathedral of St Joseph) - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:София 19 October 2012 (The Cathedral of St Joseph) - panoramio.jpg
- File:София 19 October 2012 - panoramio (17).jpg
- File:София 19 October 2012 - panoramio (20).jpg
- File:СОФИЯ 2011 the Cathedral of St Joseph - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio_(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 10:51, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:35, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Bulgaria.
- File:Sofia statue 04-10-2012 PD 1.jpg
- File:Sofia statue 04-10-2012 PD 6.jpg
- File:Sofia statue 04-10-2012 PD 6a.jpg
- File:Sofia statue 2012 PD 010.jpg
- File:Sofia statue 2012 PD 011.jpg
- File:Sofia statue 2012 PD 013.jpg
- File:Sofia statue 2012 PD 014.jpg
- File:Sofia statue 2012 PD 015.jpg
- File:Statue of Ioannes XXIII in Sofia.jpg
- File:Statue of St. Sofia and the Catholic Church - panoramio.jpg
- File:Tram in Sofia near Sofia statue 2012 PD 001.jpg
- File:Tram in Sofia near Sofia statue 2012 PD 011.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:15, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Not CC HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:17, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:26, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Not CC HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:17, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:26, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Educational wall pictures in the Netherlands - Nederlandse Schoolplaten 15 - Aan het strand.jpg
edit
This file was initially tagged by Racconish as Dw no source since (dw no source since)
These schoolplates belong to the public domain since the day of printing (around 1900) and the artist 's name is not mentioned on the print because of its use for educational purposes. Txllxt TxllxT (talk) 17:00, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:24, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Educational wall pictures in the Netherlands - Nederlandse Schoolplaten 14 - Zoetwatervisschen.jpg
edit
This file was initially tagged by Racconish as Dw no source since (dw no source since)
These schoolplates belong to the public domain since the day of printing (around 1900) and the artist 's name is not mentioned on the print because of its use for educational purposes. Txllxt TxllxT (talk) 17:02, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:24, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Educational wall pictures in the Netherlands - Nederlandse Schoolplaten 13 - Vrienden der duisternis.jpg
edit
This file was initially tagged by Racconish as Dw no source since (dw no source since)
These schoolplates belong to the public domain since the day of printing (around 1900) and the artist 's name is not mentioned on the print because of its use for educational purposes. Txllxt TxllxT (talk) 17:03, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:24, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Educational wall pictures in the Netherlands - Nederlandse Schoolplaten 12 - Knaagdieren.jpg
edit
This file was initially tagged by Racconish as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Txllxt TxllxT (talk) 17:04, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- These schoolplates belong to the public domain since the day of printing (around 1900) and the artist 's name is not mentioned on the print because of its use for educational purposes. Txllxt TxllxT (talk) 17:04, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:24, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Educational wall pictures in the Netherlands - Nederlandse Schoolplaten 11 - In een Duitsch bergwoud.jpg
edit
This file was initially tagged by Racconish as Dw no source since (dw no source since)These schoolplates belong to the public domain since the day of printing (around 1900) and the artist 's name is not mentioned on the print because of its use for educational purposes. Txllxt TxllxT (talk) 17:05, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- The correct license would be "PD-EU-no author disclosure" which would allow them to be published up to 1951. --RAN (talk) 19:11, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- The maker is A.M. Koekkoek (died 1944) so public domain. 82.72.59.31 15:25, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:24, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Educational wall pictures in the Netherlands - Nederlandse Schoolplaten 09 - Te midden van sneeuw en ijs.jpg
edit
This file was initially tagged by Racconish as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Txllxt TxllxT (talk) 17:06, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:25, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Educational wall pictures in the Netherlands - Nederlandse Schoolplaten 10 - Uit de Australische dierenwereld.jpg
edit
This file was initially tagged by Racconish as Dw nThese schoolplates belong to the public domain since the day of printing (around 1900) and the artist 's name is not mentioned on the print because of its use for educational purposes.o source since (dw no source since) Txllxt TxllxT (talk) 17:07, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:25, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Educational wall pictures in the Netherlands - Nederlandse Schoolplaten 06 - Willem van Oranje trekt over de Maas, 1568.jpg
edit
This file was initially tagged by Racconish as Dw no source since (dw no source These schoolplates belong to the public domain since the day of printing (around 1900) and the artist 's name is not mentioned on the print because of its use for educational purposes.) Txllxt TxllxT (talk) 17:08, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:25, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Educational wall pictures in the Netherlands - Nederlandse Schoolplaten 07 - In een middeleeuws klooster.jpg
edit
These schoolplates belong to the public domain since the day of printing (around 1900) and the artist 's name is not mentioned on the print because of its use for educational purposes. Txllxt TxllxT (talk) 17:08, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:25, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Educational wall pictures in the Netherlands - Nederlandse Schoolplaten 08 - In het duin.jpg
edit
This file was initially tagged by Racconish as Dw no source since (dw no source These schoolplates belong to the public domain since the day of printing (around 1900) and the artist 's name is not mentioned on the print because of its use for educational purposes.) Txllxt TxllxT (talk) 17:09, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:25, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Educational wall pictures in the Netherlands - Nederlandse Schoolplaten 05 - Op de Dam, omstreeks 1665.jpg
edit
This file was initially tagged by Racconish as Dw no source since (dw no source These schoolplates belong to the public domain since the day of printing (around 1900) and the artist 's name is not mentioned on the print because of its use for educational purposes.) Txllxt TxllxT (talk) 17:09, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:25, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Educational wall pictures in the Netherlands - Nederlandse Schoolplaten 04 - Aan de Hollandsche Waterlinie, 1672.jpg
edit
These schoolplates belong to the public domain since the day of printing (around 1900) and the artist 's name is not mentioned on the print because of its use for educational purposes. Txllxt TxllxT (talk) 17:10, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:25, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Educational wall pictures in the Netherlands - Nederlandse Schoolplaten 01 - Stadsleven in het begin der 19e eeuw.jpg
edit
This file was initially tagged by Racconish as Dw no source since (dw no source These schoolplates belong to the public domain since the day of printing (around 1900) and the artist 's name is not mentioned on the print because of its use for educational purposes.) Txllxt TxllxT (talk) 17:10, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- "PD-EU-no author disclosure", the scan/photo itself is the source. When you download something from the Internet you provide the url, when you scan an original image or take a photo of it, you use the template "scan", and the derivative image you create is your "own work". This applies to all the images in this series. --RAN (talk) 19:19, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:25, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Educational wall pictures in the Netherlands - Nederlandse Schoolplaten 02 - Een buitenplaats aan de Vecht, 1740.jpg
edit
These schoolplates belong to the public domain since the day of printing (around 1900) and the artist 's name is not mentioned on the print because of its use for educational purposes. Txllxt TxllxT (talk) 17:10, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:25, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Putten - Oldenallerbrug - Memorial for the ambush of 1 october 1944 by the Dutch resistance on a Wehrmacht vehicle which initiated the Putten raid - De razzia van Putten 03.jpg
edit
These schoolplates belong to the public domain since the day of printing (around 1900) and the artist 's name is not mentioned on the print because of its use for educational purposes. Txllxt TxllxT (talk) 17:11, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:25, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
The person in the photo doesn't want to share it anymore. ArvynC (talk) 18:44, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Seems to be a minor actor per IMDB, and it's not a great photo, anyway, so I'm fine with a courtesy deletion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:50, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:38, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Meysam amirabdollahian (talk · contribs)
editThese files all apparently show the uploader, but unlike File:Meysam Amirabdollahian3.jpg they don't seem to be selfies, so COM:VRT permissions from the photographers are missing. I've previously kept one because it is in use at Wikidata, but it can still be deleted if it is a copyvio.
Rosenzweig τ 18:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Also personal photos of a non-notable person, though we could consider keeping File:Meysam amirabdollahian2.jpg as a somewhat interesting portrait, if our permission to use it is clearly established. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:47, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:28, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
No information on J.H. Walker, and this work was publishedin the UK. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:12, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-old-assumed-expired. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:30, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
The original may well be PD, but this includes post 1964 artwork of uncertain status, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:39, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Please read the license before nominating this for deletion; it does not mention 1964. This was published before 1978 with only one copyright notice, that of "Copyright © 1914 by Frank A. Munsey Company". That would have never applied to the new material, and even if it did, it would have expired in 1914 + 75 = 1989. (There's a court case where a 1944 movie had an invalid renewal because its copyright notice was MCMXXXIV, and thus it had to be renewed in MCMXXXIV + 28, or 1962, not 1944 + 28 = 1972.)--Prosfilaes (talk) 19:10, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. The text (from 1914) is
PD-US-expired, and the artwork isPD-US-no notice. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 01:39, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:20, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Not needed Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:47, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:10, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
come from imdb https://m.imdb.com/name/nm0763590/mediaviewer/rm91941376 copyvio Andrew Branham Dyer AwkwardChester (talk) 15:46, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:27, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Urheberrechtserletzung; das Bild stammt von Aiga Rasch Dachbewohner (talk) 15:47, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, likely copyvio. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:26, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
This is a trnalsation from a danish original, and no information has been provided on the original authors lifetime. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:01, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- ShakespeareFan00: See [www.fredericiashistorie.dk/html/fredericia/navne/Gunnar_Nislev.html here]. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 01:49, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- Danish author died in 1978, with the original "Letters from the Country" being published 1935-1937. I fail to see how the originals are out of copyright, and as any translation is necessarily derivative of them, this edition would also have that concern. Was the original ever formally registered in the US? Otherwise I am understanding URAA restoration would apply on the originals?
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:41, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Danish originals obviously copyrighted in Denmark, and US work almost certainly copyrighted via URAA.--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:50, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion. The file can be restored in 2049. --Rosenzweig τ 16:39, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Low quality derivative of File:Zbigniew Kmieciak.jpg with no practical use in Wikimedia projects + false authorship Polimerek (talk) 11:32, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:14, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
The real author seems to be photographer Nguyen Phuong Thao who is copyright holder, not the depicted person. Permission via VTRS needed. Gumruch (talk) 12:18, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:13, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
The primary element in this photo is the map, which is presumably copyrighted. COM:FOP Australia only allows reproduction of 3d works or 2d works of artistic craftsmanship. This map is a standard 2d work, not a work of artistic craftsmanship. As such, permission from the map-maker is required. -M.nelson (talk) 19:22, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:08, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Bulgaria per COM:FOP Bulgaria. Subject is a building completed in 2018. Needs permission from th architects Kalloyan Kollev, Valeri Ivanov, and Galina Shepeleva of ATEK studio (source) via COM:VRT. howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 09:55, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:27, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Velodrome (Plovdiv)
editNo COM:FOP in Bulgaria per COM:FOP Bulgaria. Subject is a building completed in 2015. Needs permission from architect Sander Douma via COM:VRT.
- File:Kolodrum Plovdiv (BUL) 2015.jpg
- File:Kolodrum.png
- File:Kolodruma Plovdiv 2015.jpg
- File:Velodrome pd.png
_2015.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 09:58, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:27, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Arena Botevgrad
editNo COM:FOP in Bulgaria per COM:FOP Bulgaria. Subject is a building completed in 2014. Needs permission from architects Bozhidar Hinkov and Borislav Bogdanov via COM:VRT.
- File:Arena Botevgrad - side view, Bulgaria, 2014.06.06.jpg
- File:Arena Botevgrad 01.webm
- File:Arena Botevgrad 02.webm
- File:Arena Botevgrad 03.webm
- File:Arena Botevgrad 04.webm
- File:Arena Botevgrad, Bulgaria, 2014.06.06.jpg
howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 10:05, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
What about the part "Without consent of the owner of the copyright and without payment of compensation shall be permissible:... if done with informatory or other non-commercial purpose"?! COM:FOP Bulgaria --Exonie (talk) 17:19, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Exonie Per COM:Licensing, "Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use justifications: see Commons:Fair use. Media licensed exclusively under non-commercial only licenses (like CC BY-NC-SA) are not accepted either." howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 02:21, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- That's not at all fair use. It's clear-cut allowed by the law. But I guess it is non-commercial. I'll try getting the architects' permission Exonie (talk) 20:05, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Delete Until permissions is given (highly unlikely) or PMA 70 is hit. Sennecaster (talk) 20:17, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:27, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Altered picture Pazarmonia1 (talk) 19:24, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion RevengerTime (talk) 21:10, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Esta foto no es idea para la imagen de Patricia Manterola, ella tiene mejores fotografías Cancion10 (talk) 23:16, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:37, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
altered picture Pazarmonia1 (talk) 19:29, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion RevengerTime (talk) 21:10, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Esta foto no es idea para la imagen de Patricia Manterola, ella tiene mejores fotografías Cancion10 (talk) 23:16, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:37, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Will be making a better version, no need for this anymore. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:42, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep If the better version is just an edit, make the edit and upload the new version on the same page. Otherwise, upload the new file and link it, and only then request deletion if you think that's important to do. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:47, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:35, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Wdwd as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: complex logo, missing permission Yann (talk) 08:59, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:30, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Doubt this is an actual own work. Low quality uploads from multiple cameras. See also c:User talk:Anonymous.celeb and User talk:Anonymous.celeb. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:13, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:30, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
If description is correct, image would appear to be a copyvio, being taken from the liners of Loona's album. C.Fred (talk) 20:02, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:29, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The design of this striped rectangle is beloo TOO imho. --Ellywa (talk) 13:41, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Has former copyrighted-images. The badges are background image are from Defense Images, which should have been removed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:44, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Not sure I follow the logic here. There is no evidence presented that this is copyrighted (and the nomination itself says former copyrighted?). It's an incredibly simple pattern and its ties with the very old agency means that it is also either expired heraldry or released by OGL (as tagged) being from the MoD. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:20, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 09:34, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Andriy.v (talk) 05:29, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:35, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
redundant file to File:Robert Zakrzewski.png with false authoship Polimerek (talk) 11:29, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: copyvio. --Krd 09:35, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in France. Cjp24 (talk) 17:43, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- The poster could be blurred. Yann (talk) 20:36, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Droit de panorama ???? Mais il n'y a aucune œuvre couverte par un droit sur ce cliché. L'on y voit, de biais, une affiche. Ça mérite tout au plus un "FOP-France". Pareil pour toutes les autres demandes d'annulation sur ce sujet. Car à y aller dans ce sens, nous ne pourrons bientôt plus mettre des photos de manifs avec banderoles & pancarte. Il va falloir vous ressaisir, éviter d'interpréter la loi au delà de ce qu'elle ne dit pas, et devenir moins tatillon. — François GOGLINS (talk) 09:00, 31 July 2022 (UTC).
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:34, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
© Text, no freedom of panorama in France. Cjp24 (talk) 17:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- The text could be blurred. Yann (talk) 20:36, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Droit de panorama ???? Mais il n'y a aucune œuvre couverte par un droit sur ce cliché. L'on y voit, de biais, une affiche. Ça mérite tout au plus un "FOP-France". Pareil pour toutes les autres demandes d'annulation sur ce sujet. Car à y aller dans ce sens, nous ne pourrons bientôt plus mettre des photos de manifs avec banderoles & pancarte. Il va falloir vous ressaisir, éviter d'interpréter la loi au delà de ce qu'elle ne dit pas, et devenir moins tatillon. — François GOGLINS (talk) 09:01, 31 July 2022 (UTC).
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:34, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as Logo Yann (talk) 09:00, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Might be simple enough but looks out of scope to me. --Gbawden (talk) 08:27, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Extremely small filesizes, bordering on useless. Higher resolution but very similar photos of these buildings exist, e.g. File:Donahue Hall.jpg, File:Leitch Hall.jpg, and File:Bourgeois Hall, America, in the evening.jpg (exact higher resolution version of one of the photos). I've excluded nominating File:University Suites, America, in the evening.jpg as it shows an angle not yet on Commons.
- File:Donahue, America, in the evening.jpg
- File:Leitch Hall, America, in the evening.jpg
- File:Bourgeois Hall, America, in the evening..jpg
-M.nelson (talk) 15:39, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:19, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Anthology, each poem has it's own copyright, and there is no information provided on that. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:16, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep unless some more specific claim is made. If you find a concerning poem, feel free to re-nominate this file; otherwise, it should not be deleted because it may contain some poem which is copyrighted: that is too abstract of a fear. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 01:43, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Restoring in 2031 would clear up any issue with US copyright. There's a mention of a 1927 copyright on the verso, and a Margaret Sangster (1894-1981) poem, so it seems clearly problematic.--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:20, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:17, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
This is not a clip from the 1903 Lumière film on the Elks (see them better here) but from the 1905 film Le Cake-walk du Nouveau Cirque [11] which is still in copyright as Alice Guy died in 1968. — Racconish 💬 16:24, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:17, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
This file is a video that was screen recorded from the flight simulation w:Digital Combat Simulator by company w:Eagle Dynamics, thus I believe the video author cannot publish it under CC0. M16A3NoRecoilHax (talk) 17:55, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- I agree that this content is improperly licensed and thus shouldn't be hosted on Wikimedia Commons. With that said, it likely falls under fair use and is fit for hosting on English Wikipedia as it is intended for educational use. 150.135.165.49 22:39, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:17, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Has former copyrighted-images. The badges are background image are from Defense Images, which should have been removed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:44, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per my comments at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Royal Military Police Heraldic Badge.jpg. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:23, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per IronGargoyle and the background is too simple to be copyrighted. --Gbawden (talk) 08:15, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Crown Copyright, incorrect copyright information, needs to be removed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:45, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; needs evidence of OGL. --Gbawden (talk) 08:16, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
FWIW, COM:FOP Indonesia isn't OK for Commons as it only permits non-commercial purposes such as educational, unless if there are evidences that this building is fairly old for decades, I even doubt if there are reasons to avoid a DR (Oh looked its info page, they even didn't write parameters of {{Information}}) Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 06:28, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: If I read COM:FOP correctly it talks about "copyrighted artistic works" which I don't see here. If there are they are DM. --Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
No renewal found for compiled work, but this is an anthology which would need each work indviually confirmed as expired/non-renewal. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:14, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Absent an objection against a specific poem, I do not believe that an entire anthology (which is not itself copyrighted) should be deleted because of a fear that one of the works within it may be copyrighted. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 01:51, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete There seems to be considerable contemporaneous material in the anthology. I don't think we can ignore likely copyrighted material in an anthology.--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:29, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:07, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
TimedText:Scotland the Brave (1995) - Pipe Band - United States Air Force Reserve Band.mp3.en.srt
editLyrics written in 1950, copyrighted Dronebogus (talk) 10:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Dronebogus is the same problem present for the es and de versions? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:26, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- I don’t know. Dronebogus (talk) 17:20, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- Probably yes as derivative works Dronebogus (talk) 01:12, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:06, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Lo stemma è protetto da copyright e non può essere utilizzato su wikipedia. Ketipmaig (talk) 18:26, 30 July 2022 (UTC) Come tutti gli altri stemmi provinciali e metropolitani, lo stemma ufficiale utilizzato dall'ente è protetto da copyright. Per questo su wikipedia vengono utilizzati versioni degli stemmi realizzati dagli utenti o concessi da araldica civica. Ma questo file è l'esatta copia dello stemma ufficiale, e ciò impedisce che possa essere utilizzato su wikipedia poiché sotto copyright. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ketipmaig (talk • contribs) 18:38, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. There certainly seems to be a valid Creative Commons statement linked in the permissions section. I had to go to an archived link on the Wayback Machine, and I may have missed some nuance in the machine translation from Italian, but this looks fine to me. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:51, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per IronGargoyle. --Gbawden (talk) 08:16, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
replaced by {{PD-UA-exempt}} with type "orders, decorations and medals", see category:PD-UA-exempt (orders, decorations and medals) Johnj1995 (talk) 02:51, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Question Redirect? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:36, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- +1 Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:18, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Johnj1995: How would you feel about changing the content to
{{PD-UA-exempt|type=orders, decorations and medals}}and deleting the subpages; or with redirecting? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:33, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No reply to the question by Mdaniels5757, so I've decided to delete and redirect the template. --Rosenzweig τ 16:59, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- File:1981 Argentine Grand Prix, Ecclestone Reutemann Murray.jpg
- File:1981 Argentine Grand Prix, Murray.jpg
Per {{PD-AR-Photo}}, this photo became PD in Argentina after the URAA date of 1996-01-01. On that date its copyright was renewed in the US (if I understand correctly, until 70 years past the author's death). Though the file is in the PD in Argentina, it is copyrighted in the US this not eligible for Commons. -M.nelson (talk) 23:16, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- I don't understand, what determines that a photo from {{PD-AR-Photo}} is suitable for Commons in some cases and not in others? --Nordschleife 00 (talk) 06:02, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Nordschleife 00: Technically, all files should have tags indicating their copyright status in both the local country and in the US (the US component is at COM:HIRTLE) because Wikimedia's servers are based in the US. So in this case, although it meets {{PD-AR-Photo}}, there isn't a valid US PD tag (it doesn't meet {{PD-1996}}). The URAA policy is at COM:URAA. -M.nelson (talk) 10:10, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- So this is already a problem with the {{PD-AR-Photo}} application, something completely unrelated and that is beyond the photos I have uploaded. It must first be resolved if the {{PD-AR-Photo}} images can be in Commons and then delete all or keep all. --Nordschleife 00 (talk) 04:02, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Nordschleife 00: Technically, all files should have tags indicating their copyright status in both the local country and in the US (the US component is at COM:HIRTLE) because Wikimedia's servers are based in the US. So in this case, although it meets {{PD-AR-Photo}}, there isn't a valid US PD tag (it doesn't meet {{PD-1996}}). The URAA policy is at COM:URAA. -M.nelson (talk) 10:10, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Since the author is stated to be unknown, US copyright for these lasts until the end of 2076 per the Hirtle chart. The files can be restored in 2077. --Rosenzweig τ 16:39, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
