Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/03/06
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
))_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
I uploaded it by mistake NMK.2258 (talk) 01:32, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 07:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake. Sianka (talk) 09:43, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake. Sianka (talk) 05:56, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request, google map. --Achim55 (talk) 09:56, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Als Eigentümer der Immobilie haben wir Strafanzeige erstattet. Die Aufnahme kam durch unbefugtes Betreten der Anlage zustande. Die Staatsanwaltschaft ermittelt wegen Hausfriedensbruch. 194.25.143.58 16:07, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Keep Die Aufnahme wurde in Einklang mit den Grundsätzen der in Deutschland geltenden Panoramfreiheit erstellt. Die Aufnahme erfolgte vor dem Burgtor, durch den Torbau der Burg Heimhof hindurch, zu dem ein dauerhaft öffentlich zugänglicher Weg (Burggasse) hinführt. Es wurden weder Zäune noch Türen, Tore oder sonstige Einfriedungen durchschritten (deutlich bessere Aufnahmen wären durch Durchschreiten des Burgtores möglich, was sich vielleicht beim Betrachten des Bildes erschließt). Zu diesem Fall siehe eventuell auch die Diskussion vom letzten Jahr (2013) auf de:User_talk:DALIBRI#Nicht authorisierte Aufnahme der Burg Heimhof Innenansicht. DALIBRI (talk) 07:04, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
Die Aufnahme wurde durch unbefugtes Eindringen in unsere Privatsphäre erstellt. Da Sie durch das geschlossene Tor aus der Froschperspektive unten durch den Torflügel hindurch fotografiert haben, sind Sie in unseren privaten Bereich eingedrungen. Die Rechtsprechung sieht das bereits als Hausfriedensbruch. Ein deutlicher Hinweis "Betreten verboten" ist deutlich an der Außenseite des Toreingangs angebracht. Unser Privatgrund beginnt bereits einige Meter vor dem Tor. Das sieht die Polizei und die Staatsanwaltschaft übrigens ebenso wie unser Anwalt. Sie werden aufgefordert die unzulässige Aufnahme zu entfernen und Ihre Identität offen zu legen. Es darf darauf hingewiesen warden, dass außerdem das Kennzeichen meines PKW ersichtlich ist. Dies stellt einen weiteren Verstoß gegen unsere Rechte dar. Wir werden den Fall weiter verfolgen und bis zur Löschung der Aufnahme weiter gegen Sie vorgehen. gez. Die Eigentümer der Burganlage.
Comment: Die Burg an sich ist doch viel zu alt, um noch urheberlich geschützt zu sein. --Leyo 23:12, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: There are no copyright issues here. We do not respond to accusations and threats by anonymous IP users. If the legal position is strong, this must be communicated from an appropriate source, using OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:23, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Wie bereits mehrfach geschrieben kam das Bild durch unberechtigtes Betreten der privaten Burganlage durch Hausfriedensbruch zustande. Das Bild verletzt unsere höchstrichterlich geschützte Privatsphäre. Zudem ist das Kennzeichen des Fahrzeugs eindeutig erkennbar. 194.25.143.58 18:18, 30 July 2014 (UTC)Gerne darf sich ein Mitarbeiter von Wikimedia bei uns melden. Wir hatten bereits vor wenigen Tagen an die betreffende mail-Adresse eine separate Anfrage gestellt. Jedoch bislang ohne Antwort. Hier unsere mail-Adresse nmaier70@web.de Gerne senden wir auch einem Mitarbeiter von Wikimedia die eingescannte Strafanzeige und das Aktenzeichen der Staatsanwaltschaft. Vielleicht geht es dann schneller, wenn wir auch gegen Wikimedia Strafanzeige erstatten.
Da wir anonyme Ansprüche nicht Prüfen können: Bitte wende dich an das Support-Team oder die Rechtsabteilung der WMF. --Steinsplitter (talk) 23:07, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Nach Fehlermeldung zweiter Versuch. 109.43.48.222 08:10, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Wir haben uns auf Google als Eigentümer der Immobilie verifiziert. Die Bildaufnahme wurde illegal auf unserem Privatgrund aufgenommen. Die Aufnahme ist nicht durch die so genannte Panoramafreiheit gedeckt, da das Bild eine Innenaufnahme unseres Privatbereiches abbildet. Die Aufnahme wurde durch eine strafrechtlich relevante Handlung erstellt und ohne unsere Genehmigung hier veröffentlicht. Bitte löschen Sie nun die Aufnahme. Sollten Sie keine Löschung vornehmen, sind Sie verpflichtet eine ladungsfähige Adresse zuzusenden. Diese dient zur Zustellung weiteren Schriftverkehrs durch unseren Anwalt. Auch die Unkenntlichmachung meines KFZ-Kennzeichens ändert nichts an der Unzulässigkeit. Gez. Norbert Maier Eigentümer der Burg Heimhof. 109.43.48.222 08:14, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Speedily kept: No new rationale for deletion. This issue is not related to copyright. Contact our support team or the legal department of WMF, if necessary. Legal threats will not be accepted here. --AFBorchert (talk) 09:12, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
It contains wrong imformation Haider.bo50 (talk) 08:30, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:28, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Advertising 2001:448A:11AC:1AC0:1916:4916:7C34:58BC 13:53, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, clear case. --Achim55 (talk) 14:47, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Advertising 2001:448A:11AC:1AC0:1916:4916:7C34:58BC 13:54, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 14:49, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Adeletron 3030 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: see https://youtube.fandom.com/wiki/CristianGhost Túrelio (talk) 15:08, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedy erroneously converted to DR. --Túrelio (talk) 15:57, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
It was most likely put on using the wrong license by accident. Xfininator (talk) 16:19, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Selected the incorrect license for use on the poster most likely by accident. Xfininator (talk) 16:22, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Vs1w3r56789 2001:16A4:211:F7C3:1749:C728:850B:DF65 19:32, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per nomination. ;). --Achim55 (talk) 21:19, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Likely not own work: screenshot as you can tell from the bars at top and bottom. P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:28, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted, copyvio from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkxZjCJIbXo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:33, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
The descriptions and captions are insults (in spanish), and taking it into account it may be a copyvio. Günther Frager (talk) 23:36, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 07:20, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The picture appears on 2 different pages with 2 different authors and uploaders https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Craqdi.jpg CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:43, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
:It's just a minor mistake, it's a duplicate eligible file, try to fix it by merging it, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Priss45 (talk • contribs)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:42, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Possible ad for an artist lacking visibility CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:05, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- She got the page confused because she is an artist with visibility not possible confirmed what is visible thank you 31.4.180.220 17:33, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- So you confirm, she is looking for visibility. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:47, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Not what you are doing CoffeEngineer is attacking the LGBT community and Women 31.4.180.220 00:28, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- No argumentation left, thus you try deception. Nice. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:42, 7 March 2023 (UTC) The person or people who made that file will know what a recognized person is, I don't know why you insist on denying the evidence, if you are a person against freedoms you should go to Metapedia, thanks.Why does it bother you that Craqdi Highlady be a well known person
- End of discussion? Because you are against discussion now? What a twist. And for the reason of my request: [1], [2], but the whole page can be used. I find you last comment very insulting, as I never said anything about the LGBT community, her gender, or race, and you are telling me I am transphobic, racist and fascist. I will open a request against you for that. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:36, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- No argumentation left, thus you try deception. Nice. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:42, 7 March 2023 (UTC) The person or people who made that file will know what a recognized person is, I don't know why you insist on denying the evidence, if you are a person against freedoms you should go to Metapedia, thanks.Why does it bother you that Craqdi Highlady be a well known person
- Not what you are doing CoffeEngineer is attacking the LGBT community and Women 31.4.180.220 00:28, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- So you confirm, she is looking for visibility. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:47, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
At no time did I call him a fascist, racist or homophobic or transphobic, I just said why are you against a file in favor of the LGBT Community? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Priss45 (talk • contribs) 01:41, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
{{He entered here to say that in another discussion he said that porn was going to be uploaded to other websites, which I have not seen porn in this file and disrespecting people, please do not insinuate things out of place CoffeeEngineer}} [[Get lost, and continue uploading porn somewhere else. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:35, 6 March 2023 (UTC)]] [[Why do I say that the user CoffeeEngineer?]] [[I do not understand these disrespect of the user CoffeeEngineer to other Wikipedia members]] — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 31.4.180.220 (talk) 01:55, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Please find here the request: [3]. Have a nice day. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 02:12, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Ok thanks for your contribution 31.4.180.220 02:22, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Delete No purpose for this anywhere within any of the project's scopes. There is no reason for this text to be a bitmap image. There is no indication of the subject's notability to justify such content on any project, certainly not here. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:27, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:43, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The picture appears on 2 different pages with 2 different authors and uploaders https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Craqdi.jpg CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:06, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- ok delete one and leave the other 31.4.180.220 17:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Who are you to tell that? There are 2 users and one IP claiming this picture. Also, this artist does not have enough notability. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:45, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- CoffeeEngineer This person tirelessly tries to boycott the archive in a demeaning way towards the LGBT community and women, alleging a notoriety that says what it does not have, which is not real. Violating the terms of Wikimedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Priss45 (talk • contribs) 00:51, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- User Coffee Engineer debería informarse mejor sobre ella Craqdi Highlady he is a remarkable and respectable person — Preceding unsigned comment added by Priss45 (talk • contribs) 01:34, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Who are you to tell that? There are 2 users and one IP claiming this picture. Also, this artist does not have enough notability. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:45, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:42, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Sería bueno un proceso de permiso (OTRS). 191.126.142.134 01:41, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- This is my own work. I took this photo, and the watermark is mine, as is the copyright. My username is sarahroseanne and my name is Sarah R. Gross. Please let me know if you have additional questions or if I need to somehow send additional proof. Thank you. Sarahroseanne (talk) 02:13, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- p.s. I am Alan G. Gross's daughter, Sarah R. Gross. I am also a photographer, who took this photo of him. I own the copyright. Please do not delete the photo. Thank you. Sarahroseanne (talk) 02:27, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- No se preocupe. Se soluciona fácilmente. Veo que ya le escribieron como hacerlo. Saludos cordiales. 191.126.142.134 09:54, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:Alan Gross 2009.jpg” under ticket:2023030610008291. --Ww2censor (talk) 15:24, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: has a VRT permission now. --Rosenzweig τ 17:51, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
No proof of copyright (also see this). And the picture is photoshopped to paste a different face, so it seems to be a fake, and out of scope. MarioGom (talk) 18:15, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Support deletion per nom. Silikonz (talk) 21:26, 6 March 2023 (UTC)- Do you have any proof to prove your claim? On what do you say it is pasted or is it fake, sir, are you an expert in this field? Why do you present everything we edit with the reason and document that you are slandering and doing, but you are the reason for the rest. You can give me a call number, ask for proof and talk in a video voice that you are comfortable with, or create and edit an article, just learn the note. Mahsa3385 (talk) 05:08, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- سلام لطفآ وقتی ادعا میکنید که تصویر یا مقاله و یا هر چیز دیگری جعلی هست نسبت به ادعای خودتون مدرک ارائه کنید این درست نیست که شخصیت هنرمندان و یا شخصیت هر شخص دیگری را با حدس و گمان در میان عموم تخریب کرد این واقعا یه رفتار پسندیده نیست و بنظرم اینجوری فقط شخصی دیگری را نزد عوام تخریب مینماییم با سپاسSarasari69 (talk) 16:16, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Per nomination. --MehdiTalk 17:20, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
[[4]] {{شاید حق با شما باشه خواهش میکنم این صفحه رو مطالعه بفرمائید چون ظاهرآ همه چیز بعدآ بهم ریخته و برندگان هم اعلام نشدند و از قضا تصویر نیم رخ از جواد نظری هم تو این صفحه نمایش داده شده با همون لباسها منتها چهره اشون زیاد قابل شناسایی نیست }} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarasari69 (talk • contribs) 08:03, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd: Created by abuser. Tryvix1509 (talk) 03:48, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
foto sbagliata Vincenzo Campagna (talk) 12:02, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:20, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
I have made a mistake by uploading this file. I thought the owner gave free access, but it turns out they did not. Please remove this file. Grossertg (talk) 13:59, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 22:19, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
I have uploaded this file by error. Author did not give cc licence. It has been attached to the ticket #2023040310011137 by error. It is not included. It has been deleted but came back by error. Tressbo59 (talk) 17:28, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment VRT member is needed to review the request. Taivo (talk) 12:56, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. I have reviewed the VRT request, and there appears to be clear evidence of a valid CC BY-SA 4.0 license having been granted in April by the copyright holder. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 20:31, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per RTH. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:28, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
I have no no idea Grosim (talk) 15:05, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete uploaders request, probably out of project scope --Lukas Beck (talk) 17:02, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:19, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
I HAVE TO USE THIS PICTURE ANYWHWERE ON MY ARTICLE Alka Sharma B2 (talk) 17:43, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:17, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
privacy concern — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alka Sharma B2 (talk • contribs) 17:52, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Joking? 181.43.4.47 19:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:16, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Not a free Image Source & Here. Masry1973 | مصري1973 (talk) 23:39, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 22:14, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP Slovenia: non-free architecture by Jože Plečnik (d. 1957). Unsuitable for Commons until 2028. TadejM (t/p) 00:42, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:55, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Given that Sulumbek Abrek lived in Czarist Russia, own work is highly unlikely. Real author and publication data are needed to determine copyright status of the image. Taivo (talk) 06:33, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:56, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
This appears to be a hoax image of a girl group that doesn't exist and is thus out of project scope. Even after searching their name in Korean "소녀주문" (based on EverybodyWiki) and their album/song names, I get no results. Commons should not enable this behavior. ✗plicit 06:57, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:56, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
No FOP in Iran. MehdiTalk 09:11, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:56, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Recent artwork, thereby still in copyright. Unfortunately, Romania has no freedom-of-panorama exception. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:21, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:56, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
No evidence from Internet archive that this image was free. Leoboudv (talk) 09:22, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:56, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 12:19, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:56, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 12:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:56, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 13:21, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 13:23, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 13:35, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 14:25, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 14:34, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 14:52, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
1951 American photograph. The source doesn't give any information that would be helpful in knowing more about the provenance of this photograph. It seems like it was a photograph that would have been made available to the public in 1951 but without more information, I cannot determine if it is in the public domain or still under copyright. Abzeronow (talk) 15:41, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Uploaded 15 years ago, so the size might be OK, but the uploader has copyright violation warnings on their talk page on en from that time. Didym (talk) 16:38, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:58, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Unused photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect copyright violation. In addition, depicted person is unidentified and the file can be out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 19:21, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:58, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Unused selfie, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 19:36, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:58, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
This photo is not selfie as claimed. Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 20:05, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:58, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
File:HKCL 銅鑼灣 CWB 香港中央圖書館 Hong Kong Central Library 展覽廳 Exhibition Gallery 2019 Hong Kong Library exhibits Oct 2019 SSG 11.jpg
edit
Derivative work of copyrighted book covers A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:10, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Source was broken and unarchived, cannot verify its copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 04:13, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- The username is enough proof of copyvio. 181.43.4.47 12:10, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:11, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
YouTubers are usually non-notable and, really, ru:Астапов, Павел Викторович was deleted due to non-notability. Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 07:37, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:13, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
No FOP in Iran. MehdiTalk 09:07, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:13, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP in Iran. MehdiTalk 09:10, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:13, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FOP in Iran. MehdiTalk 09:22, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:20, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MD ASHIK PARVEZ (talk · contribs)
editPersonal image by non-contributor. Out of commons scope.
Yahya (talk) 09:25, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:20, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused file clearly for promotional purposes. Wikimedia Commons is not a place to advertise see COM:ADVERT Headlock0225 (talk) 09:40, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:21, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio Wasiul Bahar (talk) 10:27, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no evidence of permission. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:22, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio Wasiul Bahar (talk) 10:28, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no evidence of permission. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:23, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Benouladen (talk · contribs)
editUnused low-quality images without educational value.
TilmannR (talk) 11:07, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
T.O.O. ? 181.43.4.47 12:42, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, helmet is likely above COM:TOO US. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:27, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Out of scope: Unused personal image of non-contributor. TilmannR (talk) 12:45, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:28, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal image of non-contributor. TilmannR (talk) 12:51, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:29, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Angela Haisha Adamou (talk · contribs)
editUnlikely to be own work. Three different cameras, FBMD and no metadata.
- File:Capannone mollificio.jpg
- File:Emilio Longoni 2.jpg
- File:Longoni su 'La Subfornitura' - n°2 2019.jpg
- File:Emilio Longoni e il padre.jpg
- File:Emilio Longoni.jpg
Didym (talk) 12:52, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:30, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Low-quality JPG of a 3D model of a person, who claims to be Prime Minister of Nigeria, while this Wikipedia article states that Nigeria hasn't had a Prime Minister since 1966. TilmannR (talk) 13:02, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:31, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Advertising 2001:448A:11AC:1AC0:1916:4916:7C34:58BC 13:53, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:49, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Too old to be own work 181.43.4.47 13:36, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. This seems to be from a German cigarette card album from 1936. The work is anonymous, so {{PD-anon-70-EU}} would seem to apply. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:47, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Not anonymous. We have the album at File:Bilder deutscher Geschichte - Cigaretten-Bilderdienst (IA bilderdeutscherg01ciga).pdf (nominated for deletion), it's also at [5]. This image is image (Bild) 67 on page [37], it says there Gemälde von Kaulbach (painting by Kaulbach). Per [6] and [7] what we have is an 1870 woodcut by (Theodor) Knesing (1840-1927) after a painting by Hermann Kaulbach (1846-1909). --Rosenzweig τ 14:51, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Low quality COM:VULVA photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 16:44, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination --Lukas Beck (talk) 16:51, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:38, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 16:52, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:38, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
And also
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. The building was built in 1996-2003. No Permission from the architect Vasyl Zoryk. Микола Василечко (talk) 19:57, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:35, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Exif and description say, Copyright holder is JULIA TERJUNG 87.169.42.234 20:12, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:32, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HoraceRHolt14 (talk · contribs)
editCommons is not your personal free web host.
- File:3Lifeincanada1.png
- File:Lifeincanada131.png
- File:Lifeincanada13q.png
- File:9Lifeincanada13.png
- File:Lifeincanada13.png
- File:Corruption 101.png
- File:Lifeincanada.png
- File:Corruption.png
- File:Lifeincanada16.png
Achim55 (talk) 21:13, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:34, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Out of the scope Michel Bakni (talk) 22:29, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:31, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Out of the scope Michel Bakni (talk) 22:29, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:31, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Regardless, it's presumably not a selfie yet claimed to be own work by the subject. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:27, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, likely not own work. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:29, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused blurred photo, nothing particular discernable, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:38, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep It looks like frozen tundra, as per the title. Why couldn't that be usable and in scope? It probably needs more categories, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:28, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- It is unusable because its quality is abysmal. This image has no value over the numerous high-quality images already in Category:Tundra. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:16, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- I don't agree that it's abysmal as a thumbnail, which is how it would be used in an online article. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:43, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Per Ikan Kekek. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:28, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: Profile picture, No proven notability https://www.youtube.com/@culgrindmayor6257 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:38, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:27, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Copyright Briski (talk · contribs)
editunlikely to be own work
Didym (talk) 13:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:35, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Equaliz3r official (talk · contribs)
editout of project scope
Didym (talk) 14:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:34, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 14:41, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment This user is a cross wiki spammer.[8] —MdsShakil (talk) 14:44, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:33, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mahesh DM408 (talk · contribs)
editOut of scope. Random personal photos of no educational value
Adamgerber80 (talk) 07:56, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+ one is a copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:42, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mahesh DM408 (talk · contribs)
editunlikely to be own work
- File:State level.png
- File:BGS PU college.png
- File:Christ university.jpg
- File:BGS PU College.jpg
- File:Magadi.jpg
Didym (talk) 14:50, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:33, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Skyscraper City post from a different user: https://www.skyscrapercity.com/threads/university-district-development-news-and-photos.1322713/post-181962359, need permission from the photographer Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:32, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Unattributed COM:SCREENSHOT. Belbury (talk) 15:34, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:31, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Rebecca J Michelson is the photographer - they need to provide the permission via COM:VRT. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:35, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:31, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blurry and unused image, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 16:50, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:30, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blurry and unused image, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 16:53, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nomination --Lukas Beck (talk) 17:18, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:30, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Iceland A1Cafel (talk) 16:55, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:29, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Iceland A1Cafel (talk) 16:55, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:29, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Iceland A1Cafel (talk) 16:57, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:28, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Iceland A1Cafel (talk) 16:58, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:28, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Iceland A1Cafel (talk) 16:58, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:28, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Iceland A1Cafel (talk) 16:58, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:28, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Iceland A1Cafel (talk) 16:59, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:28, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in Finland A1Cafel (talk) 17:04, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:27, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused text document promoting a book. Out of scope. Johnj1995 (talk) 18:47, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:56, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Unknown moustache and beard 181.43.4.47 19:00, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:55, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE Oscar_. (talk) 21:18, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:54, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:42, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:52, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
copyvio of picture on Saeed Safari's official website https://saeidsafari.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/IMG_7413-579x1030.jpg AngusWOOF (talk) 23:55, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:53, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 14:10, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no response. --GPSLeo (talk) 10:33, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Not own work. VRT-permission from the photographer is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:34, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:36, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Uploaded locally in 2013 by fawiki user fa:user:فرارو the photo was previously published via http://www.panoramio.com/photo/75762263 (2012, © All rights reserved by "Toofan Golkarian"). Permission needed.
The Wikimapia ({{WikiMapia}} file http://wikimapia.org/1448360/ru/%D0%93%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%BD#/photo/3737181 appears to be uploaded only in 2014. Gunnex (talk) 14:51, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination : previously published in Panoramio and not free --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:43, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
No FOP in Iran. MehdiTalk 09:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:37, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP in Iran. MehdiTalk 09:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:38, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP in Iran. MehdiTalk 09:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:37, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP in Iran. MehdiTalk 09:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:37, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
))_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
))_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP in Iran. MehdiTalk 09:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
))_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:37, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
))_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
No FOP in Iran. MehdiTalk 09:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:37, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP in Iran. MehdiTalk 09:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:37, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Newspaper scan, no date. Yann (talk) 11:02, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:49, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
I would like to have this file deleted as I believe this image is subject to copyright. I uploaded this image when I was a minor and from my memory have tried to have this image deleted on the basis that I never took it (from memory a friend took it and then I used it) and also on the basis that I was a minor at the time when I uploaded this, hence would like to have it voided on the basis that I was a minor at the time, and took no steps to affirm the contract as an adult (from memory, I even tried to delete it). As such, my licence is voidable, especially since it is entirely negative against me. 7physc (talk) 10:21, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:38, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
I would like to have this file deleted as I believe this image is subject to copyright. I would like it removed on the basis that I was a minor at the time when I uploaded this, hence would like to have it voided on the basis that I was a minor at the time, and took no steps to affirm the contract as an adult (from memory, I even tried to delete it). As such, my licence is voidable, especially since it is entirely negative against me. 7physc (talk) 10:23, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:38, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Carlos Gardel is not a simple geometric shape! 181.43.4.47 12:44, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Its use because its license is related to a geometric logo or "logo text", and in this case it would be the last one. Likewise, it is the same as the current logo of the grammy logo (2022) and there were no problems with it. Latothy99 (talk) 13:01, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
.png%7CFile:Latin){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:39, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Is this simple for you? 181.43.4.47 12:46, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Comment No, but I'm not a law expert. Perhaps it is nevertheless a textlogo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:42, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:39, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Is this simple? 181.43.4.47 12:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:39, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Own work?! 181.43.4.47 13:34, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:40, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ashwitha12 (talk · contribs)
editunlikely to be own work
- File:SWAMIJI.png
- File:SJM Institute.jpg
- File:About Math.jpg
- File:DR Sri Shivamurthy Murugha Sharanaru.jpg
- File:Swamy.png
- File:Sri Muruga Math.jpg
Didym (talk) 13:36, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:42, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE personal project. From the file descriptions (For Numberdopydeg wiki(-:) these were intended for https://numberdopydeg.fandom.com rather than Commons.
- File:Numberdopydeg the terrible Mikes.png
- File:Numberdopydeg Rainbow.png
- File:Ninety-Seven Thousand One Hundred-Four (Figured-Out).png
- File:UltraStup.png
- File:StupcrashThousand.png
- File:StupaneThousand.png
- File:StupThousand.png
- File:Ninety-Seven Thousand One Hundred-Four.png
- File:Rob??.png
- File:Stupine one off-on a rectangle.png
- File:Ronald 2.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Belbury (talk) 16:19, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Speedy delete all those per nominator. Those drawings are poorly made and completely redundant.- The Harvett Vault (user; talk) 06:32, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:42, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Unused and unexplained icons.
- File:My channel logo (old).jpg
- File:Attribution-exe.png
- File:Attribution-exe (No black colors).png
- File:Double Wales Dragons.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Belbury (talk) 20:54, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Ugh... - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 21:39, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:27, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kırmızı süleyman (talk · contribs)
editCOM:DW of Bangladeshi bank notes - no allowance for banknotes in Commons:Currency and government works are publish+60 per COM:BANGLADESH.
- File:Bangladeshi 10 taka Banknote 1980s series reverse side..jpg
- File:Bangladeshi 10 taka Banknote 1980s series..jpg
- File:Bangladeshi 2 taka Banknote 1980s series reverse side..jpg
- File:Bangladeshi 2 taka Banknote 1980s series..jpg
- File:Bangladeshi 50 taka Banknote 1990s series reverse side..jpg
- File:Bangladeshi 500 taka Banknote 1990s series reverse side..jpg
- File:Bangladeshi 500 taka Banknote 1990s series..jpg
- File:Bangladeshi 50 taka Banknote 1990s series..jpg
- File:Bangladeshi 10 taka Banknote 1990s series reverse side..jpg
- File:Bangladeshi 10 taka Banknote 1990s series..jpg
- File:Bangladeshi 500 taka banknote 2001 series. Reverse side..jpg
- File:Bangladeshi 500 taka banknote 2001 series. Obverse side..jpg
- File:Bangladeshi 100 taka banknote 2001 series. Reverse side..jpg
- File:Bangladeshi 100 taka banknote 2001 series. Obverse side..jpg
- File:10 taka polymer banknote 2000 series. Reverse side..jpg
- File:10 taka polymer banknote 2000 series. Obverse side..jpg
- File:Bangladeshi 500 taka banknote 2002 series. Reverse side..jpg
- File:Bangladeshi 500 taka banknote 2002 series. Obverse side..jpg
- File:Bangladeshi 100 taka banknote 2002 series. Reverse side..jpg
- File:Bangladeshi 100 taka banknote 2002 series. Obverse side..jpg
- File:Bangladeshi 50 taka banknote 2003 series. Reverse side..jpg
- File:Bangladeshi 50 taka banknote 2003 series. Obverse side..jpg
- File:Bangladeshi 20 taka banknote 2002 series. Reverse side..jpg
- File:Bangladeshi 20 taka banknote 2002 series. Obverse side..jpg
- File:1000 taka banknote reverse side 2008 series.jpg
- File:1000 taka banknote obverse side 2008 series.jpg
- File:2 taka bank note reverse side..jpg
- File:2 taka bank note.jpg
- File:50 taka banknote reverse side. (1987 series).jpg
- File:50 taka banknote observe side (1987 series)..jpg
- File:50 taka banknote reverse side..jpg
- File:50 taka banknote..jpg
- File:20 taka reverse side.jpg
- File:20 taka banknote.jpg
- File:100 Taka Bangladshi note.jpg
- File:60e343a2797674.05156153-original.jpg
- File:Bangladesh BB 500 taka 2018.00.00 B353j P58 6699728 f-3000x1268.jpg
- File:Tk5o10r.jpg
- File:Tk5o7o.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Эlcobbola talk 16:57, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:41, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kırmızı süleyman (talk · contribs)
editOfficial portraits of military and other personalities. Unlikely to be under a free license.
- File:Rear Admiral Shaheen Rahman.jpg
- File:Shafiuddin Ahmed 2021 (cropped).jpg
- File:Shafiuddin Ahmed and Masud Bin Momen (cropped).jpg
- File:Gen Bikram Singh with COAS Bangladesh Army Gen Iqbal Karim (cropped).jpg
- File:লেফটেন্যান্ট জেনারেল এম হারুন-উর-রশীদ.jpg
- File:জেনারেল মুস্তাফিজুর রহমান.jpg
- File:লেফটেন্যান্ট জেনারেল মুহাম্মদ মাহবুবুর রহমান.jpg
- File:লেফটেন্যান্ট জেনারেল আবু সালেহ মোহাম্মদ নাসিম.jpg
- File:লেফটেন্যান্ট জেনারেল নুরউদ্দীন খান.jpg
- File:Abdur Rahman Biswas.jpg
- File:ASM Sayem.jpg
- File:Iajuddin Ahmed.webp
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 14:28, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:34, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:41, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Samaranews (talk · contribs)
editCOM:NOTUSED: Unused logos perhaps uploaded for advertisement.
Tulsi 24x7 09:16, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
No FOP in Iran. MehdiTalk 09:19, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hugotopping (talk · contribs)
editunlikely to be own work
- File:CPL2X.jpg
- File:CPL1X.jpg
- File:Gallyon 4.jpg
- File:Gallyon 2.jpg
- File:Gallyon 1.jpg
- File:Travelers visit with London staff.jpg
- File:2018 Hackathon Winning Team.jpg
- File:Whizz-Kidz Charity Bike Ride 2016.jpg
- File:99 Gresham Street London Office.png
- File:England Amputee Football Association.jpg
Didym (talk) 12:43, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:43, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. The uploader already has lots of deleted copyright violations.
- File:ShabPhoto.jpg
- File:Damon Sharpe Metaverse.jpg
- File:Harper Starling O2 Arena.png
- File:Harper Starling Wikipedia Photo.jpg
- File:Cinzia Moniaci.jpg
- File:Harper Starling Wikipedia Article Picture (1).jpg
- File:Hillary roberts.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Didym (talk) 12:47, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:45, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work
- File:Medenychi-otg.png
- File:Imaes (14).jpg
- File:Molodgromady.jpg
- File:Veloprobihshkola.jpg
- File:Lizej.jpg
- File:Ridnashkola.jpg
- File:Med svyato.jpg
- File:Sfs456jklh.jpg
- File:Velomaraf.jpg
- File:Imaes (9).jpg
- File:Без названия (12).jpg
- File:Без назия (11).jpg
- File:«KHexEdit-0.8.6.png».jpg
- File:02608308 n3.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Didym (talk) 12:57, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:45, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Out of project scope Frodar (talk) 16:22, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:46, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Is this really your own work? 181.43.4.47 19:05, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:46, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Afghanistan (2013–2021).svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:19, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:46, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Low resolution image missing EXIF data, also the user's only uploads, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 03:11, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:02, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Low quality, blurry and unused image, can be replace by alternatives A1Cafel (talk) 16:25, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:02, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lorenzo Roel (talk · contribs)
editOut of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:41, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lorenzo Roel (talk · contribs)
editNot own work. Various cameras and photographers in metadata.
- File:SC 133 Reforma Laboral 20181120.pdf
- File:Lorenzo Roel Hdz.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel. Gustavo de Hoyos. Gerardo Trejo. Jesus Padilla. Francisco Lopez.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel. Gustavo de Hoyos. Gerardo Trejo. Jesus Padilla.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel. Gustavo de Hoyos. Gerardo Trejo.jpg
- File:Osorio Chong Lorenzo Roel.jpg
- File:Camara Diputados.jpg
- File:Asamblea INCAM.jpg
- File:Javier Don Lorenzo Lorenzo Roel.jpg
- File:Lienzo Don Lorenzo Roel.jpg
- File:CTM Carlos Aceves Lorenzo Roel.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel H.jpg
- File:Canal Judicial marzo 2018.jpg
- File:Senado Octavio Carbajal Javier Lozano Tomas Natividad Lorenzo Roel.jpg
- File:Reforma Constitucional en materia de justicia laboral.jpg
- File:COPARMEX Gustavo de Hoyos Jose Medina Mora.jpg
- File:F Asamblea INCAM 21 jun 2016.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel Tomas Natividad.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel. Tomas Natividad 1.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 88.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 90.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 89.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 87.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 86.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 85.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 83.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 82.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 84.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 79 B.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 79 A.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 80.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 79.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 77.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 78.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 70.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 76.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 72.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 69.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 68.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 63.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 59.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 57.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 55.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 54.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 53.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 52.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 50.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 45.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 31 A.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 40.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 42.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 38.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 36.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 35.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 32.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 33.jpg
- File:Foro-laboral-COPARMEX 2017.jpg
- File:Foro-laboral-COPARMEX 2017 2.jpg
- File:Foro-laboral-COPARMEX 2017 1.jpg
- File:Firma convenio COPARMEX INAM ANADE 28 junio 2016 3.jpg
- File:Comision Laboral COPARMEX Oct 2017 2.jpg
- File:Comision Laboral COPARMEX Oct 2017 1.jpg
- File:Comision Laboral COPARMEX Oct 2017.jpg
- File:Comision Laboral COPARMEX Mayo 2017 3.jpg
- File:Comision Laboral COPARMEX Marzo 2017 4.jpg
- File:Comision Laboral COPARMEX Marzo 2017.jpg
- File:Comision Laboral COPARMEX Marzo 2017 3.jpg
- File:Comision Laboral COPARMEX Marzo 2017 2.jpg
- File:Comision Laboral COPARMEX Junio 2016 8.jpg
- File:Comision Laboral COPARMEX Junio 2016 3.jpg
- File:Comision Laboral COPARMEX Junio 2016 1.jpg
- File:Comision Laboral COPARMEX Ago 2016 2.jpg
- File:Comision Laboral COPARMEX Ago 2016.jpg
- File:Comision Laboral COPARMEX Junio 2016.jpg
- File:Comision Laboral COPARMEX Enero 2018 1.jpg
- File:Comision Laborla Enero 2018.jpg
- File:Comision Laboral Ago 2017 3.jpg
- File:Comision Laboral COPARMEX Ago 2017 1.jpg
- File:Comision Laboral Abril 2016 4.jpg
- File:Angel Ind Vamos Por Mas.jpg
- File:Comision Laboral COPARMEX Abril 2016 1.jpg
- File:Angel Ind Vamos Por Mas 1.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 29.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 28.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 26.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 25.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 24.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 23.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 22.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 21.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 20.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 19.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 18.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 17.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 16.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 15.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Reol 14.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 13.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 12.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 11.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 10.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 9.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 8.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 7.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 6.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 5.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 4.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 3.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 2.jpg
- File:Lorenzo Roel 1.jpg
Didym (talk) 14:59, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:22, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Still of a YouTube video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Op1tvNkzWiI CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:27, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 02:26, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Collection of Virgin Mary statue photos with different styles and borders, which appear to have been copied from multiple different photographers around the internet, but credited to the uploader.
File:Mary_Help_of_Christians_of_Paranaque_City.jpg is EXIF credited to Michael Angelo Cortez Daquioag. File:Lourdes Retiro.jpg is watermarked to Beata Memoriam (https://www.facebook.com/BlessedEncountersPH). File:NUESTRA SENORA DE Caridad de Bantay.jpg has Facebook EXIF and appears on the Flickr account of Wilfred Naval at https://www.flickr.com/photos/56096786@N06/24025818629/ File:MERCED_TARLAC.jpg is EXIF credited to GCVICTORINO (https://www.flickr.com/photos/gabvic13/).
- File:Lourdes Retiro.jpg
- File:Mt Carmel of New Manila.jpg
- File:OUR LADY OF LOURDES OF RETIRO CORONADA.jpg
- File:Nuestra Senora de los Dolores de Quezon.jpg
- File:DESAMPARADOS DE MANILA CORONADA.jpg
- File:Nuestra Senora de Pronto Soccoro de Boac.jpg
- File:NUESTRA SENORA DE Caridad de Bantay.jpg
- File:Merced de Novaliches Coronada.jpg
- File:Nuestra Senora de los Dolores de Quezon Coronada.jpg
- File:Virgen de la Asuncion de Dauis Coronada.jpg
- File:Mary Help of Christians of Paranaque City.jpg
- File:Patrocinio de Maria Santisima.jpg
- File:La Purisima Concepcion de Sta Maria.jpg
- File:NANA CISO NG PALANYAG.jpg
- File:Our Lady of the Rosary of La Naval de Manila.jpg
- File:Mama OLA.jpg
- File:La Virgen de la Rosa de Macati.jpg
- File:La Virgen de la Rosa de Macati Coronada.jpg
- File:MALABON INMACULADA.jpg
- File:NUESTRA SENORA DEL PILAR DE MORONG CORONADA.jpg
- File:DEL PILAR DE MANILA CORONADA.jpg
- File:LA INMACULADA MALOLOS.jpg
- File:IMMACOLATA MALOLOS.jpg
- File:CONSOLACION Y CORREA.jpg
- File:NAMACPACAN MADONNA.jpg
- File:VIRGIN OF SAN SEBASTIAN.jpg
- File:OUR LADY OF ROSARY OF ORANI.jpg
- File:INDU 1956.jpg
- File:INDU.jpg
- File:SANTO ROSARIO DE CARDONA CORONADA.jpg
- File:MAHAL NGA PATRONA.jpg
- File:OUR LADY OF CAYSASAY.jpg
- File:MANAOAG 3.jpg
- File:ANTIPOLO 2.jpg
- File:REINA DE GAPAN.jpg
- File:ILOY.jpg
- File:ARANZAZU de San Mateo CoronadA.jpg
- File:PILAR DE IMUS CORONADA.jpg
- File:PASIG CORONADA.jpg
- File:GUADALUPE DE CEBU.jpg
- File:MATER DOLOROSA DE TARLAC.jpg
- File:MERCED TARLAC.jpg
- File:Immaculate Conception of Batangan.jpg
- File:OLA Muntinlupa.jpg
- File:OLA ALABANG.jpg
Belbury (talk) 08:49, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - There is also the question of whether the works have copyrights. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:35, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Further images more likely to have been found online than taken personally by the uploader. File:Patrocinio de Maria de Boljoon Coronada Canonica.jpg is watermarked and credited to Immonzon 2011 in the EXIF, File:Our Lady of Ransom of Tarlac.jpg appears to be almost identical to the image at https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=575371911297850&set=pb.100064751383132.-2207520000.&type=3 (an infinitesimal difference in angle but all details including individual tassles identical), File:Mahal nga Patrona Virgen de la Asuncion de Maasin Coronada.jpg has Facebook EXIF, File:Nuestra Senora de la Inmaculada Concepcion de Batangan - La Batanguena.jpg has a digital border that the others lack.
- File:Patrocinio de Maria de Boljoon Coronada Canonica.jpg
- File:Mahal nga Patrona Virgen de la Asuncion de Maasin Coronada.jpg
- File:Our Lady of Ransom Tarlac.jpg
- File:Our Lady of Ransom of Tarlac.jpg
- File:Nuestra Senora de la Inmaculada Concepcion de Batangan - La Batanguena.jpg
- File:Nuestra Senora del Santisimo Rosario de Cardona - La Virgen de Sapao.jpg
Belbury (talk) 17:54, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 16:36, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Low quality COM:VULVA photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 16:32, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Question How many close up photographs of human vulva we have with the age of 26? And is there any category tree to prove that? --Lukas Beck (talk) 16:58, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Son Vds dos obsesionados con genitales? Dónde está el límite? Si tenemos de 25 y 26 años, luego van a querer órganos reproductivos de 25 anos y medio?! DELETE, uno más del montón. 181.203.13.251 22:41, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your kind comment. My question relates to the age of the vagina, as it is important to represent different age groups. If we have enough comparable images, I am happy to support the deletion. However, most pictures lack information about age, which is why this image can still be useful. Lukas Beck (talk) 05:34, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Son Vds dos obsesionados con genitales? Dónde está el límite? Si tenemos de 25 y 26 años, luego van a querer órganos reproductivos de 25 anos y medio?! DELETE, uno más del montón. 181.203.13.251 22:41, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Low-quality, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:35, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete we have enough of this and who cares if she’s 26 Dronebogus (talk) 05:37, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 06:57, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Low quality COM:VULVA photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 16:37, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep quality is not that bad. --Lukas Beck (talk) 16:56, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Yeah, this could be good enough to keep. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:34, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep fine quality Dronebogus (talk) 05:38, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. ✗plicit 06:58, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
unbrauchbar 93.230.209.133 09:17, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason given. --Leyo 17:12, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Kept: As per Leyo. Skeezix1000 (talk) 18:33, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Low quality COM:VULVA photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 16:42, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Interesting touch through sepia photography. --Lukas Beck (talk) 16:53, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep perfectly good image Dronebogus (talk) 05:38, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. ✗plicit 07:00, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Divulgalitoral (talk · contribs)
editunlikely to be own work
- File:Vladimirperfil.jpg
- File:Vladimiroliveirajogador.jpg
- File:Vladimiroliveirajogadorprofissionaldefutebol.jpg
- File:Vladimirjogadoruniao.jpg
- File:Vladimir-oliveira-uniao-barbarense.jpg
- File:Vladimir-oliveira-lance.jpg
- File:Vladimir-oliveira-atleta-profissional-campeao-goiano.jpg
- File:Vladimir-oliveira-atleta-profissional-campeonato-sergipano.jpg
- File:Vladimir-oliveira-atleta-profissional.jpg
Didym (talk) 16:44, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 06:46, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Possible Copyright Infringement. If you throw the picture into TinEye, you will get some results that look quite similar to the woman. The picture was presumably reworked and sold as a separate work. Not to mention the image description. Lukas Beck (talk) 18:40, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 06:58, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
The cropped image focuses on a copyrighted character (Goomba), so COM:DE MINIMIS does not apply in this case. ZebaX2010 (talk) 22:49, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 07:01, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Thumb photo from https://www.armada.cl/la-armada/alto-mando-naval/almirante/almirante-juan-andres-de-la-maza-larrain of unknown copyright status. Pierre cb (talk) 06:26, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:04, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Date and author is clearly wrong; I suspect a copyright violation. Jmabel ! talk 00:06, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hello colleague, I don’t know about the date, but the source is clearly correct, since the drawing was taken from the book of the Ingush writer Bagaudin Zyazikov «Девять дней из жизни героя» dedicated to Mandre. Targimhoï (talk) 10:31, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Targimhoï: but the uploader claimed it is their own work (used {{Self}} and that they are granting a free license. Are you saying that User:All Hail Britannia is Bagaudin Zyazikov? Because if so, we need VRT, and if not, this is a copyright violation. - Jmabel ! talk 16:32, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:28, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Image by Andries van der Sloot (1883-1955) still under copyright until 1 jan 1956 2026. Sharing this work requires permission from the owners of the copyright. -- Mdd (talk) 00:27, 6 March 2023 (UTC) / 01:06, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Please also delete other two pictures from the same uploader for the same reason
-- Mdd (talk) 00:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Question Under copyright until when? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:34, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Dutch artist, so I think that should be until 2026. XxakixX (talk) 10:59, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Cool. Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:29, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you both. I only just noticed my mistake, and made the correction. -- Mdd (talk) 01:06, 7 March 2023 (UTC).
- Sure thing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:18, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- There could be a complicating factor here: the URAA limitations on European works. If we take in account the URAA it will be about 2039 or so. If we follow the Wikimedia Foundation guidelines we can stick to 2026. -- Mdd (talk) 17:39, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I don't remember what Commons policy is on that, but I trust that the closing admin will. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:10, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- Mdd, why are Wikimedia Foundation guidelines different from URAA? Please ping me if you answer. Best regards, RodRabelo7 (talk) 03:49, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
- RodRabelo7 thanks for asking, but this complicated. This nomination got me troubled even before I started it, and I guess that is why I made two dyslectic mistakes in the initial text. Now I tried to explain yesterday, see here, but realized I was over-demanding and retracted that comment. Now it is not so much that "Wikimedia Foundation guidelines different from URAA," but the Wikimedia Foundation guidelines towards dealing with the URAA can be interpreted in different ways. Yet this is my interpretation, and bringing this up right now right here is to complicated due to a larger context. -- Mdd (talk) 11:47, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:29, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP Slovenia: non-free architecture by Ivan Vurnik (d. 1971).
TadejM (t/p) 00:27, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:29, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jake M. Evans (talk · contribs)
editEach of these photos shows EXIF from a different camera, and some of them have been found at lower resolution at yachtingworld.jp. It is unlikely that these are all own work, and in that case COM:VRT is required.
- File:2017 EZ Dock Prince Edward Island Canada Front Cover.jpg
- File:EZ DOCK.jpg
- File:Kagoshima kokutai.jpg
- File:コンサートステージ.jpg
- File:Rocket on the sea.jpg
- File:Walk on Piafloat.jpg
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:34, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:36, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted memorial plaque. no FoP, no permission. B.T.Thatcher (talk) 07:19, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:36, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Photograph of non-free work. -- Asclepias (talk) 12:18, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Cette photo est le reflet d'une présentation publique dans un espace public, créé par une association. Cette association doit être ravie qu'on reprenne son travail pour le vulgariser.
- A garder. ChBougui (talk) 08:28, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - infringes on copyrighted plaque. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Photograph of non-free work. -- Asclepias (talk) 12:34, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Cette photo est le reflet d'une présentation publique dans un espace public, créé par une association. Cette association doit être ravie qu'on reprenne son travail pour le vulgariser.
- A garder. ChBougui (talk) 08:29, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Although these photographs are marked CC-BY-SA on Flickr, the image description and metadata both say "Photos can not be republished without permission from the photographer." The copyright for these photographs belong to Karl Kuntz, not the theatre group.
- File:Allison Schiller.png
- File:Kayla Ryan Walsh.png
- File:Madelyn Loehr.png
- File:MG 0601 (39710593000).jpg
- File:MG 0601 (40626450605).jpg
- File:MG 0601 (40806515944).jpg
- File:MG 0601 (41519435921).jpg
- File:MG 0601 (41519436001).jpg
- File:MG 0601 (41519436011).jpg
- File:MG 0601 (41519436151).jpg
- File:Much Ado About Nothing (24000231264).jpg
- File:Much Ado About Nothing (24000273424).jpg
- File:Much Ado About Nothing (24000296204).jpg
- File:Much Ado About Nothing (24001542363).jpg
- File:Much Ado About Nothing (24001591623).jpg
- File:Much Ado About Nothing (24001602253).jpg
- File:Much Ado About Nothing (24001615733).jpg
- File:Much Ado About Nothing (24260638539).jpg
- File:Much Ado About Nothing (24260641799).jpg
- File:Much Ado About Nothing (24260662389).jpg
- File:Much Ado About Nothing (24332815370).jpg
- File:Much Ado About Nothing (24332871000).jpg
- File:Much Ado About Nothing (24332894240).jpg
- File:Much Ado About Nothing (24332901240).jpg
- File:Much Ado About Nothing (24520013442).jpg
- File:Much Ado About Nothing (24520032912).jpg
- File:Much Ado About Nothing (24520049222).jpg
- File:Much Ado About Nothing (24520074992).jpg
- File:Much Ado About Nothing (24520094602).jpg
- File:Much Ado About Nothing (24520111352).jpg
- File:Much Ado About Nothing (24602180596).jpg
- File:Much Ado About Nothing (24602189286).jpg
- File:Much Ado About Nothing (24602240476).jpg
- File:Much Ado About Nothing (24602261516).jpg
- File:Much Ado About Nothing (24628394415).jpg
- File:Much Ado About Nothing (24546203741).jpg
- File:Much Ado About Nothing (24546239651).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:12, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- I realized there are over 250 files on Commons that are marked "Photos can not be republished without permission from the photographer." Whatever the consensus is on these files should apply to all photographs by Karl Kuntz. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:19, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:42, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
The watermark gives clearly "Copyright". The user mentions "own work". Is user E17D= Jos Daemen? The image without the watermark is here. Wouter (talk) 14:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Dear sir, Jos Daemen is my father. I made the watermark on his drawing to make sure it would not be used in a non-exepted way. E17D (talk) 14:46, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- @E17D: Ik stel voor de Wikimedia Vrijwilligers Respons Team toestemmingsgenerator te gebruiken om het bestand onder een vrije licentie vrij te geven. If you want this comment translated in English please let me know. Wouter (talk) 19:30, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - needs a free license directly from Jos Daemen via VRT. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:44, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
The watermark gives clearly "Copyright". The user mentions "own work". Is user E17D= Jos Daemen? The same image without the watermark is here. Wouter (talk) 14:32, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Dear sir, Jos Daemen is my father. I made the watermark on his drawing to make sure it would not be used in a non-exepted way. E17D (talk) 14:47, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- @E17D: Ik stel voor de Wikimedia Vrijwilligers Respons Team toestemmingsgenerator te gebruiken om het bestand onder een vrije licentie vrij te geven. If you want this comment translated in English please let me know. Wouter (talk) 19:29, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination needs a free license directly from Jos Daemen via VRT. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:44, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Copyright for this image belongs to Haverfordwest County, not to the player or his father: https://haverfordwestcountyafc.com/2023/01/jack-leahy-joins-on-loan-from-cardiff-city-for-remainder-of-season/ Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:53, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/"Universe Sandbox"
editScreenshots of the Universe Sandbox software, the usage policy of which (https://universesandbox.com/usage) is broadly similar to CC-Attribution but more restrictive; for example, their restrictions for online user require attribution to be both "prominent" and "clickable" (which these uploads to Commons already fail; the attribution is not hyperlinked), and they have specific restrictions for television reuse about where to be credited and not to fade the credit out. This seems like it may be too strict for COM:LICENSING.
- File:Proxima Centauri planetary system.png
- File:Rigel stellar system imagination.png
- File:Sun turning into a supernova.jpg
- File:Gliese 1061 system.png
- File:Destruction of satellite passing Roche limit area.ogv
- File:Messier 32.png
- File:T type brown dwarf.png
- File:Universe Sandbox² - 20160123-185806 38400x10800.png
- File:Y type brown dwarf.png
- File:Ross 508 system.png
- File:O type star image.png
- File:F type star image.png
- File:M type star image.png
- File:A type star image.png
- File:B type star image.png
- File:G type star image.png
- File:Universe Sandbox ² - 20170728-210757.png
- File:L type brown dwarf image.png
- File:Wolf 1061 system.png
- File:K type star image.png
Belbury (talk) 15:30, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Belbury, Do you want to keep those files, or not? Please answer to me. It hasn't been solved for over a week. Power Hacks (discussion) (contributions) 13:59, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Power Hacks: It's not my decision, I've just flagged it for discussion because the licence is an unusual one that seems to me to be too restrictive for COM:LICENSING. These discussions often stay open for months. Belbury (talk) 14:58, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Belbury, Oh no, I have to used one of those images. I will delete the text "Universe Sandbox" and fix those images to prevent it from being possibly deleted (to ensure that those file won't be deleted, I will replace the text "Universe Sandbox" with the text "a simulation"). Power Hacks (discussion) (contributions) 13:41, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Power Hacks: The files will be deleted if it's decided that the Universe Sandbox licence isn't compatible with Commons, and kept if it's considered compatible.
- Deleting the mentions of Universe Sandbox and describing it generically as "a simulation" wouldn't allow them to be kept, it would literally be breaking their licence, which requires "prominent attribution" to Universe Sandbox. Belbury (talk) 14:11, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Belbury, Oh no, I have to used one of those images. I will delete the text "Universe Sandbox" and fix those images to prevent it from being possibly deleted (to ensure that those file won't be deleted, I will replace the text "Universe Sandbox" with the text "a simulation"). Power Hacks (discussion) (contributions) 13:41, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Power Hacks: It's not my decision, I've just flagged it for discussion because the licence is an unusual one that seems to me to be too restrictive for COM:LICENSING. These discussions often stay open for months. Belbury (talk) 14:58, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Now, it won't be long until some of those files will be distributed through wikis, and it hasn't been solved for over a month. Where will we go? Will those files be deleted, or be kept? Power Hacks (contributions) (talk) 15:05, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- Do you want to give any thoughts on why you believe the Universe Sandbox licence to be compatible with COM:LICENSING? Admins are more likely to close it if there's been a discussion with points for and against.
- Looking at it again I think Universe Sandbox's requirement that If the content is distributed online: ... Send us a link so we can see what you've created. is clearly going against the Commons principle that Notification of the creator [must not be] required, rather than requested, for all or for some uses. Belbury (talk) 15:21, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:52, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thomas thévenoud (talk · contribs)
editAuthor of pictures is not the account and there is no authorization from real authors to publish these files under CC licence.
Jules* (talk) 16:18, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:53, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work
- File:قصر بهرام گور.jpg
- File:سیستم مختصات ژئودتیک.jpg
- File:SPS930 with TSC2 005.jpg
- File:Leica-flexline-ts09-plus.jpg
- File:Teodolite T2 1973.jpg
Didym (talk) 16:26, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:54, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 16:45, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:54, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DECHAMMAKL (talk · contribs)
editunlikely to be own work
- File:Heat Flow 9218.jpg
- File:Gravity 9218.jpg
- File:Electromagnetic waves.png
- File:Geophysics.jpg
- File:Etchells.jpg
- File:P25 ruth-etchells.jpg
- File:ರುತ್ ಎಟ್ಚೆಲ್ಸ್....jpg
- File:ರಾಷ್ಟಕವಿ ರುತ್ ಎಟ್ಚೆಲ್ಸ್.jpg
- File:ರುತ್ ಎಟ್ಚೆಲ್ಸ್.jpg
Didym (talk) 16:47, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:54, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of project scope, also unlikely to be own work.
- File:Jagadguru 6.jpeg
- File:Original Jagadguru 3.jpeg
- File:Original Jagadguru 2.jpeg
- File:Kripaluji Maharaj 2.jpeg
Didym (talk) 16:51, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:54, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Iceland. Artist Einar Jónsson died in 1954, undelete in 2025 A1Cafel (talk) 17:01, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- But it says in Icelandic FoP (unofficial translation): "Photographs may be taken and presented of buildings, as well as works of art, which have been situated permanently out-of-doors in a public location." That is the case for this photograph, taken from a public park. Images are only free for non-commercial use, however, so I would consent to the the license being changed to CC-BY-NC-SA (or just CC-BY-NC). --WiseWoman (talk) 22:02, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- @WiseWoman: Non-commercial use is not allowed on Commons. See Commons:Licensing#Forbidden licenses for further info. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:09, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- I personally don't mind commercial use. Is there any image license that would fit? The sculpture is so grand, the picture doesn't really do it justice, although I had the building behind it sort of opening its arms around the statue, as the statue itself opens its arms around the children. --WiseWoman (talk) 10:33, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- @WiseWoman: Non-commercial use is not allowed on Commons. See Commons:Licensing#Forbidden licenses for further info. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:09, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:55, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
This logo is probably above the threshold of originality. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 17:27, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. The Seattle SuperSonics routinely published this logo on various merchandise without copyright notice. Because this logo was introduced in 1975, it is in the public domain per {{PD-US-no notice}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:26, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:55, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by %USER% as Speedy similar File:MTR Shenzhen logo.svg was kept GPSLeo (talk) 17:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- This file was initially tagged by Jackycheung0929 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: CSD G4 (recreation of content previously deleted per community consensus): Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of Mass Transit Railway (MTR) Hong Kong. (supplemented by Jacky Cheung (talk) 07:27, 8 March 2023 (UTC))
- Delete as it violates COM:TOO Hong Kong. (Besides, even if it didn't violate TOO, it's not even accurate to the real logo.)
- As an aside, what's the protocol for the various other wikis that are currently using this image and want to keep using it? EN-wiki has its own copy of the logo here that isn't allowed to be copied to Commons, so I've changed all usages on EN-wiki to the EN-wiki version, but what about the other wikis? Edderiofer (talk) 21:09, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Edderiofer: It's either/or—if it's too dissimilar to be an accurate copy, then it can't be a TOO violation. Useddenim (talk) 22:17, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete MTR logo was once deleted for violating the COM:TOO Hong Kong in the previous DR. Jacky Cheung (talk) 07:27, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- Dot why was File:MTR Shenzhen logo.svg than decided to keep? GPSLeo (talk) 07:39, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- File:MTR Shenzhen logo.svg was kept by COM:TOO China. Obviously, this file is should follow the COM:TOO Hong Kong whether in terms of the file name including hk or the origin of Hong Kong. Jacky Cheung (talk) 07:49, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- If it indeed depicts an old form of the character 木 (see File:木-seal.svg) a copyright can IMO be doubted. --Achim55 (talk) 21:29, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- File:MTR Shenzhen logo.svg was kept by COM:TOO China. Obviously, this file is should follow the COM:TOO Hong Kong whether in terms of the file name including hk or the origin of Hong Kong. Jacky Cheung (talk) 07:49, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- Dot why was File:MTR Shenzhen logo.svg than decided to keep? GPSLeo (talk) 07:39, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep This icon was deliberately created as a public domain placeholder to resemble the MTR logo. The letterform is noticeably different in its shape, so therefore it does not violate COM:TOO Hong Kong. (It seems that the only reason this file has got caught up in the mass DR is because the actual logo was redirected to this file rather than being deleted outright.) Useddenim (talk) 22:17, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- Even if this icon is resemble the MTR logo, it still may be found to be infringing by a courts where case law is practiced because the MTR logo violates the COM:TOO Hong Kong. Per COM:PRP it should not be kept here on Commons. Jacky Cheung (talk) 13:54, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- I don't see where "vaguely resembles" is listed as a reason in COM:PRP. Useddenim (talk) 02:56, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
- I bring up COM:PRP as keeping this icon may lead to copyright infringement of the MTR logo. Jacky Cheung (talk) 03:49, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
- I don't see where "vaguely resembles" is listed as a reason in COM:PRP. Useddenim (talk) 02:56, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
- Even if this icon is resemble the MTR logo, it still may be found to be infringing by a courts where case law is practiced because the MTR logo violates the COM:TOO Hong Kong. Per COM:PRP it should not be kept here on Commons. Jacky Cheung (talk) 13:54, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keepthis is a ancient chinese word, different form the real MTR logo--北極企鵝觀賞團 (talk) 04:16, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: If it is close enough to the original to be in scope, then it is a copyvio. If it isnot a copyvio, then it is out of scope. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:57, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
unlikely to be own work
- File:Maestrasophiahablaencongreso.jpg
- File:Maestrasophiapolicia.jpg
- File:Sophiaforode.jpg
- File:NombramientoSophía.jpg
Didym (talk) 17:56, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:58, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
This must be a photo of a photo of Otto Stark in 1999. The meta data give that an iPhone 7 is used. This phone was announced on September 7, 2016; So what about the copyright of the original photo? Wouter (talk) 19:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:58, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
The cropped image focuses on a copyrighted character (Piranha Plant), so COM:DE MINIMIS does not apply in this case. ZebaX2010 (talk) 22:53, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:59, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Copyright infringement, it is obvious from the watermark that the photo belongs to SOTA, probably the user Uncle Bogdan took it from this publication https://t.me/sotaproject/47544 Sijokun (talk) 00:04, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:59, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Diegoromch (talk) 04:42, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:00, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cinthia arboleas (talk · contribs)
editunlikely to be own work
- File:Federico Weil - CEO TGLT.jpg
- File:Forum Puerto del Buceo - TGLT.jpg
- File:Venice - TGLT.jpg
- File:Forum Puerto Norte - TGLT.jpg
- File:Metra Puerto Norte - TGLT.jpg
- File:Forum Puerto Madero - TGLT.jpg
- File:Forum Alcorta - TGLT.jpg
- File:Brisario - TGLT.jpg
- File:Astor Nuñez - TGLT.jpg
- File:Astor Palermo - TGLT.jpg
- File:Astor San Telmo - TGLT.jpg
Didym (talk) 13:18, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - mix of EXIF data suggests you're right. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:48, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
COM:FOP Germany only applies to permanently installed works. This advertising poster appears to be temporary. Wcam (talk) 13:25, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- It is not a poster but a mural painted on the wall. Someone removed "murals in Germany" from the "hogwarts legacy" category. But you can still find the words "mural" and "Wandgemälde" in the file description. You can also look at File:Hogwarts Legacy 2.jpg (in the very same category!): you can clearly see the bolts in the wall, that could be used to mount a temporary advertising poster and they have not been used but instead overpainted with wall paint. It is even better visible in File:Heidi Klum Mural.jpg (same building, other side) and File:Heidi Klum Mural 7.jpg. C.Suthorn (talk) 15:38, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- The only way to remove this permanent murals would be by destroying them in place. C.Suthorn (talk) 15:45, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- An advertisement poster for a video game is typically designed to be a temporary promotional tool to increase awareness and generate interest in the game. As such, these posters are usually only paid for a short period of time, and are not intended to be permanent installations. Firstly, video game companies often have a specific marketing budget allocated for advertising, which includes the cost of creating and distributing promotional materials such as posters. This budget is typically allocated for a certain period of time, and once it is exhausted, the advertising campaign will end. This means that the company will not continue to pay for the posters once the budget has been used up. Secondly, video game posters are designed to be eye-catching and attention-grabbing, but they are not intended to be permanent fixtures. Outdoor posters are subject to weather conditions and can become damaged or faded over time. Moreover, they may be subject to vandalism or defacement, which could affect the game's image negatively. For these reasons, video game companies typically do not invest in long-term outdoor advertising campaigns using posters. Thirdly, video game companies often change their marketing strategies frequently in response to market trends and consumer behavior. This means that they may not want to commit to a long-term outdoor advertising campaign, as they may need to shift their focus to a different marketing approach in the future. In conclusion, video game advertisement posters are usually only paid for a short amount of time, as they are intended to be temporary promotional tools. These posters are not permanent installations and are subject to weather conditions and other factors that could damage or affect their effectiveness over time. Moreover, video game companies often change their marketing strategies frequently, which means that they may not want to commit to a long-term outdoor advertising campaign. --Wcam (talk) 04:13, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Keep Es ist klar gemalt, keine Plane. Egal wie lang, das ist "auf Lebenszeit" angebracht und somit Panoramafreiheit anzuwenden. --Ralf Roletschek 06:07, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete The question of "permeance" ultimately comes down to if the work of art will "from the point of view of the general public, [it is] intended to remain in the public place for a long, mostly indefinite, period of time". So does that apply to this mural? Not according to this article. To quote from it "If you want to see the graffiti live, you have to hurry: Despite the great effort, such murals usually have a very short 'lifespan' and are therefore only active for a few days before they are replaced by the next advertising motif." Nothing about that makes it sounds like the mural placed there with the purpose of it staying up for an indefinite period. Seriously, why would it be? No is going to care about Hogwarts Legacy in a few years, if they even do now. So it would be ridiculous to act like an ad for it would stay up permanently. That's not how advertising works. Especially in the video game world. It's not like paintings can't be taken down either. Nor does the law say anything about the work having to attached to fixtures for it to be permanent or not either. At least not that I'm aware of. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:28, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Germany is full of murals, that are advertisements for products where the company that made it went bancrupt decades ago. Especially in the formner GDR you will see ads at walls for businesses that went out of business in 1945. By the logic expressed above no graffiti in Germany would fall under FoP. I.E. the wall gallery near Berlin Ostbahnhof with its paintings of Gorbatschow kissing Honecker and so on would not fall unser FoP as these images get overpainted often. Also a MediaMarkt in Rhineland-Palatine that has a 15m x 5m ad for the Samsung Galaxy S 10, while Samsung is at the same time selling the S 23 and has stopped support for the S 10 years ago: The add can still be seen from rail cars passing by. C.Suthorn (talk) 11:05, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- You can always find edge cases to argue whatever point your trying to make. I don't think the fact that some murals are never taken down doesn't negates the nature of the thing or if this is permanent in the way that the law stipulates or not though. "All posters are permanent because there's still an example of a poster from World War 1 stuck to a wall somewhere" is just a bad, non-argument. Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Posters still makes it clear that images of posters are generally not acceptable anyway. In this case most murals of advertisements are taken down after the ad has ran its course. That's just a fact. Again, that a few here and there are left up doesn't change that or make them permanent. --Adamant1 (talk) 17:42, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- It is a mural. Not a poster. C.Suthorn (talk) 08:54, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- I'm aware. It's called an example. Just like you brought up graffiti in your last comment even though it clearly isn't graffiti. Why not respond to the point I was making instead of playing dumb by acting like you don't know what an analogy is? --Adamant1 (talk) 15:42, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- It is a mural. Not a poster. C.Suthorn (talk) 08:54, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- You can always find edge cases to argue whatever point your trying to make. I don't think the fact that some murals are never taken down doesn't negates the nature of the thing or if this is permanent in the way that the law stipulates or not though. "All posters are permanent because there's still an example of a poster from World War 1 stuck to a wall somewhere" is just a bad, non-argument. Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Posters still makes it clear that images of posters are generally not acceptable anyway. In this case most murals of advertisements are taken down after the ad has ran its course. That's just a fact. Again, that a few here and there are left up doesn't change that or make them permanent. --Adamant1 (talk) 17:42, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- Other stuff. Like I said you can cherry pick examples of murals for advertisements still being around all day long, but that doesn't change the nature of if they are permanent or not. "Cars must be permanent, stationery objects because this car has been sitting in the woods since the 1930s" isn't an argument. It's also just circular because there obviously aren't going to be pictures of advertising murals that have been taken down still being up to prove they aren't around anymore. I can guarantee that if you were look through images of any semi-large city that were taken more then a few years ago there will be plenty of advertising murals that aren't up anymore though. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:43, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:49, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 15:09, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Las pinturas no son out of scope. Vd confunde scope con notability, y la notabilidad es cosa de enciclopedias, no de Commons. Mire el tema desde el ángulo de si estás pinturas necesitan OTRS o no. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 181.203.13.251 (talk) 22:45, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Para mí son pinturas no únicas, del tipo que se venden en tiendas de hogar chinas. 181.203.13.251 22:49, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Por lo tanto no requieren permiso del artista. 181.203.13.251 22:51, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:50, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
This is a duplicate of File:Game images from a contest between the National Football League Dallas Cowboys and the Denver Broncos at the Cowboys' home field AT&T Stadium in Arlington, Texas LCCN2015630559.tif, which was uploaded earlier. Denniscabrams (talk) 15:17, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:54, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
This is a duplicate of File:Game images from a contest between the National Football League Dallas Cowboys and the Denver Broncos at the Cowboys' home field AT&T Stadium in Arlington, Texas LCCN2015630556.tif, which was uploaded earlier. Denniscabrams (talk) 15:21, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:55, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Appears to be a previously published photo: https://world.uz/en/post/view/universitet_anadolu Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:34, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 12:25, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Appears to be taken from Skyscraper city post from another user, permission needed: https://www.skyscrapercity.com/threads/university-district-development-news-and-photos.1322713/post-180977178 Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:29, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 12:28, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Logo of a non-existent television show, perhaps a personal project. Belbury (talk) 16:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:24, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Possibly protected by copyright. TinEye found the picture 2013 here. Lukas Beck (talk) 18:22, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:26, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Very unlikely own work as per resolution and other copyvios Bedivere (talk) 19:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:27, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Probable copyvio. The source page (which is not linked to on the image description page) does not say the image is free and there is no reason to think an Associated Press image would be free. It is also worth noting that the username of the uploader suggests that they're related to the subject of the photo. Denniscabrams (talk) 15:29, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: VRT permission. --Herby talk thyme 11:57, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Celebrity Wardrobe Stylist Pilar Scratch attend Patricia Field New York Fashion Week Event.jpg
edit
OTRS o no? 181.203.13.251 22:54, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: No VRT permission. --Herby talk thyme 11:58, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photoPoor quality image that not a good one to illustrate the subject, also the authorship made the own work claim suspicious. A1Cafel (talk) 16:24, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Info Mirror reflection is in scope. I have changed my rationale for deletion. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:01, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:30, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Low-resolution image superseded with a better one Niketto sr. (talk) 16:22, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:00, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Sempre Pascom? 181.43.4.47 19:03, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Advertising/scope. --Gbawden (talk) 08:01, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Any difference with the deleted ones? 181.43.4.47 19:58, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: not own work and needs permission for the artwork as well. --Gbawden (talk) 08:01, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Nice photo, though. This is another one that could be recategorized and kept purely as a portrait, if we like. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:26, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- No, it's not a nice photo. She is a nice looking woman. If you liked her that much propose marriage. 181.43.4.47 12:37, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- I don't think you have the right to do that, and my girlfriend wouldn't like that, but it's irrelevant and ad hominem. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:44, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, If you judge this picture to be of enough quality, I will not oppose, meanwhile, for this one, it seems to me like an ad. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:49, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Sure, it's definitely meant to be promotional. I will respect whatever decision the closing admin makes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:31, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- I don't think you have the right to do that, and my girlfriend wouldn't like that, but it's irrelevant and ad hominem. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:44, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, categorized and clearly in scope. RodRabelo7 (talk) 06:27, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: I am disappointed. Clearly a copyvio - only upload of this user. found online https://www.cronica.com.py/2018/08/02/serenata-sin-locales-sanlorenzana-me-siento-ignorada/. --Gbawden (talk) 08:04, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F3. Not eligible for F3, taken in a public place. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:38, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Where should I go to learn what is meant by “Speedy (SD)” and “F3” when used in this context? tia, yrs., trs9k. Trs9k (talk) 07:23, 23 May 2023 (UTC) *Edit to add; moments later: found the info by stepping back a page via above link to “commons:deletion requests” and poking around there. I would delete my original question and simply not post this follow-up if I weren’t so unsure about the policy on “deleting a recently written and kinda dumb question after answering it one’s self.” Posterity and all that good stuff. Won’t be offended if someone deletes all this useless clutter I’ve just added. Until such time and as always, I remain faithfully yrs., trs.
- Delete For now because the US doesn't have freedom of panorama for 2D public art, and Mickey Mouse is currently still copyrighted. HOWEVER, I think this file should be set to be undeleted on January 1, 2024, as Mickey will no longer be copyrighted by then. Di (they-them) (talk) 01:33, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete and don’t undelete because there’s no way in hell Disney will actually respect that Dronebogus (talk) 19:25, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:55, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: PD now. --Yann (talk) 18:22, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP Slovenia: no evidence that this building from 1910 is public domain. The cut-off date is 120 years ago. The building in the background is copyrighted too. TadejM (t/p) 00:50, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep and possibly crop. The focus of this photograph is on the Austrian embassy which was built in 1895. There is an image of the foreign affairs office in the background, and I think this is the L-shaped building of the Mladika Complex which was designed by Max Fabiani (he died in 1962 and the building was built in 1906-1907). An image of the Austrian embassy is still within scope though, even if it is arguably being misused. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:25, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- Agreed. The file can be kept with a crop. This page says 'before 1910', but it could also mean in 1895. --TadejM (t/p) 18:36, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- If it is kept and cropped, the uses (most of which now illustrate the Mladika Complex) should probably be replaced by File:Postcard of Ljubljana, Internat Mladika 1918 (cropped).jpg until we get a more modern picture of the building in the postcard. This more rectangular second building was designed by a different architect who died in 1925 but still illustrates a building in the complex. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:00, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- Agreed. The file can be kept with a crop. This page says 'before 1910', but it could also mean in 1895. --TadejM (t/p) 18:36, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Yes, this is work by C.M. Koch. It should be used but care should be taken not to present it is work by Max Fabiani, like it has been done in the German Wikipedia. (with trigger-happy administrators) --TadejM (t/p) 20:40, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: The focus is on the Austrian embassy, and the other building appears to be de minimis in my opinion. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:49, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A szerző, Nagy Béla még az 1969-es évben is készített felvételeket, tehát még 1969-ben is élt ([9]), így a fényképe nem szabad licencű, tehát Delete. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 02:19, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- How did someone who lived (1895–1969) take a photo of someone in 1867? Or am I missing something. --RAN (talk) 05:30, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Sehol nem szerepel, hogy bármelyik kép is 1867-ben készült, sehol nem ír olyant, hogy a regnálásuk ideje alatt készültek a képek. Ha valamelyik akkor is készült volna, nem határozható meg, melyik kép Nagy Béláé és melyik nem az, így a fájl törlendő (vagy ha sikerül beazonosítani, hogy valamelyiket nem ő hanem 70 évnél régebb elhunyt fotós csinálta, akkor az a rész kivágható és menthető). Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 05:55, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Photographer of this 1937 image was alive in 1969. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:50, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Matr1x-101 as no permission (No permission since) Krd 04:14, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Krd: there's no permission from the Connecticut Secretary of the State. --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 17:11, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Looking back, I think {{PD-US-GovEdict}} might apply. --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 15:34, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: PD-US-GovEdict applies. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:50, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
No FOP in Iran. MehdiTalk 09:21, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: These Museum Figures appear to have been created more recently than 1992. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:54, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
No FOP in Iran. MehdiTalk 09:22, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Museum figures appear to be made more recently than 1992. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:23, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
It isn't an official law, decree, regulation or proclamation and there's a copyright notice at the source webpage. Celia Homeford (talk) 16:11, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- I would argue our usage is under royal decree. Official portraits of monarchs are usually not copyrightable. There are other pictures on commons which show that this indeed is the official portrait.
- I did not know what to put for the source as while the photo was not created by the webpage, that's where the digital upload of the image is from. TansoShoshen (talk) 01:24, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Just found the original from an official Cambodian government site. I'll change the source link. TansoShoshen (talk) 01:31, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment That web page says "Copyright © 2023 | Developed by Department of Information Technology. All Rights Reserved. | Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of Cambodia ". -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:50, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
- That copyright claim is in a footer, presumably automatically added. It doesn't seem to specifically concern this image. If such an official portrait is in the public domain in Cambodia, or the copyright is owned by somebody else than the Department of Information Technology, then the copyright message changes nothing. –LPfi (talk) 07:49, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- Then who do we put as the author? TansoShoshen (talk) 01:25, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- As the photo is published on an official site without noting the artist, one could argue that saying the author is {{Anonymous}} is allowed. It is possible, however, that it is well-known in Cambodia (in the sense that it was told when the photo was first published or similar) who the photographer is, and in that case we should really try to find it out. In similar cases, I use NN, which I find better than leaving the field empty or saying anonymous (or {{Unknown}}) without thorough research. I'd be more comfortable with a specific template. –LPfi (talk) 08:01, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- I'm Cambodian. Usually photos are taken by either the royal themselves or someone on the Royal Cabinet. However, as far as I know, there is no finding a specific person with the latter. TansoShoshen (talk) 01:28, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- As the photo is published on an official site without noting the artist, one could argue that saying the author is {{Anonymous}} is allowed. It is possible, however, that it is well-known in Cambodia (in the sense that it was told when the photo was first published or similar) who the photographer is, and in that case we should really try to find it out. In similar cases, I use NN, which I find better than leaving the field empty or saying anonymous (or {{Unknown}}) without thorough research. I'd be more comfortable with a specific template. –LPfi (talk) 08:01, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- Then who do we put as the author? TansoShoshen (talk) 01:25, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- That copyright claim is in a footer, presumably automatically added. It doesn't seem to specifically concern this image. If such an official portrait is in the public domain in Cambodia, or the copyright is owned by somebody else than the Department of Information Technology, then the copyright message changes nothing. –LPfi (talk) 07:49, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Not an official document, is a photograph that appears to be from Cambodia's government. Would appear to become PD in Cambodia in the late 2070s. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:29, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
I fear the news site is the copyright owner of that logo. Wasiul Bahar (talk) 10:28, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Probably below COM:TOO US in my opinion, what other country's laws are relevant here? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:39, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- It would appear this is from Bangladesh. Abzeronow (talk) 18:27, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. COM:Bangladesh does not specify a level of originality. To determine whether a design is below TOO is always a bit subjective. Imho this image is showing a creativity of the designer and it is therefore copyrighted. The image has to be deleted as a consequence. --Ellywa (talk) 21:56, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted coat of arms Riad Salih (talk) 18:41, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. According to the file page the image was transferred from en:WP and drawn by User:Theo van der Zalm. --Ellywa (talk) 21:58, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
