Wikimedia Commons

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Vladislav Bakharovskiy

< Commons:Deletion requests
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Vladislav Bakharovskiy

edit

Please, where is educational purpose? The whole category is on an obviously non-notable boy, the photos are very likely blatant violation of personality rights...

A.Savin 01:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC) And even if some of these photos are relevant for illustration of war victims of Ukraine, there is surely no need for a series of >100 similar shots! --A.Savin 02:06, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep some, at least. This DR raises a matter of scope, and yet the nominator concedes the common subject of these photos is «relevant for illustration of war victims» — the problem seems to be one of sheer quantity (and I don’t disagree), something that cannot be dealt with by wholesale deletion. Furthermore these photos are also all we currently have for this particular hospital, and the ones with the ballon-animal-making duo are great and apparently so far lacking in Commons.
I’m trusting Butko for all necessary consent concerns — that should not be a cause for deletion, either.
Culling of near-dupes should be done in this case (one among so many!), so, lets close this DR and work on that. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 03:00, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You are damaging Commons with your obvious bias towards out-of-scope content. No matter what has been RfD'ed for scope reasons, you vote VK. However, an RfD isn't a poll. --A.Savin 03:25, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A.Savin, are you trying to intimidate me? Trust me, it is not working. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 23:56, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
1) No, I'm not. 2) Intimidation/harrassment is rather your cup of tea than mine. 3) I don't trust you. Any more questions? --A.Savin 02:18, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot intimidate anyone here as you do (or try to do) because I’m not an admin. You are, and your attempt of silencing my participation in Deletion Request discussions above in this thread is only backed by the fact that you could block me at whim, just like Fastily did those three times listed in the report you linked. Now Fastily is gone, though, and that brings me to one question I do have for you, since you asked so nicely: How well, admin A.Savin, do you think you would fare in a RfdA…? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 02:45, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The state Russian TV does not know any personality rights, so your comparison is just - wrong. Detailed photos of minors require consent by the parents, which is very likely not the case here. --A.Savin 13:56, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Files in scope, per victims of the efects of a War, especially the one in the east of Ukraine and per Butko. People are clearly posing for the photos and aware of it being taken. Tm (talk) 03:40, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Once again, what is the educational purpose of this mass upload of hundreds of same person(s)? Even if the boy had own Wikipedia entry (however he doesn't and is of course far from that), still, what to do with hundreds of same photos of him? It is really poor behaviour 1) by Butko who is trying to boost up his upload count, without any care for meaningful content and order, 2) by you Tuvalkin that you use sockpuppets to "vote" in deletion requests. There is not a single one new argument in this discussion... Is it just me who is feeling dissed? --A.Savin 05:21, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Socketpuppets? Instead of answering to other peoples concerns and statements, you attack them accusing without evidences in a really classy move. If you, an administrator, "have" "proof" (that doesnst exist) why staying with them in this DR and not persue the conveniente venues. Or do you want me to pursue your false statements above of accusing liably two users of being a puppet master and a socketpuppet? About scope enough said above. Tm (talk) 09:16, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree with A.Savin, there are a lot of similar shots for this event. I don't like such series too. But Butko rights, this material does not violate the rules of Commons. There are notable persons and users may need to certain shots for specific use.  Keep.--sasha (krassotkin) 11:55, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: with the exception of the images of the Spiderman cake. There are a lot of near duplicate images in this set, perhaps smaller Deletion Nominations could be made for images which are essentially copies of each other, but except for that, there doesn't seem to be a licensing or source issue with these. Some had background television images, but de minimus Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:55, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Vladislav_Bakharovskiy&oldid=183954505"