User talk:Yann: Difference between revisions
m added Category:Photo wrongly deleted using HotCat |
|||
Line 426: | Line 426: | ||
[[User:Svobodat|Svobodat]] ([[User talk:Svobodat|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 21:58, 2 December 2013 (UTC) |
[[User:Svobodat|Svobodat]] ([[User talk:Svobodat|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 21:58, 2 December 2013 (UTC) |
||
:Well, no. Most book covers do have a copyright. Regards, [[User:Yann|Yann]] ([[User talk:Yann#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 22:58, 2 December 2013 (UTC) |
:Well, no. Most book covers do have a copyright. Regards, [[User:Yann|Yann]] ([[User talk:Yann#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 22:58, 2 December 2013 (UTC) |
||
[[Category:Photo wrongly deleted]] |
Revision as of 09:53, 3 December 2013
You can leave me a message in English or French, at the bottom. Click on the + above. Yann 22:13, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
/archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Deleted photo
Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu logo.png Hi, I work at the Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, and I have a contribution when this logo was created. This is official logo of my university. Please let me use this logo. Thank you.
ChrisAmp
Dionyssis Konstantopoulos 2 Αυγ (Πριν από2 ημέρες)
προς Εμένα Αγαπητέ Χρήστο,
με τιμά το ενδιαφέρον σου για τα εικαστικά μου πονήματα και φυσικά σου ΠΑΡΑΧΩΡΩ ΤΗΝ ΑΔΕΙΑ δημοσίευσης στη Βικιπαίδεια της επισυναπτόμενης φωτογραφίας μου, που προέρχεται από το προσωπικό μου αρχείο, είναι αναρτημένη στη σελίδα "προφίλ" μου στο facebook και έχει τραβηχτεί από τη Μάρθα Αγούλου στο εργαστήριό μου στη Ζάκυνθο. Στέλνω και κάποια έργα- αξιοποίησέ τα όπως επιθυμείς. Σχετικά με τα άλλα θέματα που έθεσες τηλεφωνικά να ξαναμιλήσουμε σύντομα.
Ευχαριστώ
Διονύσης. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChrisAmp (talk • contribs)
Hello, can someone please explain me, why is this files copyright violation? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jirka.h23 (talk • contribs)
Deleted Photo
Hi Yann,
You recently deleted a photo on the cover of the book of my brother Josep Font i Huguet. This book, Sentiment Català is available in google books and don't have any copyright restrictions. Anyway I am the administrator of the rights of the work of my brother and please, do not delete the new file I uploaded.
Thank you. Jaume font — Preceding unsigned comment added by Santiagofont (talk • contribs)
Image Source : I myself have designed, created and uploaded Virchand Gandhi photos. Hi sir. Appreciate your work on Wikipedia. Sir I myself have designed, created and I am owner of this photo. So please remove speedy deletion tag and I have uploaded same for free usage for educational and non-commercial use. I extend my complete permission. Please guide, how to add details if photos are designed by uploader. Same was published with my article published in NY's newspaper. I have sent you message also. Please extend your desired co-operation. Sir this photo is duly added with my article at NY's this link [1]. Which should help in proving my claims. You can verify with newspaper . Pankaz Jain (talk)
Your WIPO photo
Hi, Yann,
May we use your WIPO headquarters photo from 2005 for our online newsletter? How would you like me to attribute it, if so?
Thanks, Arva
By the way, this is the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. I'll certainly send you an image of how we use your image before we post live, and we really will appreciate your permission. Mind contacting me directly?
Thanks, Arva — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arvalarva (talk • contribs)
VI-Pic Lacerta agilis - concolor
Hi Yann, thanks for your comment on the nomination page. I don't really know, how i can add this description correctly to the image descriptions - without this stupid google-tranlated text and how i can add the refferences correctly (linking, and so on). Maybe, you can give me some tips how i can do this correctly without doing any formating errors? Are there some template codes for such issues available? Thanks & greetings, Christoph (talk)
File:UDB political poster.jpg
Just... thank you for your work ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ranndi7 (talk • contribs)
Undo deletion
Hi there sir, you have filed a deletion to my After School images. I found them in a random sites such as google or any other sites. I've searched thoroughly to where the images came from and I've found out those images were taken from a Korean fan. The author of the images didn't forbid those sites to stop using his/her images to posted on their sites, but instead. He/She let them to use it as in free. I believed it's a free license. I've provided the image source and the author's blog. I put credits I'm not plagiarizing, I plagiarized if I didn't put the source at all. Hoped you understand it, please undo the deletion for the other images that are deleted. I'm not starting a contest here I'm only explaining my side, thanks have a good day.
Photo Finale de la Coupe de France RC Cannes-USSP Albi
Bonjour, Vous avez supprimé la photo "Finale de la Coupe de France RC Cannes-USSP Albi" sur l'article wikipedia "Virginie Jouault". Cette photo est tirée du site internet http://rc-cannes.pagesperso-orange.fr/ Ce site est abandonné. Je veux bien citer le site en référence. J'aurais dû le faire.
Cette photo a plusieurs intérêts : elle est très significative de sa carrière du poste auquel elle jouait, rares sont les photos de Virginie Jouault de cette époque précise où elle était professionnelle, la photo est originale et esthétiquement belle, pour une fois que c'est le cas pour ce sport.
Je me permets donc de revenir vers vous pour trouver une solution afin de réinsérer cette photo.
Cordialement. Emmanuel Lecomte
Russell
Hi - just seen your reasoned (but esoteric) comment on my Russell badge. I was very annoyed at its deletion on Russell (main Wiki) page and got into trouble when I admittedly over-reacted by deleting the whole page as a result. However, someone kindly elected me back in. Now, let's sort out the original. No photographer (of 50+ years ago) is going to object to this image on a badge, surely. And the badge is a unique (I use the word carefully) part of social and political history. Let's get it back there. My common-sense and respect of my youth(!) and judgement of copyright say we should do this. Despite my number of contributions to Wiki, I feel an admin amateur. Please help! - Tony
Holiday greetings
Wishing you the happiest of holidays — Vera (talk), December 2012
and the best new year!
|
Royal Park Towers Colombo
Hello, I have added the licence, and it is mine, but the page still says something is missing: File:Royal Park Towers Colombo.jpg. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Popthepuff (talk • contribs)
permission sent, please check OTRS. thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarahleann (talk • contribs)
Deleted Photo
Yann, you deleted this photo: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Peterfeaver.gif.
It was taken from this webpage:http://tiss.sanford.duke.edu/people/executive.php
I had the owner of the photo email wikimedia with permission for it to be uploaded for use in the commons. How do I get access to the photo again to use it for Peter Feaver's wikipedia page?
Photo File:VanDiagram-updated.png
Yann,
This is the first time I have uploaded a image file to wikimedia commons. I made a mistake in selecting the licensing and copyright for this file. This file is "File:VanDiagram-updated.png" and it is not a copyrighted file and is free for public use. Plant With Purpose is the organization that I work for who created the file, but the file is neither copyright protected or trademarked. Let me know if you need any further information from me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cunningchrisw (talk • contribs)
Escriptori cat.jpg
Hi, This is Oriol, I've seen you added some info to a pic I uploaded (File:Escriptori cat.jpg). It is one of my first pict uploaded and as you've seen I have troubles... Could you info me about the licensces? I did just upload an image download from google images... What is the licensce, how can I know it?
Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oriol D (talk • contribs)
Hi Yann, Thanks a lot, i have seen your message. One question, what kind of liscense was I am supposed to choose? Which one did you choose? The next time I wonder to do it on my own :p Thanks again!
Daniel Paillé
Bonjour! J'ai envoyé le formulaire d'autorisation à l'auteure de la photo de Daniel Paillé, soyez attentif à recevoir l'autorisation d'utiliser l'image. Merci! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samounet (talk • contribs)
Hi Yann. I see that you have posted a comment on this nomination for deletion page. But I think you probably wanted to delete the file. I could be wrong but I do find a month to be an unusual long amount of time for a delete nomination to be going on. Usually, these discussions only last a week. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.70.214.226 (talk • contribs)
Hello, Yann. You have new messages at Commons:Deletion requests/File:James Mackay 2012 Publicity Shot.jpg.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
Minit images copyright
Bonjour Yann,
Tu as effacé les images que j'avais uploadé sur l'article Mister Minit. Car copyrighté. Existe t'il quelques part un formulaire à soumettre pour informer Wiki que je possède les images et que l'entreprise m'a autorisé à utiliser les logos et images? Dernière question, quelle licence utilisé pour les images sensibles logos, merchandising par exemple qui a été déposé par l'entreprise? Ceci pour qu'il soit non utilisable et non intégrable ailleurs que sur Wikipedia?
Merci par avance pour ton aide.
Jette un oeuil à l'article si tu as un moment :) Assez peu de source malheureusement, pas faute d'avoir cherché :) A + http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilisateur:Anonymous12011987/Brouillon#Les_nouveaux_services_au_fil_des_ann.C3.A9es
<Apparent copyright violation.> REQUEST FOR SPEEDILY DELETION OF FILE I CREATED ABOVE. IT WAS A MISTAKE. STILL LEARNING TO EDIT. THANKS Ekhaya2000
Photo of Mahatma Gandhi and Shastri
Dear Yann,
Thank you for posting the image of Mahatma Gandhi and Shastri. I would like to use this image in an article I am submitting for publication on leprosy. I understand it is no longer copyright protected. Do you know where I can locate the original photograph at the optimal resolution? Thank you so much for your help. I really appreciate it.
Caroline
Arquivos de Clau Carvalho
Caro Yann, os arquivos que carreguei foram excluídos da página do Sampaio Correa na Wikipedia (menos um) e fui notificado quanto à questão de direitos autorais. Concordo que em alguns arquivos que foram utilizados eu pus apenas como fonte a "Internet", porque entendo que já entraram em domínio público, uma vez que não dá pra saber quem são seus autores. Mas em outras ocasiões, eu citei a fonte de onde retirei, como são os casos da Revista Placar e do blog Futebol Maranhense Antigo. A figura de Samuel Rosa e Marcelo Adnet não é uma fotografia, não, são dois cliques que dei nos seus respectivos vídeos que estão divulgados no Youtube, fonte que foi devidamente citada. Eu fiz a montagem. Que falta, então? Que eu coloque o autor do vídeo do Youtube? Sinceramente, gostaria que me explicasse isso melhor. Já li a política do WikiCommons, mas acho que não compreendi bem. Em todo o caso, fiz com a melhor das intenções, pelo grande amor que tenho pelo time do meu coração. Peço que esta mensagem não esteja ao alcance de outras pessoas, pois que é de natureza muito pessoal. Atenciosamente. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clau Carvalho (talk • contribs)
File:Vista de ventas de zafarraya.jpg
Good evening, last february you deleted the file File:Vista de ventas de zafarraya.jpg, saying it had copyright, well it was a picture i took as far as i remember so i think there is no copyright at all. Could you restore it? --AMPERIO (talk) 17:03, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
- I restored it, and created a DR: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vista de ventas de zafarraya.jpg. Could you please explain why there is a copy on this website? Yann (talk) 17:13, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. You started deleting files from this DR, but only got halfway and never closed the DR. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:45, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Escudo_de_los_Condes_de_Luxburg.png
estimado usuario la imagen o archivo en cuestión fui co-autor en las mejoras o modificaciones que se le hicieron al escudo familiar, la imagen fue colocada después en la pagina de la fundación de los condes de Luxburg, debe tener en cuenta la imagen es de los condes de luxburg y era allí donde se encontraba en uso. es un emblema de una familia noble europea y en cuestión no se a violado ningún tipo de derechos de autor como usted indica., asi mismo le pido que levante el letrero que coloco en la la imagen encuestion y reistalar la misma--201.248.227.146 15:36, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
user estimated or image file in question was co-author on the improvements or modifications that were made to the family coat of arms, the image was placed on the page after the founding of the counts of Luxburg, consider the image is the counts of Luxburg and was where it was in use. is an emblem of a European noble family and was concerned not violated any copyright as you indicate. likewise I ask to lift the sign placed on the image and reistalar ATISSUE it.--201.248.227.146 15:40, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- Hello, If that is the case, please send a permission. See COM:OTRS for details. Yann (talk) 15:41, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- he solicitado los permisos pero o he recibido ningún mensaje, me podrías ayudar en eso de verdad se me a hecho muy difícil entender cono hacerlo --Von Luxburg (talk) 19:25, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted image: File:Pilar_de_9fmp.jpg
Hi, the file is from the website with permission. {{OTRS|ticket=https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketID=3216837|nota=Autorització per utilitzar http://www.castellersdevilafranca.cat/ sota llicència CC-BY-SA. --[[Usuari:Vriullop|V.Riullop]] ([[Usuari_Discussió:Vriullop|parlem-ne]]) 20:00, 2 jul 2009 (CEST)}} = Autorization to use http://www.castellersdevilafranca.cat/ in CC-BY-SA.
Discussion page: [2] See this and please load again the picture. Thank's --Baggio (talk) 15:57, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- As an OTRS volunteer, I have checked the given ticket. I can confirm that the page/website [www.castellersdevilafranca.cat] is under a free license and material from there can be used on Wikipedia. Please confirm if the given image is from the website and the copyright belonged to the owner of the site. If so, it would also be free and have necessary licensing to be undeleted.
- (P.S. If I confused anything, please contact me on my Enwiki talk page)
- TheOriginalSoni (talk) 18:25, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- Restored, and ticket added. Yann (talk) 08:29, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thank's.
- Restored, and ticket added. Yann (talk) 08:29, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for your cleanup of the fake Dschwen block. It was a proxy server with no other edits on Commons. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:12, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello Yann,
The images and the content I am working on is of the organization I am working with and the use of images and logo is with their permission.
So, how do I proceed in this? (P.S. I am new here)
Warm Regards, Blessin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blessinvarkey (talk • contribs)
No copyright tag on image
Hello, Yann. I uploaded mage http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jmtindel&oldid=109562351 without copyright info. It is a company logo, and I have contacted the company to find out how they want to distribute it. I will add the appropriate tag once I have that info, or upload another copy, if it has been automatically deleted in the meantime. Thank you! --Mike (jmtindel)
Hi Yann, I tried to move the w:File:Complexity-map-overview.png from Wikipedia to Commons, but it seems you deleted this file in 2010. As far as I can see this file is original work by w:User:Bcastel3, who identified himself as Brian Castellani, sociology professor of the Kent State University, Kent Ohio. Could you explain, what I am missing here? And maybe how we could solve this? -- Mdd (talk) 15:20, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
- I just noticed I asked you this question 3 months ago (see here), and there was one argument back in 2010 (see here. -- Mdd (talk) 15:43, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
I don't what's going on with this file. I restored it, and created a DR. I copied your messages there. Please comment here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Complexity-map-overview.png. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:42, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, it seems we can work this out. I did notice the image info here on commons was incomplete, and didn't (yet) link to w:User:Bcastel3/Brian Castellani. -- Mdd (talk) 18:23, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
deleted page File:Restauro come terapia.jpg
This file, as well as all the others about "William Girometti", reproduce painting of my father, who died 15 years ago. Since I am his only heir, now that my mother died too, I have the ownership of all the paintings whose pictures I uploaded. Probably I chose the wrong licence, but I wish that people enjoy my father's paintings. I am also working to a page in Wikipedia about my father, in which also a bibliography is available. I wrote to permission-commons@wikimedia.org too. Please tell me how I may upload the file again without problems. Thank you very much, Silvia Girometti
Deleted page/photo
Dear Yann, File:Ellen_Nisbeth.jpg has been deleted. I have the rights to use this photo. See http://www.ellennisbeth.com/#!gallery/c24vq where it is clearly stated that the photos are available for PR-usage. Please make it available again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philia85 (talk • contribs)
- Unfortunately, PR-usage is not enough for us. We need a written permission for a free license. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:35, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
What was this?
At Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Constanza_Lüer.jpg we have a nonsense DR, my vk stating that file is in use and then poof, it is gone. What’s going on? -- Tuválkin ✉ 20:46, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- As I wrote, it was deleted by Fastily. Please ask him, or request undeletion at COM:UR. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:50, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- I’m asking you: As an admin, as opposed to a clerk or a robot, do you think that the DR above was done properly? -- Tuválkin ✉ 21:56, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Whether a file is in use may be of interest if the scope is questioned. The reason for this deletion seems to be a suspected copyright violation, and here we cannot have existing use trump copyright. --Dschwen (talk) 22:04, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Where is that copyvio mentioned in the DR? -- Tuválkin ✉ 22:44, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Nowhere. It should have been. But since you are asking what that was I'm answering you: "A probable copyvio". You can read the deletion rationale here. --Dschwen (talk) 22:56, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks Dschwen. My question («What was this?») was not about what was on the deleted image, but something like «what was this all about?», with «this» being the DR itself. -- Tuválkin ✉ 02:02, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Nowhere. It should have been. But since you are asking what that was I'm answering you: "A probable copyvio". You can read the deletion rationale here. --Dschwen (talk) 22:56, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Where is that copyvio mentioned in the DR? -- Tuválkin ✉ 22:44, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Whether a file is in use may be of interest if the scope is questioned. The reason for this deletion seems to be a suspected copyright violation, and here we cannot have existing use trump copyright. --Dschwen (talk) 22:04, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- I’m asking you: As an admin, as opposed to a clerk or a robot, do you think that the DR above was done properly? -- Tuválkin ✉ 21:56, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Meanwhile I read JuTa’s notice (08:32, 12 November 2013) in the uploader’s talk page. All good, then. However, this exchange should be added to the DR (out side the blue area), because other users, like me, may expect DRs to be done in a transparent, clear fashion. -- Tuválkin ✉ 22:59, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- OK, fine. I added "for copyright violation" in my closure comment. Yann (talk) 07:19, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Meanwhile I read JuTa’s notice (08:32, 12 November 2013) in the uploader’s talk page. All good, then. However, this exchange should be added to the DR (out side the blue area), because other users, like me, may expect DRs to be done in a transparent, clear fashion. -- Tuválkin ✉ 22:59, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Yann. Excuse me, as I am new user. You deleted the images I uploaded to Carlos León Escudero page. The images are artworks by the artist taken from the website of his gallery ( http://www.maxestrella.com/ ) and licensed by the artist for public communication with educational purposes through Wikipedia. Would it be possible, please, you undelete them? Best regards, thanks a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arneb2014 (talk • contribs)
- Hello,
- First there is no mention on the website of a free license. "Public communication with educational purposes" is not enough for us. We need an explicite written free license from the author. See COM:OTRS for details. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:53, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi, can i know why you deleted image File:Henrique Luvannor.jpg uploaded by me? I uploaded it with soccer.ru template. This template has OTRS permission for materials from this site? So, wtf?
PS, how i see, you posted (Copyright violation: http://footballhd.ru/allnews/worldcupnews/39490-v-sbornoy-moldovy-mozhet-poyavitsya-etnicheskiy-brazilec.html). But this article has only 1 month. Article from where i get image is much older. Can you see the difference? I do not violated nobody's copyright. I uploaded this image legaly. For much info see {{Soccer.ru}}. Please undelete image. --XXN (talk) 01:29, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- footballhd.ru mentions the source as "Getty Images", so I don't think it is OK. What do you think? Yann (talk) 07:13, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- soccer.ru - You can use photos only from the gallery! --ManFromNord (talk) 09:48, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Wilfredor DRs
Hi, I have been looking through some past DRs and came across Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lema y yo.jpg. The deletion nomination does not appear to be a policy based reason to create a DR. Could you please add a meaningful closure statement to it? Thanks --Fæ (talk) 03:21, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- This image is completely out of scope, so it is very well within the policy. When I closed with as above, it means that I agree with the nominator (and eventually other comments). Isn't clear enough? Yann (talk) 07:05, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, no. The nomination stated "User contributions in spanish is only in her user page. Self promotion, low image quality, non enciclopedic value." I cannot see the image any more, as you have deleted it, however based on the hundreds of other DRs that Wilfredor has created over the last few days, several that you have closed by deleting, that include non-policy nominations (see list), this nomination is worth looking at again. The facts are:
- You make reference to your closure relating to "eventually other comments", however there is none apart from the nomination.
- I am not completely clear what "User contributions in spanish is only in her user page" means, however it appears to be nominating an image for deletion because one of our contributors does not use English on her user talk page. This would definitely not be a deletion rationale and would be troubling of itself.
- "Self promotion" is unlikely, in the list of images up for deletion this have been used to describe "selfies" and similar profile photographs which were not against policy per se. One might argue that some of these were out of scope due to possible lack of educational value, but any closing admin should make that clear.
- "low image quality", this would have to be bad enough to render the image out of scope to be a rationale for deletion, there are many cases in the above list where this was incorrectly mentioned in the nomination.
- "non enciclopedic value", this is against Commons policy and no DR closure should agree with this as a deletion rationale.
- Please amend your closure to explain the reasons you chose to delete the image. The nomination as it stands is not something that a closing admin should just take at face value and delete the image with the comment "as above". Thanks --Fæ (talk) 09:55, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- This is a personal image (portrait with his girl friend?) of poor quality, and not used. So your points 3, 4, and 5 above cover it. I don't see where is your problem. I think that point #2 means that if the only edits of a user would in his/her user page (not the case here), it would be a rationale for deletion. This gave me the opportunity to review other files from this user. Two of them are not own work, and have at least a wrong license, and may be a copyvio. I nominated them for deletion. Yann (talk) 10:20, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Could you please add a similar explanation to the closing statement of the DR? It is important that Administrators are not seen to support nominations on the basis of contributors writing in Spanish, or being "non-encyclopedic".
- Done. Yann (talk) 11:18, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- You appear to be confirming that you believe that "non-encyclopedic value" is a reason to delete images from Commons, if that is the case then we should probably continue the conversation at COM:AN so that other Administrators can provide viewpoints on how to interpret policy. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 11:11, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- "non-encyclopedic value" doesn't mean anything in itself. You need to explain why a file would be, or not, of encyclopedic value. Yann (talk) 11:18, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- No, this is a frequent and fundamental misunderstanding of scope. Specifically, Commons differs from the English Wikipedia by having a scope that includes media with educational value, this is much broader than encyclopaedic value. DRs with these sort of nominations should be either corrected or the closing statement should clarify that difference as Commons should never delete images which have an educational rationale but happen to fail to have an encyclopaedic rationale. --Fæ (talk) 11:28, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, but this seems rather semantic. I think I agree with you that Commons' scope is broader than Wikipedia's. But in this case, I don't see the point you want to make. Above I mean "educational" rather than "encyclopedic". So I rewrite my statement as "non-educational value" doesn't mean anything in itself. You need to explain why a file would be, or not, of educational value. And in this case, the image is neither educational nor encyclopedic. Yann (talk) 11:33, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- The word encyclopedia comes from the Koine Greek ἐγκύκλιος παιδεία, transliterated enkyklios paideia, meaning "general education." Both words are just semantic for many. And for a Spanish speaker, there is not much meaning in sticking on the exact meaning of an English word. JKadavoor Jee 11:42, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for making the correction. Commons policies are written using words, to argue them away as being semantics is unhelpful. The same rationale of semantic equivalence can make almost any policy useless or inverted, for example you can argue that anything written on Commons can never be harassment, or that it is okay to delete all photographs of people who do not have Wikipedia biographies. Please stick to "educational" not "encyclopaedic", I do not want to waste everyone's time by asking for this to be clarified on noticeboards when our community policies are completely unambiguous. --Fæ (talk) 12:03, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Well, it seems simple, but it may not be. I wouldn't be surprised if Wilfredor used "encyclopaedic" when he meaned "educational", and many non-native English speakers would do too. Did you ask him? Yann (talk) 12:13, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- No, the DR was closed and you had deleted the file. You are the closing admin for a DR with no comments apart from the nomination, so you must have been satisfied that Wilfredor had correctly nominated it. The only relevant action to challenge the above discrepancies was to clarify your closing statement. --Fæ (talk) 13:16, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Well, it seems simple, but it may not be. I wouldn't be surprised if Wilfredor used "encyclopaedic" when he meaned "educational", and many non-native English speakers would do too. Did you ask him? Yann (talk) 12:13, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for making the correction. Commons policies are written using words, to argue them away as being semantics is unhelpful. The same rationale of semantic equivalence can make almost any policy useless or inverted, for example you can argue that anything written on Commons can never be harassment, or that it is okay to delete all photographs of people who do not have Wikipedia biographies. Please stick to "educational" not "encyclopaedic", I do not want to waste everyone's time by asking for this to be clarified on noticeboards when our community policies are completely unambiguous. --Fæ (talk) 12:03, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- No, this is a frequent and fundamental misunderstanding of scope. Specifically, Commons differs from the English Wikipedia by having a scope that includes media with educational value, this is much broader than encyclopaedic value. DRs with these sort of nominations should be either corrected or the closing statement should clarify that difference as Commons should never delete images which have an educational rationale but happen to fail to have an encyclopaedic rationale. --Fæ (talk) 11:28, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- "non-encyclopedic value" doesn't mean anything in itself. You need to explain why a file would be, or not, of encyclopedic value. Yann (talk) 11:18, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Could you please add a similar explanation to the closing statement of the DR? It is important that Administrators are not seen to support nominations on the basis of contributors writing in Spanish, or being "non-encyclopedic".
- This is a personal image (portrait with his girl friend?) of poor quality, and not used. So your points 3, 4, and 5 above cover it. I don't see where is your problem. I think that point #2 means that if the only edits of a user would in his/her user page (not the case here), it would be a rationale for deletion. This gave me the opportunity to review other files from this user. Two of them are not own work, and have at least a wrong license, and may be a copyvio. I nominated them for deletion. Yann (talk) 10:20, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, no. The nomination stated "User contributions in spanish is only in her user page. Self promotion, low image quality, non enciclopedic value." I cannot see the image any more, as you have deleted it, however based on the hundreds of other DRs that Wilfredor has created over the last few days, several that you have closed by deleting, that include non-policy nominations (see list), this nomination is worth looking at again. The facts are:
Même si tu as très probablement eu raison de supprimer cette photo, tu aurais quand même pu me prévenir... --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:56, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Désole, mais elle n'aurait jamais dû être déposée sur Commons. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:04, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Je ne dis pas le contraire. Mais quand on supprime un fichier, on en prévient l'utilisateur responsable.
- Pour info je l'avais déposée à un moment où les règles étaient très floues à propos des photos d'écran pendant des évènements de type concert ou compétition sportive (en effet je précise que la photo que tu as supprimée était un écran diffusé en direct sur le lieu de la compétition et dont je doute qu'il ait été enregistré ni diffusé ailleurs).
- D'ailleurs je me demande s'il y a désormais des règles claires à ce sujet, vu le nombre important de fichiers problématiques du même style dans Category:Video displays. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 10:11, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
I don't appreciate messages like this on my talk page. It's not your place to tell me if I feel an issue has been explained properly. It's not even your place to tell me to stay away from another admin's talk page. If you have a problem with anything I've done and think I need to be stopped from doing something, then take it to a community noticeboard. Don't waste my time (or indeed yours) issuing pointless warnings like that, which you must be aware will only anger the recipient. If I catch you trying to intimidate another user like this over an issue of admin accountability again, I'll be doing the same. Ultra7 (talk) 16:28, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- Your are wrong on all counts here. Yes, if you make problems, it is necessary to tell you. And yes, it is my work to tell you to stop bothering others. Nobody appreciate your bashing. Please stop. This is the last warning. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:33, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- Your 'warning' was read and deleted - do not restore it again. This is your last warning to stay off my talk page - it is totally unacceptable for you to be reverting my talk page to restore messages I have read [3]. It's also pretty stupid to be posting this same message here, and then again on my talk page. I frankly don't care what you appreciate or not - if you think I cause problems, If you think you have a case, take it to a noticeboard. If you continue to try and intimidate users, I will report you. Ultra7 (talk) 16:41, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- You really need to calm down, this behaviour is ridiculous. You are badgering people and it is getting on everyone's nerves. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:48, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Again about deleted files with William Girometti's paintings (e.g. Restauro_come_terapia.jpg)
Hi Yann, sorry for bothering you again about the same topic. I would just like to ask you whether there is anything I can do while I am waiting, in order to support my request about the images being restored (request sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org about a week ago). Thank you very much again and best regards, Silvia Girometti — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silvia Girometti (talk • contribs)
Permission in File:Calamità naturale.jpg
Hello Yann, I added permission in the file: did I put it in the right place? And shall I do the same for all the other files you are restoring? Thank you so much, Silvia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silvia Girometti (talk • contribs)
LSU shield
Yann,
Thank you for the reply regarding the LSU shield. I'm sure it's copyrighted similar to the University of Michigan "M", but it's not a big deal for me if it's removed. I thought it was an interesting picture from the stadium gate, so I took the picture. I'm actually writing to thank you for how you respond to my request to have it undeleted. It gave an explanation and also useful information. There are people who edit that give no explanation and decide to delete regardless of explanation or discussion. They do it in a rude fashion and actually harass and attack contributors. Your response was greatly appreciated. spatms (User talk:spatms) 10:23, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
PermissionOTRS
Done. I added {{tl|PermissionOTRS|id=2013111610010253|Darkwind}} in all files where it has not been added yet, and put my father's name in "Author" (however not in "User") as you wrote. Am I allowed to delete all {{OTRS pending|year=2013|month=November|day=19}} or {{OTRS pending|year=2013|month=November|day=22}}? And, last but not least, should I upload any image more of the same kind, which is the rightest way for doing it? Thank you so much again for everything and kind regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silvia Girometti (talk • contribs)
May I ask you what do you think of the changes I made to File:Senza_titolo_11.JPG before I make changes to all files? I do appreciate your suggestions very much, and hope having done in the right way, however it is not really easy to put a subject (in description?) for surrealistic works (at least some of them). Thanks a lot, --Silvia Girometti (talk) 22:17, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Great! I'll do the same for all files! Thank you so much --Silvia Girometti (talk) 22:33, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Marcação da imagem File:2005-11 Iscal-com 12 (Capa do Boletim Informativo).pdf
Thanks. I would appreciate you support for {{speedy|erro de carregamento} Regards, Rui Beja (talk) 18:33, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
I have uploaded some images, however most of their images are promotional and not educational - most of them are not in our project scope. Yeah, there is some interesting photos like Korean GIrls' baseball league, however some of photos like
are potentially promotional. Do you think I should upload these photos? Regards, --레비ReviD✉CM 08:00, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- PS - Should I create category for these photos? --레비ReviD✉CM 08:01, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for looking into this. Of course, many of these images are promotional, and are not interesting for Commons. You need to select them. Think what could be used in Wikipedia. I think that providing an English description would make a huge difference about their possible use on Wikimedia. At least I think that images of sports ([4]), some electronics ([5], [6]), and some portraits ([7]) would be in scope. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:16, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- OK. Going to upload them..... --레비ReviD✉CM 08:19, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- Uploaded links in example. However, last one is portrait of not notable person and may be in trouble with Personality rights. So I did not uploaded it. --레비ReviD✉CM 08:39, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- At least the portraits of modeles could be uploaded, as there is no issue with personality rights. We already need more portraits. Yann (talk) 08:46, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- I have uploaded +20 photos today. I will do more tomorrow. :-D --레비ReviD✉CM 08:58, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- At least the portraits of modeles could be uploaded, as there is no issue with personality rights. We already need more portraits. Yann (talk) 08:46, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for looking into this. Of course, many of these images are promotional, and are not interesting for Commons. You need to select them. Think what could be used in Wikipedia. I think that providing an English description would make a huge difference about their possible use on Wikimedia. At least I think that images of sports ([4]), some electronics ([5], [6]), and some portraits ([7]) would be in scope. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:16, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
files in Category:Images from LGEPR. --레비ReviD✉CM 09:40, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
- Great! Thanks a lot! Yann (talk) 09:44, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Milvus etc..
Yann, can you delete those files please. They are not used and according to our 'local specialist' they can not be identified properly. Moreover I'm the author and I want only properly id'ed images of mine published. Thanks. B.p. 11:02, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- Hmm. These images looks quite nice. Any way, I don't think they meet any criteria for speedy deletion, especialy because they are QI or VI. Please open a regular DR. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:05, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Please review my image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Corona_(solitaire)_Layout.jpg, and let me know if it is up to Wikimedia Common's standards. I have added the link to the copyright information into the "permissions" area. I will proceed to change the rest of the images I have uploaded after you tell me if this is okay. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abehrle (talk • contribs)
Permission to use Gandhi image in Australia
Hi Yann, I live in Australia and I am making a documentary on humanitarian engineering. May I please have permission to use your image "File:Gandhi Juhu May1944.jpg" as I am featuring pictures of famous humanitarians? Or is this image already on the public domain in Australia? Thank you! Kind regards sheena — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sheena.2990 (talk • contribs)
- Hello,
- This image is in the public domain in India, and in all countries which apply the rule of shorter term. I am not sure about Australia. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:32, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Re: File:Dąbrowski Paweł Pelizzaro.jpg
I am working on description, maybe at least 10 minutes from uploading before you will take an action, please ! Vert (talk) 21:06, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
You may rename it (by removing one extra File:) and re add it or just ignore it. It seems a critically endangered sp. JKadavoor Jee
- Done Back in after renaming. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:05, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
use of images
Dear Yann I am daughter and heir of the sculptor Lev Razumovsky. On November 30, 2013 I sent an email to permissions-ru@wikipedia.org allowing the use of all images on pages Разумовский, Лев Самсонович and Lev Razumovsky, and attached a copy of his will. Please can you restore the images you have deleted or advise me how to do so. I have tried to upload the images again (having renamed them first), but the system hasn't accepted them. Many thanks, Maria Razumovskaya МЛР (talk) 06:46, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Recently deleted photo reuploaded
You recently deleted File:Seramahen.jpg due to my request at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Seramahen.jpg. It has been reuploaded with the same issues at File:Serama Hen.jpg. Regards, Chipmunkdavis (talk) 10:14, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
- Done Yann (talk) 11:58, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Photo wrongly deleted
The file File:Alopekis_wirehaired.jpg was wrongly deleted. I am the original author of this photograph. It was published in my magazine in Greece (publications no longer active) and subsequently used and reproduced by many authors, with my permission, in articles about the Alopekis breed. It is also included in the article of the Greek wiki that I authored: el:Αρχείο:Alopekis_wirehaired.jpg and carries a FREE licence.
The file was wrongly deleted. I am the author of both articles and of the photo. I wish the photo re-instated.
Thank you Fainomenon (talk) 18:57, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
- Since this was previously published, we need a formal permission. Meanwhile, I restored the image and created a proper deletion request: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alopekis wirehaired.jpg. Please send a permission, or it will be deleted again. Thanks, Yann (talk) 19:13, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Dear Yann, I filed an un-delete request and I provided information about this image. It is published by the Greek wiki carrying a FREE licence. I provide the link to the Greek wiki and the file licence. What more do I need to do ? Fainomenon (talk) 19:24, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Book cover deleted
Hi Yan, you have deleted the bookcover on https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tim_Stryker&action=history due to alleged copyright violation. Working at a National Library I know that book covers are copyright free by most legislations. DO you have any reason to believe the opposite ? Svobodat (talk) 21:58, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
- Well, no. Most book covers do have a copyright. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:58, 2 December 2013 (UTC)