User talk:Fry1989: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
File:Logo Tarnovia Tarnow.svg has been nominated for deletion
Yavidaxiu (talk | contribs)
922 edits
Line 93: Line 93:
== [[:File:Logo Tarnovia Tarnow.svg]] ==
== [[:File:Logo Tarnovia Tarnow.svg]] ==
{{Autotranslate|1=File:Logo Tarnovia Tarnow.svg|2=|3=|base=Idw}} [[User:Rapsar|Rapsar]] ([[User talk:Rapsar|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 11:32, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
{{Autotranslate|1=File:Logo Tarnovia Tarnow.svg|2=|3=|base=Idw}} [[User:Rapsar|Rapsar]] ([[User talk:Rapsar|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 11:32, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

== [[:File:Map of Mexico, gay rights.svg]] ==

La versión del mapa señalando a Oaxaca como una entidad donde se permite el matrimonio gay es errónea. En México, una resolución de la Corte no significa una modificación de las leyes estatales. Mientras el Congreso de Oaxaca no modifique el Código Civil local &mdash;lo que fue requerido por inconstitucionalidad de su artículo 143&mdash;, en Oaxaca no se permiten los matrimonios gay. Las parejas pueden apelar a un [[:es:Juicio de amparo]] y esperar una respuesta de la Corte, pero esto no significa que la ley oaxaqueña haya sido modificada. Por favor, lea [[:es:Matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo en México]]. Saludos, [[User:Yavidaxiu|Yavidaxiu]] ([[User talk:Yavidaxiu|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 20:36, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:36, 10 December 2012

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10


Acknowledgements

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
Thanks of manually replacing hundreds of images across all the Wikiprojects (so I didn't have to), and for your tireless contribution to the field of heraldry and vexillology on Commons. Thank you! Sodacan (talk) 05:26, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The SVG Barnstar
For obvious reasons. INeverCry 20:48, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]




Discussions ↓↓↓


Re: Hello

Hello. Of course I can give it a try, however it will take some time before I will be ready. I have to finish another request first, and it is rather big one. Cheers! Avalokitesvara (talk) 09:47, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Emblem of SFR Yugoslavia

Hello Fry1989 and nice to meet you. Could you kindly tell me the problem with the previous file of the national emblem of SFR Yugoslavia? In my opinion this version has more details than the current one, the correct oval shape and font on ribbon. And there're some sources from Yugoslavia using that version. Including banknotes, passport cover, official documents from president office as follows:

I agree with you for emblem on a webpage, there should not be much 3D effects. However according to sources above, the original design did have some so I reduced it by adjusting contrast color.

In my opinion, we are all volunteers who spend our free time to make Wikipedia more accurate and better. Acutally I don't have personal preference with both version, but to make the image accord with historical facts. If there're official sources from Yugoslavia shows the design of the emblem, I think we'd better follow.

Thank you and happy editing!

-- Ericmetro (talk) 04:28, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The way it is on the banknotes is different from even how it is on the other sources you have provided. The 3D-ness needs to go all together, it's not on the other sources. The two versions would be better combined some how than this drastic change. The banner is horrible and choppy on the new one too, it needs to be re-done. Fry1989 eh? 16:54, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you - yeah I agree that the best official source is the scheme in laws or national standards. I tried to find the official documents with the scheme from Yugoslavia, but I hardly find any. Therefore if we can not find a better source to prove it is not accurate (for we found sources to prove Thai emblem on banknotes is not official), banknotes can be regard as realiable sources in my opinion. I think the priority in selecting sources is: scheme in laws > passports, banknotes > documents from centeral government > documents from local government > stamps etc.
As for the old version, I think it is a good solution to combine both designs if we found sources supporting both version. Unfortunately I'm afraid the problem is I didn't see any sources support that version, while I searched several sources showing the new version. In my opinion drastically difference is not a problem if the previous one is not accurate. After all the original uploader User:R-41 also support the new version.
As we haven't find a better source yet, I suggest we could follow the emblem on passport [1] and government documents [2] [3]. I also noticed that on banknotes there's a little bit more 3D-ness on the banner, which not appears on the passport and the two document. I'll try to remove these effects to make it accord with these two sources and upload a new version later today.
-- Ericmetro (talk) 05:48, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I did some fix on the oval version. Removed those redundant 3D-ness on the banner, lowered the color contrast and make the bottom of the banner clear. This time I also picked up a border police badge (1946-63 version emblem) as a reference to the shape of the banner ([4]). Color of the banner from a book published in China in 1980s ([5]). -- Ericmetro (talk) 11:53, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat of arms of Costa Rica.svg

Hello, Fry1989. I have reverted your new upload to File:Coat of arms of Costa Rica.svg because it is obvius they're not the same image. The first image has a well declared source. The second image (the one you uploaded) is not sourced, and so I can not prove it is in the public domain. --Ralgistalk 18:06, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

They are infact the same image, they're written the same way. Please stay away from things you don't know about. Fry1989 eh? 21:40, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LGBT maps

Hey, so I can see you are very gung-ho about updating the images for the various LGBT maps which is great, but in regards to the South America map, I'm having trouble editing the legend. It doesn't seem to want to let me. Is there any way you could do that for me, and I'll upload the new image? It would be greatly appreciated. Until then, I won't be updating the map. 

-chase1493 (talk) 1:45, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
Sure, you can upload your new version and I can update the legend for you. Fry1989 eh? 18:33, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Might want to nominate this one for deletion...

File:Icons-flag-bat.png. -- AnonMoos (talk) 17:15, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Fry1989 eh? 21:23, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rome flag

Hi there, Commons:Village_pump/Proposals#City_of_Rome.27s_official_flag:_Update_request is your sort of territory - what do you think? Rd232 (talk) 18:08, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly Italian is not one of the languages I have a clue with, but based on page 12 of the PDF, it looks legit to me. Fry1989 eh? 21:22, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Albania reply

sorry for my behavior last night but you need to understand that i would never edit it if it was this one i swear, the Parliament chose this one cause it fits for the emblem only, it was used before in the dictatorship of Enver Hoxha. But if you watch closely between the two heads you will see a difference " the left head is a bit below and the right head is above, this is why.. so i would be grateful if you return the official eagle that is currently http://www.ega-golf.ch/020000/images/albania_flag.jpg Regards, AceDouble (talk) 04:03, 3 December 2012 (UTC).[reply]

File:Logo Tarnovia Tarnow.svg

File:Logo Tarnovia Tarnow.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Rapsar (talk) 11:32, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Map of Mexico, gay rights.svg

La versión del mapa señalando a Oaxaca como una entidad donde se permite el matrimonio gay es errónea. En México, una resolución de la Corte no significa una modificación de las leyes estatales. Mientras el Congreso de Oaxaca no modifique el Código Civil local —lo que fue requerido por inconstitucionalidad de su artículo 143—, en Oaxaca no se permiten los matrimonios gay. Las parejas pueden apelar a un es:Juicio de amparo y esperar una respuesta de la Corte, pero esto no significa que la ley oaxaqueña haya sido modificada. Por favor, lea es:Matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo en México. Saludos, Yavidaxiu (talk) 20:36, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fry1989&oldid=84732495"