Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/03/18: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Krdbot (talk | contribs)
m Bot: Archiving 1 thread from Commons:Deletion requests/2024/03/18
Krdbot (talk | contribs)
m Bot: Archiving 1 thread from Commons:Deletion requests/2024/03/18
Line 36: Line 36:
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:WelcomeToTheUnitedStatesAGuideForNewImmigrants.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:WelcomeToTheUnitedStatesAGuideForNewImmigrants.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by PuroSchmidt}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by PuroSchmidt}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Gisela Achterberg}}

Revision as of 19:47, 22 March 2024

Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 18th, 2024
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Misunderstanding in backchannel communication - campaign has not agreed to release image into the public domain Bremps... 01:07, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Campaign has refused to release the image into the public domain, as they don't want a photo of Desvignes and Willis circulating around. They had agreed to release the image into the public domain earlier as a result of a misunderstanding. Bremps... 01:19, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is a selfie which is not used in any article Abdulkadir Özhan (talk) 07:03, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept, Nonsense request (the image doesn't show anybody, so clearly not a selfie). --PaterMcFly (talk) 08:24, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tolong artikel ini dihapus Kakakhd31 (talk) 08:18, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:Proposed deletion notify|Emblem Of Sundapura Nusantara}} Kakakhd31 (talk) 08:24, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:22, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{subst:Proposed deletion notify|Flag Of Sundapura Nusantara.jpg}} Kakakhd31 (talk) 08:30, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 09:21, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

anatomy sections 2604:3D08:9885:2800:F890:934F:30DF:8F2C 11:19, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense request. --Achim55 (talk) 12:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake logo? (per DMA180guy) Mvcg66b3r (talk) 11:28, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In what sense? 200.111.17.10 21:25, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Per Sammi Brie in the ANU complaint. To quote from her, "Recently, they've gone through and removed the NBC peacock from their NBC affiliates (to promote local branding). They haven't done this with the CBS affiliates." So at least from that the uploader jumped the gun by creating, uploading, and adding modified logos to Wikimedia projects when the station themselves either haven't changed their logos yet or don't plan to in the future. The files are also misattributed to the station in the meantime. When in reality they were purely created by the uploader themselves based on their own personal opinion of what the new logos will look like. Whatever the case though there's zero reason we can't wait until the station creates their own modified if they ever do and upload that one when it happens. That's at least a lot better then presenting people a logo in a Wikipedia article that's clearly incorrect. We aren't here to spread disinformation. So the uploader should just reupload the actual logo from an actual source whenever or if ever it's created. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:49, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:50, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake logo? (per DMA180guy) Mvcg66b3r (talk) 11:29, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why? 200.111.17.10 21:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Per Sammi Brie in the ANU complaint. To quote from her, "Recently, they've gone through and removed the NBC peacock from their NBC affiliates (to promote local branding). They haven't done this with the CBS affiliates." So at least from that the uploader jumped the gun by creating, uploading, and adding modified logos to Wikimedia projects when the station themselves either haven't changed their logos yet or don't plan to in the future. The files are also misattributed to the station in the meantime. When in reality they were purely created by the uploader themselves based on their own personal opinion of what the new logos will look like. Whatever the case though there's zero reason we can't wait until the station creates their own modified if they ever do and upload that one when it happens. That's at least a lot better then presenting people a logo in a Wikipedia article that's clearly incorrect. We aren't here to spread disinformation. So the uploader should just reupload the actual logo from an actual source whenever or if ever it's created. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:49, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) doclys (❀) 15:46, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake logo? (per DMA180guy) Mvcg66b3r (talk) 11:30, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Per Sammi Brie in the ANU complaint. To quote from her, "Recently, they've gone through and removed the NBC peacock from their NBC affiliates (to promote local branding). They haven't done this with the CBS affiliates." So at least from that the uploader jumped the gun by creating, uploading, and adding modified logos to Wikimedia projects when the station themselves either haven't changed their logos yet or don't plan to in the future. The files are also misattributed to the station in the meantime. When in reality they were purely created by the uploader themselves based on their own personal opinion of what the new logos will look like. Whatever the case though there's zero reason we can't wait until the station creates their own modified if they ever do and upload that one when it happens. That's at least a lot better then presenting people a logo in a Wikipedia article that's clearly incorrect. We aren't here to spread disinformation. So the uploader should just reupload the actual logo from an actual source whenever or if ever it's created. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:50, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) doclys (❀) 15:44, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake logo? (per DMA180guy) Mvcg66b3r (talk) 11:31, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Per Sammi Brie in the ANU complaint. To quote from her, "Recently, they've gone through and removed the NBC peacock from their NBC affiliates (to promote local branding). They haven't done this with the CBS affiliates." So at least from that the uploader jumped the gun by creating, uploading, and adding modified logos to Wikimedia projects when the station themselves either haven't changed their logos yet or don't plan to in the future. The files are also misattributed to the station in the meantime. When in reality they were purely created by the uploader themselves based on their own personal opinion of what the new logos will look like. Whatever the case though there's zero reason we can't wait until the station creates their own modified if they ever do and upload that one when it happens. That's at least a lot better then presenting people a logo in a Wikipedia article that's clearly incorrect. We aren't here to spread disinformation. So the uploader should just reupload the actual logo from an actual source whenever or if ever it's created. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:50, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) doclys (❀) 15:48, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake logo? (per DMA180guy) Mvcg66b3r (talk) 11:32, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Per Sammi Brie in the ANU complaint. To quote from her, "Recently, they've gone through and removed the NBC peacock from their NBC affiliates (to promote local branding). They haven't done this with the CBS affiliates." So at least from that the uploader jumped the gun by creating, uploading, and adding modified logos to Wikimedia projects when the station themselves either haven't changed their logos yet or don't plan to in the future. The files are also misattributed to the station in the meantime. When in reality they were purely created by the uploader themselves based on their own personal opinion of what the new logos will look like. Whatever the case though there's zero reason we can't wait until the station creates their own modified if they ever do and upload that one when it happens. That's at least a lot better then presenting people a logo in a Wikipedia article that's clearly incorrect. We aren't here to spread disinformation. So the uploader should just reupload the actual logo from an actual source whenever or if ever it's created. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:50, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) doclys (❀) 15:45, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake logo? (per DMA180guy) Mvcg66b3r (talk) 11:33, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Per Sammi Brie in the ANU complaint. To quote from her, "Recently, they've gone through and removed the NBC peacock from their NBC affiliates (to promote local branding). They haven't done this with the CBS affiliates." So at least from that the uploader jumped the gun by creating, uploading, and adding modified logos to Wikimedia projects when the station themselves either haven't changed their logos yet or don't plan to in the future. The files are also misattributed to the station in the meantime. When in reality they were purely created by the uploader themselves based on their own personal opinion of what the new logos will look like. Whatever the case though there's zero reason we can't wait until the station creates their own modified if they ever do and upload that one when it happens. That's at least a lot better then presenting people a logo in a Wikipedia article that's clearly incorrect. We aren't here to spread disinformation. So the uploader should just reupload the actual logo from an actual source whenever or if ever it's created. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:51, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:50, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake logo? (per DMA180guy) Mvcg66b3r (talk) 11:34, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a fake logo. BMarGlines (talk) 22:47, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@BMarGlines: Can you provide the source then? It should be easy to provide one if the logo is real and the file description is correct. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:01, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Per Sammi Brie in the ANU complaint. To quote from her, "Recently, they've gone through and removed the NBC peacock from their NBC affiliates (to promote local branding). They haven't done this with the CBS affiliates." So at least from that the uploader jumped the gun by creating, uploading, and adding modified logos to Wikimedia projects when the station themselves either haven't changed their logos yet or don't plan to in the future. The files are also misattributed to the station in the meantime. When in reality they were purely created by the uploader themselves based on their own personal opinion of what the new logos will look like. Whatever the case though there's zero reason we can't wait until the station creates their own modified if they ever do and upload that one when it happens. That's at least a lot better then presenting people a logo in a Wikipedia article that's clearly incorrect. We aren't here to spread disinformation. So the uploader should just reupload the actual logo from an actual source whenever or if ever it's created. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:51, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; unused logo. --Ankry (talk) 12:35, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake logo? (per DMA180guy) Mvcg66b3r (talk) 11:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Per Sammi Brie in the ANU complaint. To quote from her, "Recently, they've gone through and removed the NBC peacock from their NBC affiliates (to promote local branding). They haven't done this with the CBS affiliates." So at least from that the uploader jumped the gun by creating, uploading, and adding modified logos to Wikimedia projects when the station themselves either haven't changed their logos yet or don't plan to in the future. The files are also misattributed to the station in the meantime. When in reality they were purely created by the uploader themselves based on their own personal opinion of what the new logos will look like. Whatever the case though there's zero reason we can't wait until the station creates their own modified if they ever do and upload that one when it happens. That's at least a lot better then presenting people a logo in a Wikipedia article that's clearly incorrect. We aren't here to spread disinformation. So the uploader should just reupload the actual logo from an actual source whenever or if ever it's created. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:51, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Bedivere. (non-admin closure) doclys (❀) 15:42, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake logo? (per Sammi Brie) Mvcg66b3r (talk) 12:11, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Per Sammi Brie in the ANU complaint. To quote from her, "Recently, they've gone through and removed the NBC peacock from their NBC affiliates (to promote local branding). They haven't done this with the CBS affiliates." So at least from that the uploader jumped the gun by creating, uploading, and adding modified logos to Wikimedia projects when the station themselves either haven't changed their logos yet or don't plan to in the future. The files are also misattributed to the station in the meantime. When in reality they were purely created by the uploader themselves based on their own personal opinion of what the new logos will look like. Whatever the case though there's zero reason we can't wait until the station creates their own modified if they ever do and upload that one when it happens. That's at least a lot better then presenting people a logo in a Wikipedia article that's clearly incorrect. We aren't here to spread disinformation. So the uploader should just reupload the actual logo from an actual source whenever or if ever it's created. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:51, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:50, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

es incoprrecto Brandonq12 (talk) 19:53, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Own userspace. --Achim55 (talk) 19:59, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by org, no usage and out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:32, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:58, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alma Sand (talk · contribs)

COM:SPAM, multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no usage and out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:34, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:59, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not appropriate Nikhildarekar07 (talk) 21:48, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:54, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete as soon as possible. There is no permission or a CC-license for this picture. The photographer Toni Ott has send me an email. Tocquevillosia (talk) 14:49, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Speedy delete all. Next time, please don't upload anything that is not either photographed by you, already specified as being suitably licensed on another page or public domain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:33, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:41, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete as soon as possible. There is no permission or a CC-license for this picture. The photographer Toni Ott has send me an email. Tocquevillosia (talk) 14:49, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:41, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fritz_Koenig_-_Kleine_Kugelkaryatide_V,_1._Entwurf_-_1968.png Tocquevillosia (talk) 14:49, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete as soon as possible. There is no permission or a CC-license for this picture. The photographer Toni Ott has send me an email. Tocquevillosia (talk) 14:52, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:41, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fritz_Koenig_-_Kleine_S%C3%A4ulenkaryatide_B_-_1968.png Tocquevillosia (talk) 14:50, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete as soon as possible. There is no permission or a CC-license for this picture. The photographer Toni Ott has send me an email. Tocquevillosia (talk) 14:52, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:41, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fritz_Koenig_-_Kleine_S%C3%A4ulenkaryatide_B_-_1968.png Tocquevillosia (talk) 14:50, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete as soon as possible. There is no permission or a CC-license for this picture. The photographer Toni Ott has send me an email. Tocquevillosia (talk) 14:52, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:40, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fritz_Koenig_-_Kleine_S%C3%A4ulenkaryatide_B_-_1968.png Tocquevillosia (talk) 14:50, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete as soon as possible. There is no permission or a CC-license for this picture. The photographer Toni Ott has send me an email. Tocquevillosia (talk) 14:53, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:40, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete as soon as possible. There is no permission or a CC-license for this picture. The photographer Toni Ott has send me an email. Tocquevillosia (talk) 14:53, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:40, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete as soon as possible. There is no permission or a CC-license for this picture. The photographer Toni Ott has send me an email. Tocquevillosia (talk) 14:53, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:40, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete as soon as possible. There is no permission or a CC-license for this picture. The photographer Toni Ott has send me an email. Tocquevillosia (talk) 14:54, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:40, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete as soon as possible. There is no permission or a CC-license for this picture. The photographer Toni Ott has send me an email. Tocquevillosia (talk) 14:54, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same file as this one. The Newer version was uploaded over the old one. باسم (talk) 16:42, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@باسم I fail to see any justification for nominating my file for deletion. The superseded template specifically caters to such cases, or alternatively, seeking permission before I uploaded my own version would have been appropriate. Directly requesting the file's deletion reflects a lack of respect. Regards Riad Salih (talk) 17:00, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: alread deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 08:36, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of Panorama in Russia Altenmann (talk) 18:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, withdrawn; there is FOP for buildings. Altenmann (talk) 18:05, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 08:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Russia Altenmann (talk) 18:02, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, withdrawn; there is FOP for buildings. Altenmann (talk) 18:04, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 08:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lo subí por equivocación Darian Italyetzi (talk) 23:02, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Own userspace. --Achim55 (talk) 08:03, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in USA. VRT permission is required to proof that statement A1Cafel (talk) 06:52, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do not Delete. US has FOP for Public Interiors. This 2D art is a permanent exhibit at a National Historic Site. It has been donated to the public and derivative works are permitted.
Documentation has been forwarded to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Netmouse (talk) 11:59, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file contains location information that needs to be removed. I already uploaded File:USANewImmigrantGuide.jpg to replace it (also fixed articles linking to it). HellcatSRT (talk) 18:11, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I requested speedy deletion (G7) instead. HellcatSRT (talk) 02:24, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 07:55, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by HellcatSRT as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7 Yann (talk) 07:54, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 07:55, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the author/uploader of this file. This file unexpectedly contains GPS coordinates in its EXIF, which is not relevant and not needed. I created and reuploaded File:USANewImmigrantGuide.jpg to remove that data. This (old) file is no longer needed.

P.S. In the previous nomication, I wrongly thought I could do speedy deletion for my own file (I didn't notice that SD G7 only allows speedy deletion within 7 days after the file uploading), so I crossed out it and requested speedy deletion instead. HellcatSRT (talk) 05:58, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Duplicate of File:USANewImmigrantGuide.jpg. --Yann (talk) 10:08, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PuroSchmidt (talk · contribs)

fantasy diagrams are out of project scope

Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 12:46, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:02, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PuroSchmidt (talk · contribs)

fake data, misleading diagrams : not the actual composition of the Hong Kong LegCo elected in 2012, not the number of seats of the South African Senate in 1979...

Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 10:17, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:03, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PuroSchmidt (talk · contribs)

These images are for a hoax/made-up/fictional legislative election. Outside of Commons scope to host personal fantasy election results.

Whpq (talk) 11:46, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:31, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; works by living artist; no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 13:16, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per Krdbot.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 20:58, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bot is not a person. Only informs reception, not acceptance. 186.175.147.139 02:23, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 17:27, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]