Commons:Deletion requests/2024/09/30: Difference between revisions
| Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:2011 Joplin Tornado Timeline.jpg}} |
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:2011 Joplin Tornado Timeline.jpg}} |
||
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:MuncieIce.JPG}} |
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:MuncieIce.JPG}} |
||
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ray Wagiu Basrowi.jpg}} |
|||
Revision as of 13:12, 30 September 2024
![1.1 File:Majid Jammoul podczas pracy w swojej pracownii 2024, rzeźba "Naprzód" - Photo Jacenty Matys.jpg](#File:Majid_Jammoul_podczas_pracy_w_swojej_pracownii_2024,_rzeźba_"Naprzód"_-_Photo_Jacenty_Matys.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
September 30
File:Majid Jammoul podczas pracy w swojej pracownii 2024, rzeźba "Naprzód" - Photo Jacenty Matys.jpg
Deriviative work of a modern sculpture. VRT permission from the artist is necessary to keep such file on Commons. ~Cybularny Speak? 00:05, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:21, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
circa 1960 photograph. This being an own work is doubtful, and no information on publication means copyright status is unknown. Abzeronow (talk) 00:18, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 14:03, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
No explanation why this is a public domain work. Some random Flickr account cannot confer public domain status on this image. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:23, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Keep "PD-US-not renewed" While the show is copyrighted any publicity images would not have been. A copyright symbol added to publicity images did not start occurring until the 1980s. The purpose of the publicity image was to get it reprinted as widely as possible at no cost. The alternative was to pay for advertising space in periodicals. --RAN (talk) 17:58, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
unused fictional election apportionment diagram (wrong numbers), out of scope. 2003:E5:372A:5F00:38A1:B04F:198E:C0B4 00:29, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Uploaded an edited version. TheJazzFusion (talk) 22:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Can you explain what the purpose of these audio files is, and provide sources for all of the (24 hours! of) audio they include? Omphalographer (talk) 23:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Uploaded a new version. TheJazzFusion (talk) 00:58, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination of author. --Sadads (talk) 00:11, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Apparently blatant copyright violation Kzirkel (talk) 01:06, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:05, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Не тот файл A44men den (talk) 01:35, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:43, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
unused fictional election apportionment diagram, out of scope (numbers of seats untrue for 2019, before and after the 2019 election, maybe based on early projections or preliminary election results). 2003:E5:372A:5F00:EC35:73AE:D531:8BFC 01:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
used for self promo --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 01:57, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Appears to have been copied directly from https://transportnsw.info/sydney-trains-network-map, however the uploaded file appears to be an older version, see the Wayback Machine for an exact version somewhere between February 2020 and July 2024. Fork99 (talk) 02:01, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Speedy delete: Government property, per COM:GVT Australia. It appears that the original copyright notice at the bottom of the file has been cropped out. Fork99 (talk) 08:01, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:08, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
unused fictional election apportionment diagram, out of scope (untrue numbers of seats for the 2017 Austrian general election, maybe based on early projections or preliminary results). 2003:E5:372A:5F00:EC35:73AE:D531:8BFC 02:04, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:28, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
blurry image, poor quality, superceded with more current, crisp image - Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 03:08, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
This is jayanta (user jay.hete). You can remove the picture as it's not neeting the standard, and it's not very clean too. It's perfectly ok to take off the picture from wiki — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 106.222.230.52 (talk) 03:02, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:59, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
As the original uploader and commissioner of this work, I no longer wish for it to be hosted on Wikimedia Commons for my userpage. Raskuly (talk) 03:16, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused user image. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:59, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 03:20, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Artist Marta Minjjin is still alive, so clearly not old enough to be in PD A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (sadly FOP does not apply for paintings). --MGA73 (talk) 15:12, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 09:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:33, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:49, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in Japan, installed in 2006 A1Cafel (talk) 03:28, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:02, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in Japan, artist Louise Bourgeois died in 2010 A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:02, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in Japan, artist Louise Bourgeois died in 2010 A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:02, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:02, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:33, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:02, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in Japan, artist Tony Cragg is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:04, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in Japan, artist Jean-Michel Othoniel is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 03:35, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:04, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in Japan, artist Jean-Michel Othoniel is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:04, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Morocco A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Morocco A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation: https://www.ovb-online.de/rosenheim/rosenheim-stadt/rosenheim-stefan-roitner-56-erreicht-den-siebten-dan-im-taekwondo-93095996.html Planetblue (talk) 04:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
This image has been sourced from an NWS website,[1] which attributes it to Google Earth.
The image has been trimmed to remove most of the Google logo, but the "G" and half the first "o" is still visible at the lower right of the photo.
Per COM:CB: "Satellite pictures and derived maps from commercial projects like Google Earth, Google Maps, bing.com, and others are based on a combination of free and copyrighted satellite imagery and are, therefore, not acceptable on Commons."
Without any evidence that Google has placed this image in the public domain, or that it was created using only free imagery, this is presumably an unfree image and we must delete.
 | Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request. |
- Oppose The image is showing how destructive the tornado was Hoguert (talk) 06:45, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Commons can only accept free images -- that is, images that was ineligible for copyright when they were created, or their copyright has expired, or the copyright holder has released the image into the public domain or under a free license. What evidence do you have that this image falls into one of those categories? --Rlandmann (talk) 09:49, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- It's on the NWS website so it should be public domain, if its not, it's fair use Hoguert (talk) 21:09, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not all contents of the NWS website are in the public domain; only contents that were created by the NWS or other federal agency, which Google is not (plus some very old images whose copyright has expired.)
- And the Commons does not accept "fair use" files. See COM:FAIRUSE. --Rlandmann (talk) 22:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- I still want to show satelitte imagery of Washington, Il after the tornado, do you have any images that are public domain? Hoguert (talk) 00:13, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- English Wikipedia accepts fair use.
Delete from Commons. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 05:00, 1 October 2024 (UTC) - I don't, and I think it's unlikely that any free imagery of this exists (or the NWS would probably have used it instead of commercial imagery). That said, English Wikipedia accepts files under fair use. You can find the policy here. --Rlandmann (talk) 07:23, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- English Wikipedia accepts fair use.
- I still want to show satelitte imagery of Washington, Il after the tornado, do you have any images that are public domain? Hoguert (talk) 00:13, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- It's on the NWS website so it should be public domain, if its not, it's fair use Hoguert (talk) 21:09, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Commons can only accept free images -- that is, images that was ineligible for copyright when they were created, or their copyright has expired, or the copyright holder has released the image into the public domain or under a free license. What evidence do you have that this image falls into one of those categories? --Rlandmann (talk) 09:49, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete – per reasons given by Rlandmann. ChrisWx ☁️ (talk - contribs) 05:35, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:12, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Worng file Iekneidiebrud82& (talk) 06:29, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Comment Deletion was requested by the uploader shortly after upload, but file is still COM:INUSE at th:สมาชิกสภาผู้แทนราษฎรจังหวัดอ่างทอง. --Rosenzweig τ 18:42, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: If uploader say the wrong file is uploaded then it raises concerns if the file really is own work and license is correct. --MGA73 (talk) 15:16, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Wrong file Iekneidiebrud82& (talk) 06:32, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
no educational purpose. Too fast animation, disturbing Estopedist1 (talk) 07:03, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MGA73 (talk) 15:16, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
This file might become useful, however it was recently tagged by Nv8200pa as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 NearEMPTiness (talk) 07:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Please keep because it doesn't save storage space to delete unused files. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 07:14, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: may be in scope, no reason to delete. --Wdwd (talk) 14:18, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Please keep because the non-encyclopedcal part of this photo has been removed, since this file was initially tagged by Nv8200pa as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 NearEMPTiness (talk) 07:34, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion (there are no similar files). --MGA73 (talk) 15:18, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss. The uncensored and uncropped version of this photo is shown in the file. The blunt retouching was probably done, to show the painting in an Arabian article, in which it would be inabpropriate to show the face. I recommend to keep the file, athough this file was initially tagged by Nv8200pa as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 NearEMPTiness (talk) 07:53, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: may be in scope, no reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 14:23, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Copyright © SumselPost Allright Reserved Urang Kamang (talk) 08:02, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:00, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
© Copyright - Gatra 2021-2022 Urang Kamang (talk) 08:03, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:00, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Anzor alem artiste .jpg Mwashani (talk) 08:04, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep no obvious reason for deletion--Tmv (talk) 15:07, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: The reason provided is bad but its a crop of a file https://www.turboimagehost.com/p/52750581/anzor-alem23.jpg.html seen in this gallery https://www.turboimagehost.com/album/164896/anzor_alem_ so I doubt we can trust that it is own work. --MGA73 (talk) 15:31, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Copyright © 2024 SINDOnews.com All Rights Reserved Urang Kamang (talk) 08:07, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:00, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Copyright © 2024 Investor.id PT. Koran Media Investor Indonesia Urang Kamang (talk) 08:07, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:00, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Copyright @ 2024 detikcom, All right reserved Urang Kamang (talk) 08:08, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:00, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
© Copyright 2023 Siberkreasi News Room. Urang Kamang (talk) 08:09, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:00, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine; this commercially-licensed image infringes the sculptor's copyrights as a result. Per this, the statue dates to 1991 and was authored by Іван Сонсядло. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:17, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete --Микола Василечко (talk) 12:18, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:25, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Not sure if this is de minimis or not, but the image description implies the monument as the intended subject; true to that, it is at the center of the image. The image may have some "independent economic value" that might be damaging for the sculptor's rights to monopoly over images of his work.
Ukraine does not permit commercial Freedom of Panorama. The work dates to 1982 and was authored by sculptor Микола Невеселий. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:23, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:27, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine, making this image infringing to the sculptural copyrights. The monument dates to 1993. Sculptor is not named in the online source, however. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:29, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete --Микола Василечко (talk) 12:19, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:27, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine, making these commercially-licensed images infringements to the sculptural copyrights. The monument dates to 1995, though the name of the sculptor is not mentioned in the online source.
- File:Кременець (126).jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Т.Г.Шевченку 1.JPG
- File:Пам'ятник Т.Г.Шевченку 2.JPG
- File:Пам'ятник Т.Г.Шевченку 3.JPG
- File:Пам'ятник Т.Г.Шевченку 4.JPG
- File:Пам'ятник Т.Г.Шевченку 5.JPG
- File:Пам'ятник Тарасові Шевченку (Кременець) P1610764.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_P1610764.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:35, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:53, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine, which means commercially-licensed photos like this are infringing sculptural copyrights. Per this online source, the monument dates to 1991 and was authored by: architect М. Федик and sculptor М. Посікіра. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as no permission (No permission since) I think permission is not necessary, but the file is missing. Yann (talk) 08:42, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete (if technically possible): Photograph of a painting by artist Waldemar Burmakin (1938-2022), indeed no permission. Apparently, this is a curious result of a failed deletion, cause in one browser of mine I really don't see this file, as does Yann, in another one - I can see it perfectly: a temporary copy on a free hosting, will be deleted in a fortnight (this is probably a cache, it is visible to those who opened the file yesterday). --Quick1984 (talk) 10:26, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as per Quick1984. --Yann (talk) 10:29, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. The author of this 1993 monument was sculptor Я. Голець.
- File:61-242-0025 Monastyryska Shevchenko Monument RB.jpg
- File:Монастириська Пам'ятник поету, письменнику, художнику Шевченко Т.Г.jpg
- File:Монастириська Пам'ятник Шевченку P1310270.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник поету, письменнику, художнику Тарасові Григоровичу Шевченку, м.Монастириська.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник поету, письменнику, художнику Шевченко Тарас Григорович, м. Монастириська.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:43, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Delete--Микола Василечко (talk) 07:46, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:05, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Per this site, this statue of Taras Shevchenko was unveiled in 1954, and the sculptor was Y. Chaika. I haven't been able to determine when the sculptor died (immediate online search only gives links to stock photo sites like Alamy), but even if the sculptor died more than 70 years ago by now (public domain in Ukraine), the statue is eligible for US copyright. This means these photos should not be undeleted/restored until the statue's US copyright expires (95 years after 1954). US copyright can be ignored if Ukraine had commercial freedom of panorama. But unfortunately, the Ukrainian government – in amending the nation's copyright law in December 2022 – only gave a non-commercial FOP that is not OK for Wikimedia.
- File:61-250-0117 DSC 9607 Terebovla.jpg
- File:61-250-0117 Terebovlia IMG 1656.jpg
- File:Monument to Taras Shevchenko in Terebovlia 01.jpg
- File:Monument to Taras Shevchenko in Terebovlia 02.jpg
- File:Моя Тернопільщина Місто712.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:11, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Sculptor Yakiv Chaika dead in 1995. --Микола Василечко (talk) 18:07, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- If that is the case, then the monument is unfree in its country of origin until January 1, 2066, 70+1 years after Chaika died. US copyright no longer matters as the monument enters US public domain on January 1, 2049 (95+1 years). Undelete in 2066 (or earlier if Ukrainian law becomes favorable for Wikimedia). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:58, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:49, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
More files of the same, unfree monument in Ukraine, which does not permit commercial Freedom of Panorama. These three images are all submissions to Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Ukraine.
- File:Пам'ятник поету, письменнику, художнику Тарасові Григоровичу Шевченку 1954р м. Теребовля.jpg
- File:Теребовля, пам'ятник Тарасові Шевченку (1).jpg
- File:Теребовля, пам'ятник Тарасові Шевченку (2).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:49, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete --Микола Василечко (talk) 12:19, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:05, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Same unfree monument as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Statue of Taras Shevchenko, Terebovlia. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:50, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
COM:Derivative work, photograph-of-photograph. Original source and author unknown. MKFI (talk) 08:51, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:28, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine, and this commercially-licensed image infringes sculptural copyright. This online source claims the monument dates to 1989. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:58, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by CoffeeEngineer as no permission (No permission since) Krd 09:23, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: It is very old file so we can't expect high res and meta data. I only found newer files with Tineye and Google. So unless someone find better indications of copyvio I think we can AGF and keep. --MGA73 (talk) 15:37, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
According to some element in this picture, such as sharpness, it is impossible that this one was taken in 1920s. Wutkh (talk) 00:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Why do you think it wasn't possible to create sharp images in 1920? This image is apparently scaled down significantly, so the original may not be as sharp as this low-res copy. PaterMcFly (talk) 13:04, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Of course large negative photos of the 1920s and earlier can be crystal clear sharp. If you see particular details that make the stated date "impossible", please explain. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:34, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- As I cannot find any evidence to proof my though, I would like to withdraw my request. Thank you all for kind responses. Wutkh (talk) 18:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:02, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Post-closure comment: This was very obviously a sepia-colouring of a modern digital photo. The original photo is here: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1423509354580067&set=a.564795151725634 --Paul_012 (talk) 03:03, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comment! Wutkh (talk) 11:16, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Not an old photo, as the uploader claims, just a sepia colored version of modern copyrighted one: [2]/[3] or [4], bogus PD rationale. Quick1984 (talk) 10:00, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
![[2]](https://scontent.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/452861950_3649894125274901_6263537192356230504_n.jpg?_nc_cat=106&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=a5f93a&_nc_ohc=_sKQNiDexVcQ7kNvgEuXI1g&_nc_ht=scontent.xx&oh=00_AYAOlVlxXV4BZh2lEgSbJ0pfdbC9dmAfvjWvhT80VPnrmA&oe=6700497B){kind=link}
- Delete, as original speedy tagger. User:Yann, this was very clear-cut and my tag shouldn't have been reverted without notice. --Paul_012 (talk) 12:05, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- The original image, which I noted in the speedy request, is here. --Paul_012 (talk) 12:06, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:54, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
See watermark: copyright Getty images. Wouter (talk) 10:00, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Getty copyrighted. --RAN (talk) 12:09, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:39, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Selfpromo, out of scope. ReneeWrites (talk) 10:29, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MGA73 (talk) 15:38, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Неправильная атрибуция Heidingi (talk) 10:55, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Можно отменить запрос на удаление, привязал фото к нужному объекту Heidingi (talk) 16:38, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 18:39, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Bangladesh according to 2023 copyright act. Syrus257 (talk) 11:11, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Syrus257: could you please help us by explaining what is the prohibition regarding graffiti?--Rocky Masum (talk) 11:41, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Sure. Though you stated in the description that it's a graffiti but it seems more like a street art regarding the recent movement in Bangladesh. Graffitis are in Public Domain but I'm not sure about the street arts. Syrus257 (talk) 12:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Nv8200pa as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1 Not a clear copyright violation case. Please explain why you suspect it is a copyvio. BrightRaven (talk) 11:15, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- The description says it was taken from the agent's website. Nv8200p (talk) 11:16, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:42, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Headlock0225 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: See COM:PACKAGE Not a clear copyvio case. It could be de minimis. BrightRaven (talk) 11:19, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- possibly but it is the the clear subject of the photograph Headlock0225 (talk) 11:24, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: I agree its not a clear case but the package is the main focus. If we blurr it then the file will probably not be usable (it is allready unused). --MGA73 (talk) 15:41, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Неправильная атрибуция. Координаты указывают на другой дом, также находящийся в списке. Heidingi (talk) 11:20, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Запрос на удаление можно отменить, создал правильный объект и привязал к нему Heidingi (talk) 12:24, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 18:36, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Неправильная атрибуция. Координаты указывают на другой дом, также находящийся в списке. Heidingi (talk) 11:20, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Запрос на удаление можно отменить, создал правильный объект и привязал к нему Heidingi (talk) 12:23, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 18:36, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Неправильная атрибуция. Координаты указывают на другой дом, также находящийся в списке. Heidingi (talk) 11:20, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Запрос на удаление можно отменить, создал правильный объект и привязал к нему Heidingi (talk) 12:26, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 18:37, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Неправильная атрибуция. Координаты указывают на другой дом, также находящийся в списке. Heidingi (talk) 11:21, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Запрос на удаление можно отменить, создал правильный объект и привязал к нему Heidingi (talk) 12:24, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 18:36, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Неправильная атрибуция. Координаты указывают на другой дом, также находящийся в списке. Heidingi (talk) 11:21, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:38, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Неправильная атрибуция. Координаты указывают на другой дом, также находящийся в списке. Heidingi (talk) 11:21, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Запрос на удаление можно отменить, исправил карточку изображения Heidingi (talk) 12:16, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 18:36, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
This image is sourced from a web page of the National Weather Service.
Such pages host a mixture of NWS-created content (clearly public domain), and material from third parties, including businesses and individuals.
Although Mike Eckert was an NWS meteorologist, this image appears to be his personal property and is watermarked with an explicit copyright notice: "© Michael T. Eckert".
This is an unfree image and we cannot host it here.
| Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request. |
- Strong delete per watermark. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 04:57, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:12, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
map with too low resolution to be educational, I guess that the real Category:Wikipedia Education Program has better and more educational material. Enyavar (talk) 12:12, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MGA73 (talk) 15:42, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted content. As long as the uploader brings no certain proof of these images being his own creation, then we have a copyright problem with this. Msb (talk) 12:14, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:44, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
I think this picture is very problematic and should be deleted as soon as possible. Obviously, this image was taken from a video conference. Not only are the small profile pictures clearly recognizable (with their presumed real names), but also video stills of participants in this event. The participants have not given any permission for their profile pictures (which are probably also protected by copyright) or their photos to be made freely available on the Internet. Msb (talk) 12:18, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal photo, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 14:45, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
No simple shap, no simple geometric structures, no text only; no COM:DW. This derivative work of a festival ticked is an issue of copyright as it is right now. Msb (talk) 12:22, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:46, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
This image has been sourced from an NWS website, and contains a mixture of free and unfree elements.
The image captioned "St John's Regional Medi[c]al Center before May 22nd" contains a watermark at its bottom right that contains an explicit copyright notice: "© Google 2011" (The "after" photo to its right is a known free image from the NOAA).
The underlying grayscale satellite image that makes up most of the background of this infographic also strongly resembles a commercial satellite map (note the "Joplin MO" and "Iron Gate" legends), although I do not have a match for it.
Per COM:CB: "Satellite pictures and derived maps from commercial projects like Google Earth, Google Maps, bing.com, and others are based on a combination of free and copyrighted satellite imagery and are, therefore, not acceptable on Commons."
In its place, I've trimmed the infographic down to just its timeline element, which is unquestionably free: File:2011_Joplin_Tornado_Timeline_-_trimmed.jpg
| Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request. |
- Keep With Solution — Given the only element of the photo that is copyrighted is the first of the satellite images, can someone reupload the image with a black box over that image? On Wikisource, if a U.S. government document was mostly public domain, but contained a copyrighted element, that copyrighted element could be blacked out/hidden and the rest of the content could remain. So, to prevent full deletion of the large bulk of the image, I propose we black out that small satellite imagery, reupload it, and then delete the previous version which contains the copyrighted image. WeatherWriter (talk) 13:26, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Per COM:OVERWRITE, only the original uploader (you) can overwrite a file with a major modification like that.
- That aside, I would still pursue deletion of that modified version as described due to (very) significant doubt that the greyscale background is actually a free image and not sourced from a commercial satellite map, as it appears to be.
- Of course, it would be possible to replace that background with a free one. With that change in place as well, there would be no reason to delete it. Assuming a suitable source is available, it's probably only a few minutes' work for someone who knows their way around Photoshop or GIMP. --Rlandmann (talk) 13:49, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete – as this is similar to the 2020 derecho image I nominated. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 04:59, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Google copyright ©️ element. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 04:59, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I made a free alternative here: File:2011 Joplin Tornado Timeline - free.png --Rlandmann (talk) 10:46, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Awesome. We can now unambiguously delete this not-fully-free image. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:30, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Awesome. We can now unambiguously
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:12, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
This file is sourced to a National Weather Service website.
Such sites host a mixture of content created by the US federal government (public domain) and content created by businesses and private individuals (a wide variety of free and unfree licenses). We rely on the captions they were published with to tell us where the photo originated.
Unfortunately, the citation we have points directly to the image itself and so although we can verify that in the Internet Archive, we no longer have access to its copyright and licensing information.
Because it is unlike the images usually taken by NWS staff in the course of their duties and looks more like a public submission, I reached out the to NWS office that published this photo (Indianopolis).
They do not know who took this photo.
I have forwarded this response to the VRT (ticket:2024093010007205).
Because we cannot verify that it is (or was ever) available under a free license, we must delete as a precaution unless the precise creator and evidence of permission can be found. If it is truly an orphan image, it will enter the public domain 120 years after it was taken, in 2126.
| Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request. |
- Delete per above. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 05:01, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- I’d like to pass along this to any closing admin: the English Wikipedia uses this image in the Ice Storm Warning article. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 23:01, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- File:Trees with Ice.JPG would be a good replacement photo. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:14, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- I’d like to pass along this to any closing admin: the English Wikipedia uses this image in the Ice Storm Warning article. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 23:01, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Rlandmann: I found the original source website containing the photo. Unfortunately, there is still no author information. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:33, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- (N)ice work! Thank you! But yes, still sufficiently unlike the types of images that NWS employees usually take in the line of duty to cross the "significant doubt" line (and obviously especially so since the WFO has no record of its provenance). --Rlandmann (talk) 16:43, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:13, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
No mention of source and proof of license NFarras (talk) 13:12, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 14:48, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
