User talk:Yann
You can leave me a message in English or French, at the bottom. Click on the + above. Yann 22:13, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Holiday greetings
|
Wishing you the happiest of holidays — Vera (talk), December 2012
and the best new year!
|
|
/archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Thanks
Thanks for your cleanup of the fake Dschwen block. It was a proxy server with no other edits on Commons. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:12, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello Yann,
The images and the content I am working on is of the organization I am working with and the use of images and logo is with their permission.
So, how do I proceed in this? (P.S. I am new here)
Warm Regards, Blessin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blessinvarkey (talk • contribs)
No copyright tag on image
Hello, Yann. I uploaded mage http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jmtindel&oldid=109562351 without copyright info. It is a company logo, and I have contacted the company to find out how they want to distribute it. I will add the appropriate tag once I have that info, or upload another copy, if it has been automatically deleted in the meantime. Thank you! --Mike (jmtindel)
Hi Yann, I tried to move the w:File:Complexity-map-overview.png from Wikipedia to Commons, but it seems you deleted this file in 2010. As far as I can see this file is original work by w:User:Bcastel3, who identified himself as Brian Castellani, sociology professor of the Kent State University, Kent Ohio. Could you explain, what I am missing here? And maybe how we could solve this? -- Mdd (talk) 15:20, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
- I just noticed I asked you this question 3 months ago (see here), and there was one argument back in 2010 (see here. -- Mdd (talk) 15:43, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
I don't what's going on with this file. I restored it, and created a DR. I copied your messages there. Please comment here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Complexity-map-overview.png. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:42, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, it seems we can work this out. I did notice the image info here on commons was incomplete, and didn't (yet) link to w:User:Bcastel3/Brian Castellani. -- Mdd (talk) 18:23, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
deleted page File:Restauro come terapia.jpg
This file, as well as all the others about "William Girometti", reproduce painting of my father, who died 15 years ago. Since I am his only heir, now that my mother died too, I have the ownership of all the paintings whose pictures I uploaded. Probably I chose the wrong licence, but I wish that people enjoy my father's paintings. I am also working to a page in Wikipedia about my father, in which also a bibliography is available. I wrote to permission-commons@wikimedia.org too. Please tell me how I may upload the file again without problems. Thank you very much, Silvia Girometti
Deleted page/photo
Dear Yann, File:Ellen_Nisbeth.jpg has been deleted. I have the rights to use this photo. See http://www.ellennisbeth.com/#!gallery/c24vq where it is clearly stated that the photos are available for PR-usage. Please make it available again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philia85 (talk • contribs)
- Unfortunately, PR-usage is not enough for us. We need a written permission for a free license. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:35, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
What was this?
At Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Constanza_Lüer.jpg we have a nonsense DR, my vk stating that file is in use and then poof, it is gone. What’s going on? -- Tuválkin ✉ 20:46, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- As I wrote, it was deleted by Fastily. Please ask him, or request undeletion at COM:UR. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:50, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- I’m asking you: As an admin, as opposed to a clerk or a robot, do you think that the DR above was done properly? -- Tuválkin ✉ 21:56, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Whether a file is in use may be of interest if the scope is questioned. The reason for this deletion seems to be a suspected copyright violation, and here we cannot have existing use trump copyright. --Dschwen (talk) 22:04, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Where is that copyvio mentioned in the DR? -- Tuválkin ✉ 22:44, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Nowhere. It should have been. But since you are asking what that was I'm answering you: "A probable copyvio". You can read the deletion rationale here. --Dschwen (talk) 22:56, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks Dschwen. My question («What was this?») was not about what was on the deleted image, but something like «what was this all about?», with «this» being the DR itself. -- Tuválkin ✉ 02:02, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Nowhere. It should have been. But since you are asking what that was I'm answering you: "A probable copyvio". You can read the deletion rationale here. --Dschwen (talk) 22:56, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Where is that copyvio mentioned in the DR? -- Tuválkin ✉ 22:44, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Whether a file is in use may be of interest if the scope is questioned. The reason for this deletion seems to be a suspected copyright violation, and here we cannot have existing use trump copyright. --Dschwen (talk) 22:04, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- I’m asking you: As an admin, as opposed to a clerk or a robot, do you think that the DR above was done properly? -- Tuválkin ✉ 21:56, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Meanwhile I read JuTa’s notice (08:32, 12 November 2013) in the uploader’s talk page. All good, then. However, this exchange should be added to the DR (out side the blue area), because other users, like me, may expect DRs to be done in a transparent, clear fashion. -- Tuválkin ✉ 22:59, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- OK, fine. I added "for copyright violation" in my closure comment. Yann (talk) 07:19, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Meanwhile I read JuTa’s notice (08:32, 12 November 2013) in the uploader’s talk page. All good, then. However, this exchange should be added to the DR (out side the blue area), because other users, like me, may expect DRs to be done in a transparent, clear fashion. -- Tuválkin ✉ 22:59, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Yann. Excuse me, as I am new user. You deleted the images I uploaded to Carlos León Escudero page. The images are artworks by the artist taken from the website of his gallery ( http://www.maxestrella.com/ ) and licensed by the artist for public communication with educational purposes through Wikipedia. Would it be possible, please, you undelete them? Best regards, thanks a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arneb2014 (talk • contribs)
- Hello,
- First there is no mention on the website of a free license. "Public communication with educational purposes" is not enough for us. We need an explicite written free license from the author. See COM:OTRS for details. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:53, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi, can i know why you deleted image File:Henrique Luvannor.jpg uploaded by me? I uploaded it with soccer.ru template. This template has OTRS permission for materials from this site? So, wtf?
PS, how i see, you posted (Copyright violation: http://footballhd.ru/allnews/worldcupnews/39490-v-sbornoy-moldovy-mozhet-poyavitsya-etnicheskiy-brazilec.html). But this article has only 1 month. Article from where i get image is much older. Can you see the difference? I do not violated nobody's copyright. I uploaded this image legaly. For much info see {{Soccer.ru}}. Please undelete image. --XXN (talk) 01:29, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- footballhd.ru mentions the source as "Getty Images", so I don't think it is OK. What do you think? Yann (talk) 07:13, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- soccer.ru - You can use photos only from the gallery! --ManFromNord (talk) 09:48, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Wilfredor DRs
Hi, I have been looking through some past DRs and came across Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lema y yo.jpg. The deletion nomination does not appear to be a policy based reason to create a DR. Could you please add a meaningful closure statement to it? Thanks --Fæ (talk) 03:21, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- This image is completely out of scope, so it is very well within the policy. When I closed with as above, it means that I agree with the nominator (and eventually other comments). Isn't clear enough? Yann (talk) 07:05, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, no. The nomination stated "User contributions in spanish is only in her user page. Self promotion, low image quality, non enciclopedic value." I cannot see the image any more, as you have deleted it, however based on the hundreds of other DRs that Wilfredor has created over the last few days, several that you have closed by deleting, that include non-policy nominations (see list), this nomination is worth looking at again. The facts are:
- You make reference to your closure relating to "eventually other comments", however there is none apart from the nomination.
- I am not completely clear what "User contributions in spanish is only in her user page" means, however it appears to be nominating an image for deletion because one of our contributors does not use English on her user talk page. This would definitely not be a deletion rationale and would be troubling of itself.
- "Self promotion" is unlikely, in the list of images up for deletion this have been used to describe "selfies" and similar profile photographs which were not against policy per se. One might argue that some of these were out of scope due to possible lack of educational value, but any closing admin should make that clear.
- "low image quality", this would have to be bad enough to render the image out of scope to be a rationale for deletion, there are many cases in the above list where this was incorrectly mentioned in the nomination.
- "non enciclopedic value", this is against Commons policy and no DR closure should agree with this as a deletion rationale.
- Please amend your closure to explain the reasons you chose to delete the image. The nomination as it stands is not something that a closing admin should just take at face value and delete the image with the comment "as above". Thanks --Fæ (talk) 09:55, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- This is a personal image (portrait with his girl friend?) of poor quality, and not used. So your points 3, 4, and 5 above cover it. I don't see where is your problem. I think that point #2 means that if the only edits of a user would in his/her user page (not the case here), it would be a rationale for deletion. This gave me the opportunity to review other files from this user. Two of them are not own work, and have at least a wrong license, and may be a copyvio. I nominated them for deletion. Yann (talk) 10:20, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Could you please add a similar explanation to the closing statement of the DR? It is important that Administrators are not seen to support nominations on the basis of contributors writing in Spanish, or being "non-encyclopedic".
- Done. Yann (talk) 11:18, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- You appear to be confirming that you believe that "non-encyclopedic value" is a reason to delete images from Commons, if that is the case then we should probably continue the conversation at COM:AN so that other Administrators can provide viewpoints on how to interpret policy. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 11:11, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- "non-encyclopedic value" doesn't mean anything in itself. You need to explain why a file would be, or not, of encyclopedic value. Yann (talk) 11:18, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- No, this is a frequent and fundamental misunderstanding of scope. Specifically, Commons differs from the English Wikipedia by having a scope that includes media with educational value, this is much broader than encyclopaedic value. DRs with these sort of nominations should be either corrected or the closing statement should clarify that difference as Commons should never delete images which have an educational rationale but happen to fail to have an encyclopaedic rationale. --Fæ (talk) 11:28, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, but this seems rather semantic. I think I agree with you that Commons' scope is broader than Wikipedia's. But in this case, I don't see the point you want to make. Above I mean "educational" rather than "encyclopedic". So I rewrite my statement as "non-educational value" doesn't mean anything in itself. You need to explain why a file would be, or not, of educational value. And in this case, the image is neither educational nor encyclopedic. Yann (talk) 11:33, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- The word encyclopedia comes from the Koine Greek ἐγκύκλιος παιδεία, transliterated enkyklios paideia, meaning "general education." Both words are just semantic for many. And for a Spanish speaker, there is not much meaning in sticking on the exact meaning of an English word. JKadavoor Jee 11:42, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for making the correction. Commons policies are written using words, to argue them away as being semantics is unhelpful. The same rationale of semantic equivalence can make almost any policy useless or inverted, for example you can argue that anything written on Commons can never be harassment, or that it is okay to delete all photographs of people who do not have Wikipedia biographies. Please stick to "educational" not "encyclopaedic", I do not want to waste everyone's time by asking for this to be clarified on noticeboards when our community policies are completely unambiguous. --Fæ (talk) 12:03, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Well, it seems simple, but it may not be. I wouldn't be surprised if Wilfredor used "encyclopaedic" when he meaned "educational", and many non-native English speakers would do too. Did you ask him? Yann (talk) 12:13, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- No, the DR was closed and you had deleted the file. You are the closing admin for a DR with no comments apart from the nomination, so you must have been satisfied that Wilfredor had correctly nominated it. The only relevant action to challenge the above discrepancies was to clarify your closing statement. --Fæ (talk) 13:16, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Well, it seems simple, but it may not be. I wouldn't be surprised if Wilfredor used "encyclopaedic" when he meaned "educational", and many non-native English speakers would do too. Did you ask him? Yann (talk) 12:13, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for making the correction. Commons policies are written using words, to argue them away as being semantics is unhelpful. The same rationale of semantic equivalence can make almost any policy useless or inverted, for example you can argue that anything written on Commons can never be harassment, or that it is okay to delete all photographs of people who do not have Wikipedia biographies. Please stick to "educational" not "encyclopaedic", I do not want to waste everyone's time by asking for this to be clarified on noticeboards when our community policies are completely unambiguous. --Fæ (talk) 12:03, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- No, this is a frequent and fundamental misunderstanding of scope. Specifically, Commons differs from the English Wikipedia by having a scope that includes media with educational value, this is much broader than encyclopaedic value. DRs with these sort of nominations should be either corrected or the closing statement should clarify that difference as Commons should never delete images which have an educational rationale but happen to fail to have an encyclopaedic rationale. --Fæ (talk) 11:28, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- "non-encyclopedic value" doesn't mean anything in itself. You need to explain why a file would be, or not, of encyclopedic value. Yann (talk) 11:18, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Could you please add a similar explanation to the closing statement of the DR? It is important that Administrators are not seen to support nominations on the basis of contributors writing in Spanish, or being "non-encyclopedic".
- This is a personal image (portrait with his girl friend?) of poor quality, and not used. So your points 3, 4, and 5 above cover it. I don't see where is your problem. I think that point #2 means that if the only edits of a user would in his/her user page (not the case here), it would be a rationale for deletion. This gave me the opportunity to review other files from this user. Two of them are not own work, and have at least a wrong license, and may be a copyvio. I nominated them for deletion. Yann (talk) 10:20, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, no. The nomination stated "User contributions in spanish is only in her user page. Self promotion, low image quality, non enciclopedic value." I cannot see the image any more, as you have deleted it, however based on the hundreds of other DRs that Wilfredor has created over the last few days, several that you have closed by deleting, that include non-policy nominations (see list), this nomination is worth looking at again. The facts are:
Même si tu as très probablement eu raison de supprimer cette photo, tu aurais quand même pu me prévenir... --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:56, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Désole, mais elle n'aurait jamais dû être déposée sur Commons. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:04, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Je ne dis pas le contraire. Mais quand on supprime un fichier, on en prévient l'utilisateur responsable.
- Pour info je l'avais déposée à un moment où les règles étaient très floues à propos des photos d'écran pendant des évènements de type concert ou compétition sportive (en effet je précise que la photo que tu as supprimée était un écran diffusé en direct sur le lieu de la compétition et dont je doute qu'il ait été enregistré ni diffusé ailleurs).
- D'ailleurs je me demande s'il y a désormais des règles claires à ce sujet, vu le nombre important de fichiers problématiques du même style dans Category:Video displays. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 10:11, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
I don't appreciate messages like this on my talk page. It's not your place to tell me if I feel an issue has been explained properly. It's not even your place to tell me to stay away from another admin's talk page. If you have a problem with anything I've done and think I need to be stopped from doing something, then take it to a community noticeboard. Don't waste my time (or indeed yours) issuing pointless warnings like that, which you must be aware will only anger the recipient. If I catch you trying to intimidate another user like this over an issue of admin accountability again, I'll be doing the same. Ultra7 (talk) 16:28, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- Your are wrong on all counts here. Yes, if you make problems, it is necessary to tell you. And yes, it is my work to tell you to stop bothering others. Nobody appreciate your bashing. Please stop. This is the last warning. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:33, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- Your 'warning' was read and deleted - do not restore it again. This is your last warning to stay off my talk page - it is totally unacceptable for you to be reverting my talk page to restore messages I have read [1]. It's also pretty stupid to be posting this same message here, and then again on my talk page. I frankly don't care what you appreciate or not - if you think I cause problems, If you think you have a case, take it to a noticeboard. If you continue to try and intimidate users, I will report you. Ultra7 (talk) 16:41, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- You really need to calm down, this behaviour is ridiculous. You are badgering people and it is getting on everyone's nerves. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:48, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Again about deleted files with William Girometti's paintings (e.g. Restauro_come_terapia.jpg)
Hi Yann, sorry for bothering you again about the same topic. I would just like to ask you whether there is anything I can do while I am waiting, in order to support my request about the images being restored (request sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org about a week ago). Thank you very much again and best regards, Silvia Girometti — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silvia Girometti (talk • contribs)
Permission in File:Calamità naturale.jpg
Hello Yann, I added permission in the file: did I put it in the right place? And shall I do the same for all the other files you are restoring? Thank you so much, Silvia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silvia Girometti (talk • contribs)
LSU shield
Yann,
Thank you for the reply regarding the LSU shield. I'm sure it's copyrighted similar to the University of Michigan "M", but it's not a big deal for me if it's removed. I thought it was an interesting picture from the stadium gate, so I took the picture. I'm actually writing to thank you for how you respond to my request to have it undeleted. It gave an explanation and also useful information. There are people who edit that give no explanation and decide to delete regardless of explanation or discussion. They do it in a rude fashion and actually harass and attack contributors. Your response was greatly appreciated. spatms (User talk:spatms) 10:23, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
PermissionOTRS
Done. I added {{tl|PermissionOTRS|id=2013111610010253|Darkwind}} in all files where it has not been added yet, and put my father's name in "Author" (however not in "User") as you wrote. Am I allowed to delete all {{OTRS pending|year=2013|month=November|day=19}} or {{OTRS pending|year=2013|month=November|day=22}}? And, last but not least, should I upload any image more of the same kind, which is the rightest way for doing it? Thank you so much again for everything and kind regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silvia Girometti (talk • contribs)
May I ask you what do you think of the changes I made to File:Senza_titolo_11.JPG before I make changes to all files? I do appreciate your suggestions very much, and hope having done in the right way, however it is not really easy to put a subject (in description?) for surrealistic works (at least some of them). Thanks a lot, --Silvia Girometti (talk) 22:17, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Great! I'll do the same for all files! Thank you so much --Silvia Girometti (talk) 22:33, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Marcação da imagem File:2005-11 Iscal-com 12 (Capa do Boletim Informativo).pdf
Thanks. I would appreciate you support for {{speedy|erro de carregamento} Regards, Rui Beja (talk) 18:33, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
I have uploaded some images, however most of their images are promotional and not educational - most of them are not in our project scope. Yeah, there is some interesting photos like Korean GIrls' baseball league, however some of photos like
are potentially promotional. Do you think I should upload these photos? Regards, --레비ReviD✉CM 08:00, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- PS - Should I create category for these photos? --레비ReviD✉CM 08:01, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for looking into this. Of course, many of these images are promotional, and are not interesting for Commons. You need to select them. Think what could be used in Wikipedia. I think that providing an English description would make a huge difference about their possible use on Wikimedia. At least I think that images of sports ([2]), some electronics ([3], [4]), and some portraits ([5]) would be in scope. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:16, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
OK. Going to upload them..... --레비ReviD✉CM 08:19, 25 November 2013 (UTC)- Uploaded links in example. However, last one is portrait of not notable person and may be in trouble with Personality rights. So I did not uploaded it. --레비ReviD✉CM 08:39, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- At least the portraits of modeles could be uploaded, as there is no issue with personality rights. We already need more portraits. Yann (talk) 08:46, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- I have uploaded +20 photos today. I will do more tomorrow. :-D --레비ReviD✉CM 08:58, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- At least the portraits of modeles could be uploaded, as there is no issue with personality rights. We already need more portraits. Yann (talk) 08:46, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for looking into this. Of course, many of these images are promotional, and are not interesting for Commons. You need to select them. Think what could be used in Wikipedia. I think that providing an English description would make a huge difference about their possible use on Wikimedia. At least I think that images of sports ([2]), some electronics ([3], [4]), and some portraits ([5]) would be in scope. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:16, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
files in Category:Images from LGEPR. --레비ReviD✉CM 09:40, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
- Great! Thanks a lot! Yann (talk) 09:44, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Milvus etc..
Yann, can you delete those files please. They are not used and according to our 'local specialist' they can not be identified properly. Moreover I'm the author and I want only properly id'ed images of mine published. Thanks. B.p. 11:02, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- Hmm. These images looks quite nice. Any way, I don't think they meet any criteria for speedy deletion, especialy because they are QI or VI. Please open a regular DR. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:05, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Please review my image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Corona_(solitaire)_Layout.jpg, and let me know if it is up to Wikimedia Common's standards. I have added the link to the copyright information into the "permissions" area. I will proceed to change the rest of the images I have uploaded after you tell me if this is okay. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abehrle (talk • contribs)
Permission to use Gandhi image in Australia
Hi Yann, I live in Australia and I am making a documentary on humanitarian engineering. May I please have permission to use your image "File:Gandhi Juhu May1944.jpg" as I am featuring pictures of famous humanitarians? Or is this image already on the public domain in Australia? Thank you! Kind regards sheena — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sheena.2990 (talk • contribs)
- Hello,
- This image is in the public domain in India, and in all countries which apply the rule of shorter term. I am not sure about Australia. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:32, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Re: File:Dąbrowski Paweł Pelizzaro.jpg
I am working on description, maybe at least 10 minutes from uploading before you will take an action, please ! Vert (talk) 21:06, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
You may rename it (by removing one extra File:) and re add it or just ignore it. It seems a critically endangered sp. JKadavoor Jee
Done Back in after renaming. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:05, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
use of images
Dear Yann I am daughter and heir of the sculptor Lev Razumovsky. On November 30, 2013 I sent an email to permissions-ru@wikipedia.org allowing the use of all images on pages Разумовский, Лев Самсонович and Lev Razumovsky, and attached a copy of his will. Please can you restore the images you have deleted or advise me how to do so. I have tried to upload the images again (having renamed them first), but the system hasn't accepted them. Many thanks, Maria Razumovskaya МЛР (talk) 06:46, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Recently deleted photo reuploaded
You recently deleted File:Seramahen.jpg due to my request at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Seramahen.jpg. It has been reuploaded with the same issues at File:Serama Hen.jpg. Regards, Chipmunkdavis (talk) 10:14, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
- Done Yann (talk) 11:58, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, Chipmunkdavis (talk) 00:51, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Photo wrongly deleted
The file File:Alopekis_wirehaired.jpg was wrongly deleted. I am the original author of this photograph. It was published in my magazine in Greece (publications no longer active) and subsequently used and reproduced by many authors, with my permission, in articles about the Alopekis breed. It is also included in the article of the Greek wiki that I authored: el:Αρχείο:Alopekis_wirehaired.jpg and carries a FREE licence.
The file was wrongly deleted. I am the author of both articles and of the photo. I wish the photo re-instated.
Thank you Fainomenon (talk) 18:57, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
- Since this was previously published, we need a formal permission. Meanwhile, I restored the image and created a proper deletion request: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alopekis wirehaired.jpg. Please send a permission, or it will be deleted again. Thanks, Yann (talk) 19:13, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Dear Yann, I filed an un-delete request and I provided information about this image. It is published by the Greek wiki carrying a FREE licence. I provide the link to the Greek wiki and the file licence. What more do I need to do ? Fainomenon (talk) 19:24, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Book cover deleted
Hi Yan, you have deleted the bookcover on https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tim_Stryker&action=history due to alleged copyright violation. Working at a National Library I know that book covers are copyright free by most legislations. DO you have any reason to believe the opposite ? Svobodat (talk) 21:58, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
- Well, no. Most book covers do have a copyright. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:58, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
The wrongly deleted file
Hi Yann, I need this file restored: File:Diane Gaidry with her dog Yatahey.jpg - It has the copyright tag on it, and I took this file from the site this person owns ( the person who is the subject of this wikipedia article) and I'm acting on her behalf. There's no specific content use section on this site, so images can be re-used freely. Can you restore this file soon, or what is it exactly that has to be done, to have this image restored? Everything is fine with the copyright for this image. that's the page I'm talking about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diane_Gaidry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Indigo7771975 (talk • contribs)
- Hello,
- It seems you are not the photographer. The description mentions dianegaidry.com and "unknown author". We need a formal written permission to have this on Commons. See COM:OTRS for details. Regards. Yann (talk) 12:09, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Alvernia Studios - image license violation
Hi,
I need files to be restored - I have images directly from my client (http://alvernia.com). Please help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Satch83 (talk • contribs)
- Hello,
- Since these files were made by a third party, we need a formal written permission. See COM:OTRS for details. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:12, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Regarding File:Joseph F. Smith family.png
You closed Commons:Deletion requests/File:Joseph F. Smith family.png/2.
I'm sorry but you are 100% incorrect. Commons is very very clear. Any image that the author is unknown has to be 120 years old not 99 (see template:PD-US-unpublished. Even the source of the original image says that the image is Copyrighted. See: here] it reads "Patron Usage Instructions: c2002 Brigham Young University. All rights reserved. Except as provided above, or any use beyond what is allowed by fair use (Title 17, Section 107 U.S.C.).
How can you say there is no doubt that the image is Public Domain if there is no proof of publication prior to 1923, Author is unknown and the original source says it's copyrighted? If you don't believe me ask another administrator like Fastily. I known I'm right becuses when I first started uploading images about 10 got deleted due to this very issue.--ARTEST4ECHO talk 20:11, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
- Hello,
- I am sorry, but you are wrong. {{PD-US-unpublished}} is for unpublished works. Anonymous works published before 1923 are in the public domain in USA. The source of the image is not a proof of the copyright itself. In this case, it is called copyfraud. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:18, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
There is no copyright violation on the serama image. It was taken by me and I allow its pubblication. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NCOCEO (talk • contribs)
AGAIN, I RELEASE MY IMAGE I TOOK OF MY BIRD INTO THE PUBLIC DOMAIN.
File:Squirrel posing.jpg
|
Hello, Yann. You have new messages on another wiki at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Squirrel posing.jpg#Discussion title.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
If you have Photoshop or some other software, could you please modify the brightness and re-upload the picture? Thanks. --Alex‘s SeeSide 05:53, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
I took a photo which you require delete. NC.A — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dailyupmu (talk • contribs)
- This looks like a screenshot. Yann (talk) 10:24, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu logo.png Hi, I work at the Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, and I have a contribution when this logo was created. This is official logo of my university. Please let me use this logo. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eduard STOICA (talk • contribs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Melbourne Evening Herald flag (blue).svg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Melbourne Evening Herald flag (red).svg
Please see my comments regarding your close of the above 2 DR's at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Abusive DR. LGA talkedits 09:20, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
File renaming unsuccessful in de-Wikibooks
Hi, some days ago you tried to rename a file in b:de:Das Schreiblernbuch/ Bilderalphabet h. Unfortunately the Abusefilter 11 prevented this change. By analyzing the filter conditions I found out that the sequence color:#ffffff was detected as vandalism as well as normal text fffff or any similar "keyboard test". Now I improved the filter conditions to reject this "false positive" check. -- Juetho (talk) 11:48, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Juetho, Sorry, but I don't know which file you are talking about. Are you sure that it was me? Yann (talk) 11:54, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- b:de:Special:AbuseLog/1906 told me that you tried to change File:25-08-2008 002.JPG(FELIPE MOSTARDA SP BRASIL.JPG to File:25-08-2008 Conde Prates Building SP Brasil.jpg (16:32, 4 Dec. 2013 CET) but you weren't able to do so. You renamed this file at Commons; then CommonsDelinker changed at 16:36, 4 Dec. 2013 CET. My intention to store this message was to inform you why the abusefilter prevented your change. Everything's alright now.
-- Juetho (talk) 13:50, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- b:de:Special:AbuseLog/1906 told me that you tried to change File:25-08-2008 002.JPG(FELIPE MOSTARDA SP BRASIL.JPG to File:25-08-2008 Conde Prates Building SP Brasil.jpg (16:32, 4 Dec. 2013 CET) but you weren't able to do so. You renamed this file at Commons; then CommonsDelinker changed at 16:36, 4 Dec. 2013 CET. My intention to store this message was to inform you why the abusefilter prevented your change. Everything's alright now.
Editor @ ar.wiki
Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 14:06, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- @Avocato: Thanks, but I am quite surprised because I don't know Arabic, and I don't think I will learn it any time soon. ;o) Yann (talk) 15:00, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
I own the rights to this file. The JoeNanini.jpg file I do not own the rights to, so if you feel the need to remove it then do so, but the NinoDelPesco.jpg file is mine and belongs to no one but myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ndelpesco (talk • contribs)
Hi, Yann, I have uploaded this file to-day and I don't know what to do to get the necessary license. The file was found on the net, but if it's not publishable, I don't really mind if it's removed, although, of course, I'd rather we could keep it as it beautifully illustrates the last section of my article on Dickens's American Notes (Notes américaines). Thanks for your advice and help. Best wishes, --RF sub tegmine fagi (talk) 20:48, 7 December 2013 (UTC) (Robert Ferrieux).
- Le peintre est Leslie Arthur Wilcox, mort en 1982, cette peinture est donc sous droits d'auteur jusqu'en fin 2052. Désolé. Yann (talk) 20:57, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Images on wikipedia
Is it important for the images uploaded on wikipedia to be clicked by the editor? I recently came across some good quality images on a blog that suited an article I was editing but they were removed though I mentioned the site I was sourcing it from. I didn't know the work was copyrighted or not. I don't know how to show an image's license or the page where it's creator states that the image can be used by anybody. I have removed the images from the articles and they will be deleted after 8 days or so due to improper sourcing by me. So can I remove the copyright status messages from my talk page? Since I am not a professional photographer or someone who can produce an image's license from the page I sourced it from, will I never be able to upload an image at wikipedia? Ananya 2012 (talk) 06:00, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
OTRS permissions
Dear Yann, In continuation of your intimation regarding the need for a written permission to OTRS for use and undeletion of following files, I am informing you that, written permission from respective authors, publishers and websites have been sourced and mailed to OTRS permissions address. I hope these merit Wikipedia's expectations and the following files find speedy "undeletion" or removal from "impending deletion" lists.
File:Deevitigegalu by S. R. Ramaswamy.jpg, File:"Nagarikathegala Sangharsha" by S. R. Ramaswamy.jpg, File:Oswald Spengler on Indian Culture by Dr S.Srikanta Sastri.pdf and File:Geopolitics of India and Greater India by S. Srikanta Sastri.jpg.
With best regards --Rkkrupa (talk) 08:15, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, hopefully this permission is OK. BTW, our rules are made to protect creators, and are not intimation. If your permission is right, you should be satisfied. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:26, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Concerning the picture I uploaded, it refers to something happened on 5 september 1943 in the Netherlands, more than 70 years ago. To help you to understand, this is the wikipedia page in English: en:Dolle Dinsdag. I did not find any info about the author. So according to the EU rules about copyright it should be free to be pubblished: 70 years after the shot was taken if the author is unknown. The picture was downloaded from this website: Lis Neighborhood Rotterdam. If you feel that there is a violation of copyright, feel free to delete it, just let me know. Cheers Hypergio (talk) 20:30, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- PS I am quite sure that in the info I associated to the image i put the mentioned website as source, that the author was unknown and the picture was taken on 5 sep 1943. Sorry if I miss to put any of these info. Cheers again. Hypegio.
- @Hypergio: Hello,
- First, there is a problem about the date: in the image description, it is "5 September 1943", but in the article, it is "5 September 1944". I understand that the later is correct.
- Unfortunately, this could only be in the public domain 70 years, after its publication, which would be on 1st January 2015, supposing that it was published in 1944, right after this event.
- Last, you forget to add a license. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:44, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry... I made a mistake. You are right, the correct date is 1944. I will upload the image again the next year. And sorry for not putting the license... Even if I reachead a good level in different wiki projects, I am still new (not even 6 months) and I can make mistakes. I am going to delete the link from it:Dolle Dinsdag, so if it is in your power, delete the image imediately. Cheers Hypergio (talk) 18:01, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Done, added in Category:Undelete in 2015. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:53, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry... I made a mistake. You are right, the correct date is 1944. I will upload the image again the next year. And sorry for not putting the license... Even if I reachead a good level in different wiki projects, I am still new (not even 6 months) and I can make mistakes. I am going to delete the link from it:Dolle Dinsdag, so if it is in your power, delete the image imediately. Cheers Hypergio (talk) 18:01, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello. Please undelete this page; it is not an orphaned talk page, but an archive of Commons talk:Licensing (see link in bot archive box). The project space page was no doubt added later by the drive-by editor. Thank you. Xeriphas1994 (talk) 05:02, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- @Xeriphas1994 : Done, but I think this page should be moved somewhere else. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:35, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, and you're probably right. Xeriphas1994 (talk) 00:01, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
OLa Yann Me ensine
Ola Yann EU NAO SEI como colocar isso nas fotos São liberadas pra mim COmo faço pra colocar isso quue voce falou??? por favor me ensine. Coloco AONDE?? EM que campo?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warney Smith (talk • contribs)
Gandhi
Hi! There used to be this image of Gandhi in Commons. If i remember it right, it also was Valued Image or Quality Image. I couldn't find any DR of it. Any idea where it vanished? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 11:22, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- @Dharmadhyaksha: Yes, it was deleted because it is not free. Yann (talk) 11:24, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- As in not in PD? URAA issues? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 17:57, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, not in the PD, and not in URAA either. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:MKGandhi.jpg. Yann (talk) 18:11, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- I see. And File:MKGandhi.jpg redirects now. All the histories of article show the new image, instead of a redlink. That's probably why i couldn't locate it easily. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 07:00, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, not in the PD, and not in URAA either. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:MKGandhi.jpg. Yann (talk) 18:11, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- As in not in PD? URAA issues? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 17:57, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
I have given the clear information about this picture. I don't know why you aim at deleting it. You are the most worst user I have ever seen! --991joseph (talk) 11:40, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi, could you please restore this file. I got a OTRS-ticket ticket:2013121210009314. The permission is not sufficiant but it is hard for me to judge if this person is the copyrightholder when I can't see the file. Natuur12 (talk) 13:21, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- @Natuur12: Done. Yann (talk) 13:28, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. Natuur12 (talk) 13:45, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
VI (suite)
Bonsoir, il ne s'agit pas de fair play, mais de logique pour ne pas dire d'équité. J'ai déjà parlé du travail de retouche effectué par Jebulon, j'y ajoute un exemple récent, celui de Halavar. Il nous a fallu trois ou quatre semaines pour lui faire admettre que ses couleurs étaient trop saturées et qu'il était possible de rectifier la perspective de ses monuments. Peu à peu, il a modifié son point de vue. Je ne vois donc pas pourquoi une qualité de retouche minimum ne serait pas, elle aussi, exigible en VI pour ce qui concerne les photos ou cartes postales anciennes. Voilà le sens de mon intervention inhabituellement intempestive. Je viens d'y ajouter, puisque tu demandais de l'aide, un début de retouche de la photo de Marthe Brandès sur laquelle, bien sûr, on peut encore travailler mais qui me paraît suffisant étant donné la qualité de l'original.-- Cordialement. JLPC (talk) 17:30, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- @JLPC : Bonsoir,
- Merci pour tes modifications sur cette image, mais comme je l'ai dit dans la VIC, je ne fais pas ce type de retouche, car ce n'est personnellement pas "rentable" vu la qualité de l'original. J'aime retoucher des images, mais quand ça en vaut la peine (cf. deux d'entre elles qui sont des FP). Mais si tu veux le faire, vas-y, tu as carte blanche, mais je pense exagérer de me demander de le faire pour que ces images soient acceptées en VI. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 17:44, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Me explique como liberar fotos
Caro Yann Em primeiro lugar me desculpe, mas não conheço como upar fotos minhas. Ou que sejam governamentais e estejam liberadas pois são de divulgação nao conheço o sistema da Wiki
Por favor me explique como liberar fotos, qual licença uso e onde devo colocar tal licença e qual? entre os colchetes da mesma foto?
As fotos estão nessa pagina https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Warney_Smith Como faço para liberar elas automaticamente, como coloco a sigla para que sejam liberadas??
--Warney Smith (talk) 03:33, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Vasundhara Movie Poster file Upload
Hello Yann,
I really don't understand what is wrong with me uploading the file to commons as I have got the rights from the production team to add these images online.
Please let me know how to take this forward as I'm new to wiki commons.
Regards, Vishwas — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.51.144.138 (talk • contribs)
- As for all professional material, we require that you send a formal written permission. See COM:OTRS for details. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:33, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Максим_Олегович_Тимошенко.JPG
Photo Максим_Олегович_Тимошенко.JPG was made special for wikipedia and was taken by http://ludinaroku.com.ua/archive/person/903 only after it was downloaded to wikipedia. Please, replace it back. Thanks for understanding and your assistance. Timosh2011 (talk) 17:22, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Please stop that user; we've revert one picture he/she wrongly featured. Jee 14:16, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
The deleted picture is under Licence: CC Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 --> https://wikipixel.fr/blog/wikipixel-senvole-a-seoul-et-tokyo-avec-la-ministre-fleur-pellerin/ May you undelete it?
Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by DylanGoubin (talk • contribs)
- @DylanGoubin: Done. Yann (talk) 21:54, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
This DR
I did file a separate DR on this image by the uploader and he still says to keep in the DR above. Could you make a comment in the DR? PS: I also filed a flickr unfree message on the uploader's talkpage to tell him that images with a non-Commercial restriction is not OK. But he still thinks its acceptable in the above DR where the image has an NC restriction. As for the speedy delete, I thought the UAE image has major FOP issues--and it was not in use--so perhaps a speedy delete was OK in this case. That is why I did not file this DR. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:03, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: As a principle, pictures taken by Commons contributors which have no-FOP issues should not be speedy deleted. Another admin will close it in due time. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:05, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- OK. Thank you for telling me about this rule for pictures taken by Commons contributors with no non-FOP issues. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:24, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: Speedy deletion nominations should only be used for "obvious copyright violations". No-FOP issues are nearly always not that obvious. There are many factors involved: age of the depicted object, whether it is de minimis or not, etc. Yann (talk) 10:44, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- OK. Thank you for telling me about this rule for pictures taken by Commons contributors with no non-FOP issues. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:24, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:23, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
This image has a big derivative poster. Perhaps you know if it should be passed or failed. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:34, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Not sure, may be the poster does not have a copyright because it is not registered. Please create a deletion request. Yann (talk) 19:54, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
2014 !
|
* * * 2014! * * * |
| Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Happy holidays! -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:00, 22 December 2013 (UTC) |
Happy Holidays
|
Happy Holidays! |
| G'day, just a quick greeting wishing you and your family happy holidays and all the best for 2014. And of course, a big thank you for putting a leg up by doing what you do on Commons, and helping to make it the fantastic project that it is. Greetings from a warm west coast of Aussie. russavia (talk) 01:53, 24 December 2013 (UTC) |
Photo of the High School "Dante Alighieri" - Rome
Hallo! I have noticed that you have just deleted the following file: Liceo Dante Alighieri-Roma.jpg|thumb|250px|
The image that I had loaded is taken directly from the web page of the High School "Dante Alighieri" of Rome, where I am a teacher. It is not subject to any copyright and may be used freely. In particular, it has been extracted from the following URL: http://www.liceodantealighieri.it/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Where-we-are1.pdf . I hope that you could reconsider your decision. Greetings. Teo Orlando
Holiday wishes
|
||||
YGM
 | Hello, Yann. Check your email—you've got mail! You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template. |
- Thanks in advance. LGA talkedits 07:25, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Avertissement Google
Bonjour, Il serait préférable d'enlever l'avertissement de Google au début des scans avant d'importer les fichiers sur Commons. Je peux vous aider si nécessaire. Cordialement, Yann (d) 09:20, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
Merci beaucoup de cette indication.
A vrai dire j'ai toujours laissé les avertissements tant pour les fichiers Google que pour les fichiers Gallica ou les fichiers des autres bibliothèques.
Je peux faire en sorte de les enlever désormais ; en revanche pour modifier les fichiers déjà corrigés en grande partie. par exemple File:Le Nivernois - Album, 1840, T1.djvu je pense que je devrais remplacer les pages d'avertissement par des pages vierges pour ne pas modifier la pagination. Par ailleurs, si je découvre après coup une page manquante, et que je doive la rajouter, je ne connais pas d'autre solution que de créer un nouveau fichier et de détruire l'ancien ensuite.
En tout cas merci de toute aide précieuse. Bien cordialement Pibewiki (talk) 10:29, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
- @Pibewiki: Oui, c'est ce que j'ai fait pour les fichiers que j'ai modifiés. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 10:34, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
Feliz navidad retrasada
|
Feliz Navidad |
| Joyeux Noël frère. J'espère que cette fois vous pouvez l'utiliser comme je l'ai effectivement fait récemment (à venir rendre visite à ma grand-mère), avec la famille et les amis. C'est un moment idéal pour partager et faire un peu de charité pour le prochain. Laissant de côté les différences que nous avons parfois à ces gens que nous aimons. De même, je vous souhaite une bonne fin d'année partie. Un câlinWilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 00:26, 26 December 2013 (UTC) |
please undelete
Hi Yann, you have deleted two files, 09-39-gkchp.jpg and ABZ Moskau.jpg, which were clearly marked as PD-RU-exempt (news reports). Please read the template, and undelete both files. --Matrikelpartikel (talk) 13:02, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- @Matrikelpartikel: These are copyright violations. You need to read COM:L. Thanks, Yann (talk) 13:06, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- Hi again, i have certainly read it. You should read the template PD-RU-exempt. News reports from Russia and USSR are exempt. --Matrikelpartikel (talk) 13:21, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- @Matrikelpartikel: These are NOT news reports, but pictures. Yann (talk) 13:24, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- News reports are in no way restricted to text-only. --Matrikelpartikel (talk) 13:33, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- So therefore, please undelete the two files. --Matrikelpartikel (talk) 13:49, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- @Matrikelpartikel: Sorry, but no. As I said, these are NOT news reports. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:05, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- Ok, RIA Novosti is a news agency and publishes news reports. Where can i appeal your decision? --Matrikelpartikel (talk) 14:44, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- @Matrikelpartikel: Sorry, but no. As I said, these are NOT news reports. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:05, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- So therefore, please undelete the two files. --Matrikelpartikel (talk) 13:49, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- News reports are in no way restricted to text-only. --Matrikelpartikel (talk) 13:33, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- @Matrikelpartikel: These are NOT news reports, but pictures. Yann (talk) 13:24, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- Hi again, i have certainly read it. You should read the template PD-RU-exempt. News reports from Russia and USSR are exempt. --Matrikelpartikel (talk) 13:21, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Two questions
Questions for you at:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of the Commonwealth of Nations.svg
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Meyers Blitz-Lexikon
Thanks, . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:18, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
BSicon request
Hi, could you please delete File:BSicon uvSTRr.svg and File:BSicon RP1q-.svg (redirects)? Other files need to be moved to that names. YLSS (talk) 12:32, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- @YLSS: Done Yann (talk) 12:34, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, that was fast! YLSS (talk) 12:35, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Excuse me, I do not understand anything. Why delete my pictures? What license can be if these pictures freely available? I read the rules, but they are not clear even in my language. I do not need to block, I'm not special. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jorjiana Kempl (talk • contribs)
Hello.
I speak Russian. But what can I do, if I write an article about a celebrity. I can not make her own photo. Decided to find on the Internet.
I do not even know where to write a response to the letter. T_T
Suppression des images sur les pages françaises de Belk Bow et Pinstripe Bowl
Bonsoir, J'ai bien reçu vos deux messages relatifs à la suppression des images importées (logos du Belk Bowl et du Pinstripe Bowl). Je dois probablement avoir mal rempli les données demandées lors de l'importation des fichiers. je n'en suis qu'à mes débuts sur Wiki et je trouve tout ca vraiment compliqué. Ces logos figurent déjà sur les pages anglaises de ces mêmes bowls. Je ne comprend donc pas pourquoi elles devraient e^tre retitrées sur les pages françaises ....Apparement sur les pages anglaises il ne faut pas d'autorisation pour copier ces images. En effet sur les sites officiels de ces évènements les logos peuvent etre "copier coler" (pas de copyright). Le "wiki cmmns ne concerne-t-il que les images "françaises" car lorsque je fais une recherche de ces images sur "commons FR" je ne les trouve pas ? Dans l'attente de vos nouvelles. Amicalement--Denvis1 (talk) 16:12, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
- @Denvis1: Bonjour,
- Tous les logos ont un copyright par défaut, à moins qu'ils ne soient vraiment très simples (uniquement du texte et des figures géométriques simples). Sur WP en anglais, les logos peuvent être publiés sous "fair use", mais WM Commons n'accepte pas les fichiers sous "fair use". N’hésitez pas à me demander si nécessaire. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 16:16, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Dear Admin Yann,
Can you please close this DR by JuTa as keep. JuTa has been away for several days. The uploader has updated the licenses for his other images. I have to sign off now and go to work but he saw my message to his talkpage 8 hours ago. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 17:11, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thank You. Sorry, I was away from home for work. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:56, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, you wrote [6] that you kept one image. But you deleted the image for which I wrote that it falls under FoP-Spain. As I remember the deleted File:Son Servera 03 ies.jpg only shows a part of File:Son Servera 01 ies.jpg (which was not nominated for deletion by nobody, but you added "kept" [7]). I think this is confusing a bit. Can you look again and restore perhaps? Holger1959 (talk) 19:41, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
- Ah ok. Effectively, I was confused. Restored. Yann (talk) 19:49, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
- thank you! Holger1959 (talk) 03:25, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. I reached the same conclusion you did in your comment -- that the DR was a mess and I was slowly working though them.
When we get DRs like this one, I'd like to do a speedy keep and tell the nom to bring it back in pieces with a little more research. Trouble with that, though, is that the nom may not bother to bring it back, in which case the problems that are in the DR will remain on Commons. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:48, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Ready, pelase see if all is Ok. Thanks for your advise Ezarateesteban 13:43, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Images de Temoudje sans licence
Bonjour,
Je viens de voir le message que tu as laissé sur la PDD de Temoudje à propos d'images sans licence. Cette utilisatrice a à priori quitté Commons mais je suis repassé sur la plupart des versement qu'elle a réalisés quand elle était en stage à la bibliothèque de Brest et j'ai pu supprimer un bandeau de licence par inadvertance (on m'a signalé un cas ce midi). Ta remarque concernait-elle un autre fichier que File:Rhodymenia palmata.jpg ? J'ai lancé un CatScan mais je n'en ai pas trouvé d'autre. --EdouardHue (talk) 18:24, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- @EdouardHue: Oui. cf. Category:Media without a license: needs history check. Perso, je prefererai que le modele {{Album de plantes marines naturelles}} soit substitué ({{subst:Album de plantes marines naturelles}}). Tu devrais pouvoir trouver les fichiers sans licence avec [8]. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 18:46, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- Bonjour à vous,
Je n'ai pas vraiment quitté Commons, j'ai juste un peu mis mon activité entre parenthèses, pour cause de travail intense (et de changement d'emploi). Je vais corriger ces problèmes de licence.
Biografía.pdf
Concerning this — it was a misworded closing remark: This file should be deleted because it is a PDF, outside the narrow scope of acceptable PDF files. It is not out of scope (subject is a documentary film director mentioned in several articles of w:es), and its contents would have been accepted as in scope should they had been presented as separate images files and text in w:es. -- Tuválkin ✉ 19:40, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
André Michelin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Charles Nungesser.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paul Vaillant-Couturier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
){kind=link}
_Layout.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg_and_Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Melbourne_Evening_Herald_flag_(red).svg){kind=link}
![56 File:Debbie Reynolds Auction - Ingrid Bergman signature full suit of armor with chain mail vest from "Joan of Arc" (2).jpg](#File:Debbie_Reynolds_Auction_-_Ingrid_Bergman_signature_full_suit_of_armor_with_chain_mail_vest_from_"Joan_of_Arc"_(2).jpg){kind=link}
_Layout.jpg){kind=link}
_Layout.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_by_Randall,_Jone_E.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
![[7]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File_talk:Son_Servera_01_ies.jpg&oldid=112725504){kind=link}
,_d%C3%A9l%C3%A9gu%C3%A9_indochinois,_Congr%C3%A8s_communiste_de_Marseille,_1921,_Meurisse,_BNF_Gallica.jpg){kind=link}