Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rådhuset metro station June 2015.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2015 at 12:17:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info Rådhuset metro station, Stockholm. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 12:17, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Support -- ArildV (talk) 12:17, 3 November 2015 (UTC)- Support I thought something like this exist only in Helsinki --Ralf Roleček 12:24, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Ivar (talk) 12:51, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:30, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support This is amazing Sakhalinio (talk) 13:57, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support Great work! --Yann (talk) 14:38, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 14:41, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support sure --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:09, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:23, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Maire (talk) 15:46, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Böhringer (talk) 15:53, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 16:32, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support interesting --Mile (talk) 16:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support Like from the best science fiction movie. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 17:13, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Weak Support DoF a little bit too small, may be tilted CW. But: Very nice and wonderful composition. --XRay talk 17:25, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support interesting --Mile (talk) 16:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:59, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support POTY finalist of course --The Photographer (talk) 18:25, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 18:49, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support my vote is superfluous, but I do it anyway
--LivioAndronico (talk) 19:08, 3 November 2015 (UTC) - Support --Code (talk) 20:05, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- wow! Amazing station! Great composition as well! Nikhil (talk) 05:51, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- weak support Yes it's an amazing place, but a bit spoiled by execution. Architectural subject shall have "horizontal lines" not skewed IMO. Still a great wow. - Benh (talk) 11:23, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support Not perfect—the man on the escalator is a little motion-blurred—but so what? +1 to Johann's comment. Daniel Case (talk) 18:43, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support Wow! --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:22, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Weak oppose Unbalanced compositon.--Verde78 (talk) 12:00, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Unbalanced composition ? --The Photographer (talk) 12:09, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Love the pic, but I see his point. While the lines on the ground are level with the "horizon" the escalator is not. Moreover, that massive pillar on the right does give the impression the composition is weighted to the right as well. Saffron Blaze (talk) 17:58, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Unbalanced composition ? --The Photographer (talk) 12:09, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
