User talk:Region of Peel Archives

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Revision as of 02:37, 6 May 2021 by Region of Peel Archives (talk | contribs) (thanks!)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Region of Peel Archives!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:33, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:1877 Peel Atlas pg86 PN2019 21871-88.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:1877 Peel Atlas pg86 PN2019 21871-88.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:08, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed the issue with these files. Mindmatrix 19:21, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Mindmatrix! -- Region of Peel Archives (talk) 02:27, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

thanks!

[edit]

Thanks for your recent uploads!

Thanks for the heads up that you had nominated older, less detailed uploads for deletion.

Deleting older, less detailed versions, when a new version is uploaded, is not controversial, not when they are essentially duplicates, except one version is of higher resolution. Deleting the older version doesn't require a deletion discussion. We have a special tag, {{Duplicate}} for those.

User {{duplicate|File:example.jpg}} where example.jpg is the superior version.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 20:20, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, cool, thank you! Should I replace the nominations with this template, or let the nominations be closed by an admin? -- Region of Peel Archives (talk) 02:37, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]