Commons:Deletion requests/2024/08/15

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

August 15

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is a derivative work of Lasinpuhaltaja (Q65238846), a 1960 sculpture by Kalervo Kallio (1909–1969; Q5898122), located in Riihimäki, Finland. The original work (the sculpture) is still under copyright and thus not in public domain until 2040-01-01. Freedom of panorama is for buildings only in Finland. Apalsola tc 00:12, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


A guide in Finland for photographing public art objects (e.g. sculptures) says, free translation from Finnish: "Photographing a work of art, such as a sculpture, is allowed when the work is permanently placed in or in the immediate vicinity of a public place. If the work is the main subject, the image may not be used for commercial purposes. A photograph of such a work may not be published as the main subject for gainful purposes and, for example, a postcard must be authorised by the rightholder. "

Source https://www.finnfoto.fi/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Kaytannon-opas-valokuvaajan-tekijänoikeudesta.pdf - in Finnish, chapter 12.1.4. Finnfoto is (free translation from website of Finnfoto): "Finnfoto ry represents and works for the whole photographic industry. We develop the appreciation and status of photography and those working in the field. Finnfoto represents both professional and amateur photographers. We strive to strengthen photographers' copyrights and their enforcement. We also develop photographers' ability to market and sell their images and services." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:99a:846:3300:a897:d953:3cdb:463e (talk • contribs)

Unfortunately, the "the image may not be used for commercial purposes" is the problem. Images uploaded to commons must be free also for commercial use. --PaterMcFly (talk) 11:15, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Very many wikipedia lists of public sculptures/monuments in Finnish cities have similar photos, and there are other similar photos in the Riihimäki list, too. If this particular photo is removed, there will be a massive task ahead to remove other similar photos of public sculptures that do not have explicit permission from the sculptor.
I very much wonder about this requirement, as I understand it is not in line with the Finnish guidelines on photography (such as the Finnfoto ry guidelines). And it will change very much the content of wiki commons. PenHei (talk) 06:26, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The photographs of copyrighted sculptures in the Wikipedia lists are (or should be) saved into Wikipedia projects instead of Commons. See fi:Tiedosto:Toripolliisi.jpg for example. However, in Commons commercial use must be possible. ––Apalsola tc 14:19, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:30, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo was not taken by a USDA government employee. The description states it was taken by a school principal. Missvain (talk) 00:36, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:27, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The channel that uploaded this video to YouTube, Combating Islam, has re-uploaded this video under an unlawful CC license, since the video is not originally under CC license by its original uploader, JihadWatchVideo of Robert Spencer (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1r1tU53s-KA). Several more videos like this have been uploaded unlawfully, under Category:Videos by Combating Islam. Thismess (talk) 00:45, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was under the impression that Spencer was collaborating with the channel. But please go ahead and delete if i'm wrong Trade (talk) 00:54, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Spencer publishes his videos on his own JihadWatchVideo channel as I mentioned. And under no CC license. Thismess (talk) 01:09, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: already deleted by Minorax. --Rosenzweig τ 09:27, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Videos by Combating Islam

The channel that uploaded these videos to YouTube, Combating Islam, has re-uploaded these videos under an unlawful CC license, since the videos are not originally under CC license by its original uploader, JihadWatchVideo (of Robert Spencer) --Thismess (talk) 00:56, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:27, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yann is a self promotionist and a liar about own work. 186.175.149.235 01:20, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:13, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

露骨に性的なものであるため HST39 (talk) 01:37, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete typical dick pic Dronebogus (talk) 14:26, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Gbawden. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Good-looking, healty teeth, but is he in scope? 186.175.149.235 02:29, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Supposedly an activist: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q125208158 who got some (minimal, but international) media coverage [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] and some local coverage [8][9][10] (not sure whether this establishes notability). Nakonana (talk) 21:52, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:16, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What is the scope of this file? 186.175.149.235 02:30, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:16, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Why would he be in scope? 186.175.149.235 02:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:16, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file already has its updated version without misspelled titles and incorrectly made file. ATE205 (talk) 02:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:04, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

He looks more like self-promotion activist than climate activist. 186.175.149.235 02:33, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @186.175.149.235, It is important to notify that Kevin Ossah is a recognized Togolese climate activist with a long-standing commitment to environmental protection. His actions and initiatives on the ground reflect his dedication to the climate cause, and he is valued for his positive impact in Togo and beyond. His picture is not for self-promotion as you thought. You can find below some links about Mr Kevin. Thank you!
https://oceans-news.com/kevin-ossah-activiste-climat-et-environnementaliste-singulier/
https://vert-togo.tg/kevin-ossah-prend-part-au-sommet-des-jeunes-sur-le/
https://www.societecivilemedias.com/2021/11/25/interview-tout-savoir-sur-le-projet-de-renforcement-de-lengagement-des-jeunes-et-des-femmes-a-laction-climatique/
https://vert-togo.tg/togo-reduire-lutilisation-du-bois-avec-le-biogaz/energiiii/
https://www.letemps.ch/videos/actualite/kevin-ossah-togo-defi-lerosion-cotiere Akouete (talk) 21:15, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:16, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 02:59, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:27, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, artist Pascale Marthine Tayou is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:27, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:27, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:02, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:27, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:02, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:27, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:03, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:27, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:03, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:27, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, the last surviving architect died in 2007 A1Cafel (talk) 03:14, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:51, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, the last surviving architect died in 2007 A1Cafel (talk) 03:14, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:51, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, the last surviving architect died in 2007 A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Merci pour votre message.
je pensais qu'il s'agissait d'un bâtiment public non protégé mais après vérification je constate "que La France ne reconnaît aucune exception au droit d'auteur pour les œuvres d'art ou bâtiments protégés qui se trouvent sur la voie publique." Voir Commons:FOP France (en anglais). Cette catégorie sert à classer les demandes de suppression concernant la FOP en France.
Je n'ai donc pas d'argument pour m'opposer à la suppression de cette image.
Cordialement Wikibphil (talk) 15:57, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:31, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building was completed in 1996 by Dominique Perrault (1953–). There is no freedom of panorama in France, permission from the architect is required.

A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quite right: no FoP-France indeed. I sent an e-mail to the architect requesting permission. Vysotsky (talk) 07:39, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. (Files may be undeleted if proper VRT permission from copyright holder is recieived). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:32, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Satellite images from Digital Typhoon are copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 03:37, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:17, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Carte fantaisiste non sourcée qui induit les gens en erreur 2A01:CB11:805F:62B0:51AF:160C:E41A:5E85 03:52, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Sourced and in use. --Achim55 (talk) 12:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:17, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This gallery page has only one image, that is not enough "to present readers with a structured and meaningful collection of the media". (See Commons:Galleries.) JopkeB (talk) 04:15, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:17, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: nonsense AI-generated infographics and maps, unused outside a user sandbox.

Omphalographer (talk) 04:17, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as garbled diagrams and maps (China marked as EUROPE, the Indian Ocean as NOCTIAL AWERICA), no plausible educational uses for this. Belbury (talk) 13:41, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:36, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

AI-generated images of schoolchildren with misgenerated hands and faces, only in use in the uploader's es.wikipedia.org sandbox. Commons has many genuine photos of school pupils.

Belbury (talk) 09:57, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:36, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gallery page with only one image. That is not enough "to present readers with a structured and meaningful collection of media" (see Commons:Galleries). JopkeB (talk) 05:00, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:17, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. -- Karim (talk) 05:26, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:SS. --Yann (talk) 17:18, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.instagram.com/zakho.tourism.media/ Yann (talk) 06:46, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:36, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, have alternatives at Category:3,3-Dimethylbutanal. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 06:47, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:18, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as his insta profile pic - https://www.instagram.com/amanmeetsingh_/reels/ - think we need VRT Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: procedural close, already deleted. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:05, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The main body of these photos are outer packaging and may be protected by copyright. --Thyj (talk) 06:55, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, some. E.g. File:HK TST 尖沙咀 Tsim Sha Tsui 柯士甸道 140 Austin Road Market Place by Jasons Supermarket goods Thai Soymilk product brand 大力獅 Lactasoy September 2022 Px3 03.jpg might be ok, as it contains only text. The text on the label of a milk package is probably not original enough to be protected by copyright. PaterMcFly (talk) 11:19, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A photo of a person who died in 1994 cannot be «own work» dated 2024. Leokand (talk) 07:20, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The description says it's from the 1950s. Nakonana (talk) 22:04, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, seen elsewhere online years before Commons; unlikely to be work of uploader. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:34, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

identická stránka s https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Jakubin%C3%A1 Akul59 (talk) 07:29, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:19, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tommy Duxoo (talk · contribs)

Photographs of art events in Italy by living artists. No permission.
NB: Some photos might be de minimis, but this should be checked in this DR.

Ruthven (msg) 07:51, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt any are de minimis and would suggest deletion per the precautionary principle unless the copyright holders contact COM:VRT. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:51, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ixocactus as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: unfree source
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion about whether these lines do reach COM:TOO at all. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:57, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It seems this newspaper is published in the US, and thus I'd clearly say this is well below COM:TOO and is a perfect fit for {{PD-text}} PaterMcFly (talk) 11:23, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:20, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by I.schjol (talk · contribs)

Questionable authorship claims; based on the low resolutions and missing metadata.

0x0a (talk) 08:19, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:21, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 08:38, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:52, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 08:38, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:52, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Billboards are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 08:40, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:52, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Billboards are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 08:41, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This billboard is not like other billboards. It's a caricature of an advertisement that has always been in this form at the Boomgaardstraat as a piece of art, as this is a side street of the Witte de Withstraat, a street with multiple art galleries. Vera (talk) 18:36, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; COM:DW - much of the billboard (or artwork, whatever one calls it) is a clearly copyrightable modern photo, not work of Flickr photographer who lacks authority to license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:36, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:42, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


  •  Keep This billboard is not a 2D object because two dimensional (2D) shapes do not have any thickness, while this billboard has thickness which is much larger than in paintings (e.g. graffiti). -- Pofka (talk) 20:08, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The photo of the basketball player is clearly COM:DW, Flickr photographer does not have authority to license original photo contained in the billboard. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:38, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Billboards are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 08:43, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:52, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 08:45, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Comment COM:GRAFFITI might be applicable. Nakonana (talk) 22:07, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & precaution; looks much more like mural than graffiti. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:39, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 08:45, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Comment COM:GRAFFITI might be applicable. Nakonana (talk) 22:09, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & similar listing; does not appar to be graffiti (illegally/unofficially placed). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 08:47, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Comment billboard image can be edited out as it is not the focus of the image. As for the billboard image itself, it's mostly just text and the scrambled text logo of the Russian TV channel TNT (Russian: ТНТ). That logo is on Commons: Category:TNT (Russia) logos. Nakonana (talk) 22:18, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The photo of the person on the billboard is clearly over minimis. A modified version of the photo would probably be ok with the billboard blurred or the top part of photo cropped; may be submitted to graphics lab if you wish. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:43, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Per the nominator. The billboard is the main visual element of the photograph. So I don't think it's de minimis. Just because something doesn't take up 99% of an image doesn't mean it's minimal. That's not how de minimis works. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:31, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:17, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 08:47, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:52, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 08:47, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:52, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 08:48, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:52, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Italy, artist Romano Romanelli died in 1968 A1Cafel (talk) 08:54, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:52, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Italy, artist Romano Romanelli died in 1968 A1Cafel (talk) 08:54, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:17, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Italy, artist Romano Romanelli died in 1968 A1Cafel (talk) 08:54, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:52, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JoSheref99 (talk · contribs)

Personal photos by non-Wikipedian.

-- Karim (talk) 09:05, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:22, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission, copyrighted image see metadata - (c)2003 Animation Factory - www.animfactory.com Hoyanova (talk) 09:14, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:40, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

XKCD is under an NC license. Randall Monroe has relicensed a couple comics for Wikipedia, but there's no evidence this is one of them. Prosfilaes (talk) 09:31, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 License."--Loodog (talk) 11:55, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But you've uploaded it here as CC-Attribution, dropping the NonCommercial. Commons doesn't host NonCommercial CC licenced content.
 Speedy delete. Belbury (talk) 17:11, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:34, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission see metadata - Author Copyright Great Picture Netherlands www.greatpicture.nl Copyright holder Eigendom: henny vegt Bewerken niet toegestaan! Hoyanova (talk) 09:39, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:40, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, personal image. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 09:42, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Appears to be a copy of File:2108050024 Mukmin Amsidi Foto Berwarna kecil.jpg (which is used on a user page). Nakonana (talk) 22:24, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Both. Personal image of a non-contributor. Taylor 49 (talk) 23:22, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted all files by this user (copyvio or spam). Taylor 49 (talk) 19:49, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:26, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:36, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal photo. Gikü (talk) 10:30, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Appears to be a Romanian scholar / academic judging by Google Scholar [11], but the image is also used on the page of this veterinary association [12], so not sure about copyright. There was also a Wiki article on him on Romanian Wikipedia which got deleted on 15 August [13] by the filer. Nakonana (talk) 22:34, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:05, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Almost exact copy of File:Центральный офис компании в Москве.jpg Drakosh (talk) 10:39, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pas poto 186.175.17.127 10:41, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:42, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No scope. 186.174.169.20 10:43, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:43, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE? Geohakkeri (talk) 10:52, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:52, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work? 186.174.169.20 10:56, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:44, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused crop, unnecessary file 186.174.169.20 10:57, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poto Rudy. Not own work. 186.174.169.20 11:03, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? The description doesn't say the subject is the photographer. However, it also doesn't really say who the subject is, thus this is quite unusable. PaterMcFly (talk) 11:36, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Therefore? 186.174.169.20 13:15, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You should be providing a valid deletion rational. And the claim that it is not own work is unsubstantiated, so that is not a reason to delete the image. PaterMcFly (talk) 10:40, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:WEBHOST. --Yann (talk) 17:45, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Putita, esto no es trabajo propio. 186.174.169.20 11:23, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file is copyrighted by GMM TV (Image Original Source) (Image Original Webpage) not as claimed by the user Minener's (talk) 14:12, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:45, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As requested Ralffralff (talk) 11:34, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by EugeneZelenko. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As requested Ralffralff (talk) 11:36, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:31, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As requested Ralffralff (talk) 11:36, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:31, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Concerning this photo. It couble be copyright violation. Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 11:45, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I agree, very blurred and thus probably copied from somewhere. PaterMcFly (talk) 10:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:46, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{GODL-India}} seems somewhat far-fetched here. Geohakkeri (talk) 11:55, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just going to comment that the reason I chose GODL as the license as the archived OFB link (at the time) is under government control (Plus I'm not sure of any other India-based license that would work). Ominae (talk) 05:39, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:46, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Speedy delete Copyvio. Nike copyrighted work. -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:58, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:20, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chart is a personal creation with no legend or definition of its content; it also makes POV claims about countries, here again with no reliable source Moumou82 (talk) 12:08, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chart is a personal creation with no legend or definition of its content; it also makes POV claims about countries, here again with no reliable source Moumou82 (talk) 12:08, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chart is a personal creation with no legend or definition of its content; it also makes POV claims about countries, here again with no reliable source Moumou82 (talk) 12:09, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:09, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Don’t need this one Bha.p (talk) 12:17, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:32, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chart is a personal creation with no legend or definition of its content so cannot be used Moumou82 (talk) 12:29, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:09, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to use it somewhere else without it being a duplicate. Fani Miya (talk) 12:36, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:24, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to use it somewhere else without it being a duplicate. Fani Miya (talk) 12:37, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:24, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to use it somewhere else without it being a duplicate. Fani Miya (talk) 12:39, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:25, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to use it somewhere else without it being a duplicate. Fani Miya (talk) 12:42, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:25, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

AI-generated image that looks nothing like the photos of actual cucur cakes in Category:Cucur, or elsewhere on the internet. Belbury (talk) 12:42, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:47, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to use it somewhere else without it being a duplicate. Fani Miya (talk) 12:43, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:24, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This 1921 German Notgeld (emergency money) bill is a work of Hans Christian Delfs, who died in 1956. So it is not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2027. Rosenzweig τ 12:43, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:53, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional flag imagined by the uploader. Out of COM:SCOPE and unused. Gikü (talk) 12:44, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same goes for File:Anoide TV (2024-prezent).png, which is only used in user's own test page on rowiki. Gikü (talk) 12:45, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:47, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio; artworks by Willy Charles Erismann (1920–1989), no fop. Martin Sg. (talk) 12:49, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:45, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio; artworks from 1989 or later, no fop.

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:54, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:17, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je veux le changer Zjfldaldk (talk) 12:56, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:23, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:HŽPP 1141 382 + 1141 389 (53180861044).jpg MaGa 13:11, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + turned into a redir. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:42, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not my personal website. 186.174.169.20 13:14, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:48, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No he salido bien. 186.174.169.20 13:15, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:48, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture, not in use. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 13:16, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:48, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung - Urheber soll die abgebildete Person sein, es handelt sich allerdings nicht um ein Selfie Lutheraner (talk) 13:18, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: procedural close - already deleted. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:09, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is extracted from a conference paper presented at the 26th Conference on Severe Local Storms held by the American Meteorological Society, Poster Session P7, 3:00 PM-4:15 PM: Wednesday, 7 November 2012, Loews Vanderbilt Hotel, Nashville. The paper is downloadable in PDF format here. The photo is on page 2 and was taken near near Calumet, Oklahoma, shortly after May 24, 2011.

The conference paper was co-authored by four people, three of whom were employees of the NWS, and one an employee of a private enterprise, Haag Engineering Co., Irving, Texas. The paper doesn't identify the source of the photo; whether it was one of the four authors or someone else entirely.

The uploader has tagged it with {{PD-NWS}}, claiming that it is in the public domain because:

  • it was "stored on the web servers of the U.S. National Weather Service" and
  • the NWS Sioux Falls regional office once hosted a photo competition where a condition of entry was that any submitted photo "is being released into the public domain"

However, putting aside any scrutiny of these two rationales in this instance: because we don't know who actually took it, we have no evidence that this photo was taken by a federal government employee in the course of their duties (which would have made it ineligible for copyight in the first place) or that, if copyright ever did exist over this image, we have no evidence of permission that it was ever transferred into the public domain.

Works created in the US since 1989 do not need to be published with a copyright notice or to have their copyright registered in order to be protected. The conference paper was published in 2011.

The source, as given by the uploader, is not hosted on an NWS web server, nor is there any evidence that it ever was.

Nor is there any evidence to suggest that it was ever entered into a photo competition at NWS Sioux Falls.

In short, there is no evidence to suggest this photo is in the public domain or available under a free license. Rlandmann (talk) 13:30, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Neutral per WeatherWriter. Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs) 01:21, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Neutral per WeatherWriter. ChessEric (talk) 04:49, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per PCP. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used due to copyright reasons 178.232.25.55 07:03, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • You risk legal consequences if a textlogo is not removed from Wikidata? Is that Commons' issue? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:32, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm not sure if this is a direct issue for Wikimedia Commons, but we hope that you can cooperate and assist us in this matter, as it is important for our organization. If there is a more appropriate channel or procedure for requesting the removal of this file, please let us know, and we will gladly follow the necessary steps. I've now removed the image from our Wikidata page. Brandhaug (talk) 08:22, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Martin, vi forstår ikke det underliggende problemet. Please explain. --Achim55 (talk) 11:54, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a previous logo of Strise AS. During its usage, a large company approached us claiming that our logo bore a striking resemblance to theirs. They threatened us with a lawsuit if we didn't modify our logo. Although their case may or may not have been strong, as a small company, we lack the resources to defend ourselves in a legal battle. Consequently, we have updated our logo to feature a capital 'S' and are now making efforts to eliminate the old logo from the internet. Brandhaug (talk) 12:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That sounds like a trademark case. Commons does not enforce trademarks. I think the solution here would be to keep it, with the caption that this used to be Strise's logo and was changed because of the request of [Name of Company, if you'd like to provide it], which claimed it was too similar to their logo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no longer in use, and there is no article for this company in any WP; out of scope. --P 1 9 9   18:02, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted: as per [14]. Yann (talk) 11:45, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subject: Request for Deletion of File: Strise Logo Registered RGB.png Due to Trademark Concerns and Non-Educational Use File: File .png Reason for Deletion: I am writing to formally request the deletion of the above-referenced file due to concerns related to trademark usage, the promotional nature of the content, and its lack of educational value. Justification: Trademark Considerations: While the Strise logo itself is not a registered trademark, "Strise" as a wordmark is registered and protected. The use of the Strise logo on Wikimedia Commons is not approved by the trademark holder. Unauthorized use of the logo on this platform may lead to confusion about our brand and its appropriate representation. Lack of Permission: The trademark holder, Strise AS, does not accept or endorse the use of the logo on Wikimedia Commons. The use of our logo in this context was not authorized, and we request its removal to prevent any potential issues related to our trademark rights. Advertising Nature of the Logo: The Strise logo primarily serves as a branding and promotional tool, which does not align with Wikimedia Commons' guidelines that prioritize content with educational value. The logo does not contribute to the educational mission of Wikimedia Commons and is instead used to represent the commercial identity of Strise AS. Non-Educational Purpose: The file does not provide any significant educational benefit or value to Wikimedia Commons users. Its primary purpose is related to brand identity and marketing, which does not align with the goals of the platform. As such, it should not be hosted on a platform that prioritizes educational content. Impact on External Stakeholders: Due to its presence on Wikimedia Commons, the incorrect logo is often the first result when searching for "Strise" on Google. This has led to partners, customers, and others copying and using the wrong logo in their materials, which creates inconsistency and confusion about our brand. Moreover, this widespread misuse can lead to misunderstandings regarding our contractual obligation to always present the logo with a capital "S." Such misunderstandings can affect our contractual agreements and further complicate our brand management efforts. Compliance with Wikimedia Commons Policies: Considering that the logo is used in a promotional context and does not align with the educational objectives of Wikimedia Commons, it is in violation of the platform's policies. We believe the file should be removed to maintain the integrity of Wikimedia Commons as a repository of freely usable educational media. Request: We kindly request that the file be removed from Wikimedia Commons to prevent further unauthorized use of our logo, ensure compliance with our trademark policies, and uphold the educational standards of the platform. If you require any further information or documentation regarding our trademark rights, the promotional nature of the logo, or the issues caused by its misuse, please do not hesitate to contact us. Thank you for your understanding and prompt attention to this matter. Best regards, Magnus Hagem, Head of Legal at Strise AS 195.0.152.250 13:38, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Question I wonder, would overwriting [15] the Commons logo with the new company logo help resolve the issue in a way that all parties would be satisfied...? Nakonana (talk) 23:19, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this means that we can upload the correct logo to replace the problematic logo, and that the problematic logo will not show up on google search, than yes. Please confirm Kueajeth (talk) 06:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, we keep historic logos. I've moved the new logo to File:Strise Logo 2024.png and inserted that in Wikidata. I will move this file to File:Strise Logo 2019.png. --Rosenzweig τ 09:20, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Changer de logo plus grand pour un jeu Zjfldaldk (talk) 13:58, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:29, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See w:File:Tomb of Oscar Wilde.JPG. This file may not be uploaded to Commons before 2030 due to lack of FOP in France, see COM:FOP France. The sculptor is w:Jacob Epstein. Stefan2 (talk) 14:04, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:46, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Page should be only on Wikipedia, the person who uploaded the file placed wrong license in commons WarsawUSC (talk) 14:09, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I just didn't know how to upload it solely on Wikipedia and not Commons. Delete it if the license is wrong. Leprazoori (talk) 19:31, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@S.A. Julio WarsawUSC (talk) 21:39, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: by Yann. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry photo Eihel (talk) 14:10, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use; usable in article thumb size. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:47, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful Markus13666 (talk) 14:31, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:49, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Source https://www.instagram.com/novndrr Viii23dawari (talk) 13:25, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not present at mentioned source, no reason as before. --Krd 09:26, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful Marchuk17 (talk) 14:23, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Perfectly reasonable photograph of a gaming chair. Omphalographer (talk) 17:25, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep +1, name of image even fits. PaterMcFly (talk) 13:27, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The image is not particularly useful - the gaming chair is at an angle that hides most of the chair, and there is a lot of inappropriate garbage around it.
An example of a good image File:Gaming chair.jpg Julie13666 (talk) 17:49, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:31, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful Marchuk17 (talk) 14:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per previous discussion; no additional reason offered. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:48, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image shows other person, not Yannick Neuder. Barzdonas (talk) 14:33, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD G7. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:42, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality edit of a PD photograph, falsely claimed by uploader to be own work (see their last edit on the page). Boylarva99 (talk) 14:34, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong file Dahellisgoingonlolxd (talk) 14:50, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:55, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eksilon (talk · contribs)

Apparently fictitious flags and emblems. Uploader claimed the Nepali image to be the coat of arms of the "Nepali People’s Republic" when adding it to enwiki, an entity which does not appear to have existed outside of a videogame. The Category:State flag of Virginia is not a hand-drawn star with the word "DOMINION" in it.

Belbury (talk) 14:58, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nomination. Güiseppi669 (talk) 16:01, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be historically inaccurate. It's a lower resolution version of File:Yugoslavia 1945.png with one light green section changed to dark, contradicting that file's description that that region was not yet solidified by the Paris Peace Treaties of 1947 by suggesting that one region had been "solidified" by 1946.

User has uploaded fictional versions of Yugoslavia's history before at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of Yugoslavia (1962-1990).png. Belbury (talk) 15:08, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Güiseppi669 (talk) 16:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:36, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image in copyright, no evidence that uploader was copyright holder MorrisStuff (talk) 15:15, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source website [16] is showing the file is royalty free, which is not compatible with the Commons License on the file page CCBYSA4.0. The file page mentions if one wants to make changes, the recording should be purchased. This is not compatible with the Commons licensing. Ellywa (talk) 15:22, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After a second look of what the source website now, I agree with you this should be deleted on commons. This piece of music was an initiative that I tried with Wikimedia Taiwan to ask some of more open oriented online firms in Taiwan to donate some of their contents. But it seems the license has evolved and become clear that this is not compatible anymore. Shangkuanlc (talk) 06:02, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, likely self-promotional image; no usage and out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 15:24, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 15:34, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, dark, personal image. Adds nothing to the existing collection of images. 200.39.139.14 17:45, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism, is kept a couple of times, even after ten days waiting. - Inertia6084 (talk) (talk) 11:38, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I explained already. 200.39.139.14 16:01, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When the same person impedes a request that IS vandalism. Let the community decide. 200.39.139.14 16:15, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Still no reason to delete presented. We might have a few similar images, but ASFAIK few in black-and-white or from 1984. PaterMcFly (talk) 10:47, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep - I once nominated it, but withdraw it and closed it and this IP-user can't handle that, and keeps nominating this. Look like vandalism to me. / It's an unique photo for 1984, we don't have a lot of similar images, maybe a few. So strongly keep, and after keeping it, please a lock on the page, to prevent it for nominating again and again.... - Inertia6084 (talk) (talk) 14:07, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I know very well what vandalism is and you do give indications of your own. The photo is about an unknown person (F10) and dark. It is not useful for anything educational. 1984 or 2024 has no difference at all about nudity. Lastly, your deletion request only made me aware of this unuseful personal image. Have you got personal reasons to keep it? Say that. Please stop claiming vandalism about IPs. If I were a vandal I would use a username and hide myself. 200.39.139.14 16:25, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:51, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 16:12, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 16:13, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probably promotional. Uploader got blocked for spam on English Wikipedia. Nakonana (talk) 23:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 16:13, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 16:19, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"STEPHANIE SCARBROUGH/POOL/AFP/Getty Images; Steve Karnowski/AP" RAN (talk) 16:20, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nul non utile Zjfldaldk (talk) 16:22, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:55, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 16:24, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used and better version at File:Sound of Music - 1980.svg 67.23.251.242 16:25, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation of 'daily-quotes' websites. May not be the work of uploader. 106.51.110.101 16:27, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:51, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Image has appeared in multiple websites: [17], [18] 106.51.110.101 16:30, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:52, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation of 'daily-quotes' websites. May not be the work of uploader. 106.51.110.101 16:33, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:52, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Image has appeared in multiple websites: [19], [20]. 106.51.110.101 16:35, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:52, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 16:40, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Might be in scope. There are a number of those logos here: Category:Bottega Veneta. Nakonana (talk) 23:38, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Nakonana: Hmm, interesting. Although, I don't really understand the point of having multiple copies (in the category you mentionned) of the same file. 😕🤷‍♂️ 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 12:28, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Εὐθυμένης They are different versions with different lettering and cropping. But I'm also not sure, whether we need this many versions of the logo. Nakonana (talk) 13:41, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:11, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 16:40, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bohren (talk · contribs)

Not a notable person, out of the project scope: fr:Donald Tomàs TWAY

Nutshinou Talk! 16:55, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Sheikh Rasel Chahal (talk) 16:56, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; G7.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:43, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 17:20, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 17:21, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 17:29, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 17:30, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 17:30, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 17:30, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cosquerherald (talk · contribs)

Unused personal photos and images, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   17:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 17:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 17:36, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 17:37, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 17:38, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fichiers de l'utilisateur:StéphanieLagueux

Toutes ces images ont été téléversées par moi-même User:StéphanieLagueux, et elles devraient être supprimées car elle ne sont pas libres de droit. Ce sont des logos qui devraient être téléversés sur Wikipédia avec la licence Marque déposée, dans la Catégorie:Image non libre de logo, dans le but d'être lié à une page Wikipédia. --StéphanieLagueux (talk) 18:13, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader asked for deletion on my talk page. Unused. Abzeronow (talk) 18:34, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:53, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Illustration of an irrelevant Media Viewer bug used only at the extension talk page. U-leo (talk) 18:35, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Banner for Russian Wikipedia ads template. Unused after template deletion. U-leo (talk) 18:47, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:11, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source is listed as a video of a black-and-white public domain film, but these are colorized stills. Colorization is copyrightable, so these should be deleted unless there's a proper source for where these versions of the images were published. hinnk (talk) 19:05, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:53, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has already been widely published across the internet (see [21]), and is unlikely the work of the uploader. WikiDan61 (talk) 19:26, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:54, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely COM:LL. Is the satellite view and Copernicus Sentinel data freely licenced? P 1 9 9   19:31, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:38, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User has uploaded the logos of lots of football (soccer) clubs as "own work". User clearly did not design all these clubs' logos ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:33, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:38, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User has uploaded the logos of lots of football (soccer) clubs as "own work". User clearly did not design all these clubs' logos ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:34, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:38, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User has uploaded the logos of lots of football (soccer) clubs as "own work". User clearly did not design all these clubs' logos ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:34, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:38, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User has uploaded the logos of lots of football (soccer) clubs as "own work". User clearly did not design all these clubs' logos ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:34, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:38, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User has uploaded the logos of lots of football (soccer) clubs as "own work". User clearly did not design all these clubs' logos ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:34, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:38, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User has uploaded the logos of lots of football (soccer) clubs as "own work". User clearly did not design all these clubs' logos ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:35, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:38, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User has uploaded the logos of lots of football (soccer) clubs as "own work". User clearly did not design all these clubs' logos ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:35, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:38, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User has uploaded the logos of lots of football (soccer) clubs as "own work". User clearly did not design all these clubs' logos ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:36, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:38, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User has uploaded the logos of lots of football (soccer) clubs as "own work". User clearly did not design all these clubs' logos ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:36, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:38, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User has uploaded the logos of lots of football (soccer) clubs as "own work". User clearly did not design all these clubs' logos ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:36, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:38, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User has uploaded the logos of lots of football (soccer) clubs as "own work". User clearly did not design all these clubs' logos ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:36, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:38, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User has uploaded the logos of lots of football (soccer) clubs as "own work". User clearly did not design all these clubs' logos ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:37, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:38, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no permission (No permission since) Sreejith K (talk) 19:46, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Falls below the TOO in the United States. – Pbrks (t • c) 21:08, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yep. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:55, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also, File:Founders_Cafe.jpg

COM:HOST Out of scope. Photo uploaded by someone that appears to be Blanchet House PR for PR purposes. Graywalls (talk) 19:49, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copied from Facebook. --Yann (talk) 09:49, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

demande que la photo soit supprimée par le propriétaire Sotos (talk) 20:10, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete La proporiétaire écrit à l'équipe de soutien, par Ticket:2024081410008639, que la photo soit prise de son domaine privé. Le bâtiment a été photographié de près avec un grand angle (18 mm). Cela plaide en faveur de sa version. – The owner has written to the support team per Ticket:2024081410008639, claiming that the photo was taken from her private ground. Considering that the photo was taken with wide angle (18 mm) from short distance, her claim seems plausible. --Mussklprozz (talk) 07:19, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but there's no right on the picture of one's own property. The image doesn't have any privacy issues. PaterMcFly (talk) 10:50, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PaterMcFly, you are missing the point. We may use photos of private property taken from public ground. Yet this photo was taken illegally by breaching into private ground. We may not use photos that were taken in breach of the law. Mussklprozz (talk) 12:28, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, "we" don't need to care here, the uploader would, as this is a Non-copyright restriction. It is similar to taking a picture in a museum where photography is not allowed (see Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#MUSEUM). PaterMcFly (talk) 13:34, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are right on two points: 1. The photographer must care. 2. This is not a copyright issue. – The rest of your statement is misguided. The situation is not comparable to taking a picture in a museum. It is not about a relation between two parties only. It is about a possible breach of law. French legislation applies, and the article 226-4 of the French Penal Code penalizes the breaking into a private property. A good that has been acquired unlawfully may not be used. This, of course, also applies to third parties: we (!) may not use a picture that was taken during a break-in.
The question is now: did such break-in take place? Following some correspondence with both the landlady and with a lawyer friend who is familiar with French law it is now clear that it hasn't. The key point is that the premises must be enclosed: by a fence, a wall, or at least by a sign prohibiting unauthorized access. Only under such conditions does French law consider it to be a break-in. The owner was so honest as to admit in her last letter to the support team that such a barrier did not exist when the photo was taken.
We can thus keep the image. Deletion by courtesy might be an option, since it was the photographer himself who started the request.
Cheers, --Mussklprozz (talk) 18:26, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Courtesy deletions aren't supposed to be done when a file is COM:INUSE, I believe, but of course the closing admin can do whatever they want... -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:56, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a photo taken by Rodriguez Calero. 186.175.179.97 20:19, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not an own work. 186.175.179.97 20:21, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Artist died in 96. 186.175.179.97 20:22, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is the uploader her? How do we know? 186.175.179.97 20:23, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio! 186.175.179.97 20:29, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof of anonymous publication; no proof of license from the copyright holder. PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:41, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Who did you identify as the creator and the copyright holder? Tineye searched 65 billion images and found no one claiming to be the creator or claiming to be an active copyright holder. --RAN (talk) 00:57, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    If the copyright holder is unknown, then his rights cannot be respected, and then the image is non-free and illegal. As soon as we cannot state the year of publication and the year of author's death, the image is not free. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 01:00, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • You wrote: "If the copyright holder is unknown, then his rights cannot be respected, and then the image is non-free and illegal." This is absolutely wrong. The actual rule is: "This work was originally published anonymously or under a pseudonym: before January 1, 1943 and the name of the author did not become known during 50 years after publication". We have a 1925 circa image and in the absence of any contradictory Russia case law, we follow USA case law, which has an image "made public" (publication) when it leaves the custody of the creator. --RAN (talk) 02:46, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    We have no proof that this image was published. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 11:02, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:12, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Early 1920s British photograph, possibly PD but a proper source and author information needed. Abzeronow (talk) 21:11, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No original source given, so it is not possible to ascertain if the author is really "unknown" as claimed by the PD-UK-unknown tag now attached to the file. No "reasonable enquiry" as demanded by that tag demonstrated. Not old enough for PD-old-assumed. The file can be restored in 2043 with {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Rosenzweig τ 07:53, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Circa 1947 American photograph, possibly PD by formalities, but should be checked. Abzeronow (talk) 21:21, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:49, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio; artwork 1997; no fop.

Martin Sg. (talk) 14:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The second is de minimis. --Zenwort (talk) 12:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; the artwork is very prominent in the second picture, too, certainly not de minimis. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:45, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Church built in the 1960s, interior not covered by FOP.

Didym (talk) 21:29, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the case of the two pictures File:Evang. Erlöserkirche Bad Soden - Altarraum.jpg and File:Evang. Erlöserkirche Bad Soden - Kirchenraum.jpg, I can well imagine that it is due to the glass artwork. However, I see no reason to delete the other pictures because they only show organs, benches and windows which are in no way protected by copyright. FauleBirne 007 (talk) 22:22, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sadads (talk) 14:16, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by OtsoTA (talk · contribs)

User left a message on my talk page seeking deletion, claiming these are "not mine". Most of these don't have any EXIF data.

Abzeronow (talk) 21:30, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:39, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All those files are carelessly copied from flickr EPA/NARA accounts - but the full collection has already been uploaded to Commons by the 2011 US National Archives upload. Those files here are not only redundant, they also have stronger compression, and only a fraction of the metadata compared to the original uploads.
Random example: Original file - duplicate.
The originals are easily found by looking at categories such as "DOCUMERICA photographs by XXX", where they will be next to each other.

~TheImaCow (talk) 21:37, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: There were a handful edited versions included in the original nomination. I removed them. ~TheImaCow (talk) 21:54, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Please note that the summary statement of this request is incorrect for a number of these files - this request includes a number of files which were uploaded to Commons years before the bulk upload in 2011 - hardly "careless". Where there are duplicates, I have no objection lower res a redirect to the higher res, or if they are both of the same resolution, keep the earlier upload. Very importantly, please check that all relevant information and appropriate categories from all versions are on the version to be kept before any versions are deleted. - Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:48, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I removed all files which were uploaded by users other than Vanished Account Byeznhpyxeuztibuo, Victorgrigas, Rudolphous, Red panda bot and Artix Kreiger - files uploaded by them were bulk uploaded in 2024, 2016, 2017. This should mean that all remaining files are from after the 2011 upload. ~TheImaCow (talk) 22:01, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note also that a part of those files have been tagged as duplicate at some point by a bot - but those deletions were declined because of "resolution"... F8 explicitly includes "scaled-down duplicate", but whatever. ~TheImaCow (talk) 22:10, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I uploaded one of these images: File:Dragline Basket and Claim Shell Bucket Are Used to Scoop Oil - Laden Debris from Log Boom on the San Juan River, 10-1972.jpg.

    No, I did not know it was what our nominator, TheImaCow, called a "careless copy". But, subsequent to my upload, User:Hohum uploaded a color corrected version.

    The NARA version(s) our nominator says he or she prefers ARE NOT color corrected.

    I am going to ask, doesn't this means our nominator should withdraw this nomination, and make individual nominations?

    Nominator hasn't even claimed they confirmed that all these images duplicate an already uploaded image. Geo Swan (talk) 04:06, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    I removed this file + all other non-automated flickr transfers (around 10-15) from the nomination already yesterday. All remaining images duplicate existing files. ~TheImaCow (talk) 15:58, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I clicked to a couple of files and some of them are (carelessly?) in use. Just deleting them would remove them from the articles. I don't think a mass deletion request is the right approach. Move relevant information (SDC/categories) and use {{Duplicate}} instead. Multichill (talk) 16:50, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Plenty of files had already been tagged as {{Duplicate}}, but those have been declined by @Mdaniels5757. Random examples here here here here here here I don't think its appropiate to simply re-add this.
    Re tagging using duplicate template; people spending ten minutes copying those files en masse could not be bothered to check if they existed already. Now I don't see why others should have to spend hours cleaning this up by cross-referencing the original file on hundreds of automatically created duplicates.
    I don't have anything againest going through and replacing them where in use, or copying better categorisation over to original, but using {{Duplicate}} on every file is not worth the time & effort. ~TheImaCow (talk) 19:22, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: Now I have spend OVER TWO HOURS and lost countless braincells while individually going through all +700 files and copying categorisation if better, replacing existing usages etc. I also removed a handful of files from the above list, where some geniuses have deleted the uncompressed, better described & older original files as duplicates instead of the flickr copies.

Anyway, all files listed above are now ready for deletion. ~TheImaCow (talk) 23:44, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per @Multichill and note by @Infrogmation as well as further comments by @Geo Swan regarding original and subsequent "color corrected" uploads. Any qualifying files above should be resubmitted for review, individually, using the "duplicate" tag. Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 01:46, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ooligan Have you read any of my replies? Please link a single manually "color corrected" file that is part of the nomination. And please respond to my comments about individually tagging duplicates (Such as many files having already been tagged as duplicates and the effort of uploading the duplicates vs tagging the duplicates being in no relation), if you really think that is a good idea. ~TheImaCow (talk) 09:33, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have read this reply and all the rest, @TheImaCow. Please, ask @Geo Swan about "color corrected" images, since it was their original observation. As for "individual tagging of duplicates"- that is the current process and best practise on Commons. You are asking for a speedy deletion for many photos at once, without supplying the alleged "duplicate' photo for each photo subject to your deletion request. You make reference to only one file as an "example" as a substitute for each and every other file proposed for deletion. You wrote:
Apparently, this single "example" is to save you time and effort.
You then ask someone else or an Administator to do the work- to verify each individual photo by having them do the research work themselves, instead of you doing that work for each of your proposed deletions. Apparently, it is because as you wrote "... using {{Duplicate}} on every file is not worth the effort." It it worth their effort?
On the DR you note that,
  • "The originals are easily found by looking at categories such as "DOCUMERICA photographs by XXX", where they will be next to each other."
Using the current duplicate tag process "is a good idea." Respectfully, -- Ooligan (talk) 22:20, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Apparently, this single "example" is to save you time and effort." - Yes, of course I want to save unnessescary effort. Reminder, these are hundreds of files uploaded within a few clicks, many had not even been given a single meaningful category by the uploaders.
"You then ask someone else or an Administator to do the work- to verify each individual photo, It it worth their effort?- No, I am not, because it is not worth the effort. There is no legitimate reason to manually cross link 700 lazily spammed duplicates.
"The originals are easily found by..." - Come on. There is a difference between picking out random files listed here and finding the original vs doing that on 700 files and copy the file name onto the description.
And if you, or someone else really thinks that we should manually cross-link every single one, then just go ahead and do it yourself. Getting rid of duplicates with lower quality, less metadata, poorer curation is in everyone's best interest.
And again, plenty of files had already been tagged as duplicate, but declined for incorrect reasons, what about them? ~TheImaCow (talk) 22:52, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Closing as kept; no consensus for bulk deletion of all. Discussion doesn't seem be usefully progressing. No prejudging relisting individual or carefully selected subgroups of files. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:19, 26 August 2024 (UTC). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:19, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal logo, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:45, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:39, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Fumikas Sagisavas as no license (No license since) – PD from official account or what's the issue here? Prototyperspective (talk) 21:49, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When I uploaded a video using V2C, I did not mark the correct authorization information of the video in time. V2C will prompt that the video from Flickr marked as public domain is not authorized, and the administrator needs to manually check the authorization information. In addition, I checked the authorization method of the source of the video and it is indeed public domain. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 22:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: appears to be US Gov PD per discussion by Fumikas. --Sadads (talk) 14:17, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:52, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:39, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:56, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:39, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BlueberryCheeseCream (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: unused, low-quality AI-generated images (one of a safe with its handle on the inside; one of a cake; two of people gathering).

Omphalographer (talk) 22:11, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:39, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the image doesn't have clear educational value. If it is jewellery then something that adds some context is required  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:33, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:39, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

if this is bespoke jewellery then it will have a copyright, otherwise the image is of poor quality and the educational value of the picture is not expressed to give context to the images  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:35, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:54, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a logo nor own work. 200.39.139.16 22:36, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Rubýñ as duplicate (Duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Bandera del partido Cantonal.jpg  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:42, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The file is close enough to duplicate, and insufficient quality to retain.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:35, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission no author copyvio from https://www.motorola.com/nl/Moto%20E22i?_q=Moto%20E22i&map=ft Hoyanova (talk) 22:45, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:51, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]