Commons:Deletion requests/2024/10/25

24 October 2024

26 October 2024

Deletion requests on 25 October 2024

October 25

Files uploaded by JSwanne (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: plain text; fringe science theories.

Omphalographer (talk) 00:24, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Delbert7 (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: unused images related to a fringe scientific theory deleted from enwiki in 2014 (w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ABC Preon Model).

Omphalographer (talk) 00:29, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rostyslav's photo.jpg

Copyright 186.172.254.163 01:09, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sharelin screenshot.jpg

Screenshot with DW images, no permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:14, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SharkTorrent.png

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:15, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Michael Craig-Martin's 2008 creation, "Garden Fork," at the Nasher Sculpture Center is a museum that opened in 2000 in Dallas, Texas LCCN2014633061.tif

No FoP for 3D works in the United States Nv8200p (talk) 01:37, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:White moth (4948421350).jpg

Terrible photo of some unidentified white moth, unusable, out of scope. Also added:

File:Yellow moth (4948421198).jpg

--P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:37, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The yellow moth is not as bad, but yeah, agreed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:10, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:VortexSculpture.png

No FoP for 3D works in the United States Nv8200p (talk) 01:38, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I live 18 miles from The Modern Museum of Ft Worth and visit it quite often. I took this photo and uploaded it. KLLwiki 70.119.183.174 03:40, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Conjoined Sculpture (138820215).jpeg

No FoP for 3D works in the United States Nv8200p (talk) 01:39, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Jwhdk (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: unused diagrams related to fringe science theories.

Omphalographer (talk) 01:46, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Force of gravity.pdf

Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 01:50, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gravitational attraction of sphere.jpg

Out of scope: unused, mostly plain text, and almost unreadable due to JPEG compression. Omphalographer (talk) 01:51, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Sci22 (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: unused diagrams related to fringe science theories.

Omphalographer (talk) 01:54, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:بياناتٌ فيزيائيةٌ جديدة عن الجاذبية.pdf

Out of scope: plain text; unpublished fringe science theories. ResearchGate is not a scientific journal and does not review papers posted there. Omphalographer (talk) 01:57, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Theory Of Anti-Relativity 1.jpg

Out of scope: plain text, unused nonsense about "speed of mind". Omphalographer (talk) 01:59, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Principles of Relativistic Velocity.pdf

Out of scope: plain text, fringe science theories. Omphalographer (talk) 02:04, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Grossman1Daniel (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: diagrams of a personal theory of "astrogeomanity", outlining an odd blend of conventional history and scientific cosmology with religious history (e.g. "Sodom 2,300 - 2,100 BC"), questionable science ("Electro-Gravity Device 1952 CE"), and a completely out-of-place "introduction to the wisdom of Kabbalah" in some images. No clear educational use.

Omphalographer (talk) 02:13, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:-2015-01-29- 6º Ato contra a tarifa São Paulo 66 Romerito Pontes (16794281845).jpg

zackcloud.chan@gmail.com 47.144.244.87 02:16, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question What is the reason for the deletion request? I'm not seeing that email address in the EXIF data nor the file description, so how is the email address connected to the file and the nomination? Nakonana (talk) 19:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Apophis symbol (fixed width).svg

Copyright violation. The source for the symbol (https://suberic.net/~dmm/astro/diary.html) clearly states that All symbols on this page created and copyright © 2008 by Denis Moskowitz and Alec Finlay. Permission is universally granted to use them for nonprofit purposes. Please email for other permissions ("nonprofit" highlighted by me). This is incompatible with the source in the file description ("own work") and with the license (CC BY-SA 4.0). I see no evidence that additional permissions have been granted.

Unlike some of the other symbols created by Moskowitz (the two latest examples being this and this), the Apophis symbol has never actually been submitted (or adopted) by Unicode, which may have changed the copyright situation. Until Unicode adopts it, the symbol was specifically devised by Moskowitz for his book.

Moskowitz writes that Since Apophis is the Greek name for the Egyptian snake-god Apep, I based its symbol on traditional depictions of Apep, adding a star as was typical of 19th-century asteroid symbols. Clearly this meets the threshold for originality. Renerpho (talk) 02:41, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The same copyright problem affects the other versions of the file: File:Apophis symbol (bold).svg, File:Apophis symbol (Moskowitz).png (which gives the correct author, but also claims CC BY-SA 4.0, with no indication that this is applicable), and File:Apophis symbol (bold, white).svg (which isn't mentioned in the file description for File:Apophis symbol (fixed width).svg, but is clearly just another version of the same image). Renerpho (talk) 03:02, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As with fonts, the actual images such as file:Apophis symbol (Moskowitz).png are copyrighted, graphic approximations of them are not. I was wrong to upload the png file [checking with the author whether it's actually a problem], but my own reproductions are fine. Kwamikagami (talk) 03:48, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright owner said they can change the release conditions to allow use on WP. Kwamikagami (talk) 03:20, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kwamikagami: Thank you! If possible, formal permission via an ORTS ticket would be great. (Even after changing the note on the website, the fact remains that it did say something else when the files were uploaded.)

to allow use on WP -- Please note that this wouldn't be enough. Restrictions to use on Wikipedia specifically are not compatible with a free license. Compare Commons:Volunteer Response Team#Declaration of consent for all enquiries.

Copyright owner said they can -- To be sure, that is owners (plural), correct? I think you need permission from both. Renerpho (talk) 04:35, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright has been handed over, so just the one.

No, not WP specifically, probably the same release as for the other symbols. Kwamikagami (talk) 06:15, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jørgen Peder Hammerich.JPG

unused image, used briefly in bio article shortly after deleted with lack of notability, so out of scope. TherasTaneel (talk) 03:04, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Defense 2007 2.jpg

No FoP in France, artist Takis died in 2019 A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bassin Takis (Esplanade de La Défense).JPG

No FoP in France, artist Takis died in 2019 A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Défence (2961707815).jpg

No FoP in France, artist Takis died in 2019 A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Defense2.jpg

No FoP in France, artist Takis died in 2019 A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:A traditional Chinese paper-cutting style mural, Beisi Village, Huwei Township, Yunlin (Taiwan).JPG

No FoP for 2D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mural in the city of Shenzhen, China created by The Bogside Artists..jpg

No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Map of Nanxun Ancient Town 2014-06.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK Urban Canvas, by Hong Kong Youth Arts Foundation (2019).jpg

Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 03:48, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ambassador Theatre at Ximending 20080805b.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment can the copyrighted poster be blurred? The image can still serve as the photo of the theater even with the poster blurred. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 05:52, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eslite Ximen Store 20110404.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Streetart Taipei Ximen amk.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Middle east mural before 2017 restoration.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Women's Community Cancer Project Mural.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Middle east mural after 2017 restoration.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:53, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:White Oak Middle School mural Silver Spring MD 2022-08-17 17-28-18.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:03, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Silverspringb&o049.JPG

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:05, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Woollahra Municipality Arms.jpg

"State of New South Wales, https://www.nsw.gov.au/nsw-government/copyright" has zero relevance to a local government CoA. Therefore permission is required from the council, and threshold of originality is very low in Australia Bidgee (talk) 04:34, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Natalie Ward MLC, Parliament of NSW.jpg

"State of New South Wales, https://www.nsw.gov.au/nsw-government/copyright" has zero relevance to the NSW parliament, which has its own copyright page https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/pages/Copyright--Conditions-of-Use.aspx Bidgee (talk) 04:43, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ErgonomicMinder: Could you provide the exact source of this image? It was clearly not taken from the front page of https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/ and looking at the metadata it seems it was taken from either Facebook or Instagram. Günther Frager (talk) 06:02, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very similar image https://sopba.com.au/natalie-ward-appointment but has a background, rather than just a plain white background. Bidgee (talk) 06:33, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Matt Cross MP, Member for Davidson.jpg

"State of New South Wales, https://www.nsw.gov.au/nsw-government/copyright" has zero relevance to the NSW parliament, which has its own copyright page https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/pages/Copyright--Conditions-of-Use.aspx Bidgee (talk) 04:44, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Markspeakmanscmp.jpg

"State of New South Wales, https://www.nsw.gov.au/nsw-government/copyright" has zero relevance to the NSW parliament, which has its own copyright page https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/pages/Copyright--Conditions-of-Use.aspx Bidgee (talk) 04:44, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elenipetinos.jpg

"State of New South Wales, https://www.nsw.gov.au/nsw-government/copyright" has zero relevance to the NSW parliament, which has its own copyright page https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/pages/Copyright--Conditions-of-Use.aspx Bidgee (talk) 04:45, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:John-Graham.jpg

Lacking a vaild source to the photograph, making impossible to know if "https://www.nsw.gov.au/nsw-government/copyright" applies. Bidgee (talk) 04:48, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Stranded passengers wait at Howrah Station..webp

I uploaded it by mistake Igobymanynames1 (talk) 05:18, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Yann at 09:39, 25 October 2024 UTC: per COM:NETCOPYVIO --Krdbot 13:02, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mike Dean Donda Interview.jpg

Incorrect way to upload an image AbelXO247 (talk) 05:39, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Looks like a copyvio. Estrellato (talk) 19:07, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:El Jefe's Cantina - 2021-11-14 - Sarah Stierch 01.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 06:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Amherst MA WV Banner.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 06:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Missvain at 05:02, 26 October 2024 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Wow I uploaded that 10 year ago....was a bit clueless I suppose. --Krdbot 13:02, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:WTC Dust after collapsing.jpg

Image is credited to Fox News. I could find no evidence Fox News has agreed to release it into public domain. It even has some obvious watermarks! Ixfd64 (talk) 06:33, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peppa Pig in Bordeaux.jpg

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 06:34, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Social activist Sikander Bizenjo in Naal, Balochistan.jpg

Not relevant for wikipedia Tribal Explorer (talk) 06:34, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe not, but this isn't Wikipedia. I did a quick web search, and he seems like a significant person (e.g. [1], [2], [3]). I don't know why we shouldn't keep the photo, but it should be categorized better. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:08, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bobo's old channel profile photo.jpg

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 06:35, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Collapse of the World Trade Center

Images are credited to filmmaker Lyle Owerko, who has never been an NIST employee. I could find no evidence he has agreed to release these photos into public domain.

Ixfd64 (talk) 06:36, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rendering of thalassa like planet 1 1.png

Random AI-generated image, unlikely to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 06:37, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No comment other than it is algorithmically generated, but not with AI --Zache (talk) 15:10, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is part of a collection of similar images; see Category:Songs of Distant Earth (Arthur C. Clarke). Might be more appropriate to nominate the whole collection if you believe they're not useful, as they're all similar in nature. Omphalographer (talk) 16:54, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gram the Ram.jpg

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 06:39, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Salisbury Cathedral Lady Chapel 2, Wiltshire, UK - Diliff.jpg

also File:Salisbury Cathedral Lady Chapel 1, Wiltshire, UK - Diliff.jpg

If I am not mistaken, we have to delete this image because it displays a sculpture that is protected by copyright. Because it was only exhibited within the church temporarily, as indicated in the file description, freedom of panorama under UK copyright law does not apply, see COM:FOP UK. Gnom (talk) 06:43, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to the description of the photo, this is an installation by Nicholas Pope called “The Apostles Speaking in Tongues Lit By Their Own Lamps”. Per the info provided by the sculptor, this was exhibited in Salisbury Cathedral from 24 May to 3 August 2014. The picture was taken on 8 July 2014. The lamps were lit three times daily and the first photo captures that. @Diliff: Would you be willing to ask the artist for a permission? This would be otherwise a significant loss. --AFBorchert (talk) 10:00, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Albert Räber by Max Bill.jpg

Der Urheber der abgebildeten Plastik, Max Bill, starb 1994. Sein Werk ist in der Schweiz urheberrechtlich bis 2064 geschützt (70 Jahre nach dem Tod). Eine Einverständniserklärung des derzeitigen Rechteinhabers zur Publikation auf Wikimedia Commons ist nötig. Matutinho 06:20, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The author of the illustrated sculpture, Max Bill, died in 1994 and his work is protected by copyright in Switzerland until 2064 (70 years after his death). A declaration of consent from the current copyright holder for publication on Wikimedia Commons is required. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matutinho (talk • contribs) 06:24, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Banner Página Wiki Mais Mulheres 2024.png

This file was initially tagged by DarwIn as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Krd 07:14, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Banner Página Wiki Mais Diversidade 2024.png

This file was initially tagged by DarwIn as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Krd 07:14, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by EX Centre from Star Avenue 2018 (talk · contribs)

I'm not sure what's going on here - it's 12 minor variations of the same picture, named, licensed, and attributed as being AI work (author "Victorla Dockside AI"), but with metadata from an iPad.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:36, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by EX Centre from Star Avenue 2018 (talk · contribs)

Unusable - too dark. Out of COM:SCOPE.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:25, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Celtic Cross in the Writers' Garden in the English Cemetery 01.jpg

Duplicated: Same image with a better description is available on File:Monument to Elizabeth Martha Stewart (1855-1870) 01.jpg Dcapillae (talk) 08:11, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Celtic Cross in the Writers' Garden in the English Cemetery 02.jpg

Duplicated: Same image with a better description is available on File:Monument to Elizabeth Martha Stewart (1855-1870) 02.jpg Dcapillae (talk) 08:12, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Celtic Cross in the Writers' Garden in the English Cemetery 03.jpg

Duplicated: Same image with a better description is available on File:Monument to Elizabeth Martha Stewart (1855-1870) 03.jpg Dcapillae (talk) 08:12, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Celtic Cross in the Writers' Garden in the English Cemetery 04.jpg

Duplicated: Same image with a better description is available on File:Monument to Elizabeth Martha Stewart (1855-1870) 04.jpg Dcapillae (talk) 08:12, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Donghem (talk · contribs)

Potential copyright violation. Low resolution and lack of EXIF data. Some photos can be found on the Interent.

SCP-2000 08:35, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

cc @Hanyangprofessor2: --SCP-2000 08:37, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Royal Malaysia Police VSP.png

This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No government exception cited at Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Malaysia. Yann (talk) 08:46, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It seems the case is more complicated. Please see [7]. Yann (talk) 08:47, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to Section 23 of the Malaysian Copyright Act, 'Copyright which subsists in works of the Government, Government organizations and international bodies under this Act shall continue to subsist until the expiry of a period of fifty years computed from the beginning of the calendar year next following the year in which the work was first published.' The work here is a derivative of a 1958 Royal Malaysia Police logo which aged well over 50 years. n_niyaz 🇷🇺 (talk) 09:01, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Belgian Series of Beer Pong.jpg

Visibly watermarked to "Beats n Bots" and credited to Sean Depover in the EXIF. No evidence of COM:PERMISSION from either of these. Belbury (talk) 08:47, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also:

File:Wedstrijd bierpong 2024.jpg (same watermark and exif)
File:Belgian Series of Beer Pong 2024 - TAGMAG.jpg (watermarked to TAGMAG)

--Belbury (talk) 13:32, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Immigration Department of Malaysia Logo.svg

This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No government exception cited at Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Malaysia. Yann (talk) 08:48, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It seems the case is more complicated. Please see [8]. Yann (talk) 08:57, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to Section 23 of the Malaysian Copyright Act, 'Copyright which subsists in works of the Government, Government organizations and international bodies under this Act shall continue to subsist until the expiry of a period of fifty years computed from the beginning of the calendar year next following the year in which the work was first published.' The work here was used since the foundation of the department during the founding of Malaysia (1957) which was well over 50 years. n_niyaz 🇷🇺 (talk) 08:58, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This response applies to File:Logo of Department of Immigration Malaysia.svg and File:Immigration Department of Malaysia Flag.jpg too. n_niyaz 🇷🇺 (talk) 12:48, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo of Department of Immigration Malaysia.svg

This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No government exception cited at Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Malaysia. Yann (talk) 08:49, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It seems the case is more complicated. Please see [9]. Yann (talk) 08:57, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Immigration Department of Malaysia Flag.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No government exception cited at Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Malaysia. Yann (talk) 08:49, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It seems the case is more complicated. Please see [10]. Yann (talk) 08:58, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by DataBuzz (talk · contribs)

Freely licensed but not notable and unlikely to have an educational use. Mainly used for self promo

Gbawden (talk) 08:53, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:RAGULVARMA PRABHU.jpg

Appears to be a hoax - an altered version of File:Udhaya.jpg an actual indian politician KylieTastic (talk) 09:04, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:RAGULVARMA PRABHU.jpg

Copyright 2409:40F4:304E:84F8:8000:0:0:0 09:55, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pradeep Paudelmm.jpg

Photoshopped to remove the background, unlikely to be own work. PCP Gbawden (talk) 09:04, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arlo Parks at The Great Escape 2023.jpg

The metadata give Auteur Victor Frankowski Auteursrechtenhouder www.victorfrankowski.com. Is the user Victor Frankowski? Wouter (talk) 09:10, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pyras Chronik 1997.jpg

Rechteinhaber verstorben. Aktuell keine Möglichkeit der Freigabe. Danke! Paddy.84 (talk) 09:10, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:East-West Alley 89758-Guilin (49040799851).jpg

COM:TOYS メイド理世 (talk) 09:13, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:RAGULVARMA PRABHU.png

Appears to be a hoax as was used on hoax article en:Draft:RAGULVARMA_PRABHU along with hoax faked image File:RAGULVARMA PRABHU.jpg and File:Shri RAGULVARMA PRABHU M.K.png. The face on the right has been altered from the original (that I have not been able to locate like I have with the other two) KylieTastic (talk) 09:15, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:3 Leilah Show.jpg

no exif, unlikely to be own work. A version of this was found online before upload - https://www.facebook.com/thiagosonhodrums/photos/t.100044325975055/708214946045926/?type=3 - PCP Gbawden (talk) 09:20, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Garter encircled shield of arms of Muzaffir al-Din, Shah of Persia, KG.png

attribution to Muzaffir al Din Sha is wrong, the text in the coat of arms reads Nasser al din Shah who was the one warded the order of garter 78.32.37.66 09:27, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hédervár chapel 02.jpg

I uploaded it by mistake TricksterWildcat (talk) 09:37, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marelle1.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Jan.Kamenicek as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Most probably copyvio, compare the profile foto at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfJnVZVKSgJhM3JVmbnnGkw Yann (talk) 09:45, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Foodie-logo.svg

This file was initially tagged by Royiswariii as Copyvio (db-copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.foodie.com/%7Chelp=off PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 09:49, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete This looks like a {{PD-textlogo}}, but I am a bit doubtful that this is within project scope as a random corporate logo. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 19:10, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Foodie-logo-negative.svg

This file was initially tagged by Royiswariii as Copyvio (db-copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.foodie.com/%7Chelp=off PD-textlogo Yann (talk) 09:49, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete This looks like a {{PD-textlogo}}, but I am a bit doubtful that this is within project scope as a random corporate logo. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 19:10, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hunker-Logo-RGB-Default-Color.svg

This file was initially tagged by Royiswariii as Copyvio (db-copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.hunker.com/%7Chelp=off PD-textlogo Yann (talk) 09:49, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete This looks like a {{PD-textlogo}}, but I am a bit doubtful that this is within project scope as a random corporate logo. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 19:11, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Lower Saxony photographs taken on 2024-10-23

Unfortunally there is no FoP for interior views in Germany.

Lukas Beck (talk) 09:53, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Löschantrag unbegründet. Das Bild hat dokumentarischen Charakter, es geht nicht darum, ein Kunstwerk illegal zu kopieren. Clic (talk) 09:58, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Der Urheberrechtschutz macht dabei leider keinen Unterschied. Lukas Beck (talk) 10:54, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The train appears to be the main subject. It covers most of the artwork in the background, therefore I'd say that the artwork is de minimis. Nakonana (talk) 19:54, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree clearly at this point. The artwork makes up almost half of the image background. The user could also have photographed the train in such a way that the work of art took up less space. It can't stay like this. Lukas Beck (talk) 03:47, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader could have also photographed an empty train station without a train if they wanted to show the artwork. Either way, the artwork is right at the edge of the photograph and can be easily cropped out if necessary. No need to delete the image. Nakonana (talk) 07:51, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think File:Stadtbahn Hannover 8 3035 Hauptbahnhof 2410230657.jpg does have to be cropped, can be, and should be, and then it would be OK. The other photo should probably be deleted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:21, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by AntonSmit78 (talk · contribs)

Doubt that uploader owns the copyright to all these images, more information about each photographer and permission is needed.

Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 10:24, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Question 3.jpg

I uploaded it by mistake တကၠသိုလ္ ခ်စ္မင္းေဆြ (talk) 10:28, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SuShi-Portrait.jpg

The image has no source. Its provenance is not established and descriptive information is not verifiable (e.g., what it claimed to depict previously was probably wrong to begin with). Included with this deletion request is the duplicate:

File:Xiang Yu.png

Its source also provides no helpful information. It seems like one of those image plucked from the internet of which not much helpful is known. --Cold Season (talk) 17:05, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No reason for deletion of these images. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral image is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. At least one of the files is currently in use on the projects, so it has to be maintained. @Cold Season: you could consider to add {{Fact disputed}} to the file pages, or one of the other more applicable warning templates listed on the template description. --Ellywa (talk) 08:27, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ellywa: There is NO SOURCE that verifies the images as a public domain image. The fact that we do not know what this image is, means that this falls under the PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE and is definitly not a {{fact disputed}} case. The fact that you closed this without participation in discussion, while waiting for the close statement to provide unilateral counter-arguments is highly inappropriate. --Cold Season (talk) 09:22, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SuShi-Portrait.jpg

This is an artwork that remains unidentified. There is no provenance or source that tells us what it is or its public domain status. In conclusion, it should be deleted per COM:PRP. Included with this deletion request is the duplicate File:Xiang Yu.png.

To @Ellywa: in the previous deletion request, {{fact disputed}} does not override this. Cold Season (talk) 09:41, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cold Season, this image is used 15 times on various Wikipedia articles, in several languages. The other version is used 3 times. Based on this, we cannot delete the image from Commons, based on our policy, as users on Wikipedia are considering the image valuable. The precautionary principle is used only in case a copyright violation might exist. Please ask additional questions on the village pump. I note you have re-nominated the image. In that case another admin will reconsider my decision. Ellywa (talk) 09:56, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not familiar with a policy or guideline that dictates that image usage should be a consideration. Furthermore, yes, not knowing anything of the artwork is the rationale that a copyright violation might exist. Point 4 and 5 in the COM:PRP policy is illustrative here. --Cold Season (talk) 10:06, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand you are not aware of all policies on Commons. I will try to explain more clearly. Commons:Deletion policy summarizes reasons for deletion, incorrectness of a file is not a reason. Educational not useful can be a reason for deletion, per COM:EDUSE, but as soon an image is in use, the image is considered in scope of this project, as stated in section COM:INUSE of that page. Regards, Ellywa (talk) 20:10, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, it is easy to find out this image is a variant of File:Portraits of Famous Men - Xiang Wang.jpg with other colors. It might be another scan of the same print, or another book with different colors, regarding the age. It was uploaded with a PD tag by Dr. Meierhofer~commonswiki in 2006. The PD tag seems correct. Ellywa (talk) 20:17, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(1) The deletion request is based on COM:PRP, because there is no information that identifies anything of this artwork and, as such, its public domain status is not established. I am not stating that the incorrectness in file description is the reason for deletion (which you keep using as a straw man argument), but I am explaining why it fails COM:PRP ("to explain more clearly" to you... again, as I shouldn't have assumed that everyone reads between the lines).

(2) Your mention of COM:EDUSE is irrelevant, as no argument with that as basis was raised here.

(3) COM:INUSE does not state that image usage is a reason to not delete or to maintain an image. Your argument has no merit. In fact, I hope you understand this instead, me saying that I'm not familiar with such a policy was just an indirect way to say that your claim is wrong (as no policy supports it).

(4) Your suggestion that the artwork is a "variant of File:Portraits of Famous Men - Xiang Wang.jpg" is incorrect, as it is simply not a scan of the same print. Feel free to overlay them in photoshop and look again, if you can't spot the differences. These are two distinct artworks with their own copyright status and, as such, it does not diminish the onus to establish this image's copyright status.

In conclusion, I see no credible argument that overrides COM:PRP. --Cold Season (talk) 07:00, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you suggesting that this is not a Qing Dynasty image? What makes you believe there is a chance it's not in the public domain? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:45, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What evidence do you have that it is? "In all cases, the burden of proof lies on the uploader or other person arguing for the file to be retained [...]" (See official policy: COM:PS#Evidence). --Cold Season (talk) 18:28, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The style does not look contemporary and looks old. Otherwise, I refer to Ellywa's remarks above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In other words, you neglect to provide any appropriate evidence of the copyright status (just like her), which violates official policy COM:PS#Evidence.

Secondly, your reply is nothing more than an assumption that it looks old without any proof, which violates official policy COM:PRP. --Cold Season (talk) 16:40, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We can't delete every photo of an old print because you feel like casting doubt on it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:51, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"In all cases, the burden of proof lies on the uploader or other person arguing for the file to be retained [...]" (See official policy: COM:PS#Evidence). Your reply is not a valid argument, nor does it addresses the two policies cited in my comment before it. What I feel is irrelevant (though it seems more about you), what a strange reply... --Cold Season (talk) 16:23, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You won't get more discussion from me. See what the closing admin rules. Again. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:23, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep China only awards 50 years protection, so if it is prior to 1974 it is PD. Tineye and Google could not find anyone named as the author or anyone claiming an active copyright or anyone claiming it is newer than 1974. --RAN (talk) 22:28, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your argument is counter to the policy COM:PRP: "Also, arguments that amount to "we can get away with it", such as the following, are against Commons' aims: [...] 5. "The file is obviously common property. It can be found all over the internet and nobody has complained.""

Secondly, you provide "ifs" and neglect the burden of proof. See the policy COM:PS#Evidence: "In all cases, the burden of proof lies on the uploader or other person arguing for the file to be retained [...]" --Cold Season (talk) 05:57, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

From this image [11] the chinese text translated by Google reads: "Portrait of Xiang Yu. Source: 'Portraits of Famous People in Chinese History' compiled by the Conservation Department of the Chinese History Museum, published by Straits Literature and Art Publishing House in 2003." So now we have a source for the image: The Chinese History Museum. Bastique ^{☎ let's talk!} 21:50, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion, source will be added. This image is obviously a variant of the Portraits of Famous Men, and there is not significant doubt about this being a Qing era print. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:43, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SuShi-Portrait.jpg

I am reopening this DR, as I am allowed to do so. There's some points I want to make here, per the discussions above. This includes the duplicate file File:Xiang Yu.png.

(1) Assumptions that it looks old are not valid to retain files per Wikimedia policy. Modern artists are able to paint in different art styles and there's many examples hereof. This is in line with the policy COM:PRP: "The file is obviously common property. It can be found all over the internet and nobody has complained."

(2) The only thing I am requesting here is evidence to confirm the status of the work, which no one so far has provided. This is required per the policy COM:PS#Evidence: "In all cases, the burden of proof lies on the uploader or other person arguing for the file to be retained [...]."

Note: Currently, User:Abzeronow added a reference (a modern book) which he has acknowledged not to have actually consulted (see the user talk page). Neither was it clarified that anyone has consulted it to confirm what's requested before he shut down the discussion above.

(3) This goes further to COM:DR: "Bear in mind, though, that admins cannot ignore Commons policies or any applicable copyright law even if a majority of users expressing opinions want them to do so." --Cold Season (talk) 10:36, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As Abzeronow has pointed out in the last closing statement there needs to be "significant" doubt to use COM:PRP as deletion reason. Examples of "significant" doubt would be things like a copyright statement in the EXIF data that contradicts the license under which a file was uploaded on Commons, or there's an author name in the EXIF data that doesn't match the uploader's name, or the uploader has a history of copyvios, or the uploader has uploaded many images that were taken with a lot of different professional cameras and it's unlikely that the uploader owns all those expensive cameras, or the image can be found on the internet where it was published before it was uploaded on Commons. None of this applies here. Of course the above list is not comprehensive and there may be other scenarios that cast "significant" doubt, but it is also the nominator's (i.e. your) responsibility to explain wherein this "significant" lays. A "theoretical" doubt that something "maybe" isn't PD or CC is not enough to reference COM:PRP. The image looks old enough to be PD and you have not provided any evidence to the contrary to establish "significant" doubt about its PD status. In your initial nomination you wrote "It seems like one of those image plucked from the internet of which not much helpful is known" but you didn't provide any URL to that image on any other website to add weight to your argument to make it qualify as "significant" doubt. In your initial nomination you wrote "e.g., what it claimed to depict previously was probably wrong to begin with" (cursive highlighting added by me). Here, you once again made a "theoretical" statement without backing it up with anything. Why do you think that its previous claims were "probably" wrong? Have you found some information that contradicts those claims? Or is it just an "assumption", a "theory" that the claims "might" be incorrect? If you have not found anything that contradicts those claims then what are your doubts based on? Again, "theoretical" assumptions are not enough for PRP, you need to provide "significant" doubt for the file to be deleted under this principle. Nakonana (talk) 20:33, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a description of the book that is stated to be the source of this image (Google translated and with emphasis added by me: "1. Except for the portrait of Lin Zexu, the portraits of people included in "Portraits of Chinese Celebrities of All Dynasties (2 volumes)" are all cultural relics collected by the National Museum of China. Most of them are hand-painted by painters of the Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties, and a few are ancient engraved books and rubbings, as well as carved brick statues. 2. The characters range from ancient times to the end of the Qing Dynasty. 3. The characters included in "Portraits of Chinese Celebrities of All Dynasties (2 volumes)" are divided into four parts according to their identities. People with multiple identities are included in the most representative part. 4. The characters included in "Portraits of Chinese Celebrities of All Dynasties (2 volumes)" are arranged in order of birth and death or dynasty. For those with the same birth year, they are arranged in order of death year. For those whose birth and death years are unknown, they are inserted in the corresponding position according to their activity period. 5. "Portraits of Chinese Celebrities of All Dynasties (2 volumes)" does not include photos of people and works created by modern people." Nakonana (talk) 21:05, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Constant reopened discussions of this image are disruptive, and admins will have to make a decision about when to end them for good and all, but that's their call. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:24, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would actually accept that argument, if that is so, which may have come to light if the closing admin had not callously closed discussion. --Cold Season (talk) 20:10, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Everything you wrote here, Nakonana, is you trying to reverse the burden of proof. In contrast, the official policy COM:PS#Evidence states "In all cases, the burden of proof lies on the uploader or other person arguing for the file to be retained [...]." It is a simple request that remains unfulfilled. --Cold Season (talk) 19:48, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are using COM:PRP as your deletion rationale, so let me quote that: "The precautionary principle is that where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file, it should be deleted." (emphasis NOT added by me) That's what the last closing admin was referring to, but you didn't accept it, so I thought I'll elaborate how that "significant" part is oftentimes interpreted in deletion requests. I didn't attempt to reverse the burden of proof but merely summarized the usual arguments when COM:PRP is brought up. Such deletion requests are oftentimes unsuccessful if the nominating party bases their arguments on assumptions / "theoretical" doubts, which you were doing in your initial nomination and that's why they were unsuccessful. Nakonana (talk) 21:17, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Israel Iran conflict 2024 map.jpg

The file appears to be a severe copyright violation, (no source given for what the base map is citing). As well as originally research, including potentially controversial edits such as Jordan supporting the Israeli military. (factually incorrect). Ecrusized (talk) 11:23, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom Abo Yemen ✉ 15:48, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that painting Jordan as a supporter of Israel is misleading and does not reflect sources. If @M Waleed can fix it then I guess it can stay, otherwise I'd support deleting it. Alaexis (talk) 14:38, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:يزيد المحارب -مكتب محاماة.png

دعاية أو ترويج Mohammed Qays 🗣 11:35, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gustave Charpentier by Pierre Apers – Gallica btv1b10023229x.jpg

Français : 1

Selon les archives du Journal officiel de la République française, M. Pierre Apers a été désigné à plusieurs reprises dans une liste d'experts professionnels. Son nom apparaît notamment dans l'édition datée du 10 avril 1957, sous la mention "Apers (Pierre) (photographie), 116, rue de Rennes, Paris (6°)" (cf. sources incluses pour la date de décès sur wikidata) . Ces éléments permettent d’établir qu’il était encore en vie en avril 1957. Bien que la date exacte de son décès demeure inconnue, il est raisonnable de conclure, en vertu des informations disponibles, que moins de 70 ans se sont écoulés depuis son décès. Par conséquent, les œuvres de M. Pierre Apers ne peuvent être considérées comme entrant dans le domaine public.

English: 1

According to the archives of the Journal officiel de la République française, Pierre Apers was repeatedly included in lists of recognized professional experts. Specifically, his name appears in the edition dated 10 April 1957, listed as "Apers (Pierre) (photography), 116, rue de Rennes, Paris (6°)." (see sources included for date of death on wikidata) This record substantiates that he was alive as of April 1957. Although the precise date of his death is unknown, it is reasonable to conclude, based on the information available, that less than 70 years have elapsed since his passing. Accordingly, the works of Pierre Apers cannot be considered part of the public domain. Trauenbaum (talk) 11:58, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See also / Voir également : File:René Maison by Pierre Apers – Great Singers of the Past.jpg

File:René Maison by Pierre Apers – Great Singers of the Past.jpg

Français : 1

Selon les archives du Journal officiel de la République française, M. Pierre Apers a été désigné à plusieurs reprises dans une liste d'experts professionnels. Son nom apparaît notamment dans l'édition datée du 10 avril 1957, sous la mention "Apers (Pierre) (photographie), 116, rue de Rennes, Paris (6°)" (cf. sources incluses pour la date de décès sur wikidata) . Ces éléments permettent d’établir qu’il était encore en vie en avril 1957. Bien que la date exacte de son décès demeure inconnue, il est raisonnable de conclure, en vertu des informations disponibles, que moins de 70 ans se sont écoulés depuis son décès. Par conséquent, les œuvres de M. Pierre Apers ne peuvent être considérées comme entrant dans le domaine public.

English: 1

According to the archives of the Journal officiel de la République française, Pierre Apers was repeatedly included in lists of recognized professional experts. Specifically, his name appears in the edition dated 10 April 1957, listed as "Apers (Pierre) (photography), 116, rue de Rennes, Paris (6°)." (see sources included for date of death on wikidata) This record substantiates that he was alive as of April 1957. Although the precise date of his death is unknown, it is reasonable to conclude, based on the information available, that less than 70 years have elapsed since his passing. Accordingly, the works of Pierre Apers cannot be considered part of the public domain. Trauenbaum (talk) 11:59, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See also / Voir également : File:Gustave Charpentier by Pierre Apers – Gallica btv1b10023229x.jpg

File:Logo of al-Furqan Media Foundation.jpg

Fake license. Screenshot from the IS video. Solodkih (talk) 12:56, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo of Asdaa Foundation.png

The copyright belongs to Asdaa Foundation. Solodkih (talk) 12:57, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Depiction of the Diwan (department) of Media of the Islamic State.png

Copyright Solodkih (talk) 13:22, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:صوت أبي حذيفة الأنصاري.ogg

Copyright Solodkih (talk) 13:26, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Audio of announcement of Abu Hafs Al-Hashimi as 5th Islamic State leader.ogg

Copyright Solodkih (talk) 13:26, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:我們是聖戰士.ogg

Copyright Solodkih (talk) 13:29, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Familia macuñucú.jpg

Selfie de una familia Carlillasa (talk) 13:33, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pesca en el río Moroco.jpg

Selfie sin valor enciclopédico Carlillasa (talk) 13:35, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A photo of a fisherman with a fish and the stream he caught it from in the background is certainly in COM:SCOPE for Commons, whether it is used in an encyclopedia or not. Moreover, the file description adds some remarks about the stream. The other photos you requested deletion of in this group are selfies of no great interest and should be deleted, but this one is not a selfie, is a decent picture and is informative. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:27, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Selfie del lago titicaca en lo mas alto de un cerro.jpg

Selfie sin valor enciclopédico Carlillasa (talk) 13:36, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Selfie junto al lago titicaca.jpg

Selfie sin valor enciclopédico Carlillasa (talk) 13:36, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Fjcamachog (talk · contribs)

Work of Miguel Rodríguez Núñez who is living. There is no evidence of a license from him. Also note that the page on WP:ES has been deleted as out of scope.

. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:42, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:DJ Parisa.webp

out of scope, low quality youtube screenshot GioviPen ^{GP msg} 14:01, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grey blue jay.JPG

Minuscule, very blurred, no location data - no realistic use, so out of Commons scope MPF (talk) 14:06, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yogurt in refrigerator.jpg

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 14:32, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yogurt de Pura Vida.jpg

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 14:32, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Diriliş ve Akıncı.jpg

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 14:34, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jay-and-Joss-Signature.svg

Per COM:SIG UK A1Cafel (talk) 14:40, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Derren Brown Signature.svg

Per COM:SIG UK A1Cafel (talk) 14:40, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jone Coaching.jpg

Watermark and metadata credit © JWB, does not appear to be the uploader Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:41, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ashley Banjo Signature.svg

Per COM:SIG UK A1Cafel (talk) 14:41, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alişer head.jpg

Contains possible copyright — Preceding unsigned comment added by Penaber49 (talk • contribs) 09:20, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and because my license review failed due to a 404 error. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:56, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sabar Oparey - সবার উপরে.ogg

"Cannot decode Ogg file: Invalid page at offset 666743546" Prototyperspective (talk) 14:59, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thumb IMG 6630 1024.jpg

Appears to be from https://x.com/DanishAtlasKhan/status/658864502415446016 Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:00, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:1.º Prefeito (Severino Raul Gadelha).png

Arquivo que não existe fonte. Foto Politicamente (talk) 15:05, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Otavio de Paula.jpg

And also File:Otavio Oscar Luz de Paula.jpg

Metadata credits erredehierro, appears to be different from the uploader Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:06, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Johanes78 (talk · contribs)

All uploads appear to be lifted from https://www.facebook.com/kudujoshua/

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:16, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:46, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Board of Trastee Award 2018.jpg

Metadata credits JEFF JANOWSKI/UNCW. The uploader appears to be the subject, but the photographer/organization retains the copyright. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:19, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PemandanganWini.jpg

I uploaded it by mistake Abcdef242526 (talk) 15:19, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Question 7.jpg

I uploaded it by mistake တကၠသိုလ္ ခ်စ္မင္းေဆြ (talk) 15:20, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ghoneime (talk · contribs)

Similar to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Board of Trastee Award 2018.jpg, appears to be a case of the user uploading photos of themselves taken by other people.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:20, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ace Attorney Miles Edgeworth Investigstions 2 Fan Translation.jpg

incorrect title, reuploading with correct title TheGoldenPickaxe (talk) 15:33, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - Do not reupload this. This is a copyright violation. (Oinkers42) (talk) 14:20, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per above. Estrellato (talk) 19:06, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Geagea.jpg

copyright Happiness Is Everywhere (talk) 15:44, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Yann at 19:48, 25 October 2024 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 13:03, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Boxeador Maguila.jpg

Has a non-free license at https://www.flickr.com/photos/amf/3936619690/ Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:46, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedily deleted per COM:F1. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 19:08, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:TheWarAndTreaty 2021.png

This photo is credited to David McClister on this website, and thus doesn't appear to be an original work by the uploader with appropriate license. Spheroidite (talk) 15:51, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:AliKhatir 7684.jpg

Copyright status is questionable. Maometto97 (talk) 15:52, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

=== File:Senador Socialista - Camilo Escalona Medina - Raúl Angelo Salazar Jil - Lilian Silva Concejal.jpg

File:Senadores Socialistas - Camilo Escalona Medina - Raúl Angelo Salazar Jil - Lilian Silva Concejal.jpg

Se debe corregir titulo 2803:C600:6103:CA34:6866:E6C:56D0:F629 16:24, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just request COM:File renaming. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:48, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

a Raulsjil (talk) 21:17, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Senadores Socialistas - Camilo Escalona Medina - Raúl Angelo Salazar Jil - Lilian Silva Concejal.jpg

Reloading Raulsjil (talk) 15:53, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:LHB coaches at Dum Dum cantonment railway station.jpg

Not clear pic Soumava2002 (talk) 17:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:LHB Coaches at Dum Dum Cantonment railway station.jpg

Not clear pic Soumava2002 (talk) 17:34, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:LHB Coaches at Dum Dum Cantonment railway station.jpg

Not clear pic Soumava2002 (talk) 17:43, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Francis Save entrainment.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Adeletron 3030 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: see https://www.fdesouche.com/2021/05/24/agen-un-homme-tue-en-pleine-rue-de-plusieurs-coups-de-couteau/

Article is from May 2021, Commons Upload is from March 2021. Uploader should contact VRT if they are an official rugby organization. Abzeronow (talk) 17:41, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:DDC metro stn entry gate.jpg

Not clear pic Soumava2002 (talk) 17:48, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bild Vogelsang Hugo Vogelsang Geschaeftsfuehrer Vogelsang GmbH & Co. KG.jpg

Not like own work UltimoGrimm (talk) 17:48, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Massimiliano lacono e Franco Zeffirelli 2.jpg

I uploaded it by mistake Massimiliano iacono (talk) 17:51, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Massimiliano Iacono e Matt Damon.jpg

I uploaded it by mistake Massimiliano iacono (talk) 17:51, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dum Dum Cantonment metro station.jpg

Not clear pic Soumava2002 (talk) 04:41, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perfectly OK to use if there are no copyright problems. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:58, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --GPSLeo (talk) 16:47, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dum Dum Cantonment metro station.jpg

Not clear pic Soumava2002 (talk) 17:54, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per previous deletion request ReneeWrites (talk) 12:38, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Cracow.Writer (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: a whole mishmash of largely personal files (low quality photos and drawings, handwritten documents, text of a court decision, screenshots of emails) with descriptions in Polish making a variety of bizarre claims. Uploader has been indef blocked for other out-of-scope uploads.

Omphalographer (talk) 17:59, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Ankry (talk) 23:35, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Bulgarian Tatars.png

Personal creation taken from reddit. The file is named erroneously and may be misused to falsely represent the claimed group, as had already been done by the uploader on the Bulgarian Wikipedia. Yue🌙 18:11, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Creator's comments at [12] make it clear that this was their own design for a flag, not a flag which is in use anywhere. Omphalographer (talk) 18:35, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Siyyid Mírzá 'Alí-Muhammad Shirazi.jpg

It is sourced back to a Wikipedia page where the image was deleted. There appears to be no source. The date given is 1905 for a painting of a man that died in 1850. Where was this published? Who made the painting? Who is supposed to be depicted in the painting? Cuñado (talk) 18:26, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ADEGOKE JLILI.jpg

Likely a personal file. Out of project scope: COM:HOST. Ratekreel (talk) 18:41, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nahid In X-2.jpg

Likely a personal file. Out of project scope: COM:HOST. Ratekreel (talk) 18:41, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Use of School Uniforms by Country.svg

Yyyyyyyyyyyyy 172.56.73.124 19:01, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nonsense request. --Achim55 (talk) 19:25, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jeg har oploadet filen, jeg ønsker filen slettet da jeg gerne vil oploade filen igen, med et andet filnavn. Jeg undskylder, det er længe siden jeg har oploadet billeder og havde glemt ,at jeg helst skal have flere ting med i filnavnet....bl.a kunstnerens navn.undskyld ulejligheden med dette. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HNBS (talk • contribs) 20:53, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Johannes Døberens død.jpg

This file was initially tagged by HNBS as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: <wrong title> Yann (talk) 19:36, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Illustration by Elisa Maria Boglino (d. 2002) would still be under copyright. —Tcr25 (talk) 19:59, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am the uploader to this file and I own the Copyright. Wikimedia commons have papers about this.I just would like to rename the file into: "Johannes Døberens død.Elisa Maria Boglino.Olie på lærred.1927" .I have tried to do this , but do not think Í succeeded? If someone could help me, I do not wish the file to be deleeted. Ciopone. (talk) 12:56, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jeg har oploadet filen, jeg ønsker filen slettet da jeg gerne vil oploade filen igen, med et andet filnavn. Jeg undskylder, det er længe siden jeg har oploadet billeder og havde glemt ,at jeg helst skal have flere ting med i filnavnet....bl.a kunstnerens navn.undskyld ulejligheden med det — Preceding unsigned comment added by HNBS (talk • contribs) 20:55, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Catalouge from exhibition 1932, Rome.jpg

This file was initially tagged by HNBS as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: <wrong title> Yann (talk) 19:36, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know about the title, but assuming the illustration on the cover is by Elisa Maria Boglino (d. 2002) it is most likely still under copyright. —Tcr25 (talk) 19:57, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I uploadet this file, and I am own the copyrigt to the paintings showed in the catalouge. I have tried to change the filename....into "Katalog udstilling Galleria di Roma, 1932. Elisa Maria Boglino" if it is ok, I would like the file not to be deleeted. Ciopone. (talk) 13:10, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Takeko Nakano.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Yuonn as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F7|The photo in question is always in black and white, while this one was only colored for the source in question. Yann (talk) 19:37, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nakano Takeko.jpg is the only photo about Nakano Takeko. This one was surely colorized when the site was created. Yuonn (talk) 19:51, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author/uploader request: G7. Yuonn (talk) 19:54, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: OK, I didn't understand the request. --Yann (talk) 19:56, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Motion Data Contact Sheet-7.jpg

Personal photo that I uploaded. OverVacation (talk) 16:17, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: may be useful. a month have passed from upload date. --Kadı Message 19:06, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Motion Data Contact Sheet-7.jpg

I uploaded it and would like it deleted for privacy. Bchauvel (talk) 19:39, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your username is different from that of the uploader, and if you have a privacy concern, you need to specify what it is in each case. If there's some reason you can't do so publicly, there's no reason for anyone to support deletion, but you can contact COM:VRT privately. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:33, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by $arthakP as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Taken from: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=2709816595798731&id=1628205197293215&set=a.1649420061838395 May be old enough. Yann (talk) 19:47, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]