User talk:Rodrigolopes/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

File:+Anima.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:39, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

File:+Anima.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:+Anima.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

File:CareFMontenegro.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:CareFMontenegro.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Herby talk thyme 14:35, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

File:14 bis.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:10, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Please fix your uploads

You've uploaded a bunch of images and marked them as {{Own}}, when they're definitely not {{Own}}. Example: File:Roberson, Willie C1931.jpg. When you upload an image, please fix the source information; don't just use the script default if it doesn't fit. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:27, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Powell, Ozie C1931.jpg

File:Powell, Ozie C1931.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Leyo 20:52, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Horton, James E. Judge 1933.jpg

File:Horton, James E. Judge 1933.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Your source info as given for this image doesn't appear to line up. The source you gave can be found here: http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/6786 but the image of Judge Horton does not appear to be anywhere on that pamphlet. Is he perhaps pictured in a different one, also free from copyright restrictions? If so, please update the file with that information a.s.a.p. Thank you!KDS4444 (talk) 03:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Callahan, William 1932.jpg

File:Callahan, William 1932.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

KDS4444 (talk) 04:37, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Rodrigolopes,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Abdallah El-Yafi Signature.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Abdallah El-Yafi Signature.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Abdallah El-Yafi Signature.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:43, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:2° Conde-de-Paraty-3,-ca.-1862-0150dpi-geneall3.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2° Conde-de-Paraty-3,-ca.-1862-0150dpi-geneall3.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:2° Conde-de-Paraty-3,-ca.-1862-0150dpi-geneall3.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:04, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Congratulations, Dear license reviewer

If you use the helper scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-.

Hi Rodrigolopes, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR
importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 08:13, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Congrats on being a reviewer! And question about File:K-Pop Night Out at SXSW, Jay Park, 2014.jpg listed for deletion!

I've just uploaded my first Flickr photos donated by a photographer. You nominated the above one for deletion. I am uncertain of the steps I needed to follow. I uploaded the photo to Commons, and it was waiting approval by a human on the license from Flickr. Then I uploaded it to WP. Was I supposed to wait until they had received approval on Commons for the Flickr licensing before uploading to WP? I want to learn the process to add more to Commons later. Thank you so much!--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 18:22, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Bonnielou2013, you uploaded one image on commons and other on wiki-en. The upload here on commons is enough. Rodrigolopes (talk) 00:02, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Oops, so you just use the JPEG upload from Commons on the WP page itself? I thought you had to re-upload it - it appears everyone is doing the same thing! Thank you - I will try to just add the Commons photo the next time!--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 00:21, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

About the photos

I' ve uploaded all these pictures representing the Peloponessian Folklore Foundation, in order to help the Europeana Fashion Editathon in Athens, which starts in a few hours. We had the same problem a few days ago and a museum's tutor send e - mail to the OTRS. I though that the task was solved so I don't know what's wrong now. All the stuff I 've uploaded until now was given to me by the museum's tutors. Postscriptum123 (talk) 02:41, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

WLE Brasil 2015

Ola Rodrigolopes, valeu pelo interesse em colaborar com o Wiki Loves Earth 2015. Vamos nos falando pelas páginas de discussão. Mais a frente gostaria de agendar uma reuniao com todos vocês para traçar algumas metas e definir algumas estratégias!!

Abraços Rodrigo Padula (talk) 21:31, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

العربيَّة ∙ Deutsch ∙ español ∙ English ∙ français ∙ português ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（台灣）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hi Rodrigolopes, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Natuur12 (talk) 18:39, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Momomorussia.jpg

Hi, You reviewed the license of this file uploaded yesterday. However today the license at source is ARR. Are you sure that there was a free license? I am asking because the other file uploaded by this user is a copyvio. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:21, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Yann, i'm pretty sure the image was ok. By the way, if the license is ARR the FlickreviewR 2 should fail the review like this one or not? Rodrigolopes (talk) 23:05, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

File:EXID LE.jpg

File:EXID LE.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Dever (Talk · Contribution) 13:25, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Question

How did you remove the rename tag from the 16 photos back in February 26 using VisualFileChange? 1989 14:10, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

1989, I don´t know if is the best way to do this, but i selected the action custom replace and used the pattern /\{\{rename.*/g. Rodrigolopes (talk) 14:25, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Ok, thanks. 1989 14:27, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

OTRS permissions queues

Hello Rodrigolopes. You are receiving this message as a license reviewer. As you know, OTRS processes a large amount of tickets relating to image releases (called "permissions"). As a license reviewer, you may have the skills necessary to contribute to this team. If you are interested in learning more about OTRS or to volunteer please visit Meta-Wiki. Tell your friends! Thank you. Rjd0060 18:51, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Help

I have been going online without finding an answer. Could you tell me how to make location maps like this?

Thanks! Hawaiifive0 (talk) 16:18, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Hawaiifive0 I have no idea, sorry. Rodrigolopes (talk) 17:32, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

??

I don't understand this. Best regards --Discasto talk 06:52, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

OK, I understand. I'm massively uploading images and store them in Category:Files uploaded by User:Discasto (generic container) before getting them categorized. Best regards --Discasto talk 13:01, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Bossk, Cosplay.jpg

File:Bossk, Cosplay.jpg.Modified, all right? Thank You.(forgive me my zero level of English)--Jordi escarre (talk) 10:28, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Edit-a-thon Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2015

Olá Rodrigo, estou organizando este edit-a-thon] para otimizar o uso das imagens e tamém para estimular o pessoal a contribuir com os artigos com base no WLE 2015. Gostaria da sua ajuda para esse planejamneto e melhoria das informações. Outra questão que gostaria de ver contigo é sobre a filtragem das fotos que seguirão para análise dos jurados. Precisaremos filtrar só as melhores, acha que vale criar uma categoria no commons pra isso? Assim ja vamos descartando as inelegíveis e selecionando as de maior qualidade. Aguardo seu retorno. Assim que definirmos essas questões pretendo fazer uma chamada nas esplanadas Rodrigo Padula (talk) 02:45, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Rodrigo Padula, estou meio ausente do commons/wikipédia ultimamente mas de alguma forma posso tentar ajudar. Concordo que uma categoria a parte é uma boa maneira para separar as fotos que tenham potencial para avaliação dos jurados. Uma sugestão seria Category:Imagens para avaliação dos jurados WLE BR 2015, ou qualquer outra, podendo esta categoria ser eliminada ou não após a avaliação. Rodrigolopes (talk) 12:28, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Avaliação das imagens do WLE 2015

Olá Rodrigo, tudo bom?

Estamos iniciando a filtragem das fotos do Wiki Loves Earth BRasil 2015. Você tem um tempo livre aí pra nos ajudar?

O pessoal da Ucrania criou uma ferramenta e uma conta única para fazermos essa primeira filtragem no Round 1. Depois teremos mais 2 rounds para eleger as melhores fotos e as notas pelos jurados.

Me adicione ai no skype: rodrigo_padula ou gtalk rodrigopadula AT gmail.

Abracos Rodrigo Padula (talk) 13:26, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Nomear fotos

Olá Rodrigolopes! Vi que você expressou dúvidas de como avaliar imagens para serem nomeadas para o destaque. Bem, explicando o guia que você leu de uma forma bem resumida: 1- uma imagem destacada deve ter uma resolução longe da borda de 2 Mpx: quase nenhuma uma imagem destacada tem uma resolução igual ao interior a esta; 2- deve ter alta qualidade, ou seja, um alto grau de nitidez: quase nenhuma tem uma qualidade média (sem ruído, sem chromatic aberration, etc.); deve transmitir grandiosidade, daquelas que a gente pensa uau, o chamado wow factor; 3- deve ter uma composição (conjunto de elementos) agradáveis (geralmente eles ajudam no wow factor). Veja exemplos de FP (Featured pictures, fotos destacadas) em Commons:FP. Em relação à imagem que você mencionou, não acho que ela seja FP, ela não tem um nível de nitidez alto e falta composição: o assunto da foto (o cálice) está cortado, não é possível vê-lo inteiro. Aos poucos e praticando você vai aprendendo... 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk)

Para você entender quais tipos de imagens que eu nomeio normalmente se destacam, veja todas as imagens destacadas do WLE Brasil, que eu nomeei:
O que você acho disso? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:13, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cervo do Pantano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:19, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Convite

Wiki Loves Monuments Logo
CONVITE - CONCURSO FOTOGRÁFICO
Wiki Loves Monuments Brasil 2015
Patrimônio Histórico

Olá Rodrigolopes,

Obrigado por ter participado do concurso Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2014/2015.

Ao longo destas duas edições contamos com a participação de quase 3.000 fotógrafos e recebemos ao todo mais de 20.000 imagens que estão sendo usadas para ilustrar artigos da Wikipédia e enriquecendo o nosso repositório de imagens aqui no Wikimedia Commons. Devido ao grande sucesso das duas edições do WLE, decidimos trazer para o Brasil o maior concurso fotográfico do mundo, que será realizado de 1 a 30 de setembro de 2015.

O Wiki Loves Monuments é organizado em vários países do mundo e é considerado desde 2011 pelo Livro dos Recordes como maior concurso fotográfico do mundo. Estamos aqui para te convidar a fazer parte da historia e do maior concurso fotográfico já realizado!

Acesse o site do Wiki Loves Monuments Brasil 2015 - Patrimônio Histórico confira nossa lista de monumentos a serem fotografados e submeta suas imagens para concorrer a premiação de R$6.000 em dinheiro.

Contribua também divulgando para seus amigos, contatos e curtindo nossa página no Facebook e seguindo nossa conta no Twitter.

Atenciosamente,

Comitê organizador do Wiki Loves Monuments Brasil 2015

Grupo Wikimedia Brasileiro de Educação e Pesquisa, Rodrigo Padula (talk). 16:50, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Question about a deletion

I'm not challenging the deletion itself but can you tell me what was wrong with File:GBBF 2009 glass (13972759508).jpg (deleted as a copyright violation; you left the message on my talk page)? I can't remember what this image was and can't find it again on Flickr, so I can't work out what I got wrong. I'd like to learn from my mistake, so I don't repeat it. Thanks, AdamBMorgan (talk) 09:34, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi @AdamBMorgan: , the photo shows a glass like File:GBBF 2015 - Flying Saucer (20357559760).jpg, but the focus of the image is the drawing and it may be copyrighted. Rodrigolopes (talk) 10:49, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
OK, thank you, AdamBMorgan (talk) 13:01, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

RE: File:AMMASSO DELLA FENICE.jpg

Il file è stata scaricato dalla pagina: https://www.flickr.com/photos/nasamarshall/7790101788/sizes/l/ dove è riportato il simbolo BY (CC-BY) (uso non commerciale). Perchè Wikipedia è un uso "commerciale"? --Mylkomeda (talk) 14:56, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Uma dúvida

Olá, eu posso colocar essa foto no Commons sobre domínio público? Na foto mostra os irmãos Daisy e Harry Earles em uma cena do filme freaks em 1932, Pois vi essa foto: File:FreaksPoster2.jpg que se encontra em domínio público, e é uma imagem derivada do filme, as fotos são da década de 30, e esse pôster de 49, e possui o copyright vencido, então como as fotos do filme são de alguns anos antes acredito que também estejam, ou seja, fotos derivadas do filme se encontram em domínio público?

Yasméssica (talk) 00:45, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Olá @Yasméssica: , acho que a imagem pode ser carregada no commons. Me parece adequado utilizar o template {{PD-US-no notice}}. Rodrigolopes (talk) 01:05, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

RE: File:AMMASSO DELLA FENICE.jpg

Io non capisco la tua risposta! Da cosa hai concluso che l'ho presa sul personale? Ho solo detto che nella pagina in questione c'era il simbolo per un uso non commerciale. Allora chiedo di sapere, visto che lavoro su Wikipedia da poco, se questa enciclopedia ha un uso commerciale o no. La foto inoltre è della NASA (e mi pare che siano, tranne poche, di pubblico dominio). Se bisogna toglierla, toglietela. Non capisco cosa ci sia da discutere. L'importante è che esista una regola. Se è stata infranta (ma mi si spieghi in cosa) si proceda pure. Cordiali saluti. P.S. Ho provveduto già a rimuoverla e l'ho sostituita con un'analoga immagine direttamente dal sito della NASA. Ciao.--Mylkomeda (talk) 09:48, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

@Mylkomeda: , mi dispiace, non capisco italiano. (google tradutor). Scrivi qui Rodrigolopes (talk) 10:53, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Marcação da imagem File:Carlos Antero Ferreira.jpg

Caro Rodrigolopes, acabei agora mesmo de enviar um e-mail ao Prof. Carlos Antero Ferreira, solicitando-lhe que envie um mails para permissions-commons-pt@wikimedia.org, conforme o modelo indicado no Commons. Abraço --João Carvalho (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Ordino Andorra.JPG

Hola buenas tardes, no puedes borrar mi imágen de Ordino, yo doy licencia de permanencia en Commons porque soy el dueño de la imágen y no veo motivo de por qué no deba permanecer. --Marrovi (talk) 16:34, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Olá @Marrovi: , escreva seus argumentos em Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Buildings in Andorra. Rodrigolopes (talk) 16:43, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Dúvidas sobre duas imagens

Olá Rodrigo, já que estávamos falando sobre outras imagens e vi que você é um License Reviewer, gostaria de tirar dúvidas quanto às licenças que inseri para duas imagens cujo upload fiz recentemente. São elas Clube Atlético Mineiro 1937.jpg e Galo-1914.jpg, ambas retiradas do website oficial do Clube Atlético Mineiro, aqui. Quanto à segunda, presumo que não haja problemas dada a data da foto, mas quanto à primeiro tenho dúvidas. Poderia conferir? Obrigado desde já. Felipebini (talk) 23:38, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Olá Felipebini, na minha opinião está certo. Você ainda tem a fonte para comprovar a data da foto. Tem várias imagens com essa mesma licença que nem fonte da data possui. Rodrigolopes (talk) 23:52, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
Tudo bem então, Rodrigo. Obrigado! Felipebini (talk) 17:32, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Category:Minas_Gerais_dam_disaster

Category discussion warning

Minas Gerais dam disaster has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Sturm (talk) 16:44, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Agência Brasil Copyvio

Olá Rodrigo, quanto ao possível copyvio da Agência Brasil, dê uma olhada em Category:Photographs by Agencia Brasil. Talvez não seja um caso de violação, mas vale a pena olhar com mais atenção! Abraços, Sturm (talk) 19:01, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Olá Sturm, se não me engano a foto estava marcada como {{Own work}}. Rodrigolopes (talk) 20:27, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Sim, é vero. O cara ao que parece carregou de qualquer jeito sem se importar muito com o que estava fazendo. Mas se tiver como corrigir ao invés de eliminar, melhor! Abraços, Sturm (talk) 21:36, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Andorra

Has someone asked you to delete all the FOP images from Andorra, or you're just doing it by your own? --Jordiferrer (talk) 18:15, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello Jordiferrer nobody asked me for nothing. I´m just applying FOP. Rodrigolopes (talk) 18:21, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
With all my respect, even if you are legally right, I think there are many other more useful tasks to do, instead of applying FOP so strictly.--Jordiferrer (talk) 16:29, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi! What does this "FOP" abbreviation in your Reasons for Deletion stand for? Is it something from the stated in this Urban dictionary?..
...Or do you mean "Fibrodysplasia"?.. Edal (talk) 05:14, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello Edal, this means Freedom of panorama. Please for more informations read Commons:Freedom of panorama#Andorra. Rodrigolopes (talk) 12:27, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi again! Thanks for the useful link! I'd suggest you use it as FOP to make it better understood by the authors of the affected pics! Kind regards, Edal (talk) 09:38, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

"Fffdiesel" account for block

Hi,

Please block a "Fffdiesel" account for indefinite time, doing to massive copyright violations (uploading non-free television screenshots, non-free film screenshots etc.). Files, uploaded by "Fffdiesel", is ready to uploaded only as fair use files in English Wikipedia and any other Wikimedia projects with fair use media approved.

Thanks, Adrianwo 14:05, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Comic Con Experience - 2014 (15416541734).jpg

File:Comic Con Experience - 2014 (15416541734).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

INeverCry 01:00, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, INeverCry 01:10, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Ayuda!!!

Saludos compañero puedes por favor VERIFICAR las fotos de Marta Etura y Manuela Velasco que son CREATIVE COMMONS!!! --Campeones 2008 (talk) 00:19, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Campeones 2008, see COM:YouTube files Rodrigolopes (talk) 01:35, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Photos of posters

I've placed {{Speedy}} tags on half a dozen flickr images, where the image was 60 percent or more just a poster. I figured that when the poster is too large to be considered de minimus we need a separate permission from whomever owned the IP rights to the poster. I am leaving you this heads-up because you gave positive flickr reviews to some of these photos. Geo Swan (talk) 17:48, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

O ficheiro Sociedade Imperatriz de Desportos.png é uma imagem de minha posse e autoria, não peguei essa imagem em outro site e não violei nenhum direito autoral, portanto não tem nenhum motivo para ela ser excluída. De: VictorVoorhees

Licencia File:Doriopsilla espinosai.jpg

Hola Rodrigolopes, si observas en la página fuente de la foto, tiene un filtro por licencia de derechos de autor, y todas las fotos del cuadrante, por tanto, aparecen con esa licencia: CC-BY, y están atribuidas a millerse. Saludos.--Josuevg (talk) 10:26, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Notificação de tradução: Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion

Olá Rodrigolopes,

Está a receber esta notificação porque inscreveu-se como tradutor de português em Wikimedia Commons.

A página Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion está disponível para tradução. Pode traduzir aqui:

A prioridade desta página é média.


Please help us to translate the speedy deletion policy in many language so that non-english speaker can read it as well.

A sua ajuda é bastante apreciada. Tradutores como você podem ajudar a Wikimedia Commons a funcionar como uma verdadeira comunidade multilingue.

Pode alterar as suas preferências de notificação.

Obrigado(a)!

Coordenadores de tradução Wikimedia Commons‎, 15:23, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Abdolrahim Mousavi.jpg

Hello, just trying to understand : how did you review the license of this image ? I could not see the mention ""All Content by Tasnim News Agency is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License". Cheers, — Racconish ☎ 20:38, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

@Racconish: there´s a footnote in tasnimnews.com. See also this discussion. Rodrigolopes (talk) 10:53, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Plakat Am Koelnberg.jpg

Hallo Rodrigolopes,

the creator and uploader is just sitting by my side at [1].

I can assure you, that there is no copyright violation. --Bahnmoeller (talk) 12:54, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Austins-pic.jpg (and others)

Good afternoon Rodrigolopes,

Thanks for your message concerning copyright information for images I have uploaded to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Carters_Steam_Fair.

Please accept my apologies for causing the extra work, and I have contacted Carters Steam Fair again to establish the best way for them and I to prove they own the copyright to the majority of the images; whether this be by email, or by creation of a copyright page on their website which I can link (you) to.

I will post further updates to keep you informed within the next few days, and will halt uploading any more images until the copyright issue has been resolved.

Regards

Jams Watton (talk) 11:38, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

@Jams Watton: , please see COM:OTRS#If you are not the copyright holder. Rodrigolopes (talk) 11:41, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
@Rodrigolopes: , Thank you for the link and information. The bulk of the images I have uploaded to the "Carters Steam Fair" category may as well be deleted please as I doubt I will be able to prove copyright release at this point. Can you suggest a bulk tool that will allow me to mark a group of images in the category as "nominate for deletion"? I understand how I can do this via the "Tools / Nominate for deletion" gadget for each file, but do not wish to have to do this over 90 times for each file page one at a time. Is there a quicker way than having to open each image's page individually and clicking "nominate for deletion pending"?

The small number of files I wish to remain I have tagged as "OTRS pending" in line with COM:OTRS, pending email confirmation from Carters Steam Fair.

Thanks for your time

Regards

Jams Watton (talk) 08:44, 21 April 2016 (UTC)


@Rodrigolopes:

Hi again,

Jarekt has also flagged one of the images I have uploaded to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Carters_Steam_Fair and I've copied a reply I have left for them below;

/q

Thanks for the message.

I tagged the file [[[File:Toytown-pic.jpg]]] as OTRS Pending, as I'm currently awaiting clearance / copyright and licence conformation from Carters Steam Fair. I am in email correspondence with them, but await them completing a licencing email template / on-line agreement. I have today emailed permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with the email thread from Carters, which I'm hoping will be enough to update the copyright on all the files I have uploaded to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Carters_Steam_Fair so far that lack the information.

Regards

/end

Hope that is acceptable.

EDIT 14:41 GMT 22/04/2016; OTRS ticket#: 2016042210012506 has been assigned to my email.

Regards

Jams Watton (talk) 13:38, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

An OTRS ticket is on the way

There is no need of marking every file I uploaded. Best wishes.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 10:49, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Un valencià al Congo.jpg.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 10:49, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
I recieved this e-mail: "Your email with ticket number "2016042210013078" is merged to "2016041910017142"." Please check it if you have permissions.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 11:04, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
@TaronjaSatsuma: sorry, i´m not an OTRS member anymore. Rodrigolopes (talk) 11:33, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Categorização das imagens do Museu da Imigração

Olá Rodrigo, a categoria Media contributed by the Immigration Museum of the State of São Paulo‎ é uma sub-cateoria de Category:Immigration_Museum_of_the_State_of_São_Paulo. Como a imagem do museu ja consta na sub-categoria, há necessidade de colocá-la também na categoria raiz? Rodrigo Padula (talk) 19:10, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

@Rodrigo Padula: , primeiro meus parabéns pela iniciativa do projeto GLAM Brasil, torço para que muitas imagens comecem a chegar no Commons. Quanto a categorização, me parece que a categoria raiz Category:Immigration Museum of the State of São Paulo devam agrupar todas as imagens do Museu (prédio) e a categoria Category:Media contributed by the Immigration Museum of the State of São Paulo as imagens enviadas através do projeto. No caso dessa imagem ficou redundante, mas me parece o correto. Rodrigolopes (talk) 20:31, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Valeu pela força, se puder dar uma força no projeto, bota seu nome lá na Wikipédia ;-). Pois é eu fiquei nessa dúvida na hora de categorizar, concordo com sua categorização. Agora tenho outra dúvida, o atual Museu da Imigração do Estado de São Paulo, recebeu o nome de Memorial do Imigrante, portanto há uma categoria Category:Memorial_do_Imigrante que já não faz mais sentido, acho que seria interessante coloca-la como sub-categoria do Museu ou então mover seu conteúdo. Várias das fotos ali listadas são do tempo em que o predio funcionava como Hospedaria dos Imigrantes. Na wikipedia o artigo ficou meio bagunçado, colocaram todas as informações no mesmo saco, creio que vamos desmembrar em 2 artigos, um do museu falado da historia da instituição e outro da hospedaria com a historia do edificio. O que acha? Rodrigo Padula (talk) 20:40, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
@Rodrigo Padula: , com certeza vou me inscrever. Vou dar uma olhada melhor no artigo para tirar alguma conclusão. Um problema que observei nas fotos carregadas e que pode gerar alguma dúvida sobre a origem é que são nomeados 2 fotógrafos como autores das imagens, o que exige a autorização destes para a publicação, veja COM:SOURCE. Não sei quantos fotógrafos estão envolvidos no projeto, mas me parece que o mais adequado seria cada um deles ter sua conta para carregar as fotos, marcando-as com {{Own work}}. Uma outra solução seria cada fotógrafo encaminhar a permissão para publicação da imagem através do OTRS, o que possibilitaria a conta atual de continuar carregando as imagens. Rodrigolopes (talk) 22:04, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Pois é, depois que eles carregaram os arquivos verifiquei que nos metadados gerados pela camera estão os nomes dos fotografos, porém todas as imagens são de propriedade do Museu e os fotografos são funcionários. Como resolver isso? Rodrigo Padula (talk) 23:56, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
@Rodrigo Padula: , existem duas alternativas:
  • os fotógrafos autorizam a publicação de suas imagens conforme COM:OTRS ou;
  • cada fotógrafo cria uma conta para publicação de suas imagens.
Atente-se também as dicas do Gunnex na Esplanada quanto ao prazo de proteção dos direitos do autor. Qualquer dúvida é só perguntar. Rodrigolopes (talk) 01:17, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Já recebemos retorno via OTRS, tudo ok! Como adiciono essa info do OTRS nos proximos arquivos a serem carregados ?Rodrigo Padula (talk) 19:35, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

@Rodrigo Padula: Ótima notícia. Se essa autorização OTRS englobar todas as imagens que venham a ser carregadas pelo projeto seria interessante criar um template com as informações do projeto, da autorização OTRS e do licenciamento. Se tiver alguma dúvida em como fazê-lo me avise que tentarei ajudá-lo. Rodrigolopes (talk) 21:05, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
No OTRS informaram que todas as imagens enviadas pelo usuario criado para o museu na categoria em questao sao de propriedade patrimonial do museu e que publicarão tudo sob licença CC-BY-SA 4. Portanto precisaremos criar esse template. Veja as recomendações que recebi nessa discussão com o Gunnex.Rodrigo Padula (talk) 21:25, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
@Rodrigo Padula: , o Gunnex tem experiência de sobra no Commons e sempre está disposto a ajudar. Criei {{Museu da Imigração do Estado de São Paulo CC-BY-SA 4.0}} fique a vontade para mudar/adaptar o texto. Do que jeito que ficou ali, deveria ser criado uma página aqui no Commons para falar sobre o projeto, como o Gunnex falou na PDU dele. Rodrigolopes (talk) 23:16, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Vi que o Rodrigo Argentom te reverteu e postou mensagem para o usuário do Museu contradizendo a sua recomendação e recomendação do Gunnex. O pessoal do Museu ja me ligou e pediu esclarecimentos, pois leram a mensagem dele tb na esplanda, daqui a pouco esse projeto morre por causa dele. Como proceder com as proximas imagens, usuários e etc? Rodrigo Padula (talk) 18:15, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

@Rodrigo Padula: , creio que a melhor solução seria pedir que o usuário que validou o OTRS, Amitie 10g, se manifeste na esplanada, informando se a permissão vale para todas as imagens carregadas ou somente para aquelas duas. Rodrigolopes (talk) 20:57, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
E quanto a categorização, template do OTRS e usuário único para carregar todas as imagens do acervo? O Gunnex disse uma coisa, RTA disse que não era pra fazer isso, mas sem entender o contexto. Sigo como em seu ponto de vista? Gosto de ouvir várias opiniões para seguir com a idéia geral da maioria, ou pelo menos a que faz mais sentido :-) Rodrigo Padula (talk) 22:59, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Notificação de tradução: Template:Abbedabb/ESC/i18n

Olá Rodrigolopes,

Está a receber esta notificação porque inscreveu-se como tradutor de português em Wikimedia Commons.

A página Template:Abbedabb/ESC/i18n está disponível para tradução. Pode traduzir aqui:



A sua ajuda é bastante apreciada. Tradutores como você podem ajudar a Wikimedia Commons a funcionar como uma verdadeira comunidade multilingue.

Pode alterar as suas preferências de notificação.

Obrigado(a)!

Coordenadores de tradução Wikimedia Commons‎, 20:23, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

WLE - Fotos não elegiveis e fotos de alta qualidade

Olá Rodrigo, topa dar uma força no WLE? Precisamos de uma força extra para marcar fotos nao elegíveis, baixa resolução, fora de contexto e também começar a marcar fotos recebidas de alta qualidade. Poderia nos ajudar a organizar essa força tarefa? Bota seu nome aqui. Rodrigo Padula (talk) 01:02, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Estamos com uma foçar tarefa, se tiver interesse e tempo em ajudar, será otimo para melhorarmos os resultados do WLE 2016. Abraços Rodrigo Padula (talk) 06:14, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Template do Museu

Olá Rodrigo, notei que ao acessar o template que vc criou para o projeto do museu com ao commons em ingles, dá erro. Como faço pra atualizar o texto e imagem do template, fiquei meio perdido aqui hehe. Rodrigo Padula (talk) 15:17, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

@Rodrigo Padula: , não criei o texto em inglês porque não sabia se você gostaria de fazer alguma mudança no atual em português. Se você achar que está ok posso criar a versão em inglês. Rodrigolopes (talk) 14:53, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Fiz alterações mas acho que zoei o template. Como nosso grupo está negociando várias parcerias GLAM para os proximos meses, talvez fosse interessante criar um template genérico que pudesse seu usado em outros museus e instituições, o que acha? Rodrigo Padula (talk) 14:55, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Notificação de tradução: Commons:Picture of the Year/2015

Olá Rodrigolopes,

Está a receber esta notificação porque inscreveu-se como tradutor de português em Wikimedia Commons.

A página Commons:Picture of the Year/2015 está disponível para tradução. Pode traduzir aqui:



A sua ajuda é bastante apreciada. Tradutores como você podem ajudar a Wikimedia Commons a funcionar como uma verdadeira comunidade multilingue.

Pode alterar as suas preferências de notificação.

Obrigado(a)!

Coordenadores de tradução Wikimedia Commons‎, 05:40, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Double-headed eagle

Hi! I'm wondering why you tagged the image with the double headed eagle I added as copyright violating? This is from a 1875 book. I just changed the sepia background to a white one. You can find a another one (better quality) here [[2]], but mine isn't a copy this one, although they obviously have the same source.— Preceding unsigned comment added by MatjoT (talk • contribs)

@MatjoT: , if it´s a image of a 1875 book, please fix the source. That´s not own work. Please see COM:SOURCE and COM:DW. Rodrigolopes (talk) 15:00, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

>> I changed it to "public domain", is that ok?

Comment on Query regarding the nomination page

Comment: File:Bird Ranthambhore India.jpg and File:Deer Ranthambhore NP India.jpg are original content of the author User:Shivanginfo. User has itself uploaded these images on his personal Facebook account. Name of the user is Shivang Krishnatreya and these are uploaded on the same FB Account as well. I can even give you the Camera details from which it has been shot.Canon EOS 700D with 55-250 Lens. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shivanginfo (talk • contribs) 19:15, 07 July 2016 (UTC)

Crazy for Oreo

Hello,

Why have you added my image File:Crazy for Oreo.jpg for the deletion. This is my original work and I had myself added the pic on my own Facebook account. Picture has my name in tagged.

Regards, Prabhat Shrivastava — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iprabhats (talk • contribs) 05:17, 07 July 2016 (UTC)

@Iprabhats: , if you are the copyright owner, please see Commons:OTRS#Licensing images: when do I contact OTRS?. Rodrigolopes (talk) 11:10, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
@Rodrigolopes: , I had mentioned the Note on my Talk Page. I hope it works. Please let me know if anything else is required. Iprabhats (talk) 05:38, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Query regarding the nomination page

Hey i had shared few of my pictures on wikipedia commons as a part of contest wiki loves earth india. It has been come to my notice that these pages have been nominated for deletion since i had shared from my Facebook. But since all images are my own art and i just used these images from facebook so i dont think there is a problem in publishing it. So i would appreciate your views with this regard. Files nominated, despite my clear clarification on email these files have been deleted so answer me :@Rodrigolopes:

File:Just amazing.jpg File:Nandi hill, Karnataka.jpg File:Nandi hill.jpg File:Sunset at lake.jpg

Shravan Kamath94 (talk) 08:56, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

@Shravan Kamath94: , if you are the copyright owner, please see Commons:OTRS#Licensing images: when do I contact OTRS?. Rodrigolopes (talk) 11:10, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I have taken some pictures of Simlipal from Facebook, but from my own Facebook page. As I am the one who has captured those images but don't have them with me right now, I have downloaded from my own FB Page, where I had uploaded them earlier.

~Wiki GSD — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki GSD (talk • contribs) 09:40, 07 July 2016 (UTC)

@Wiki GSD: , if you are the copyright owner, please see Commons:OTRS#Licensing images: when do I contact OTRS?. Rodrigolopes (talk) 11:10, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Don't you have something better to do with your time?

You're asking me to provide "evidence of permission" for a screenshot of an open source game whose entire repository is licenced GPL3 and cc-by-sa 4?

Well, you know what? Fuck it. Just delete it. Imustsay (talk) 16:25, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

@Imustsay: , Fixed, next time don´t be like a spoiled child, everybody makes mistakes. Rodrigolopes (talk) 18:32, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Some of your reviews

Hello!

File:2015 Univexpo Busan in Hyunseo Park 1.jpg, File:2015 Univexpo Busan in Hyunseo Park 2.jpg are almost User:-revi/Tistory compliant despite their non-tistory status: Go to bottom, find "Ads by Naver", see above that section, you'll see CC BY link.

As you are not an admin, here's the link: this. You should be able to see tiny CC BY icon at the bottom. So, I believe this is LR pass instead of LR fail. I've seen case like this for few times, so reminding you of User:-revi/Tistory. Thanks. — regards, Revi 15:29, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

@Czar: , issues fixed. Thanks. Rodrigolopes (talk) 18:30, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Rodrigolopes, please try to find a more useful activity than mass tagging files downloaded by admins with {{LicenseReview}} template without parameters. Sealle (talk) 04:28, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

@Sealle: I´ll try to assume good faith in your comment. I don´t find anywhere that uploaded files by admin don´t need license review, by the way, you reviewed your own files uploaded. It´s right? Rodrigolopes (talk) 10:28, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
I asked for opinions in Commons talk:License review. Rodrigolopes (talk) 12:59, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
@Sealle: , Is it serious? Please, take a look in my recent contributions. I´m tagging and reviewing. Anyway a tagged file can be reviewd by others reviewers or admins, except the uploader. Rodrigolopes (talk) 00:49, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Mapa multimodal de Pernambuco

Olá, Rodrigo! O link é o que está no arquivo mesmo. É que a imagem está em PDF. Abraço.--Juniorpetjua (talk) 22:29, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Olá @Juniorpetjua: , colega infelizmente continuo sem localizar a licença no site do Ministério dos Transportes. No mapa também não possui nenhuma informação sobre o licenciamento do mapa. Rodrigolopes (talk) 22:45, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Reversão

Olá Rodrigo! Vi que você reverteu a minha mensagem na Esplana. Gostaria de saber a razão que o levou a retirar o meu anúncio. Epsilon Tauri (talk) 21:59, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

@Epsilon Tauri: , me parece desnecessária aquela mensagem na esplanada, acho mais útil colocá-la nas páginas de usuários que não categorizam suas imagens, mas se você acha que ali é um bom local para deixar o aviso, que assim seja. Rodrigolopes (talk) 23:56, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Obrigado por me explicar o seu ponto de vista! Não quero parecer autoritário! Embora, senti que você estava a menosprezar o meu esforço para sensibilizar as pessoas a categorizar. Eu encontrei imagens especiais (featured images) apenas com a categoria do objecto que estava retratado, não havendo categorias sobre a data e a técnica usada. Era nesse sentido em que escrevi aquela mensagem. Obrigado novamente por me explicar a sua ação! Boas edições! Epsilon Tauri (talk) 04:07, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

User removing Category:Categories by office

Please do not move categories by office. --Allforrous (talk) 12:07, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Treino da seleção feminina de ginástica artística do Brasil (28487358650).jpg

File:Treino da seleção feminina de ginástica artística do Brasil (28487358650).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Daryona (talk) 20:22, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Notification about deleting photos

File:ΛΙΜΝΟΘΑΛΑΣΣΑ ΚΑΛΟΓΡΙΑΣ - KOΤΥΧΙΟΥ, ΔΑΣΟΣ ΣΤΡΟΦΥΛΙΑΣ 02.jpg and File:ΛΙΜΝΟΘΑΛΑΣΣΑ ΚΑΛΟΓΡΙΑΣ - KOΤΥΧΙΟΥ, ΔΑΣΟΣ ΣΤΡΟΦΥΛΙΑΣ 01.jpg are not grabbed from facebook. They are mine from my camera. Maybe I have uploaded them in facebook in my personal account. Mariatsil (talk) 07:12, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Notificação de tradução: Template:Abusefilter-warning-baduploads

Olá Rodrigolopes,

Está a receber esta notificação porque inscreveu-se como tradutor de português em Wikimedia Commons.

A página Template:Abusefilter-warning-baduploads está disponível para tradução. Pode traduzir aqui:

A prioridade desta página é média.


A sua ajuda é bastante apreciada. Tradutores como você podem ajudar a Wikimedia Commons a funcionar como uma verdadeira comunidade multilingue.

Pode alterar as suas preferências de notificação.

Obrigado(a)!

Coordenadores de tradução Wikimedia Commons‎, 15:00, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
سلام Yamal12 (talk) 18:56, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.


Take the survey now!


You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

  1. ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Re: Notification about possible deletion

Hi there, I do not understand your nomination for deletion regarding the following files:

I'm puzzled, because in each one of these files, it is clearly stated the author and source. In the first four images is:
Source: Flickr under Creative Commons CC BY-NC Generic license
Author: Julia Kilpatrick, Pembina Institute, 2014
And in the last one:
Source: Pixabay under Creative Commons CC0 license.
Author: Unsplash
So what is missing there? Do you need a link to the original images maybe?
I also replied you in the Talk page regarding the images of ships that you want to delete. Waiting for your reply there, and I hope we can work it out with your help, without deleting the files. Thank you and best regards, -Hanjin (talk) 22:20, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi @Hanjin: , the files needs the link of the source to confirm the licensing, see Commons:Flickr files. Rodrigolopes (talk) 09:11, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Capitanias

Tudo bem Rodrigo ? Pelo seu nome estou tomando a liberdade de escrever em portugues: vc deletou um arquivo sobre Capitanias Hereditárias hoje, sendo que o autor (Jorge Pimentel Cintra) foi o autor original do arquivo. Não apenas isto, mas como uma imagem acadêmica de um artigo citado no texto, ela está em licença aberta (desde que citado o autor original) pelo que acredito que houve uma certa pressa e engano ao apagar o arquivo. Por ora achei mais prudente falar diretamente contigo antes de levar à comunidade. Atenciosamente. Ozymandias (talk) 18:20, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Olá @Ozymandias: na realidade eu não deletei o arquivo, eu apenas apontei que o mesmo já fora publicado anteriormente em outros sites da web, o que foi confirmado por um administrador, este sim, responsável pela eliminação. Como você disse que o Jorge Pimentel é o autor original do arquivo veja Commons:OTRS#Licensing images: when do I contact OTRS? para saber como proceder. Rodrigolopes (talk) 19:59, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Valeu pelo retorno. Já "convenci" ao professor em questão a mandar a autorização via OTRS. Abraço. Ozymandias (talk) 14:12, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

RE: File source is not properly indicated: File:Twenty one pilots 4.jpg

Olá, chequei que havia colocado a fonte errada, porém já arrumei. Memyselfi357 (talk) 10:50, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, G I Chandor (talk) 03:30, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Need clarification on deletion of my images

@ :@Rodrigolopes: , despite my clarification via email and here on the talk my images which had been posted for the purpose of wiki loves earth india contest has been taken down. I need to know details about this action despite a clear clarification. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shravan Kamath94 (talk • contribs) 09:57, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

@Rodrigolopes My photographs have been deleted.

Please restore my photographs. These pictures have been clicked by me and have also been uploaded to my facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/piconnie.inc/

I did not have the time to put in description for each image in detail and that's why random file names and sloppy descriptions were used but the images are mine! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Piconnie (talk • contribs) 07:06, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rodrigolopes/Archive_1&oldid=242046800"