Commons:Deletion requests/File:Azerbaijani dilli.png

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This map is not based on any sources. It is an original research. It is also a low quality map which was haphazardly edited. A2D2 (talk) 19:08, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose due to spurious claims by the nominee and other annoyances.
First, the multiple maps you're trying to delete should have been nominated together, so we don't waste our time repeating our arguments.
Second, a dead link is not reason for deletion. There's always WayBack etc.
Third, there are no population numbers, so how can they be inflated?
Fourth, irredentism is a political philosophy that has nothing to do with this. People live where they live, and languages are spoken where they're spoken.
Fifth, I don't see much problem with the distribution in the map, which would be the only legitimate argument you make. The distribution is broadly consistent with the (Spanish) map used for years at English WP and with the brand-new maps at Ethnologue. What is the source for your claim that it's grossly inaccurate?
Kwamikagami (talk) 00:07, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. The map lacks factual accuracy, is of very low quality and sources are not provided. --Gartok~commonswiki (talk) 00:29, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Commons doesn't need references. P 1 9 9   17:03, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution with poor quality. Not fit for use: obvious visual artefacts. GPinkerton (talk) 20:51, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:21, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]