Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cityscape Frankfurt 2010 panorama crop.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Cityscape Frankfurt 2010 panorama crop.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2010 at 01:39:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info all by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald 01:39, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- Wolf im Wald 01:39, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Excellent work! --Relic38 (talk) 02:06, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support--McIntosh Natura (talk) 12:02, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose -- A quality image, maybe (it looks overexposed and washed out). But not special enough for being featured (please check Diliff's panos). -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:54, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment a lot of the Diliff's panos photos seems oversaturated imo. I understand that you like them.. but I find it is not polite/fruitful to make comparison of a user work with another user. Ggia (talk) 17:45, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment -- I respectfully disagree, as Diliff pictures are an example of excellence. Please remember that in FPC we aim to choose the best Commons has to offer -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:26, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment for your personal point of view all Diliff's panos photos are example of excellence. You can believe this.. Is this a general view of all the community (Diliff's panos photos are example of execelence)? The point for me is that is non-polite to compare other images with the nominations of the users.. Ggia (talk) 23:21, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Diliff's panos shown in his userpage have been promoted to WP:FP and so, they are examples of excellence for the community (not just for me). Also, this is a forum where candidates for FP are evaluated, not an exibition or a social event. In this perspective, I find perfectly adequate to compare the candidates with other images, particularly better ones. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 07:05, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment many users show their showcase with featured pictures.. general you can say that all the featured pictures are example of excellence.. IMO when you make comments to other user image.. you have to focus to comments concerning the aesthetics, technical details (advices to make it better) etc. As easy is to find a example of "excellence" it is easy to find a FP that is really bad. Each one has different point of view - you can see it in the nominations.. both opposes and support votes exists.. Art - aesthetics do not have limitations. Here the only limitation is the rules. Ggia (talk) 08:38, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- The kind of comments a reviewer makes when evaluating a picture in FPC is his/her own business, as long as they remain within scope and address the picture, not the author. Drawing the attention to high quality images of the same kind is a valid and constructive type of comment, used often in this forum. In this particular case, Diliff's works are very instructive examples of good lighting, colouring and composition of panoramic images, and I really fail to understand why showing them to the nominator may be considered unpolite. Neither I understand the suggestion that my comments may not comply with the present rules. But if that is what you really think, maybe it is better to start a discussion in the FPC talk page. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:09, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- * All the FP are considered the finest images in commons. If you like open a discussion in FPC talk page if you believe that only some of the FP commons are example of excellence.. And these FP pictures (that are example of excelence) should be used as an comparison example in the nominations. Ggia (talk) 18:37, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- Weak support probably a increase of saturation make image colors more vidid. The composition and the details make this image education enough and it is aethetically good to be featured. Ggia (talk) 17:45, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Comment I can't understand. This image is now FP. What happens? To me it's FP, but I don't know if I must vote.--Miguel Bugallo 20:53, 19 October 2010 (UTC)Sorry--Miguel Bugallo 20:57, 19 October 2010 (UTC)- Weak support Per Ggia--Miguel Bugallo 20:58, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Info -- Please notice that a "Week support" or a "Strong support" have exactly the same value as a "Support" vote. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:41, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks Alvesgaspar. I know it, but it's different. A {{neutral}} vote have exactly the same value as a "Oppose" vote and I don't like it, but... nobody protest--Miguel Bugallo 21:52, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- No, a "Neutral" vote is not taken into account in the final result... Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:55, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, you're right. pt: Creio que nesse caso não tenho razão e, se você o diz, eu acredito. Acaso noutro tempo, quando eu andava algo por aqui, fosse assim--Miguel Bugallo 22:02, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- No, a "Neutral" vote is not taken into account in the final result... Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:55, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks Alvesgaspar. I know it, but it's different. A {{neutral}} vote have exactly the same value as a "Oppose" vote and I don't like it, but... nobody protest--Miguel Bugallo 21:52, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Info -- Please notice that a "Week support" or a "Strong support" have exactly the same value as a "Support" vote. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:41, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Alvesgaspar. Also looks somewhat oversharpened, while missing details in part. Lycaon (talk) 13:01, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Good resolution and informative skyline. Snowmanradio (talk) 19:45, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support As long as there are no stitching errors. --IdLoveOne (talk) 21:59, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Lošmi (talk) 12:01, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose As Alvesgaspar. --Karelj (talk) 22:23, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose agree with Alvesgaspar -- Gorgo (talk) 12:52, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose per Alves. --99of9 (talk) 11:47, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose (Oversharpening)artifacts, blurry at the right, background just grey and indistinct. Qualitatively not featured --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 16:04, 25 October 2010 (UTC)