Man missing after an explosion in central Stockholm
Wednesday, December 8, 2004
Stockholm, Sweden —An explosion during the early hours of Wednesday blew a big hole in a house in central Stockholm. The tenant, a 48 year old man suspected of stealing valuable books from the Royal Library, is missing. Two persons were lightly injured in the explosion.
The cause of the explosion is not yet known. The apartment has been searched with specially trained dogs, but nothing was found. This does not rule out the possibility of explosives, just that none of the more common ones were used, according to Swedish police. Another possibility is a gas leak.
The whereabouts of the tenant is not known. Attempts to search the apartment for a body was stopped by further collapsing of the apartment. The apartment will, in accordance with the usual police routines, be secured before a crime scene investigation can be made.
The man had been in custody for a month on charges of theft from the Royal Library in Stockholm. He is suspected of having stolen books worth hundreds of thousands of dollars and has given a partial confession. Some books were found in his apartment on a previous occasion. He was released from custody this Friday.Thursday, December 9, 2004
Stockholm, Sweden —Claes-Göran Johansson, safety expert on Fortum, the gas provider, says that nothing indicated a gas explosion. "Normally such a large explosion would have started a fire". He also claims that such a large explosion should not be possible by accident.Monday, December 13, 2004
Stockholm, Sweden —The body of the 48-year old has been found in the apartment in central Stockholm.
Sources
edit- Malin Ekmark. "Man saknas efter lägenhetsexplosion" — Dagens Nyheter, December 8, 2004
- Malin Ekmark. "Den saknade misstänkt för bokstölder" — Dagens Nyheter, December 8, 2004
- Per Luthander. "Inget tyder på gasexplosion" — Dagens Nyheter, December 8, 2004
- Gunnar Sörbring. "Misstänkt boktjuv hittad död" — Dagens Nyheter, December 12, 2004
This article has passed through community review. The users who have reviewed it believe it to be factually accurate, neutral and free of legal problems. Please comment on the discussion page if you find any issues with this article, and please clearly denote any updates you make at the bottom.