List of Starship launches: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 20:4020:40, 16 November 2024 SylveonFan2005 talk contribs 40,167 bytes +67 B12 had a chine damaged, this is not nominal even if it was caught, this is an issue that SpaceX will improve on in the future undo Tag: Visual edit
curprev 03:4403:44, 16 November 2024 Redacted II talk contribs 40,100 bytes −171 →2024: Delayed to Tuesday undo Tag: Visual edit

curprev 19:1419:14, 9 November 2024 Redacted II talk contribs 40,070 bytes −5 →2024: To quote the source "Ship 30 made it to flip and landing burn and a soft splashdown in the Indian ocean before exploding". Reverting WP:OR undo Tag: Visual edit
curprev 18:5618:56, 9 November 2024 47.69.66.57 talk 40,075 bytes −1 →2024: typo undo
curprev 18:5518:55, 9 November 2024 47.69.66.57 talk 40,076 bytes +8 →2024: corrected my correction. That is what is actually seen, and wording according to the new found reference planet4589.org/space/jsr/jsr.html undo
curprev 17:0917:09, 9 November 2024 2605:59c8:4049:3a10:1d15:940e:29fd:89f6 talk 40,068 bytes −8 →Launch outcomes undo

curprev 22:4922:49, 8 November 2024 Lklundin talk contribs 40,076 bytes +12 →2024: Prepend 'upper stage' to 'in-space burn with a single Raptor engine to demonstrate deorbiting capability', to clarify that it's not the booster, per the cited source undo
curprev 10:4810:48, 8 November 2024 47.69.68.181 talk 40,064 bytes −1 →2024: "the ship" did not explode; I pointed out several times that this was a guess from unclear footage = WP:OR, now we have additional footage from the sinking ship under water which cleary shows it being intact: youtube.com/watch?v=hI9HQfCAw64 . I reccon the explosion was a surplus fuel vent, but as this is W:OR as well, we have to stick with what is shown: "an explosion" (really, only a fire) undo

curprev 08:3908:39, 3 November 2024 Dulton100 talk contribs 40,086 bytes +1 →top: updated dates undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit App select source

curprev 15:1315:13, 30 October 2024 Redacted II talk contribs 40,085 bytes +2 Reverting potential vandalism. undo Tag: Undo
curprev 10:3410:34, 30 October 2024 37.170.77.143 talk 40,083 bytes −2 No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 13:2313:23, 28 October 2024 Redacted II talk contribs 40,085 bytes +382 →2024: Added claim by Eric Berger regarding potential relight undo Tag: Visual edit
curprev 12:3012:30, 28 October 2024 Redacted II talk contribs 39,703 bytes +71 Undid revision 1253867925 by 47.67.225.78 (talk) "SpaceX completed a significant milestone in the Starship program with Flight 5 and is set to try to repeat it for Flight 6. Both vehicles are now Static-Fired and ready for integrated testing ahead of a potential November launch." undo Tag: Undo
curprev 09:0109:01, 28 October 2024 47.67.225.78 talk 39,632 bytes −71 Undid revision 1253426679 by Redacted II (talk)once more original research from speculating source just saying "Flight 6 may be only a few weeks away." This is not a fact and not stating November! undo Tags: Undo Reverted

curprev 22:4322:43, 25 October 2024 Redacted II talk contribs 39,703 bytes +71 →2024: NET November undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit
curprev 14:1814:18, 25 October 2024 RickyCourtney talk contribs 39,632 bytes −13 →2025: Considering the state of construction of OLP-B, it’s presumptuous to say these flights will all take place from OLP-A undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit