Pseudo-Riemannian manifold: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

18 June 2024

23 May 2024

  • curprev 01:0001:00, 23 May 2024Kobmuiv talk contribs 9,054 bytes +30 This article begins with "in differential geometry" and has "applications in physics" part. Only 4D Lorentzian manifolds are used in general relativity with experimental evidences. Almost all semi-Riemannian manifolds have nothing to do with physics. Where is your "win"? Nothing about it in Talk. If you won, why this article says it is geometry and has applications in physics? You should accept "quantum mechanics is not physics but chemistry or semiconductor engineering" if you insist that. kids undo Tags: Undo Reverted

6 May 2024

  • curprev 22:3622:36, 6 May 2024162.157.84.254 talk 9,024 bytes −30 this is not geometry, but a poor "knockoff". there was a discussion over this before and i "won". it was accepted "pseudo-Riemannian" is a contrived concept that belongs in the realm of "physics" and not math, because if it was math, then it wouldn't need to be called physics. losers. undo Tags: Undo Reverted

21 October 2022

18 September 2022

12 August 2022

15 July 2022

15 May 2022

4 May 2022

30 April 2022

10 November 2021

12 July 2021

15 June 2021

17 March 2021

19 August 2020

13 August 2020

9 January 2020

8 September 2019

12 April 2019

14 March 2019

17 February 2019

16 February 2019

14 February 2019

24 December 2018

28 November 2018

27 November 2018

6 October 2018

15 August 2018

12 August 2018

11 August 2018

29 July 2018

16 March 2018

15 March 2018

11 January 2018

27 December 2017

9 November 2017

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)