Content deleted Content added
Brunswicknic (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Brunswicknic (talk | contribs) j |
||
| (12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1:
Hello, Brunswicknic here. Interests: food, music, cycling, walking, comics, archaeology, geography, botany, history, art, literature, Australia, Aotearoa New Zealand, England, Scotland, Jersey, Indonesia, Austronesian languages, Papua New Guinea, Indigenous rights and issues, politics, bricks, bluestone, tea, cooking, gardening and everything (not necessarily in that order) (2011)
== Covers tidy up, and a heads up about "Otherness" (2017) ==
I wrote the following on one such song page, thought I'd place it here as a general comment
Line 9:
"Otherness": wikipedia is dominated by US individual editors (in the main, computer nerds), if a musician/group is not a commercial success in the US, then it needs a label. This is particularly so with groups outside of USA, and to a lesser extent Britain. So a group is labelled "Norwegian", "German", &c. But a US group is rarely labelled "US". The "Other" gets marked, is distinguished, the "non-Other" is normalised. Why should groups from outside the US receive "special treatment"? Why not be consistent, geographically label all groups, or none.
==
*[[Template:Format species list]]
*[[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Plants/World_Geographical_Scheme_for_Recording_Plant_Distributions]]
| |||