Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
|||
| (32 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
Line 24:
== Thanks ==
Thanks for your edits on [[Northern Raqqa offensive (November 2016–present)]]. Feel free to join us and chat with us on the article's talk page :) --[[User:Yug|Yug]] [[User talk:Yug|<small><
== [[2017 Fort Lauderdale airport shooting]] ==
Line 107:
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
:I already knew about it. Relax dude, I just talked and did nothing else. [[User:MonsterHunter32|MonsterHunter32]] ([[User talk:MonsterHunter32#top|talk]]) 08:42, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Line 121:
As for "calm down", I have looked again at the RfC and I have no idea what you're talking about. The participants seem quite calm to me.'
This is just one editor's view, take it to heart or reject it, as always. Happy editing.
== Reference errors on 22 January ==
Line 220:
== Please stop edit warring ==
You seem to be confused about what you're reading, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2017_Saint_Petersburg_Metro_bombing&diff=773717856&oldid=773717833], the reports are not contradictory. [[Kazakhstan]] is ''in'' Central Asia, and there was only one attacker. Also we always state ''attacker'' not ''suspect'' as one can't place a criminal charge against a dead person. <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">— [[User:Coffee|<big style="color:#ffa439">Coffee</big>]] // [[user talk:Coffee|<
:I don't wish to nitpick, but I have an Ordnance Survey Map of Europe dated 1999 on my office wall, and part of Kazakhstan west of the [[Ural River]] is shown as part of Europe. [[User:Ritchie333|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 13:13, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Line 226:
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|BRD]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]].
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">— [[User:Coffee|<big style="color:#ffa439">Coffee</big>]] // [[user talk:Coffee|<
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for [[WP:Edit warring|edit warring]], as you did at [[:2017 Saint Petersburg Metro bombing]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[WP:Appealing a block|request an unblock]] by first reading the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. – '''[[User:Juliancolton|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;color:#36648B">Juliancolton</span>]]''' | [[User_talk:Juliancolton|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:gray;text-shadow:gray .2em .18em .12em">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 01:07, 4 April 2017 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock -->
Line 306:
:I usually am not focused on editing articles relating to Israel, only remember one I edited long ago and don't understand why you are bringing it to me. It's better you take it to ANI. I don't have the time these days to edit any article. The small time i do have, I use it to edit Mosul battle. Other users will be able to help you if you think the edits of someone else is wrong. I may decide to check on it still though. Nothing's sure. [[User:MonsterHunter32|MonsterHunter32]] ([[User talk:MonsterHunter32#top|talk]]) 04:58, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
::FYI this is an IP sock of AndresHerutJaim. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<
== Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion ==
Line 318:
{{unblock reviewed | 1=I already issued an apology for my mistake and I didn't realise it would be seen as such. Even per that standard, I reverted 2 times. The complainant, who himself has edit-warred in the past and otherwise has been in disruptive behavior, too withdrew his complaint. Why wasn't that considered? | decline = The battle of mosul article is under 1rr restriction - One revert - not 2, not 3. You have edited the talkpage - so I believe that you have read this very prominent notice at the top. [[User:SQL|<span style="font-size:7pt;color: #fff;background:#900;border:2px solid #999">SQL</span>]][[User talk:SQL|<sup style="font-size: 5pt;color:#999">Query me!</sup>]] 03:24, 15 July 2017 (UTC)}}
*You shouldn't use the unblock template to make inquiries. If you have questions you should ping the appropriate parties or use the admin help template. You are risking a decline by leaving the request as is. [[User:Tide rolls|'''<span style="color:White;background:darkRed">Tide</span>''']][[User talk:Tide rolls|'''<span style="color:darkRed">rolls
Hey sorry, but can't the inquiry be a form of pointing out what's flawed in logic in the blocker's decision? Just saying. And [[User:SQL}}
Line 516:
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
:I made only one revert after we talked because I thought the reasons of it being "too much speculation" as not satisfying. But anyway thank you. [[User:MonsterHunter32|MonsterHunter32]] ([[User talk:MonsterHunter32#top|talk]]) 20:56, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
Line 595:
Hi MonsterHunter, I suggest you take a break from this Arya and Dasa stuff and go find something else to work on. You are going to get topic-banned or something if you persist. You have done [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indo-Aryan_migration&action=history three reverts] today? Over completely nonsensical text? You seem obsessed with this. [[Indo-Aryan migrations]] is a perfectly fine article written by {{U|Joshua Jonathan}}, who is an expert on the topic. There is nothing more you can add that is not already and that is worthwhile. Just drop it. -- [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 21:16, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
==
{{
{{u|Yamla}} I am suprised and am completely unaware of what happened. I don't understand how you call it confirmed. It is too old to be considered. And regardless, it is clear the complaint was motivated by Capitals00's animosity after his disputes with me. The claims of similarities by him are few and not completely true. There should be chance for presenting my own side. [[User:MonsterHunter32|MonsterHunter32]] ([[User talk:MonsterHunter32#top|talk]]) 17:18, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
:There is a chance. That's literally what the unblock process is for. --[[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 17:28, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
::{{u|Yamla}} I meant the chance when I was complained. And I can't keep requesting again and again. You can see well that the complaint was not of any real suspicion they believe it to be so, but simply out of animosity over disputes. I am saying the truth. How do I make you believe me? [[User:MonsterHunter32|MonsterHunter32]] ([[User talk:MonsterHunter32#top|talk]]) 17:33, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
:::I've already reviewed your unblock, but you are free to make another unblock request and see if you can convince someone else. --[[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 17:47, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
::::{{u|Yamla}} I am saying the truth. I cannot say something that isn't true. I have already shown you the actual reason behind the complaint. [[User:MonsterHunter32|MonsterHunter32]] ([[User talk:MonsterHunter32#top|talk]]) 17:52, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
{{unblock reviewed|reason=I have said this before but admins didn't choose to believe me. The only reason for it happening is Capitals00's claims of similarities at [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/DinoBambinoNFS this complaint] with another user are quite poor if you look at them. The account in question is over a year old and too stale. I wasn't even given a chance to explain anything before being blocked. This is a travesty of natural justice.<br> Even if assumed there may be somehow similarities in IP sharing, that doesn't mean it would be necessarily a sock. Capitals00 actually is only trying to have me blocked out of vengeance as I added content about Aryan migration he didn't like. He is trying to censor me and has edit-warred in the past including - [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indo-Aryan_migration&diff=838928083&oldid=838926880], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indo-Aryan_migration&diff=prev&oldid=838926723]. He even [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Capitals00&diff=839117775&oldid=839116183 justifies it] with a poor excuse of copyvio which my edit was not. I am not what he claims. It is clear he is only trying to push his agenda by getting me blocked.|decline=Assuming there is no sockpuppetry, what are the chances that your technical data would happen to coincidentally be the same as that of the editor Capitals00 accuses you of being? Very, very low. So no, accusing others of misconduct isn't going to cut it. [[User:Huon|Huon]] ([[User talk:Huon|talk]]) 18:01, 7 May 2018 (UTC)}}
:{{u|Huon}} As far as I know, they are known to be dynamic. And what I'm showing about him actually happened. And I discussed the dispute with Capitals00 and others who have reverted to engage in consensus. Others have intervened in my side too, but I edited and discussed honestly despite numerous accusations against me. If that isn't proof of good-faith, I don't know what is. [[User:MonsterHunter32|MonsterHunter32]] ([[User talk:MonsterHunter32#top|talk]]) 18:09, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
::So your stance is, "Capitals00 accused me wrongly and on weak evidence of being someone I'm not, and it's totally a coincidence that that person's technical data (which goes beyond IP addresses) happens to be identical to mine (and no one else's)." Good luck convincing anyone of that. [[User:Huon|Huon]] ([[User talk:Huon|talk]]) 18:19, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
{{u|Huon}} I have many ranges and addresses, many others may have some of them. Even before I registered, I sometimes got an IP where other users who had it were warned. As for weak evidence, what Capitals00 amounts to maybe atmost a few edits or even made-up connections. The complaint is frivolous. I have already shown what actually was the background. Do I have to convince even when I showed and spoke the truth? The disputes with him have caused my many harassments. I just want to contribute to the Wiki. [[User:MonsterHunter32|MonsterHunter32]] ([[User talk:MonsterHunter32#top|talk]]) 18:34, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
{{unblock reviewed | 1=I have said this many times. The only reason for this is it happening is Capitals00's claims of similarities at [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/DinoBambinoNFS this complaint] with another user are quite poor if you look at them. The account in question is over a year old and too stale.<br> Even if assumed there may be somehow similarities in IP range or address sharing, that doesn't mean it would be necessarily a sock. I have many ranges and addresses, many others may have some of them. Even before I registered, I sometimes got an IP where other users who had it were warned.<br> Capitals00 actually is only trying to have me blocked out of vengeance as I added content about Indo-Aryan migration he didn't like. He is trying to censor me and has edit-warred in the past including - [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indo-Aryan_migration&diff=838928083&oldid=838926880], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indo-Aryan_migration&diff=prev&oldid=838926723]. He even [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Capitals00&diff=839117775&oldid=839116183 justifies it] with a poor excuse of copyvio which my edit was not. I am not what he claims. It is clear he only had me blocked to get me out of the way. | decline = "I have said this many times" is unfortunately true; you continue to repeat the same arguments that have already led to multiple declines. I suggest you review [[WP:GAB]] and be completely honest in any forthcoming appeals. They will obviously have to be made via UTRS as you no longer have access to this page. [[User:Ponyo|<span style="color: Navy;">Jezebel's '''Ponyo'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Ponyo|<span style="color: Navy;">''bons mots''</span>]]</sup> 22:19, 7 May 2018 (UTC)}}
*Because of your repetitive unblock requests, I have revoked your access to this page. You may use [[WP:UTRS]] to appeal.--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 19:06, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
{{UTRS-unblock-user|21452|May 07, 2018 19:43:44|closed}}--[[User:UTRSBot|UTRSBot]] ([[User talk:UTRSBot|talk]]) 19:43, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
{{UTRS-unblock-user|21459|May 08, 2018 14:22:28|closed}}--[[User:UTRSBot|UTRSBot]] ([[User talk:UTRSBot|talk]]) 14:22, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
{{UTRS-unblock-user|23406|Nov 28, 2018 16:08:31|closed}}--[[User:UTRSBot|UTRSBot]] ([[User talk:UTRSBot|talk]]) 16:08, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
{{UTRS-unblock-user|23416|Nov 29, 2018 03:09:25|closed}}--[[User:UTRSBot|UTRSBot]] ([[User talk:UTRSBot|talk]]) 03:09, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
| |||