Wikipedia

Woland37

Joined 1 May 2006
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
not around since June 2012
 
(24 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{not around|3=3 June 2012}}
{{{icon|[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|45px]]}}}'''Wait! Are you here because your article was [[WP:CSD|speedy]] deleted? [[User:Woland37/CSD|Click here]] before leaving a message to find out why.'''
 
Line 19 ⟶ 20:
The [[Pragmatics]] or context with 'unmarried bachelor' by the user would determine whether it is a tautology or language verbosity. In an academic setting such as a peer reviewed journal propositions are put forward in an attempt at deriving an independent explanation for an observation. Tautologies in such a setting would be a tautological proposition and unacceptable. Tautological expressions used in an informal setting such as a sports event with its associated colloquial speech is acceptable because of the [[pragmatics]] with it. The dividing line between a tautological proposition and expression is [[pragmatics]]. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/41.208.48.160|41.208.48.160]] ([[User talk:41.208.48.160|talk]]) 07:23, 26 January 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
== GA Review of "Natural selection" ==
== Please revert? ==
 
As part of the [[WP:GAR|GA review]] sweeps process (see:[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps]], a project devoted to re-reviewing Good Articles listed before August 26, 2007), the article [[Natural selection]] has been re-reviewed. I have placed the article on hold until sufficient citations can be added to the article. If an editor has not expressed interest in improving the article within seven days, the article will be delisted as a Good Article. --<span style="background:darkgreen;color:white;font-family:Verdana">[[User:ErgoSum88|<span style="color:white;">ErgoSum</span>]]•[[User talk:ErgoSum88#top|<span style="color:white;">talk</span>]]•[[Special:Contributions/ErgoSum88|<span style="color:white;">trib</span>]]</span> 04:35, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Can you please revert this: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kristallnacht&diff=next&oldid=271565109]? Thanking you in advance. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop|talk]]) 01:46, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
:It looks like someone already has.--[[User:Woland37|Woland]] ([[User talk:Woland37#top|talk]]) 15:08, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
::Thank you. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop|talk]]) 15:11, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 
== Whatlets towork doit ?out ==▼
== Nazi, Swastika References Being Purged from [[Syrian Social Nationalist Party]] ==
 
copy paste the firs grammatical mistake. Ok? [[Special:Contributions/76.16.176.166|76.16.176.166]] ([[User talk:76.16.176.166|talk]]) 16:31, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Would you mind having a look at the problem of the [[Syrian Social Nationalist Party]]'s Nazi history and swastika flag being systematically deleted/vandalized? This removes an important aspect of neutrality from the article. References from many reliable sources are provided. See its [[Talk:Syrian_Social_Nationalist_Party#Scholarly_references_for_Fascist_and_Nazi_influences|talk page]]. The edits are being done by users with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Syrian_Social_Nationalist_Party&action=history IP addresses from very similar domains]. Thanks, [[User:Histopher Critchens|Histopher Critchens]] ([[User talk:Histopher Critchens|talk]]) 20:23, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
:Its really not salvageable at this point. I have no clear idea of what you are trying to express. The language barrier is a real problem in your edits. Perhaps try to save your edits someplace else before trying to add them.--[[User:Woland37|Woland]] ([[User talk:Woland37#top|talk]]) 16:36, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
::Not at all ? Lets try in small increments OK? [[Special:Contributions/76.16.176.166|76.16.176.166]] ([[User talk:76.16.176.166|talk]]) 16:39, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 
So do how we can together work on finding the best way to structure the text? You didn't provide me any factual information. Why did you reverted all structured sources ? Are you going to provide me any meaningful information? [[Special:Contributions/76.16.176.166|76.16.176.166]] ([[User talk:76.16.176.166|talk]]) 17:15, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
How is being chief of police in one of north america's major cities not notable? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:College and john|College and john]] ([[User talk:College and john|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/College and john|contribs]]) 22:23, 28 February 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
What is you level of expertise in molecular genetic ?
== How is being chief of police in one of north america's major cities not notable? ==
:As I said, I can't provide you with ''factual information'' because it is nigh impossible to understand the intent of your edits or to even comprehend what they are saying in the article itself. This is (at this point) less of a content issue and more of a simple comprehension issue. Your edits simply are not understandable. No reader of English is going to be able to read and understand the article. As our audience is an English speaking/reading one it is imperative that it be readable (at the absolute least). --[[User:Woland37|Woland]] ([[User talk:Woland37#top|talk]]) 17:23, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
::check now now is very easy language and easy to edit
[[Special:Contributions/76.16.176.166|76.16.176.166]] ([[User talk:76.16.176.166|talk]]) 19:44, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
:::That is not an improvement. Please revert your edits. Why in the hell are you changing the word ''hypothesis'' into ''evolution''? It simply makes no sense.
 
== You are now a Reviewer ==
How is being chief of police in one of north america's major cities not notable? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:College and john|College and john]] ([[User talk:College and john|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/College and john|contribs]]) 22:23, 28 February 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
[[File:Redaktor Wikipedia 600px.png|right|130px]]
Please read the message at the top of this page. You may also want to read [[Wp:DGAF| this]].--[[User:Woland37|Woland]] ([[User talk:Woland37#top|talk]]) 22:27, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "{{mono|reviewer}}" userright, allowing you to [[WP:Reviewing|review other users' edits]] on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a [[WP:Pending changes|two-month trial]] scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
*Given Wikipedia's definition of notability in terms of sources, having a source in an article (that actually discusses the topic) is a direct assertion of notability for the purpose of A7. Read [[Wikipedia:Notability]]--''carefully'' this time. You may also want to read [[Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers|this]]. [[Special:Contributions/160.39.213.152|160.39.213.152]] ([[User talk:160.39.213.152|talk]]) 01:57, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
::Please read the message at the top of this page. You may also want to read [[Wp:DGAF| this]].--[[User:Woland37|Woland]] ([[User talk:Woland37#top|talk]]) 22:27, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
**Since you seem to have missed the gist of my previous message, let me make myself perfectly clear: ''If an article cites a reliable source that discusses the article's topic, do not tag it for speedy deletion. It does not meet A7.''<p>The editor who contributed this article is exactly the kind of editor Wikipedia wants to attract, not repel. Wikipedia needs more sourced articles, and fewer unsourceable ones. Tagging sourced articles for speedy deletion harms the project. And if you don't "give a fuck," then feel free to stop editing Wikipedia and occupy your time with something that you ''do'' give a fuck about. [[Special:Contributions/160.39.213.152|160.39.213.152]] ([[User talk:160.39.213.152|talk]]) 10:13, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
:::You should reread the essay again. That's not what DGAFism is about; i.e. it is a positive outlook not a negative one. I help new editors all the time. Go have a nice cup of tea maybe.--[[User:Woland37|Woland]] ([[User talk:Woland37#top|talk]]) 19:09, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not [[wp:autoconfirmed|autoconfirmed]] to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only [[Special:StablePages|a small number of articles]], similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at [[Special:OldReviewedPages]].
Do you actually have any justification for trying to speedy delete a sourced article on a notable figure or are you just going to keep referring to that don't give a fuck article which is actually a complete non sequitor to the question?
 
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious [[WP:VAND|vandalism]] or [[WP:BLP|BLP violations]], and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see [[Wikipedia:Reviewing process]]). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found [[WP:Pending changes|here]].
:I nominate many many many articles for spd (some quite similar to that one). Some make it while others don't. Its completely up to whatever admin reviews it and I don't care if any of the articles I nominate get deleted or not. Its all part of the process and I believe it makes for higher standards and better articles. I'd say more than 90% of the articles I nominate get deleted. Its ok to hate me. Those of us who spend our time reviewing new articles are used to it. Now get back to work. Hippie.--[[User:Woland37|Woland]] ([[User talk:Woland37#top|talk]]) 22:08, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. <!-- Template:Reviewer-notice --> [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] ([[User talk:Courcelles|talk]]) 18:56, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
== Ethnographies of Online Cultures and Communities ==
 
== [[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]] ==
Hi there. Thanks for your editing work on the online ethnography section. I was wondering why you were using "online ethnography" as the generic term to represent the section. I prefer the term "ethnographies of online cultures and communities" but I'd be happier if someone came up with something else other than "virtual" "digital" or "cyber" or "online." It seems to me that "online ethnography" is likelier a school of this ethnographic approach (like "virtual ethnography"). Do you have any references or citations to back this up? That would be most helpful. It's still a confusing, emergent, area. It would be nice if the wiki entry could help to clarify things a bit. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Kozinets|Kozinets]] ([[User talk:Kozinets|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Kozinets|contribs]]) 15:12, 18 March 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:''Ethnographies of online cultures and communities'' has some pretty serious [[WP:Title]] issues for starters. Given this, it seems to me that ''Online ethnography'' is a pretty good, generic title for what are all essentially related methods. As far as I've seen, all of the various terms you have given above are used interchangeably.
 
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
:I did just attend the NEAA conference (North Eastern Anthropological Association) and went to a talk about the ethnography of [[Second Life]]. The anthropologist did prefer the term '' virtual'' for some theoretical reasons, but-by-and large it is my understanding that we are talking about the same thing. It would seem to me this generic title should work, which could be followed by different reasons (if any) for the differing naming conventions of the related methods.
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692013717 -->
 
== RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey ==
:It is a fairly small field and relatively new and as such I would expect there to be quite a bit of variation in terminology but I just don't see any real, differing schools-of-thought, methods, or theoretical issues between the different terms. Unfortunately I have not been able to find any references that directly deal with naming conventions for this. All I can find are people using related terms to describe what is essentially the same thing. --[[User:Woland37|Woland]] ([[User talk:Woland37#top|talk]]) 16:10, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 
[[File:Magic Wand Icon 229981 Color Flipped.svg|thumb]]
<big>'''''Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!'''''</big>
 
This is a '''one-time-only''' message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the '''[[meta:2016 Community Wishlist Survey|{{nowrap|2016 Community Wishlist Survey}}]]''' that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
== Trevor Veitch - notability established? ==
 
# [[meta:2016 Community Wishlist Survey/Categories/Moderation tools#Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled|Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled]]
I was reading the Trevor Veitch page and saw the notability caution from last October. I am wondering if notability is established through his production credits of notable songs from the 80s in particular, such as Toni Basil's "Micky", and which are discussed in the article.
# [[meta:2016 Community Wishlist Survey/Categories/Editing#Editor-focused central editing dashboard|Editor-focused central editing dashboard]]
# [[meta:2016 Community Wishlist Survey/Categories/Watchlists#"Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages|"Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages]]
# [[meta:2016 Community Wishlist Survey/Categories/Mobile and apps#Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android|Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android]]
# [[meta:2016 Community Wishlist Survey/Categories/Moderation tools#Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list|Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list]]
 
Further, there are [[meta:2016 Community Wishlist Survey/Categories/Watchlists|more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general]] that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
[[User:Dreadarthur|Dreadarthur]] ([[User talk:Dreadarthur|talk]]) 03:29, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
▲== What to do ? ==
 
<poem> Hi Woland37,
<small>Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{tl|User wikipedia/RC Patrol|}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.</small>
What to do with http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abloux&diff=291438650&oldid=291437616 ?
 
I wrote the article following the 2 (official) sites given in the ''references'' section.
Best regards, {{u|Stevietheman}} — <small>Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)</small>
*[http://sandre.eaufrance.fr/app/chainage/courdo/htm/L55-030-.php?cg=L55-030- The Abloux at the Sandre database] The Sandre provides an alphabetic list of the communes along the course of the river, its length...
<!--Sent per Special:PermaLink/753582870#Request_for_mass_message_delivery:_December_6.2C_2016 at WT:MMS-->
*The [http://www.geoportail.fr geoportail] provides very accurate maps which allow to find the precise coordinates of the source and the mouth (with their elevations), and to build the list of communes ordered from source to mouth.
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Stevietheman/RCPatrollers_list&oldid=753533319 -->
So, what can I do to avoid <nowiki>{{nofootnotes}}</nowiki> ?
==[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:User:Evans hugo]]==
Thanks in advance.</poem> [[User:Alvaro|Alvar<small>☮</small>]] [[User talk:Alvaro|☎]] 12:53, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]]
: I would look at [[WP:foot]] and [[Help:Footnotes]]. Both of these articles should provide you with what you need to know and how to do it. Its not a huge deal with smaller articles like this but it lets us know which statements came from which sources. Ciao.--[[User:Woland37|Woland]] ([[User talk:Woland37#top|talk]]) 20:56, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 
::Ok. I think the template will remain a long time on the article. I don't know how to explain... for example, look at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Frénois,_Vosges&diff=prev&oldid=292660223 this]. How can I cite my source ? I found this information on the map provided by the [[Géoportail]]. But, ''in fine'', you are right, it's no big deal ;D Ciao [[User:Alvaro|Alvar<small>☮</small>]] [[User talk:Alvaro|☎]] 13:28, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on [[:User:Evans hugo]] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under [[WP:CSD#U5|section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that [[WP:NOTWEBHOST|Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service]]. Under the [[WP:CSD#User pages|criteria for speedy deletion]], such pages may be deleted at any time.
 
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by [[:User:Evans hugo|visiting the page]] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=User%3AEvans+hugo|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request [[WP:RFUD|here]]. <!-- Template:Db-notwebhost-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:Cabayi|Cabayi]] ([[User talk:Cabayi|talk]]) 07:47, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Woland37"