Content deleted Content added
→Categories of generic name: Corrected a couple of incorrect statements regarding suppressed names in zoology (suppressed names do not become unavailable) |
m rv sock of User:Nipponese Dog Calvero |
||
(34 intermediate revisions by 29 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{short description|Taxonomic rank
{{Other uses|Genus (disambiguation)}}
{{redirect|Genera|the operating system|Genera (operating system)}}
{{Biological classification}}
'''Genus''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|dʒ|iː|n|ə|s}} {{plural form}}: '''genera''' {{IPAc-en|ˈ|dʒ|ɛ|n|ər|ə|}}) is a [[taxonomic rank]] above [[species]] and below [[family (taxonomy)|family]] as used in the [[biological classification]] of [[extant taxon|living]] and [[fossil]]
:E.g. ''[[Panthera leo]]'' (lion) and ''[[Panthera onca]]'' (jaguar) are two species within the genus ''[[Panthera]]''. ''Panthera'' is a genus within the family [[Felidae]].
The composition of a genus is determined by [[taxonomy (biology)|taxonomists]]. The standards for genus classification are not strictly codified, so different authorities often produce different classifications for genera. There are some general practices used, however,<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Sigward |first1=J. D. |first2=M. D. |last2=Sutton |first3=K. D. |last3=Bennett |title=How big is a genus? Towards a nomothetic systematics |journal=Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society |volume=183 |issue=2 |pages=237–252 |year=2018 |doi=10.1093/zoolinnean/zlx059 |url=https://pure.qub.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/how-big-is-a-genus-towards-a-nomothetic-systematics(939fc3e3-9067-4729-bd2a-23b32adfd556).html |doi-access=free |access-date=2018-12-22 |archive-date=2019-05-30 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190530164327/https://pure.qub.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/how-big-is-a-genus-towards-a-nomothetic-systematics(939fc3e3-9067-4729-bd2a-23b32adfd556).html |url-status=live |hdl=10023/16213 |hdl-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Gill |first1=F. B. |first2=B. |last2=Slikas |first3=F. H. |last3=Sheldon |title=Phylogeny of titmice (Paridae): II. Species relationships based on sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome-b gene |journal=Auk |volume=122 |issue=1 |pages=121–143 |year=2005 |doi=10.1642/0004-8038(2005)122[0121:POTPIS]2.0.CO;2 |s2cid=86067032 }}</ref> including the idea that a newly defined genus should fulfill these three criteria to be descriptively useful:
# [[monophyly]] – all descendants of an
# reasonable compactness – a genus should not be expanded needlessly.
# distinctness – with respect to evolutionarily relevant criteria, i.e. [[ecology]], [[Morphology (biology)|morphology]], or [[biogeography]]; [[DNA sequences]] are a ''consequence'' rather than a ''condition'' of diverging evolutionary lineages except in cases where they directly
Moreover, genera should be composed of [[phylogenetic]] units of the same kind as other (analogous) genera.<ref name="delamaza-benignosetal2015">{{cite journal|last1=de la Maza-Benignos|first1=Mauricio|last2=Lozano-Vilano|first2=Ma. de Lourdes|last3=García-Ramírez|first3=María Elena|date=December 2015|title=Response paper: Morphometric article by Mejía et al. 2015 alluding genera Herichthys and Nosferatu displays serious inconsistencies|journal=Neotropical Ichthyology|volume=13|issue=4|pages=673–676|doi=10.1590/1982-0224-20150066|doi-access=free}}</ref>
=={{anchor|Generic name|Name}}Etymology==<!-- Do not remove [[Template:Anchor]], since its terms are linked to as section titles -->
The term "genus" comes from
==Use==
The scientific name (or the scientific epithet) of a genus is also called the '''generic name'''; in modern style guides and science, it is always capitalised. It plays a fundamental role in [[binomial nomenclature]], the system of naming [[organism]]s, where it is combined with the scientific name of a [[species]]: see [[Botanical name]] and [[Specific name (zoology)]].<ref>{{
=== Use in nomenclature ===
Line 27 ⟶ 26:
Except for [[Virus classification|viruses]], the standard format for a [[species]] name comprises the generic name, indicating the genus to which the species belongs, followed by the specific epithet, which (within that genus) is unique to the species. For example, the [[gray wolf]]'s scientific name is {{nowrap|''{{lang|la|Canis lupus}}'',}} with ''[[Canis]]'' ([[Latin]] for 'dog') being the generic name shared by the wolf's close relatives and {{lang|la|lupus}} (Latin for 'wolf') being the specific name particular to the wolf. A botanical example would be ''[[Hibiscus arnottianus]]'', a particular species of the genus ''[[Hibiscus]]'' native to Hawaii. The specific name is written in lower-case and may be followed by [[subspecies]] names in [[zoology]] or a variety of [[infraspecific name]]s in [[botany]].
When the generic name is already known from context, it may be shortened to its initial letter, for example, ''C. lupus'' in place of ''Canis lupus''. Where species are further subdivided, the generic name (or its abbreviated form) still forms the leading portion of the scientific name, for example, {{nowrap|''{{lang|la|Canis lupus lupus}}''}} for the [[Eurasian wolf]] subspecies, or as a botanical example, {{nowrap|''{{lang|la|Hibiscus arnottianus}}'' ssp. ''{{lang|la|immaculatus}}''}}. Also, as visible in the above examples, the Latinised portions of the scientific names of genera and their included species (and infraspecies, where applicable) are, by convention, written in [[Italic type|italics]].
The scientific names of [[virus]] species are descriptive, not binomial in form, and may or may not incorporate an indication of their containing genus; for example, the virus species "[[Salmonid herpesvirus 1]]", "[[Salmonid herpesvirus 2]]" and "[[Salmonid herpesvirus 3]]" are all within the genus ''[[Salmonivirus]]''
As with scientific names at other ranks, in all groups other than viruses, names of genera may be cited with their authorities, typically in the form "author, year" in zoology, and "standard abbreviated author name" in botany. Thus in the examples above, the genus ''Canis'' would be cited in full as "''Canis'' Linnaeus, 1758" (zoological usage), while ''Hibiscus'', also first established by [[Carl Linnaeus|Linnaeus]] but in 1753, is simply "''Hibiscus'' L." (botanical usage).
Line 40 ⟶ 39:
In zoological usage, taxonomic names, including those of genera, are classified as "available" or "unavailable". Available names are those published in accordance with the [[International Code of Zoological Nomenclature]]; the earliest such name for any taxon (for example, a genus) should then be selected as the "[[valid name (zoology)|valid]]" (i.e., current or accepted) name for the taxon in question.
Consequently, there will be more available names than valid names at any point in time
In botany, similar concepts exist but with different labels. The botanical equivalent of zoology's "available name" is a [[validly published name]]. An invalidly published name is a
[[International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes|Prokaryote]] and [[International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses|virus]] codes of nomenclature also exist which serve as a reference for designating currently{{When|date=August 2023}} accepted genus names as opposed to others which may be either reduced to synonymy, or, in the case of prokaryotes, relegated to a status of "names without standing in prokaryotic nomenclature".
An '''available''' (zoological) or '''validly published''' (botanical) name that has been historically applied to a genus but is not regarded as the accepted (current/valid) name for the taxon is termed a [[synonym (taxonomy)|synonym]]; some authors also include unavailable names in lists of synonyms as well as available names, such as misspellings, names previously published without fulfilling all of the requirements of the relevant nomenclatural code, and rejected or suppressed names.
A particular genus name may have zero to many synonyms, the latter case generally if the genus has been known for a long time and redescribed as new by a range of subsequent workers, or if a range of genera previously considered separate taxa have subsequently been consolidated into one. For example, the [[World Register of Marine Species]] presently lists 8 genus-level synonyms for the sperm whale genus ''[[Physeter]]'' Linnaeus, 1758,<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=137032|title=WoRMS - World Register of Marine Species - Physeter Linnaeus, 1758|website=www.marinespecies.org|access-date=2018-06-02|archive-date=2017-07-09|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170709213325/http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=137032|url-status=live}}</ref> and 13 for the bivalve genus ''[[Pecten (bivalve)|Pecten]]'' O.F. Müller, 1776.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=138323|title=WoRMS - World Register of Marine Species - Pecten O. F. Müller, 1776|website=www.marinespecies.org|access-date=2018-06-02|archive-date=2018-08-10|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180810174658/http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails|url-status=live}}</ref>
===Identical names (homonyms)===
Line 60 ⟶ 59:
* ''Proboscidea'' is the order of [[elephant]]s and the genus of [[Proboscidea (plant)|devil's claws]].
* The name of the genus ''[[Paramecia (alga)|Paramecia]]'' (an extinct red alga) is also the plural of the name of the genus ''[[Paramecium]]'' (which is in the SAR supergroup), which can also lead to confusion.
A list of generic homonyms (with their authorities), including both available (validly published) and selected unavailable names, has been compiled by the [[Interim Register of Marine and Nonmarine Genera]] (IRMNG).<ref name ="IRMNG">{{Cite web|url=http://www.irmng.org/homonyms.php|title=IRMNG: Interim Register of Marine and Nonmarine Genera|website=www.irmng.org|access-date=2016-11-17|archive-date=2016-11-17|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161117212132/http://www.irmng.org/homonyms.php|url-status=live}}</ref>
===Use in higher classifications===
Line 66 ⟶ 65:
==Numbers of accepted genera==
The numbers of either accepted, or all published genus names is not known precisely; Rees et al., 2020 estimate that approximately 310,000 accepted names (valid taxa) may exist, out of a total of c. 520,000 published names (including synonyms) as at end 2019, increasing at some 2,500 published generic names per year.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Rees |first1=Tony |last2=Vandepitte |first2=Leen |last3=Vanhoorne |first3=Bart |last4=Decock |first4=Wim |title=All genera of the world: an overview and estimates based on the March 2020 release of the Interim Register of Marine and Nonmarine Genera (IRMNG) |journal=Megataxa |volume=1 |pages=123–140 |year=2020 |issue=2 |url=https://www.mapress.com/j/mt/article/view/megataxa.1.2.3/39250 |doi=10.11646/megataxa.1.2.3 |doi-access=free |access-date=2020-04-02 |archive-date=2021-03-22 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210322091308/https://www.mapress.com/j/mt/article/view/megataxa.1.2.3/39250 |url-status=live }}</ref> "Official" registers of taxon names at all ranks, including genera, exist for a few groups only such as viruses<ref name = "ICTV" /> and prokaryotes,<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.bacterio.net/|title=LPSN - List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature|website= bacterio.net|access-date=2018-06-01|archive-date=2022-04-01|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220401092957/https://www.bacterio.net/|url-status=live}}</ref> while for others there are compendia with no "official" standing such as ''[[Index Fungorum]]'' for fungi,<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.indexfungorum.org/|title=Index Fungorum Home Page|website= indexfungorum.org|access-date=2018-06-01|archive-date=2015-02-05|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150205221807/http://www.indexfungorum.org/|url-status=live}}</ref> ''Index Nominum Algarum''<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/ina/|title=Index Nominum Algarum: names of algae|website=Jepson Herbarium - University of California, Berkeley |access-date=2020-09-06|archive-date=2020-08-07|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200807001456/https://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/ina/|url-status=live}}</ref> and [[AlgaeBase]]<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.algaebase.org/|title=Algaebase :: Listing the World's Algae|website=algaebase.org|access-date=2020-09-06|archive-date=2020-08-29|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200829085615/https://www.algaebase.org/|url-status=live}}</ref> for algae, ''Index Nominum Genericorum''<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/|title=Index Nominum Genericorum (ING), Botany
Totals for both "all names" and estimates for "accepted names" as held in the ''[[Interim Register of Marine and Nonmarine Genera]]'' (IRMNG) are broken down further in the publication by Rees et al., 2020 cited above. The accepted names estimates are as follows, broken down by kingdom:
Line 83 ⟶ 82:
Within Animalia, the largest phylum is [[Arthropod]]a, with 151,697 ± 33,160 accepted genus names, of which 114,387 ± 27,654 are [[insect]]s (class Insecta). Within Plantae, [[Tracheophyta]] (vascular plants) make up the largest component, with 23,236 ± 5,379 accepted genus names, of which 20,845 ± 4,494 are [[angiosperms]] (superclass Angiospermae).
By comparison, the 2018 annual edition of the [[Catalogue of Life]] (estimated >90% complete, for extant species in the main) contains currently{{When|date=August 2023}} 175,363 "accepted" genus names for 1,744,204 living and 59,284 extinct species,<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.catalogueoflife.org/annual-checklist/2018/info/ac|title=
==Genus size==
[[File:Number of reptile genera with a given number of species.png|thumb|upright=1.35|Number of reptile genera with a given number of species. Most genera have only one or a few species but a few may have hundreds. Based on data from the [[Reptile Database]] (as of May 2015).]]
The number of species in genera varies considerably among taxonomic groups. For instance, among (non-avian) [[reptile]]s, which have about 1180 genera, the most (>300) have only 1 species, ~360 have between 2 and 4 species, 260 have 5–10 species, ~200 have 11–50 species, and only 27 genera have more than 50 species. However, some insect genera such as the bee genera ''[[Lasioglossum]]'' and ''[[Andrena]]'' have over 1000 species each. The largest flowering plant genus, ''[[Astragalus (plant)|Astragalus]]'', contains over 3,000 species.<ref name="Frodin">{{cite journal |last=Frodin |first=David G. |year=2004 |title=History and concepts of big plant genera |journal=[[Taxon (journal)|Taxon]] |volume=53 |issue=3 |pages=753–776 |jstor=4135449 |doi=10.2307/4135449}}</ref>
Which species are assigned to a genus is somewhat arbitrary. Although all species within a genus are supposed to be "similar", there are no objective criteria for grouping species into genera. There is much debate among zoologists whether enormous, species-rich genera should be maintained, as it is extremely difficult to come up with identification keys or even character sets that distinguish all species. Hence, many taxonomists argue in favor of breaking down large genera. For instance, the lizard genus ''[[Anolis]]'' has been suggested to be broken down into 8 or so different genera which would bring its ~400 species to smaller, more manageable subsets.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Nicholson|first1=K. E.|last2=Crother|first2=B. I.|last3=Guyer|first3=C.|last4=Savage|first4=J.M.|date=2012|url=http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2012/f/zt03477p108.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2012/f/zt03477p108.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-09 |url-status=live|title=It is time for a new classification of anoles (Squamata: Dactyloidae)|journal=Zootaxa|volume=3477|pages=1–108|doi=10.11646/zootaxa.3477.1.1|doi-access=free}}</ref>
Line 104 ⟶ 103:
* [http://www.organismnames.com/ Index to Organism Names]: includes zoological taxon names at all ranks (including genera) as continuously indexed for the [[The Zoological Record|''Zoological Record'']]
* [https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ ''Index Nominum Genericorum'' (ING)]: a compilation of generic names (accepted and unaccepted) published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (semi-continuously updated)
* [http://www.bacterio.net/ LPSN – List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature]: includes all currently{{When|date=August 2023}} accepted Bacteria and Archaea genus names (continuously updated)
* [https://
{{Taxonomic ranks}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Genus}}
[[Category:Genera|*01]]
[[Category:Botanical nomenclature|Genus]]
|