Inflationism: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by Æthereal (talk) to last version by Mean as custard
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5
 
(21 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 1:
'''Inflationism''' is a [[heterodox economics|heterodox]] [[economic policy|economic]], [[fiscal policy|fiscal]], or [[monetary policy]], that predicts that a substantial level of [[inflation]] is harmless, desirable or even advantageous. Similarly, inflationist economists advocate for an inflationist policy.
 
Mainstream economics holds that inflation is a [[lesser of two evils principle|necessary evil]], and advocates a low, stable level of inflation, and thus is largely opposed to inflationist policies – some inflation is necessary, but inflation beyond a low level is not desirable. However, [[deflation]] is often seen as a worse or equal danger, particularly within [[Keynesian economics]], andas inwell the theory ofas [[debtMonetarism|Monetarist deflationeconomics]], and thusin the policiestheory advocated by Keynesian economists such asof [[Paul Krugman]] to preventdebt deflation in cases of [[economic crisis]] are labeled as inflationist policies by others.{{By whom|date=April 2011}}
 
Inflationism is not accepted within the economics community, and is often conflated with [[Modern Monetary Theory]], which uses similar arguments, especially in relation to [[chartalism]].
 
== Political debate ==
Line 15 ⟶ 17:
 
Lenin was certainly right. There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose.
<ref>John Maynard Keynes, ''The Economic Consequences of the Peace'', 1919. pp. 235-248235–248. [https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/commandingheights/shared/minitext/ess_inflation.html PBS.org - Keynes on Inflation]</ref>
</blockquote>
 
Line 23 ⟶ 25:
The early 19th century [[Birmingham School (economics)|Birmingham School]] of economics, which advocated [[expansionary monetary policy]] to achieve full employment, was attacked as "crude inflationists".
 
The contemporary [[Post-Keynesian]] monetary economic school of [[Neo-Chartalism]], which advocates government [[deficit spending]] to yield full employment, is attacked as inflationist, with critics arguing that such deficit spending inevitably leads to [[hyperinflation]]. Neo-Chartalists reject this charge, such as in the title of the Neo-Chartalist organization the [httphttps://wwwedi.cfepsbard.orgedu/research/cfeps-archive/ Center for Full Employment and Price Stability].
 
[[Neoclassical economics]] has often argued a ''deflationist'' policy; during the [[Great Depression]], many mainstream economists argued that nominal wages should ''fall,'' as they had in 19th century economic crises, thus returning prices and employment to equilibrium. This was opposed by Keynesian economics, which argued that a general cut in wages reduced demand, worsening the crisis, without improving employment.
Line 41 ⟶ 43:
 
;Wage stickiness:
Inflation decreases the real value of wages, in the absence of corresponding wage rises. In the theory of [[wage stickiness]], a cause of unemployment in recessions and depressions is the failure of workers to take pay cuts, to decrease real labor costs. It is observed that wages are nominally sticky downwards, even in the long term (it is difficult to cutreduce realnominal wagespay rates), and thus that inflation provides useful erosion of real costs wages without requiring nominal wage cuts.<ref name="krug" /><ref>[http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~akerlof/docs/inflatn-employm.pdf Near-Rational Wage and Price Setting and the Optimal Rates of Inflation and Unemployment], George A. Akerlof, William T. Dickens, and George L. Perry, May 15, 2000</ref>
 
In this context it is worth noting that [[collectiveCollective bargaining]] in the [[Netherlands]] and [[Japan]] has at times yielded nominal wage cuts, though this has not generally occurred in the United States, andbelief that this argument ascribes high real labor costs aswere a cause ofcausing unemployment,. and argues that labor should have a lower share of national income – workers should be paid less.
 
;Decreasing real burden of debt:
In the theory of [[debt-deflation]], a key cause of economic crises is a high level of debt, and a key cause of recovery from crises is when this debt level has decreased. Other than repayment (paying down debt) and default (not paying it), a key mechanism of debt reduction is inflation – because debts are general in nominal terms, inflation reduces the real level of debt. This effect is more pronounced the higher the level of debt, in proportion to the level of debt. For example, if the [[debt to GDP ratio]] of a country is 300% and it experiences one year of 10% inflation, the debt level will be reduced by approximately <math>300\% \times 10\% = 30\%,</math> to 270%. By contrast, if the debt to GDP ratio is 20%, then one year of 10% inflation will reduce the debt level by 2%, to 18%. Thus several years of sustained high inflation significantly reduce a high level of initial debt. This is argued by [[Steve Keen]], among others.
 
In this context, the direct result of inflation is a transfer of wealth from creditors to debtors – the creditors receive less in real terms than they would have before, while the debtors pay less, assuming that the debts would in fact have been repaid, and not defaulted on. Formally, this is a de facto [[debt restructuring]], with [[principal reduction|reduction of the real value of principle]]principal, and may benefit creditors if it results in the debts being serviced (paid in part), rather than defaulted on.
 
A related argument is by [[Chartalist]]s, who argue that nations who issue debt denominated in their own [[fiat currency]] need never default, because they can print money to pay off the debt. Chartalists note, however, that printing money without matching it with taxation (to recover money and prevent the money supply from growing) can result in inflation if pursued beyond the point of full employment, and Chartalists generally do not argue for inflation.
Line 55 ⟶ 57:
*[[Asset price inflation]]
*[[Chronic inflation]]
*[[Inflation hedge]]
*[[Monetization#Monetizing debt|Debt monetization or Deficit financing]]
*[[Monetary inflation]]
*[[Statism]]
*[[Neo-Chartalism]]
 
== Notes ==
Line 69 ⟶ 73:
 
== External links ==
* [http://www.popmodal.com/video/2066/Vintage-pro-inflation-propaganda Inflation] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100620171910/http://www.popmodal.com/video/2066/Vintage-pro-inflation-propaganda |date=2010-06-20 }}, explained by [[Pete Smith (film producer)|Pete Smith]], directed by [[Zion Myers]] (1933), pro-inflation movie ([https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0194041/combined IMDb])
 
[[Category:Inflation]]