Magna Carta: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
WP:SAY changes; adding another secondary source that (while it disagrees with them) specifically says that the majority of professional historians view this as a myth.
m Updated short description
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App description change
(38 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Short description|English charter of freedoms, made in 1215}}
{{about|the English charter of 1215}}
{{pp-move}}
Line 25:
}}
{{Monarchism}}
<!--No citations are required in the article lead per [[MOS:LEADCITE]], as long as the content is cited in the article body, as it should be. Do not add missing-citation tags like {{cn}} to the lead. If necessary, {{not verified in body}} can be used, or the content removed.-->
'''{{Lang|la-x-medieval|Magna Carta Libertatum}}''' ([[Medieval Latin]] for "Great Charter of Freedoms"), commonly called '''Magna Carta''' or sometimes '''Magna Charta''' ("Great Charter"),{{Efn|The document's Latin name is spelled either {{lang|la|Magna Carta}} or {{lang|la|Magna Charta}} (the pronunciation is the same), and may appear in English with or without the definite article "the", though it is more usual for the article to be omitted.<ref>{{OED|Magna Carta}} "Usually without article."</ref> Latin does not have a definite article equivalent to "the".{{pb}}The spelling {{lang|la|Charta}} originates in the 18th century, as a restoration of [[classical Latin]] {{lang|la|[[:wikt:charta|charta]]}} for the [[Medieval Latin]] spelling {{lang|la|carta}}.<ref>[[Glossarium ad scriptores mediae et infimae latinitatis|Du Cange]] s.v. [http://ducange.enc.sorbonne.fr/charta#CHARTA1 1 carta]</ref> While "Charta" remains an acceptable variant spelling, it never became prevalent in English usage.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Garner|first1=Bryan A.|title=A Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage|date=1995|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0195142365|page=541|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=35dZpfMmxqsC&pg=PA541}} "The usual—and the better—form is ''Magna Carta''. [...] ''Magna Carta'' does not take a definite article".{{pb}}''Magna Charta'' is the recommended spelling in German-language literature. ([http://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/Magna_Charta Duden online])</ref>}} is a [[royal charter]]<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bl.uk/collection-items/magna-carta-1215|title=Magna Carta 1215|publisher=[[British Library]]|access-date=3 February 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|url=https://www.historyireland.com/volume-23/exporting-magna-carta-exclusionary-liberties-in-ireland-and-the-world/|title=Exporting Magna Carta: exclusionary liberties in Ireland and the world|journal=[[History Ireland]]|volume=23|issue= 4 |date=July 2015|author=Peter Crooks}}</ref> of [[rights]] agreed to by [[King John of England]] at [[Runnymede]], near [[Windsor, Berkshire|Windsor]], on 15 June 1215.{{Efn|Within this article, dates before 14 September 1752 are in the Julian calendar. Later dates are in the Gregorian calendar. In the Gregorian calendar, however, the date would have been 22 June 1215.}} First drafted by the [[Archbishop of Canterbury]], Cardinal [[Stephen Langton]], to make peace between the unpopular king and a group of rebel [[baron]]s, it promised the protection of church rights, protection for the barons from illegal imprisonment, access to swift and impartial justice, and limitations on [[feudal]] payments to [[the Crown]], to be implemented through a council of 25 barons. As neitherNeither side stood by their commitments, and the charter was annulled by [[Pope Innocent III]], leading to the [[First Barons' War]].
 
After John's death, the regency government of his young son, [[Henry III of England|Henry III]], reissued the document in 1216, stripped of some of its more radical content, in an unsuccessful bid to build political support for their cause. At the end of the war in 1217, it formed part of the [[Treaty of Lambeth|peace treaty agreed at Lambeth]], where the document acquired the name "Magna Carta", to distinguish it from the smaller [[Charter of the Forest]], which was issued at the same time.{{sfn|Carpenter|1990|pp=60–61}}{{sfn|White|1915|pp=472–475}}{{sfn|White|1917|pp=545–555}} Short of funds, Henry reissued the charter again in 1225 in exchange for a grant of new taxes.{{sfn|Carpenter|1990|p=379}} His son, [[Edward I]], repeated the exercise in 1297, this time confirming it as part of England's [[Statutory law|statute law]]. However, the Magna Carta was not unique; other legal documents of its time, both in England and beyond, made broadly similar statements of rights and limitations on the powers of the Crown. The charter became part of English political life and was typically renewed by each monarch in turn, although as time went by and the fledgling [[Parliament of England]] passed new laws, it lost some of its practical significance.
 
A common belief is that Magna Carta was a unique and early charter of human rights. However, the majority of historians see this as a myth created centuries later.<ref>{{cite journal|first1=R. H.|last1=Helmholz|title=The Myth of Magna Carta Revisited|url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/nclr94&div=44&id=&page=|journal=North Carolina Law Review|date= 2014|pages=1475|volume=94|quote="The latter, a negative opinion that a majority of professional historians seem to share, regards Magna Carta’s exalted reputation as a myth. In its origins, historians say, the Charter did little or nothing to promote good government. Nor, they add, did it serve to protect the legal rights of the great majority of English men and women. It served only the baronial class. Its glorification was a later invention, attributable to myth-making lawyers like Edward Coke in the seventeenth century and William Blackstone in the eighteenth."}}</ref> As [[James Holt (historian)|J. C. Holt]] said, the "Magna Carta was far from unique, either in content or in form".{{sfn|Holt|2015|pp=50–51}}<ref>{{harvnb|Blick|2015|p=39}}: "It was one of a number of such sets of concessions issued by kings, setting out limits on their powers, around this time, though it had its own special character, and subsequently it has become the most celebrated and influential of them all."</ref> At the end of the 16th century, there was an upsurge in interest in Magna Carta. Lawyers and historians at the time believed that there was an ancient English constitution, going back to the days of the [[Anglo-Saxons]], that protected individual English freedoms. They argued that the [[Norman conquest of England|Norman invasion of 1066]] had overthrown these rights and that Magna Carta had been a popular attempt to restore them,{{sfn|Hindley|1990|p=188}}{{sfn|Turner|2003b|p=140}}{{sfn|Danziger|Gillingham|2004|p=280}} making the charter an essential foundation for the contemporary powers of Parliament and legal principles such as ''[[habeas corpus]]''. Although this historical account was badly flawed, jurists such as Sir [[Edward Coke]] used Magna Carta extensively in the early 17th century, arguing against the [[divine right of kings]].{{sfn|Danziger|Gillingham|2004|p=280}}{{sfn|Breay|2010|p=46}} Both [[James VI and I|James I]] and his son [[Charles I of England|Charles I]] attempted to suppress the discussion of Magna Carta.{{sfn|Hindley|1990|p=189}}{{sfn|Danziger|Gillingham|2004|pp=280–281}} The political myth of Magna Carta and its protection of ancient personal liberties persisted after the [[Glorious Revolution]] of 1688 until well into the 19th century. It influenced the early American colonists in the [[Thirteen Colonies]] and the formation of the [[United States Constitution]], which became the supreme law of the land in the new republic of the United States.<ref name="NARA-legacy" /><ref name="NARA-Magna Carta" />
 
Research by [[Victorian era|Victorian]] historians showed that the original 1215 charter had concerned the medieval relationship between the monarch and the barons, rather than the rights of ordinary people,{{sfn|Pollard|1912|pp=31–32}}. butThe majority of historians now see the interpretation of the charter as a unique and early charter of universal legal rights as a myth that was created centuries later. Despite the changes in views of historians, the charter has remained a powerful, iconic document, even after almost all of its content was repealed from the statute books in the 19th and 20th centuries.{{sfn|Danziger|Gillingham Magna Carta still forms an important symbol of liberty today, often cited by politicians and campaigners, and is held in great respect by the British and American legal communities, [[Alfred Denning, Baron Denning|2004|p=278}}Lord Denning]] describing it in 1956 as "the greatest constitutional document of all {{sfn|Breaynot a typo|2010|p=48times}}—the foundation of the freedom of the individual against the arbitrary authority of the despot". In the 21st century, four [[Exemplified copy|exemplifications]] of the original 1215 charter remain in existence, two at the [[British Library]], one at [[Lincoln Castle]] and one at [[Salisbury Cathedral]]. There are also a handful of the subsequent charters in public and private ownership, including copies of the 1297 charter in both the United States and Australia. The 800th anniversary of Magna Carta in 2015 included extensive celebrations and discussions, and the four original 1215 charters were displayed together at the British Library. None of the original 1215 Magna Carta is currently in force since it has been repealed; however, four clauses of the original charter (1 (part), 13, 39, and 40) are enshrined in the 1297 reissued Magna Carta and do still remain in force in England and Wales.{{efn|These were 1 (aspart), 13, 39, and 40 of the 1215 charter, being clauses 1, 9, and 29 of the 1297 statute).<ref>{{Cite webAlthough |title=Thescholars contentsrefer to the 63 numbered "clauses" of Magna Carta, |url=https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/evolutionofparliament/originsofparliament/birthofparliament/overview/magnacarta/magnacartaclauses/#:~:text=Only%20four%20of%20the%2063this is a modern system of numbering,%2C%2013%2C%2039%20and%2040. |url-status=liveintroduced |access-date=2022-08-28by Sir |website=[[UKWilliam ParliamentBlackstone]]|archive-date=2022-08-28|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220828101448/https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/evolutionofparliament/originsofparliament/birthofparliament/overview/magnacarta/magnacartaclauses/}}</ref><ref>{{Cite webin |title=Magna1759; Cartathe 1297original atcharter Legislation.gov.uk|url=https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw1cc1929/25/9/section/Iformed |access-date=2022-12-08a |website=[[Legislationsingle, long unbroken text.gov.uk]]}}</ref>
 
In the 21st century, four [[Exemplified copy|exemplifications]] of the original 1215 charter remain in existence, two at the [[British Library]], one at [[Lincoln Castle]] and one at [[Salisbury Cathedral]]. There are also a handful of the subsequent charters in public and private ownership, including copies of the 1297 charter in both the United States and Australia. Although scholars refer to the 63 numbered "clauses" of Magna Carta, this is a modern system of numbering, introduced by Sir [[William Blackstone]] in 1759; the original charter formed a single, long unbroken text.
 
==History==
Line 60 ⟶ 59:
 
Although, as the historian [[David Carpenter (historian)|David Carpenter]] has noted, the charter "wasted no time on political theory", it went beyond simply addressing individual baronial complaints, and formed a wider proposal for political reform.{{sfn|Turner|2009|p=180}}{{sfn|Turner|2009|p=182}} It promised the protection of church rights, protection from illegal imprisonment, access to swift justice, and, most importantly, limitations on taxation and other feudal payments to the Crown, with certain forms of feudal taxation requiring baronial consent.{{sfn|Carpenter|1990|p=9}}{{sfn|Turner|2009|pp=184–185}} It focused on the rights of free men—in particular, the barons.{{sfn|Turner|2009|p=182}} The rights of [[serf]]s were included in articles 16, 20 and 28.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.bl.uk/magna-carta/articles/magna-carta-english-translation
|title=Magna Carta|publisher=British Library|access-date=16 March 2016}}</ref>{{efn|The Runnymede Charter of Liberties did not apply to [[Chester]], which at the time was a [[Earl of Chester|separate feudal domain]]. [[Ranulf de Blondeville, 6th Earl of Chester|Earl Ranulf]] granted his own [[Magna Carta of Chester]].{{sfn|Hewit|1929|p=9}} Some of its articles were similar to the Runnymede Charter.{{sfn|Holt|1992b|pp=379–380}}}} Its style and content reflected Henry I's Charter of Liberties, as well as a wider body of legal traditions, including the royal charters issued to towns, the operations of the Church and baronial courts and European charters such as the Statute of Pamiers.{{sfn|Vincent|2012|pp=61–63}}{{sfn|Carpenter|2004|pp=293–294}} The Magna Carta reflected other legal documents of its time, in England and beyond, which made broadly similar statements of rights and limitations on the powers of the Crown.<ref>{{harvnb|Helmholz|2016|p=869}} "First, the formulation of Magna Carta in England was not an isolated event. It was not unique. The results of the meeting at Runnymede coincided with many similar statements of law on the Continent."</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Holt|2015|pp=50–51}}: "Magna Carta was far from unique, either in content or in form"</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Blick|2015|p=39}}: "It was one of a number of such sets of concessions issued by kings, setting out limits on their powers, around this time, though it had its own special character, and subsequently it has become the most celebrated and influential of them all."</ref> <!--this point about contemporary comparisons could be expanded on -->
 
Under what historians later labelled "clause 61", or the "security clause", a council of 25 barons would be created to monitor and ensure John's future adherence to the charter.{{sfn|Turner|2009|p=189}} If John did not conform to the charter within 40 days of being notified of a transgression by the council, the 25 barons were empowered by clause 61 to seize John's castles and lands until, in their judgement, amends had been made.{{sfn|Danziger|Gillingham|2004|pp=261–262}} Men were to be compelled to swear an oath to assist the council in controlling the King, but once redress had been made for any breaches, the King would continue to rule as before.{{sfn|Goodman|1995|pp=260–261}}
Line 83 ⟶ 82:
<u>Chapter 57:</u> The return of [[Gruffudd ap Llywelyn ap Iorwerth]], illegitimate son of [[Llywelyn ap Iorwerth]] (Llywelyn the Great) along with other Welsh hostages which were originally taken for "peace" and "good".<ref name="auto">{{Cite web|url=https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/evolutionofparliament/2015-parliament-in-the-making/2015-historic-anniversaries/magna-carta/magna-carta---wales-scotland-and-ireland/|title=Magna Carta: Wales, Scotland and Ireland|access-date=19 October 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Smith |first1=J. Beverley |title=Magna Carta and the Charters of the Welsh Princes |journal=The English Historical Review |date=1984 |volume=XCIX |issue=CCCXCI |pages=344–362 |doi=10.1093/ehr/XCIX.CCCXCI.344 |issn = 0013-8266}}</ref>
 
{{hidden begin|title====={{center|Lists of participants in 1215|style=====border:solid 1px #aaa}}}}
======Counsellors named in Magna Carta======
The preamble to Magna Carta includes the names of the following 27 ecclesiastical and secular magnates who had counselled John to accept its terms. The names include some of the moderate reformers, notably Archbishop [[Stephen Langton]], and some of John's loyal supporters, such as [[William Marshal, 1st Earl of Pembroke|William Marshal, Earl of Pembroke]]. They are listed here in the order in which they appear in the charter itself:<ref>{{cite web|title=Preface|url=http://magnacartaresearch.org/read/magna_carta_1215/Preface|publisher=Magna Carta Project|access-date=17 May 2015}}</ref>
Line 170 ⟶ 169:
* Robert, chaplain to Robert Fitzwalter
{{div col end}}
{{hidden end}}
 
====Great Charter of 1216====
Line 446:
This view of Magna Carta began to recede. The late-Victorian jurist and historian [[Frederic William Maitland]] provided an alternative academic history in 1899, which began to return Magna Carta to its historical roots.{{sfn|Simmons|1998|pp=69–83}} In 1904, [[Edward Jenks]] published an article entitled "The Myth of Magna Carta", which undermined the previously accepted view of Magna Carta.{{sfn|Galef|1998|pp=78–79}} Historians such as [[Albert Pollard]] agreed with Jenks in concluding that Edward Coke had largely "invented" the myth of Magna Carta in the 17th century; these historians argued that the 1215 charter had not referred to liberty for the people at large, but rather to the protection of baronial rights.{{sfn|Pollard|1912|pp=31–32}}
 
This view also became popular in wider circles, and in 1930 [[Sellar and Yeatman]] published their parody on English history, ''[[1066 and All That]]'', in which they mocked the supposed importance of Magna Carta and its promises of universal liberty: "Magna Charter was therefore the chief cause of Democracy in England, and thus a ''Good Thing'' for everyone (except the Common People)".{{sfn|Barnes|2008|p=23}}{{sfn|Danziger|Gillingham|2004|p=283}}
 
In many literary representations of the medieval past, however, Magna Carta remained a foundation of English national identity. Some authors used the medieval roots of the document as an argument to preserve the social status quo, while others pointed to Magna Carta to challenge perceived economic injustices.{{sfn|Simmons|1998|pp=69–83}} The Baronial Order of Magna Charta was formed in 1898 to promote the ancient principles and values felt to be displayed in Magna Carta.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.magnacharta.com/|title=Home|publisher=The Baronial Order of Magna Charta|access-date=19 November 2014}}</ref> The legal profession in England and the United States continued to hold Magna Carta in high esteem; they were instrumental in forming the Magna Carta Society in 1922 to protect the meadows at Runnymede from development in the 1920s, and in 1957, the [[American Bar Association]] erected the [[Magna Carta Memorial]] at Runnymede.<ref name="NARA-Magna Carta"/>{{sfn|Wright|1990|p=167}}{{sfn|Holt|1992b|pp=2–3}} The prominent lawyer [[Lord Denning]] described Magna Carta in 1956 as "the greatest constitutional document of all times<!-- [sic]; see note above -->—the foundation of the freedom of the individual against the arbitrary authority of the despot".{{sfn|Danziger|Gillingham|2004|p=278}}
 
====Repeal of articles and constitutional influence====
Radicals such as Sir [[Francis Burdett]] believed that Magna Carta could not be repealed,{{sfn|Burdett|1810|p=41}} but in the 19th century clauses which were obsolete or had been superseded began to be repealed. The repeal of clause 26 in 1829, by the [[Offences Against the Person Act 1828]] ([[9 Geo. 4]]. c. 31 s. 1){{efn|I.e., section 1 of the 31st statute issued in the 9th year of George IV; "nor will We not" in clause 29 is correctly quoted from this source.}}<ref name=UKStatute/> was the first time a clause of Magna Carta was repealed. Over the next 140 years, nearly the whole of Magna Carta (1297) as statute was repealed,<ref>{{cite web|title=Magna Carta|url=http://www.sagamoreinstitute.org/library-article/magna-carta/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141105004655/http://www.sagamoreinstitute.org/library-article/magna-carta/|url-status=dead|archive-date=5 November 2014|publisher=Segamore Institute|access-date=4 November 2014}}</ref> leaving just clauses 1, 9 and 29 still in force (in England and Wales) after 1969.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The contents of Magna Carta |url=https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/evolutionofparliament/originsofparliament/birthofparliament/overview/magnacarta/magnacartaclauses/#:~:text=Only%20four%20of%20the%2063,%2C%2013%2C%2039%20and%2040. |url-status=live |access-date=2022-08-28 |website=[[UK Parliament]]|archive-date=2022-08-28|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220828101448/https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/evolutionofparliament/originsofparliament/birthofparliament/overview/magnacarta/magnacartaclauses/}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Magna Carta 1297 at Legislation.gov.uk|url=https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw1cc1929/25/9/section/I |access-date=2022-12-08 |website=[[Legislation.gov.uk]]}}</ref> Most of the clauses were repealed in England and Wales by the [[Statute Law Revision Act 1863]], and in modern [[Northern Ireland]] and also in the modern [[Republic of Ireland]] by the [[Statute Law (Ireland) Revision Act 1872]].<ref name=UKStatute/>
 
Many later attempts to draft constitutional forms of government trace their lineage back to Magna Carta. The British dominions, Australia and New Zealand,{{sfn|Clark|2000}} Canada{{sfn|Kennedy|1922|p=228}} (except [[Quebec]]), and formerly the [[Union of South Africa]] and [[Southern Rhodesia]], reflected the influence of Magna Carta in their laws, and the Charter's effects can be seen in the laws of other states that evolved from the [[British Empire]].{{sfn|Drew|2004|pp=pxvi–pxxiii}}
Line 462:
Magna Carta carries little legal weight in modern Britain, as most of its clauses have been repealed and relevant rights ensured by other statutes, but the historian James Holt remarks that the survival of the 1215 charter in national life is a "reflexion of the continuous development of English law and administration" and symbolic of the many struggles between authority and the law over the centuries.{{sfn|Holt|1992b|p=2}} The historian W. L. Warren has observed that "many who knew little and cared less about the content of the Charter have, in nearly all ages, invoked its name, and with good cause, for it meant more than it said".{{sfn|Warren|1990|p=240}}
 
It also remains a topic of great interest to historians; [[Natalie Fryde]] characterised the charter as "one of the holiest of cows in English medieval history", with the debates over its interpretation and meaning unlikely to end.{{sfn|Fryde|2001|p=1}} InThe manymajority waysof stillcontemporary ahistorians "sacredhowever text",see Magnathe Cartainterpretation isof generallythe consideredcharter partas ofa theunique [[uncodifiedand constitution]]early [[Constitutioncharter of thelegal Unitedrights Kingdomas a myth that was created centuries later.<ref>{{harvnb|Helmholz|2014|p=1475}} "The latter, a negative opinion that a majority of theprofessional Unitedhistorians Kingdom]];seem into share, regards Magna Carta’s exalted reputation as a 2005myth. In its speechorigins, historians say, the [[LordCharter Chiefdid Justicelittle ofor Englandnothing andto promote good government. Wales]]Nor, [[Lordthey Woolf]]add, describeddid it asserve to protect the "firstlegal rights of athe seriesgreat majority of instrumentsEnglish thatmen nowand arewomen. recognisedIt asserved havingonly athe specialbaronial constitutional status"class.<ref name=woolfspeech>{{citeIts web|url=http://magnacarta800th.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Precedent_Recent_Constitutional_Change.pdf|title=Magnaglorification Carta:was a precedentlater forinvention, recentattributable constitutionalto change|work=Judiciarymyth-making oflawyers Englandlike Edward Coke in the seventeenth century and WalesWilliam Speeches|date=15Blackstone Junein 2005the eighteenth."</ref><ref>{{harvnb|access-dateBaker|2017|p=4 November 2014missing}}</ref><ref>{{sfnharvnb|HoltRadin|1992b1947|p=21missing}}</ref> <!--section on current historians' views could do with being expanded -->
 
In many ways still a "sacred text", Magna Carta is generally considered part of the [[uncodified constitution]] [[Constitution of the United Kingdom|of the United Kingdom]]; in a 2005 speech, the [[Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales]], [[Lord Woolf]], described it as the "first of a series of instruments that now are recognised as having a special constitutional status".<ref name=woolfspeech>{{cite web|url=http://magnacarta800th.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Precedent_Recent_Constitutional_Change.pdf|title=Magna Carta: a precedent for recent constitutional change|work=Judiciary of England and Wales Speeches|date=15 June 2005|access-date=4 November 2014}}</ref>{{sfn|Holt|1992b|p=21}} Magna Carta was reprinted in [[New Zealand]] in 1881 as one of the Imperial Acts in force there.<ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.nzlii.org/nz/legis/imp_act_1881/mc25ei84/ |title= Magna Carta (25 Ed I) |publisher= New Zealand Law online }}</ref> Clause 29 of the document remains in force as part of New Zealand law.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/imperial/1297/0029/latest/whole.html#DLM10926|title=Magna Carta 1297 No 29 (as at 03 September 2007), Imperial Act – New Zealand Legislation|website=www.legislation.govt.nz|language=en-NZ|access-date=2018-12-03}}</ref>
[[File:CAC CC 001 18 9 0000 0840.jpg|thumb|The ceremony in the Capitol rotunda honouring the arrival of Magna Carta in 1976]]
The document also continues to be honoured in the United States as an antecedent of the [[United States Constitution]] and [[United States Bill of Rights|Bill of Rights]].<ref name=ChartersOfFreedom>{{cite web|url=https://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_q_and_a.html|title=United States Constitution Q + A|work=The Charters of Freedom|publisher=National Archives and Records Administration|access-date=4 November 2014}}</ref> In 1976, the UK lent one of four surviving originals of the 1215 Magna Carta to the United States for their bicentennial celebrations and also donated an ornate display case for it. The original was returned after one year, but a replica and the case are still on display in the [[United States Capitol]] Crypt in [[Washington, D.C.]]<ref>{{cite web|title=Magna Carta Replica and Display|url=http://www.aoc.gov/capitol-hill/other/magna-carta-replica-and-display|publisher=[[Architect of the Capitol]]|access-date=20 November 2014}}</ref>
Line 535:
! scope="col" | {{ubl|1215 clause|{{sfn|Breay|2010|pp=49–54}}}}
! scope="col" | {{ubl|Description|{{sfn|Breay|2010|pp=49–54}}<ref name="All clauses">{{cite web|title=All clauses|url=http://magnacarta.cmp.uea.ac.uk/read/magna_carta_1215/!all|website=The Magna Carta Project|publisher=University of East Anglia|access-date=9 November 2014}}</ref>}}
! scope="col" | {{ubl|Included in later charters|{{sfn|Breay|2010|pp=49–54}}<ref name=sharples>{{cite webharvnb|last1=SharplesThomson|first1=Barry|title=Magna Carta Liberatum (The Great Charter of Liberties) The First Great Charter of King Edward The First Granted October 12th 1297|url=http://www.bsswebsite.me.uk/History/MagnaCarta/magnacarta-1297.doc|access-date=13 November 20142011}}</ref>}}
! scope="col" | Notes
|-
Line 546:
| Regulated the operation of [[feudal relief]] upon the death of a baron.
| Y
|Repealed by [[Statute Law Revision Act 1863]] and [[Statute Law (Ireland) Revision Act 1872]].<ref name=natarchives>{{cite webharvnb|title=Magna Carta (1297)|url=http://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw1cc1929/25/9|publisher=UkUK Government|access-date=15 November 20141297}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" |3
Line 883:
{{Reflist|21em}}
 
==BibliographySources==
{{refbegin|30em}}
* {{cite book | last = Aurell | first = Martin | year = 2003 | title = L'Empire de Plantagenêt, 1154–1224 | publisher = Tempus | location= Paris | isbn = 978-2262022822 |language=fr}}
*{{cite book|first1=John|last1=Baker|title=The Reinvention of Magna Carta 1216–1616|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gsXeDQAAQBAJ|publisher=Cambridge University Press|date=2017|isbn=978-1-316-94973-3|via=Google Books|doi=10.1017/9781316940990}}
* {{cite book|last1=Barnes|first1=Thomas Garden|title=Shaping the Common Law: From Glanvill to Hale, 1188–1688|date=2008|publisher=Stanford University Press|isbn=978-0804779593|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hJ6MPXP6MwMC&q=Magna+Charter+was+therefore+the+chief+cause+of+Democracy+in+England%2C+and+thus+a+Good+Thing+for+everyone+%28except+the+Common+People%29&pg=PA23}}
* {{cite book|last1=Black|first1=Charles|author-link=Charles Black (professor)|title=A New Birth of Freedom: Human Rights, Named and Unnamed|date=1999|publisher=Yale University Press|location=New Haven, CN|isbn=978-0300077346}}
Line 913 ⟶ 914:
* {{cite book | last1 = Hallam | first1 = Elizabeth M. | last2 = Everard | first2 = Judith A. | edition = 2nd | year = 2001 | title = Capetian France, 987–1328 | publisher = Longman | location= Harlow, UK | isbn = 978-0582404281 }}
* {{cite book|last1=Hazeltine|first1=H.D.|chapter=The Influence of Magna Carta on American Constitutional Development|editor-last=Malden|editor-first=Henry Elliot|title=Magna Carta commemoration essays |date=1917|publisher=BiblioBazaar|isbn=978-1116447477}}
* {{cite journal|first1=R. H. |last1=Helmholz |title=The Myth of Magna Carta Revisited |journal=North Carolina Law Review |url=https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr/vol94/iss5/5 |date=2014|pages=1475–1493|volume=94|issue=5 }}
* {{cite journal|first1=R. H.|last1=Helmholz|title=Magna Carta and the Law of Nature|url=https://law.loyno.edu/sites/law.loyno.edu/files/file_attach/Helmholz-Proof%20-1_30_17.pdf|journal=Loyola Law Review|date= 2016|pages=869–886|volume=62}}
* {{cite book|last1=Hewit|first1=H.J.|title=Mediaeval Cheshire|date=1929|publisher=Manchester University Press|location=Manchester, UK}}
* {{cite book|last1=Hill|first1=Christopher|author-link=Christopher Hill (historian)|title=Winstanley 'The Law of Freedom' and Other Writings|date=2006|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0521031608|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_cnrjlrzUE4C&q=An+appeal+to+the+house+of+commons+Winstanley&pg=PA109}}
Line 938 ⟶ 941:
* {{cite book|last1=Prestwich|first1=Michael|author-link=Michael Prestwich|title=Edward I|date=1997|publisher=Yale University Press|location=New Haven, CN|isbn=978-0300071573}}
* {{ODNBweb |first=H. W. |last=Ridgeway |title=Henry III (1207–1272) |year=2010 |origyear=2004 |edition=online |id=12950 }}
* {{cite journal|first1=Max|last1=Radin|title=The Myth of Magna Carta|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1335742|journal=Harvard Law Review|date=1947|issn=0017-811X|pages=1060–1091|volume=60|issue=7|doi=10.2307/1335742|jstor=1335742 }}
* {{cite book|last=Rothwell|first=Harry|title=English Historical Documents 1189–1327|date=1975|publisher=Eyre & Spottiswoode|location=London|isbn=978-0413233004}}
* {{cite book|last1=Russell|first1=Conrad|author-link=Conrad Russell, 5th Earl Russell|title=Unrevolutionary England, 1603–1642|date=1990|publisher=Continnuum-3PL|isbn=978-1852850258}}
Line 945 ⟶ 949:
* {{cite journal |first=Tim |last=Tatton-Brown |title=Magna Carta at 800: Uncovering its Landscape Archaeology |journal=Current Archaeology |issue=304 |date=July 2015 |pages=34–37}}
* {{cite book|last1=Thompson|first1=Faith|title=Magna Carta – Its Role In The Making Of The English Constitution 1300–1629|date=1948|publisher=University of Minnesota Press|location=Minneapolis|isbn=978-1299948686}}
* {{cite book|editor-last1=Sharples|editor-first1=Barry|chapter=Magna Carta Liberatum (The Great Charter of Liberties) The First Great Charter of King Edward The First Granted October 12th 1297|url=http://www.bsswebsite.me.uk/History/MagnaCarta/magnacarta-1297.doc|access-date=13 November 2014| last1=Thomson |first1=Richard |title=An Historical Essay on the Magna Charta of King John |date=2011 |orig-date=1829}}
* {{cite journal|last1=Turner|first1=Ralph V.|title=The Meaning of Magna Carta since 1215|journal=History Today|date=2003a|volume=53|issue=9|url=http://www.historytoday.com/ralph-v-turner/meaning-magna-carta-1215}}
* {{cite book|last1=Turner|first1=Ralph|title=Magna Carta: Through the Ages|date=2003b|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-0582438262}}
* {{cite book|last1=Turner|first1=Ralph|title= King John: England's Evil King?|date=2009|publisher=History Press|location=Stroud, UK|isbn=978-0752448503}}
* {{cite web|title=Magna Carta (1297)|url=http://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw1cc1929/25/9|publisher=UK Government|access-date=15 November 2014|ref = {{harvid|UK Government|1297}}}}
* {{cite book|last1=Vincent|first1=Nicholas|title=Magna Carta: A Very Short Introduction|date=2012|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=Oxford|isbn=978-0199582877}}
* {{cite book|last1=Vincent|first1=Nicholas|editor-last1=Vincent|editor-first1=Nicholas|title=Magna Carta: The Foundation of Freedom, 1215–2015|chapter=From World War to World Heritage: Magna Carta in the Twentieth Century|pages=154–169|date=2015|publisher=Third Millennium Publishing|location=London|isbn=978-1908990488}}