Content deleted Content added
→Historical Accuracy: Table with historical performance of the Sahm rule |
→Origin: dab fix Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit App section source |
||
| (29 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Short description|Method of determining when the economy has entered a recession}}
[[File:Sahm rule.webp|thumb|Sahm rule 1949-
In macroeconomics, the '''Sahm rule''', or '''Sahm rule recession indicator''', is a [[heuristic]] measure by the United States' [[Federal Reserve]] for determining when an economy has entered a [[recession]].<ref>{{Cite news |date=2019-10-04 |title='Sahm Rule' enters Fed lexicon as fast, real-time recession flag |language=en |work=Reuters |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-fed-sahm-idUSKBN1WJ12J |access-date=2023-01-12}}</ref> It is useful in real-time evaluation of the [[business cycle]] and relies on monthly unemployment data from the [[Bureau of Labor Statistics]] (BLS). It is named after economist [[Claudia Sahm]], formerly of the Federal Reserve and [[Council of Economic Advisers|Council of Economic Advisors]].
The Sahm rule states:<ref>{{Cite web|last=Dr. Sahm|first=Claudia|date=2022-12-30|title=The Sahm rule: I created a monster.|url=https://stayathomemacro.substack.com/p/the-sahm-rule-i-created-a-monster|access-date=2024-07-31|website=Substack|language=en-US}}</ref>
{{Blockquote|text=When the three-month moving average of the national unemployment rate is 0.5 percentage point or more above its low over the prior twelve months, we are in the early months of recession.}}
The Sahm rule originates from a chapter in the [[Brookings Institution]]'s report on the use of fiscal policy to stabilize the economy during recessions.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Shambaugh|first=Heather Boushey, Ryan Nunn, and Jay|date=2019-05-16|title=Recession ready: Fiscal policies to stabilize the American economy|url=https://www.brookings.edu/multi-chapter-report/recession-ready-fiscal-policies-to-stabilize-the-american-economy/|access-date=2020-12-20|website=Brookings|language=en-US}}</ref> The chapter, written by Sahm, proposes fiscal policy to automatically send stabilizing payments to citizens to boost economic well-being. Instead of relying on human intuition to determine when such payments should be sent, Sahm outlines a condition to trigger the payments.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web|last=Sahm|first=Claudia|date=2019-05-16|title=Direct stimulus payments to individuals|url=https://www.brookings.edu/research/direct-stimulus-payments-to-individuals/|access-date=2020-12-20|website=Brookings|language=en-US}}</ref> The trigger suggested indicates an economy beginning a recession and is now known as the ''Sahm rule''. The Sahm rule recession indicator was also featured early in a Goldman Sachs U.S. economic research report by economist [[William C. Dudley]] with a recommended trigger of 0.33%<ref>{{Cite web|last=van Vuuren|first=Dwaine|date=2024-01-01|title=The Sahm Rule Redux|url=https://recessionalert.com/sahm-rule-redux/|access-date=2024-07-31|website=RecessionALERT|language=en-US}}</ref> (the nowadays more commonly used rule triggers a recession signal when the Sahm metric is crossing above 0.5%).▼
==
▲The Sahm rule originates from a chapter in the [[Brookings Institution]]'s report on the use of fiscal policy to stabilize the economy during recessions.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Shambaugh|first=Heather Boushey, Ryan Nunn, and Jay|date=2019-05-16|title=Recession ready: Fiscal policies to stabilize the American economy|url=https://www.brookings.edu/multi-chapter-report/recession-ready-fiscal-policies-to-stabilize-the-american-economy/|access-date=2020-12-20|website=Brookings|language=en-US}}</ref> The chapter, written by Sahm, proposes fiscal policy to automatically send stabilizing payments to citizens to boost economic well-being.
Dr. Sahm cautions: {{blockquote|"The Sahm rule is an empirical regularity. It’s not a proposition; it’s not a law of nature."▼
Instead of relying on human intuition to determine when such payments should be sent, Sahm outlines a method-based case to trigger the payments.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web|last=Sahm|first=Claudia|date=2019-05-16|title=Direct stimulus payments to individuals|url=https://www.brookings.edu/research/direct-stimulus-payments-to-individuals/|access-date=2020-12-20|website=Brookings|language=en-US}}</ref> The trigger suggested indicates an economy beginning a recession and is now known as the ''Sahm rule''. Different thresholds have been used for similar purposes—for example [[William C. Dudley]] wrote in 2000 an increase in the unemployment of over one-third of a percent would predict a recession—but Sahm has written that her rule (and its accompanying threshold) is specifically suited as an indicator of the early stages of a recession for the purposes of a fiscal policy response.<ref name="u905">{{cite web | last=Sahm | first=Claudia | title=No, you didn't invent the Sahm rule and that's ok, we need more tools! | website=Substack | date=2024-03-29 | url=https://stayathomemacro.substack.com/p/no-you-didnt-invent-the-sahm-rule?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2 | access-date=2024-09-10}}</ref>
▲
}}
And
}}
=== Implementation ===
The Sahm rule was published by The [[Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis|St. Louis Federal Reserve]] bank's [[Federal Reserve Economic Data]] (FRED) system in October 2019.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2019-10-16|title=FRED Adds Sahm Rule Recession Indicators {{!}} St. Louis Fed|url=https://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/research-news/fred-adds-sahm-rule-recession-indicators|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191016192630/https://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/research-news/fred-adds-sahm-rule-recession-indicators|url-status=dead|archive-date=2019-10-16|access-date=2020-12-20}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=FRED Adds Sahm Rule Recession Indicators {{!}} St. Louis Fed Economic Research|date=2 October 2019 |url=https://news.research.stlouisfed.org/2019/10/fred-adds-sahm-rule-recession-indicators/|access-date=2020-12-21|language=en-US}}</ref> It is retroactively calculated to evaluate performance from past recessions. The recession rule is defined as:
Line 21 ⟶ 25:
The rule only relies on a single data series, national unemployment, which is published monthly by the [[Bureau of Labor Statistics|BLS]]. This differentiates the index from other recession indicators based on statistical models, which may rely on dozens of inputs.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Berge|first=Travis J.|date=2015-05-13|title=Predicting Recessions with Leading Indicators: Model Averaging and Selection over the Business Cycle|url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/for.2345|journal=Journal of Forecasting|volume=34|issue=6|pages=455–471|doi=10.1002/for.2345|issn=0277-6693|url-access=subscription}}</ref> Further, unemployment can be more easily understood than complex financial series.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Schneider|first=Howard|date=2019-10-04|title='Sahm Rule' enters Fed lexicon as fast, real-time recession flag|language=en|work=Reuters|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-fed-sahm-idUSKBN1WJ12J|access-date=2020-12-20}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web|title=The Sahm Rule With The Eponymous Economist : The Indicator from Planet Money|url=https://www.npr.org/2019/11/26/783120728/the-sahm-rule-with-the-eponymous-economist|access-date=2020-12-21|website=NPR.org|language=en}}</ref>
== Historical
The Sahm rule is a robust tool that has been very accurate in identifying a downturn in the [[business cycle]] and almost always doesn't trigger outside of a recession. The simplicity of the calculation contributes to its reliability. The Sahm rule signals the early stages (onset) of a recession and generated only two false positive recession alerts since the year 1959 (there have been 11 recessions since 1950); in both instances — in 1959 and 1969 — it was just a little untimely, with the recession warning appearing a few months before a slide in the U.S. economy began.<ref>{{Cite news|date=2024-08-02|title=U.S. employers likely added 175,000 jobs in July as labor market cools gradually|url=https://apnews.com/article/economy-jobs-unemployment-federal-reserve-inflation-22095766804d9c1532b4fcc29565be49|access-date=2024-08-02|website=AP - The Associated Press, Washington|language=en}}</ref> In the case of the false positive warning related to the year 1959 it was followed by an actual recession six months later. The Sahm rule typically signals a recession before [[GDP]] data makes it clear.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2024-01-01|title=Sahm Rule Recession Indicator|url=https://www.currentmarketvaluation.com/models/sahm-rule.php|website=Current Market Valuation (CMV) by Gramalam, LLC|language=en-US}}</ref>
The Sahm rule is designed to indicate that the U.S. economy is in the early months of a recession, rather than forecasting future recessions.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Sahm|first=Claudia|date=2024-03-29|title=No, you didn't invent the Sahm rule and that's ok, we need more tools!|url=https://stayathomemacro.substack.com/p/no-you-didnt-invent-the-sahm-rule|website=Substack|language=en-US}}</ref> While the historical performance and timeliness of the Sahm rule has been very accurate, the reliability of the Sahm rule in today's economy has been questioned by many economists (including Claudia Sahm) due to several distortions and there is reason to believe that the economy might act differently this time around due to unique unusual conditions.<ref>{{Cite
|first=Christiaan|title=Wall Street is worrying about the ‘Sahm Rule,’ which predicts recessions—but its creator is not, yet|url=https://fortune.com/2024/07/29/sahm-rule-recession-unemployment/|website=Fortune|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|date=2024-08-02|last=Leonhardt
|first=Megan|title=Today’s Jobs Report Triggered a Recession Indicator. But Even Its Creator Doesn’t Think There Is a Downturn.|url=https://www.barrons.com/amp/articles/sahm-rule-recession-4b114b90|website=Barron's|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|date=2024-08-02|last=Daniel
|first=Will|title=This recession indicator is flashing red, but the ‘Sahm Rule’ creator says ‘this time really could be different’|url=https://fortune.com/2024/08/02/recession-indicator-claudia-sahm-rule-trigger-unemployment-rate-jobs-report/|website=Fortune|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|date=2024-08-04|last=Jones
|first=Charisse|title=Are we in a recession? The Sahm rule explained|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2024/08/02/sahm-rule-recession-indicator-explained/74651239007/|website=USA Today|language=en}}</ref>This suggests that caution should be exercised when interpreting the Sahm rule in the current unprecedented economic situation. Like all economic indicators, it should be considered alongside other economic data and indicators. However, the Sahm Rule remains a valuable tool for economists and policymakers for early detection of economic downturns.
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center"
Line 55 ⟶ 63:
| 14.80% || 4.00 || Apr 2020 || 2 months prior (Feb 2020)
|-
| 4.30% || 0.
|-
|}
Line 61 ⟶ 69:
In summary, the Sahm rule's reliability lies in its consistent performance throughout various economic climates, particularly in signaling the beginning of a recession with a high degree of accuracy.
==
Economists Pascal Michaillat and [[Emmanuel Saez]] have created a two-sided Sahm rule-based indicator<ref>{{Cite web|date=2024-08-11|title=General Economics - Has the Recession Started?|last1=Michaillat|first1=Pascal|last2=Saez|first2=Emmanuel|url=https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.05856|access-date=2024-08-17|website=arXiv|language=en}}</ref> (which the Financial Times named the 'Michez rule'<ref>{{Cite news|date=2024-08-16|title=Simple indicators of whether the US is in recession are flawed - Investors are going to have to live with some uncertainty|last=Keynes|first=Soumaya|url=https://www.ft.com/content/8e8f22b7-9234-4fdf-a5c4-0a5e18fb65fb|access-date=2024-08-17|website=Financial Times|language=en}}</ref>), using both the unemployment rate and also the vacancy rate for jobs. The economists noted that their modified indicator functioned for recessions going back to the year 1930,<ref>{{Cite news|date=2024-08-12|title=There's a 40% chance the US economy is already in a recession, according to a new indicator|last=Cloonan|first=Kelly|url=https://www.businessinsider.com/sahm-rule-claudia-recession-new-indicator-michaillat-saez-unemployment-jobs-2024-8|access-date=2024-08-17|website=Business Insider|language=en}}</ref> while Sahm's worked only back to the 1950s. Another notable difference: The 'Michez rule' is usually triggered earlier than the Sahm rule as it detects recessions on average 1.4 months after they have started.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2024-08-11|title=General Economics - Has the Recession Started?|last1=Michaillat|first1=Pascal|last2=Saez|first2=Emmanuel|url=https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.05856|access-date=2024-08-17|website=arXiv|language=en}}</ref>
==Employment-to-population Sahm rule modifications==
Morgan Stanley economists have constructed an indicator which has the same 0.5% recession threshold as the Sahm rule, but uses the employment-to-population, or EPR, ratio. It emphasizes the ratio of employed individuals to the total working-age population and may provide a more accurate picture of the labor market's state. The Morgan Stanley economists combined their approach with the modification made by Michaillat and Saez, which uses two thresholds, to create the 'Triumvirate rule'. "The Triumvirate rule has moved to 100% probability of recession within 2 to 6 months after rising above 20% historically, with an average of 3.7 months."<ref>{{Cite news|date=2024-08-19|title=Soft landing still in sight as Sahm Rule recession indicator misses more than hits|last=Ebrahim|first=Yasin|url=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/soft-landing-still-sight-sahm-210843473.html|website=Yahoo! finance|language=en}}</ref>
== Reception ==
Line 77 ⟶ 80:
Its low rate of false positives are attractive features. Federal Reserve Chair [[Jerome Powell]] characterized the Sahm rule as a "statistical regularity" at a press conference in late July 2024.<ref>{{Cite news|date=2024-07-31|title=Jobs report could trigger closely watched recession indicator|url=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/jobs-report-could-trigger-closely-watched-recession-indicator-144917689.html|access-date=2024-08-01|website=yahoo! finance|language=en}}</ref>
While the Sahm rule indicates recessions sooner than the formal NBER recession indications, which can take anywhere from half to two years, it is by no means predictive,<ref>{{Cite web|title=Business Cycle Dating|url=https://www.nber.org/research/business-cycle-dating|access-date=2020-12-21|website=NBER|language=en}}</ref>
A lesser-known feature of the Sahm model is that it is particularly useful in assessing recession ends. The standard 3-month smoothed Sahm rule has on average a minimum two month lag to recession ends (while the unsmoothed-Sahm indicator provides for near perfect coincident signalling of [[
==See also==
Line 88 ⟶ 91:
{{reflist}}
== External links ==
* National Unemployment: [https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm Monthly BLS data]
{{United States – Commonwealth of Nations recessions}}
{{Federal Reserve System}}
[[Category:Economic indicators]]
| |||