Sahm rule: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m v2.05b - Bot T20 CW#61 - Fix errors for CW project (Reference before punctuation)
→‎Origin: dab fix
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit App section source
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 6:
{{Blockquote|text=When the three-month moving average of the national unemployment rate is 0.5 percentage point or more above its low over the prior twelve months, we are in the early months of recession.}}
 
== OriginationOrigin ==
The Sahm rule originates from a chapter in the [[Brookings Institution]]'s report on the use of fiscal policy to stabilize the economy during recessions.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Shambaugh|first=Heather Boushey, Ryan Nunn, and Jay|date=2019-05-16|title=Recession ready: Fiscal policies to stabilize the American economy|url=https://www.brookings.edu/multi-chapter-report/recession-ready-fiscal-policies-to-stabilize-the-american-economy/|access-date=2020-12-20|website=Brookings|language=en-US}}</ref> The chapter, written by Sahm, proposes fiscal policy to automatically send stabilizing payments to citizens to boost economic well-being. By automating this process she saw the opportunity to get aid to people faster. Because the sooner the help was distributed in her view the better the odds that small business can stay open and that people could stay in their homes and keep their jobs. Her rule should herebythereby function as an early warning to detect the early stages of an recession and then to step in and help manage the recession on autopilot with direct payments to individuals when conditions get bad.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Sahm|first=Claudia|date=2024-08-12|title=Are We in a Recession? The Sahm Rule Says Yes. It’s Creator Says Not So Fast|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PCDteczVg4|access-date=2024-08-17|website=Bloomberg Big Take audio podcast on Youtube|language=en-US}}</ref> Instead of relying on human intuition to determine when such payments should be sent, Sahm outlines a method-based case to trigger the payments.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web|last=Sahm|first=Claudia|date=2019-05-16|title=Direct stimulus payments to individuals|url=https://www.brookings.edu/research/direct-stimulus-payments-to-individuals/|access-date=2020-12-20|website=Brookings|language=en-US}}</ref> The trigger suggested indicates an economy beginning a recession and is now known as the ''Sahm rule''. The Sahm rule recession indicator was also featured early in a Goldman Sachs U.S. economic research report by economist [[William C. Dudley]].<ref>{{Cite web|last=van Vuuren|first=Dwaine|date=2024-01-01|title=The Sahm Rule Redux|url=https://recessionalert.com/sahm-rule-redux/|access-date=2024-07-31|website=RecessionALERT|language=en-US}}</ref> Edward McKelvey, a senior economist at Goldman Sachs, has also been credited with using the idea very early.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Shedlock|first=Mike |date=2024-08-02|title=The McKelvey (Sahm) Unemployment Rate Recession Rule Just Triggered|url=https://mishtalk.com/economics/the-mckelvey-sahm-unemployment-rate-recession-rule-just-triggered/|language=en-US}}</ref>
 
Instead of relying on human intuition to determine when such payments should be sent, Sahm outlines a method-based case to trigger the payments.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web|last=Sahm|first=Claudia|date=2019-05-16|title=Direct stimulus payments to individuals|url=https://www.brookings.edu/research/direct-stimulus-payments-to-individuals/|access-date=2020-12-20|website=Brookings|language=en-US}}</ref> The trigger suggested indicates an economy beginning a recession and is now known as the ''Sahm rule''. Different thresholds have been used for similar purposes—for example [[William C. Dudley]] wrote in 2000 an increase in the unemployment of over one-third of a percent would predict a recession—but Sahm has written that her rule (and its accompanying threshold) is specifically suited as an indicator of the early stages of a recession for the purposes of a fiscal policy response.<ref name="u905">{{cite web | last=Sahm | first=Claudia | title=No, you didn't invent the Sahm rule and that's ok, we need more tools! | website=Substack | date=2024-03-29 | url=https://stayathomemacro.substack.com/p/no-you-didnt-invent-the-sahm-rule?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2 | access-date=2024-09-10}}</ref>
== Commentary ==
 
Dr. Sahm cautionscautioned: {{blockquote|"The Sahm rule is an empirical regularity. It’s not a proposition; it’s not a law of nature."
}}
And she further explainsexplained: {{blockquote|"I created the Sahm rule to send out stimulus checks automatically. The idea was to act fast to make the recession less severe and help families. The star was always the stimulus check, not the indicator that other people named after me.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Dr. Sahm|first=Claudia|date=2022-12-30|title=The Sahm rule: I created a monster.|url=https://stayathomemacro.substack.com/p/the-sahm-rule-i-created-a-monster|access-date=2024-07-31|website=Substack|language=en-US}}</ref>"
}}
 
=== Implementation ===
The Sahm rule was published by The [[Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis|St. Louis Federal Reserve]] bank's [[Federal Reserve Economic Data]] (FRED) system in October 2019.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2019-10-16|title=FRED Adds Sahm Rule Recession Indicators {{!}} St. Louis Fed|url=https://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/research-news/fred-adds-sahm-rule-recession-indicators|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191016192630/https://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/research-news/fred-adds-sahm-rule-recession-indicators|url-status=dead|archive-date=2019-10-16|access-date=2020-12-20}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=FRED Adds Sahm Rule Recession Indicators {{!}} St. Louis Fed Economic Research|date=2 October 2019 |url=https://news.research.stlouisfed.org/2019/10/fred-adds-sahm-rule-recession-indicators/|access-date=2020-12-21|language=en-US}}</ref> It is retroactively calculated to evaluate performance from past recessions. The recession rule is defined as:
 
Line 24 ⟶ 25:
The rule only relies on a single data series, national unemployment, which is published monthly by the [[Bureau of Labor Statistics|BLS]]. This differentiates the index from other recession indicators based on statistical models, which may rely on dozens of inputs.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Berge|first=Travis J.|date=2015-05-13|title=Predicting Recessions with Leading Indicators: Model Averaging and Selection over the Business Cycle|url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/for.2345|journal=Journal of Forecasting|volume=34|issue=6|pages=455–471|doi=10.1002/for.2345|issn=0277-6693|url-access=subscription}}</ref> Further, unemployment can be more easily understood than complex financial series.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Schneider|first=Howard|date=2019-10-04|title='Sahm Rule' enters Fed lexicon as fast, real-time recession flag|language=en|work=Reuters|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-fed-sahm-idUSKBN1WJ12J|access-date=2020-12-20}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web|title=The Sahm Rule With The Eponymous Economist : The Indicator from Planet Money|url=https://www.npr.org/2019/11/26/783120728/the-sahm-rule-with-the-eponymous-economist|access-date=2020-12-21|website=NPR.org|language=en}}</ref>
 
== Historical Accuracyaccuracy ==
The Sahm rule is a robust tool that has been very accurate in identifying a downturn in the [[business cycle]] and almost always doesn't trigger outside of a recession. The simplicity of the calculation contributes to its reliability. The Sahm rule signals the early stages (onset) of a recession and generated only two false positive recession alerts since the year 1959 (there have been 11 recessions since 1950); in both instances — in 1959 and 1969 — it was just a little untimely, with the recession warning appearing a few months before a slide in the U.S. economy began.<ref>{{Cite news|date=2024-08-02|title=U.S. employers likely added 175,000 jobs in July as labor market cools gradually|url=https://apnews.com/article/economy-jobs-unemployment-federal-reserve-inflation-22095766804d9c1532b4fcc29565be49|access-date=2024-08-02|website=AP - The Associated Press, Washington|language=en}}</ref> In the case of the false positive warning related to the year 1959 it was followed by an actual recession six months later. The Sahm rule typically signals a recession before [[GDP]] data makes it clear.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2024-01-01|title=Sahm Rule Recession Indicator|url=https://www.currentmarketvaluation.com/models/sahm-rule.php|website=Current Market Valuation (CMV) by Gramalam, LLC|language=en-US}}</ref>
 
Line 67 ⟶ 68:
 
In summary, the Sahm rule's reliability lies in its consistent performance throughout various economic climates, particularly in signaling the beginning of a recession with a high degree of accuracy.
 
== Trigger threshold of the Sahm Rule ==
The nowadays more commonly used rule triggers a recession signal when the Sahm metric is crossing above 0.5%. Economist William C. Dudley recommended a lower trigger of 0.33%,<ref>{{Cite web|last=van Vuuren|first=Dwaine|date=2024-01-01|title=The Sahm Rule Redux|url=https://recessionalert.com/sahm-rule-redux/|access-date=2024-07-31|website=RecessionALERT|language=en-US}}</ref> and economist Edward McKelvey recommended an even lower trigger of 0.3%.<ref name="mckelvey">{{Cite web|last=Shedlock|first=Mike |date=2024-08-02|title=The McKelvey (Sahm) Unemployment Rate Recession Rule Just Triggered|url=https://mishtalk.com/economics/the-mckelvey-sahm-unemployment-rate-recession-rule-just-triggered/|language=en-US}}</ref> Macro-economic writer Mike Shedlock recommends a trigger threshold of 0.4% as the best compromise halfway between McKelvey and Sahm, because as he explains, this already reduces the average lag time of the recession alert to just roughly one month (from a lag time of on average three months when using 0.5%), while not producing too many false positives (but he uses a slightly different rounding in his calculation).
{{block indent|1=
"A trigger of 0.4 percent rounded to a single decimal point does a better job of weeding out false positives [than McKelvey or Dudley] without the lags of Sahm straight up."<ref name="mckelvey"></ref>
}}
 
===Analysis of differing trigger thresholds===
{| class="wikitable"
! Trigger threshold !! Lead-lag times<ref name="mckelvey"></ref> !! False positive warnings<ref name="mckelvey"></ref>
|-
| 0.3% || leads the actual recession start in three cases by two months and in one case by one month || produces five (to six) false positive alerts
|-
| 0.4% || leads the actual recession start in two cases by one month || produces two false positive alerts
|-
| 0.5% || leads the actual recession start in no case || produces one false positive alert
|}
 
===Rounding===
Mike Shedlock explains that he calculates the headline U.S. unemployment rate to three decimal places and then rounds to two. As example for July 2024, the widely used Sahm rule calculates a value of 0.53%, while Shedlock calculates a value of 0.49%.<ref name="mckelvey"></ref>
 
==Two-sided Sahm rule modifications==
Economists Pascal Michaillat and [[Emmanuel Saez]] have created a two-sided Sahm rule-based indicator<ref>{{Cite web|date=2024-08-11|title=General Economics - Has the Recession Started?|last1=Michaillat|first1=Pascal|last2=Saez|first2=Emmanuel|url=https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.05856|access-date=2024-08-17|website=arXiv|language=en}}</ref> (which the Financial Times named the 'Michez rule'<ref>{{Cite news|date=2024-08-16|title=Simple indicators of whether the US is in recession are flawed - Investors are going to have to live with some uncertainty|last=Keynes|first=Soumaya|url=https://www.ft.com/content/8e8f22b7-9234-4fdf-a5c4-0a5e18fb65fb|access-date=2024-08-17|website=Financial Times|language=en}}</ref>), using both the unemployment rate and also the vacancy rate for jobs. The economists noted that their modified indicator functioned for recessions going back to the year 1930,<ref>{{Cite news|date=2024-08-12|title=There's a 40% chance the US economy is already in a recession, according to a new indicator|last=Cloonan|first=Kelly|url=https://www.businessinsider.com/sahm-rule-claudia-recession-new-indicator-michaillat-saez-unemployment-jobs-2024-8|access-date=2024-08-17|website=Business Insider|language=en}}</ref> while Sahm's worked only back to the 1950s. Another notable difference: The 'Michez rule' is usually triggered earlier than the Sahm rule as it detects recessions on average 1.4 months after they have started.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2024-08-11|title=General Economics - Has the Recession Started?|last1=Michaillat|first1=Pascal|last2=Saez|first2=Emmanuel|url=https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.05856|access-date=2024-08-17|website=arXiv|language=en}}</ref>
 
==Employment-to-population Sahm rule modifications==
Morgan Stanley economists have constructed an indicator which has the same 0.5% recession threshold as the Sahm rule, but uses the employment-to-population, or EPR, ratio. It emphasizes the ratio of employed individuals to the total working-age population and may provide a more accurate picture of the labor market's state. The Morgan Stanley economists combined their approach with the modification made by Michaillat and Saez, which uses two thresholds, to create the 'Triumvirate rule'. "The Triumvirate rule has moved to 100% probability of recession within 2 to 6 months after rising above 20% historically, with an average of 3.7 months."<ref>{{Cite news|date=2024-08-19|title=Soft landing still in sight as Sahm Rule recession indicator misses more than hits|last=Ebrahim|first=Yasin|url=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/soft-landing-still-sight-sahm-210843473.html|website=Yahoo! finance|language=en}}</ref>
 
== Reception ==