Talk:Recursion: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 03:55, 21 September 2024 edit 2600:1012:a021:670:55f0:816e:ced2:ae4f (talk) →‎recursion in "see also" (2024) ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 10:21, 23 September 2024 edit undo 100.36.106.199 (talk) Undid revision 1247053212 by 2600:1012:A021:670:2D4A:EA7C:50A3:1FF4 (talk) no, this is definitely not okay. Tag: Undo
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 246: :::::Although Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, many articles like WP:UA have some fun and entertain the reader. A small bullet in the "See also" section that says "Recursion - the article you're on right now" wouldn't ruin the reader experience while having some lighthearted fun. [[User:IxNoah\|IxNoah]] ([[User talk:IxNoah\|talk]]) 18:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC) ~~[[User:Paul August]] has been a consistent killjoy throughout all these years.~~{{RPA}} Instead of giving undue weight to a few in vocal opposition we should broaden the scope of "consensus" to a true representative audience. And so what if this one little edit goes against the "style" of this encyclopedia? Are you going to be purists to an encyclopedia that is inherently impossible to be truly pure? Over one harmless edit in what is basically a footnote section?