Talk:Wave soldering: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 194.83.191.126 - "→‎Advertisement?: "
 
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3:
}}
=External Links=
 
==Request for comment==
 
[[Special:Contributions/Chapmanc|Chapmanc]] is repeatedly adding links to his company as "Examples of wave soldering pallets" (and appears to be deleting links to his competitors). This is a [[Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest|Conflict of interest]] and will need to be resolved. It is a valid "Example" however and to keep everyone happy - i propose the layout like this:
 
Manufacturers of wave solder pallets (example): [link1] [link2] etc - with MULTIPLE companies, not just the one.
 
Same applys with wave soldering machines - will need to add links to other manufacturers other than Essemtec
 
There is more discussion at my [[User_talk:Andy.gock|talk page]].
 
Thanks
hi
 
--[[User:Andy.gock|Andy.gock]] 22:20, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 
== Wave Solder External links ==
 
I updated this link to provide a visual example of a wave solder pallet, rather than just a link to a manufacturer. I do not work ''FOR'' Pentagon, but I do work in contract manufacturing and order my pallets ''FROM'' them. If this constitutes a conflict of interest I apologize. I thought the pictures on their website provided better examples and made for a more useful link. As there are several pallet providers and no set-in-stone standard, your compromise makes perfect sense.
 
[[User:Jirisundstrum|Jirisundstrum]] 00:24, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 
== Wave Solder External Links ==
 
I added the bulk of the original section on Fixtures and added the original link to Datum Dynamics website. This was continually being deleted (which annoyed me!) and replaced with the Penatgon link. I assumed (wrongly, apparently) that this was Pentagon playing around. I agree with Andy Gock's suggestion. Please note that I have just added content concerning RoHS and wave pallet mateials, together with a link to an article (yes, that I wrote!) on the issues. It is intended to be informative, but does contain references, towards the end, of one of our products, but it is not meant to be a heavy sell. I trust that there is no objection to this?
Thanks
 
[[User:Chapmanc|Chapmanc]] 13:05, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 
= Material used but not cited? =
Line 39 ⟶ 13:
 
Is "Products like the Solderstar WaveShuttle and the Optiminer" considered advertisement? I'll leave it for someone else to decide and remove if so. [[Special:Contributions/80.254.154.67|80.254.154.67]] ([[User talk:80.254.154.67|talk]]) 13:35, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
im gonna remove it pal sorry mate your wrong <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/194.83.191.126|194.83.191.126]] ([[User talk:194.83.191.126#top|talk]]) 08:28, 24 September 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
=Machine=
Is the description of the machine incomplete? Doesn't there have to be a heating unit to melt the solder? None is mentioned.[[User:Billposer|Bill]] ([[User talk:Billposer|talk]]) 04:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)