Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Neuroscience: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Add topic

Revision as of 02:53, 26 August 2021 edit Lowercase sigmabot III (talk \| contribs) Bots, Template editors 2,235,015 edits m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Neuroscience/Archive 6) (bot ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 22:45, 26 September 2024 edit undo WhatamIdoing (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 119,264 edits →‎Please check your priority ratings: Reply Tag: Reply
(58 intermediate revisions by 31 users not shown)
Line 8: }} {{talkheader}} {{WikiProject banner shell\| {{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/WikiProject used\|link=Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2014-02-26/WikiProject report\|writer=[[ User: Mabeenot\|Mabeenot]]\|\|day=26\|month=February\|year=2014}}▼ {{WikiProject Neuroscience}} \|}}▼ ▲{{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/~~WikiProject~~Templates/Signpost ~~used~~article link for WikiProjects\|link=Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2014-02-26/WikiProject report\|writer=[[ User: Mabeenot\|Mabeenot]]\|\|day=26\|month=February\|year=2014}} {{archivebox\|auto=yes\|search=yes}} == A tool to monitor and improve images in this Wikiproject == ~~== Management of multiple sclerosis Featured article review ==~~ Hi there! I am not part of this Wikiproject, but I am a Wikigraphist. I am interested in improving Wikipedia’s visual content and I built a tool that could help detect visual gaps in Wikiprojects. I have nominated [[Management of multiple sclerosis]] for a [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/Management of multiple sclerosis/archive1\|featured article review here]]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets [[Wikipedia:What is a featured article?\|featured article criteria]]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are [[Wikipedia:Featured article review\|here]]. [[User:SandyGeorgia\|'''Sandy'''<span style="color: green;">Georgia</span>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia\|Talk]]) 02:56, 17 January 2021 (UTC) I called it [[User:MingoBerlingo/Visual content assessment tool\|Visual Content Assessment Tool]], or simply VCAT. ~~==Mikhail Lebedev notability==~~ A working version of VCAT with data for Wikiproject Neuroscience already extracted by me on 26/07/2023 can be found at [https://aquets.github.io/VCAT-dashboard/#/dashboard?data=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Aquets/VCAT-data-extractor/main/Examples/wp_Neuroscience.json VCAT-dashboard]. You can always extract fresh data for any Wikiproject using the [https://aquets.github.io/VCAT-dashboard/#/extraction extraction tool], a command line tool I created for this purpose. Can someone please help me prove that Mikhail Lebedev is notable? I need to start Wikipedia article and I am nww. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:LotteryGeek\|LotteryGeek]] ([[User talk:LotteryGeek#top\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/LotteryGeek\|contribs]]) 22:35, January 24, 2021 (UTC)</span> :The applicable notability guideline is at [[WP:PROF]]. We can't make him notable if he isn't, but the criteria to determine it are there. --[[User:Tryptofish\|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish\|talk]]) 22:54, 24 January 2021 (UTC) Some of the actions you can do with this tool are: ~~== [[Wikipedia:Sandbox organiser]] ==~~ * Monitoring the visual content coverage in a Wikiproject ~~<center>~~ * Detecting articles needing images (eg. articles without images) ~~{\| cellpadding="10" cellspacing="0"~~ * Detecting low resolution images to improve (eg. raster diagrams to be vectorized) \|- ~~\|[[File:Noun Project Creative Designing icon 1849467.svg\|140px\|link=]]~~ ~~\| style="height:1%; font:50px/1.3 FreeSans, Gill Sans MT, GillSansSA, Calibri, sans-serif; color:#4a4a4a; padding:0px 0; vertical-align:middle;" \|~~ ~~<p style="padding-left:0px;margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:5px"><!-- Title -->Sandbox Organiser~~ ~~<p style="color: #666; font-size: 48%;padding-left:0px;margin-top:-20px;"><!-- Subtitle -->A place to help you organise your work</p>~~ \|- ▲\|} ~~</center>~~ Then you can ask for image creation or vectorization on the Graphics Lab. ~~Hi all~~ What do you think? Could it be a useful tool? I've been working on a tool for the past few months that you may find useful. [[Wikipedia:Sandbox organiser]] is a set of tools to help you better organise your draft articles and other pages in your userspace. It also includes areas to keep your to do lists, bookmarks, list of tools. You can customise your sandbox organiser to add new features and sections. Once created you can access it simply by clicking the sandbox link at the top of the page. You can create and then customise your own sandbox organiser just by clicking the button on the page. All ideas for improvements and other versions would be really appreciated. [[User:MingoBerlingo\|MingoBerlingo]] ([[User talk:MingoBerlingo\|talk]]) == Nicolelis Lab Series == ~~Huge thanks to PrimeHunter and NavinoEvans for their work on the technical parts, without them it wouldn't have happened.~~ The [[Miguel Nicolelis]] Lab published, for free, two volumes of their neuroscience work. I saw that some of them are under a Wikisource friendly CC license, but I'm not sure if it applies to all of them: [[User:John Cummings\|John Cummings]] ([[User talk:John Cummings\|talk]]) 11:06, 6 February 2021 (UTC)▼ * {{Cite book \|url=https://issuu.com/mnicolelis/docs/nicolelis_labs_series_vol_1 \|title=20 Years of Brain-Machine Interface \|volume=1 \|page=452}} ~~== Free access to sources ==~~ * {{Cite book \|url=https://issuu.com/mnicolelis/docs/nicolelis_labs_series_vol_2 \|title=20 Years of Brain-Machine Interface Research \|volume=2 \|page=436}} ▲Thanks, [[User:~~John~~Erick ~~Cummings~~Soares3\|~~John~~Erick ~~Cummings~~Soares3]] ([[User talk:~~John~~Erick ~~Cummings~~Soares3\|talk]]) 1123:0611, 65 ~~February~~March ~~2021~~2024 (UTC) ~~If any of the following titles look potentially useful to you:~~ :New article: [[Walk Again Project]]. [[User:Erick Soares3\|Erick Soares3]] ([[User talk:Erick Soares3\|talk]]) 17:21, 11 May 2024 (UTC) * The Oxford Handbook of Developmental Neural Plasticity May 2017 * The Oxford Handbook of Invertebrate Neurobiology Apr 2019 * The Oxford Handbook of Neuronal Ion Channels Mar 2018 * The Oxford Handbook of Neuronal Protein Synthesis Jun 2021 * The Oxford Handbook of the Auditory Brainstem Sep 2019 * The Oxford Handbook of the Microbiome-Gut-Brain Axis Jul 2020 * The Oxford Handbook of the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory Sep 2020 * The Oxford Handbook of the Neurobiology of Pain Jun 2020 * The Oxford Handbook of Transcranial Stimulation, Second Edition Feb 2021 == Interest in weighing in on Polyvagal theory? == then please login to https://wikipedialibrary.wmflabs.org/users/my_library/ and look for the "Oxford Handbook" section. Any editor who qualifies for a [[wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library\|Wikipedia Library Card]] (500+ edits) can have free online access. [[User:WhatamIdoing\|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing\|talk]]) 03:07, 21 May 2021 (UTC) I’m posting here because I think this topic could be interesting to members of this WikiProject. Currently there’s a discussion at [[Talk:Polyvagal theory #Discussion: representation of one author’s viewpoint]] regarding the undue weight given to a critical minority opinion. [[User:Ian Oelsner\|Ian Oelsner]] ([[User talk:Ian Oelsner\|talk]]) 22:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC) ~~== Request for help ==~~ == Good article reassessment for [[Long-term potentiation]] == Hello, can anyone with knowledge on the subject please take a look at recent anonymous edits on the page [[Lucina Uddin]]? I reverted some edits recently, because they looked a bit strange to me, but the anonymous editor has now again made the same edits. I don't know exactly what to do. I don't know anything about this subject, so perhaps someone else with more knowledge might take a look. Thanks, --[[User:Dick Bos\|Dick Bos]] ([[User talk:Dick Bos\|talk]]) 14:58, 25 August 2021 (UTC) [[Long-term potentiation]] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Long-term potentiation/1\|reassessment page]]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. [[User:Z1720\|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720\|talk]]) 04:38, 12 July 2024 (UTC) :I took a quick look, and I wonder whether this might be a page that would qualify for [[WP:AfD]] under [[WP:PROF]]. But I'm not sure about that, so I'd appreciate it if other editors would take a look. Sometimes, when an IP edits that way, it can be a tip-off that the page is promoting someone who falls a little short of our notability guidelines. --[[User:Tryptofish\|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish\|talk]]) 00:17, 26 August 2021 (UTC) == Request to merge [[Frisson]] into [[Goose bumps]] == I have noticed that these two articles talk about the same thing. I have created a proposal on [[Goose bumps]]'s talk page to discuss a merger. [[Special:Contributions/80.0.166.171\|80.0.166.171]] ([[User talk:80.0.166.171\|talk]]) 01:08, 2 August 2024 (UTC) == Requested move at [[Talk:Neuromorphic engineering#Requested move 24 August 2024]] == [[File:Information.svg\|30px\|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:Neuromorphic engineering#Requested move 24 August 2024]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. [[User:RodRabelo7\|RodRabelo7]] ([[User talk:RodRabelo7\|talk]]) 01:51, 31 August 2024 (UTC) == Please check your priority ratings == An editor first labeled [[Legality of cannabis]] as top-importance for this group, and after I removed the rating, has [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Legality_of_cannabis&diff=prev&oldid=1247813728 changed it] to high-importance. Please decide for yourselves how you'd like to have it assessed. I've seen a couple of editors "upgrade" their favorite subjects, perhaps in the mistaken belief that this will result in more editors working on the articles. I specifically suggest taking a look at what's in [[:Category:Top-importance neuroscience articles]] ([[CLARITY]]? [[Hebbian theory]]? [[Tractography]]?) and [[:Category:High-importance neuroscience articles]] to see whether it reflects your group's goals and preferences. [[User:WhatamIdoing\|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing\|talk]]) 04:43, 26 September 2024 (UTC) :Thanks for the note. I changed it down to low for neuro. I don't mind leaving it at high for pharmacology. As for checking the other ratings, I'll leave that to other editors. --[[User:Tryptofish\|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish\|talk]]) 21:42, 26 September 2024 (UTC) ::WPMED set a standard years ago of 100 top-priority and 1,000 high-priority articles. The high-priority group has crept up a bit over the years. I glanced through about half the list, fixed some obvious errors, and posted a list of some others for discussion. I'll probably to the same for the rest of the list later. I thought it might be easier if one person organized it. If everyone has a look at "some", there's a risk that we'll all carefully review the articles at the start of the alphabet and nobody will look at the ones towards the end. [[User:WhatamIdoing\|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing\|talk]]) 22:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC)