Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Neuroscience: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
WhatamIdoing (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 8:
}}
{{talkheader}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|
{{WikiProject Neuroscience}}
}}
{{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Templates/Signpost article link for WikiProjects|link=Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2014-02-26/WikiProject report|writer=[[ User: Mabeenot|Mabeenot]]||day=26|month=February|year=2014}}
{{archivebox|auto=yes|search=yes}}
Line 29 ⟶ 31:
What do you think? Could it be a useful tool?
[[User:MingoBerlingo|MingoBerlingo]] ([[User talk:MingoBerlingo|talk]])
== Requested move at [[Talk:Center of Advanced European Studies and Research#Requested move 14 January 2024]] ==▼
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:Center of Advanced European Studies and Research#Requested move 14 January 2024]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. [[User_talk:Asukite|<span style="color:Purple;font-size:medium;font-family:Bradley Hand ITC"> ASUKITE</span>]] 16:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC)▼
== Nicolelis Lab Series ==
Line 56 ⟶ 49:
== Good article reassessment for [[Long-term potentiation]] ==
[[Long-term potentiation]] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Long-term potentiation/1|reassessment page]]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 04:38, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
== Request to merge [[Frisson]] into [[Goose bumps]] ==
I have noticed that these two articles talk about the same thing. I have created a proposal on [[Goose bumps]]'s talk page to discuss a merger. [[Special:Contributions/80.0.166.171|80.0.166.171]] ([[User talk:80.0.166.171|talk]]) 01:08, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
▲== Requested move at [[Talk:
▲[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:
== Please check your priority ratings ==
An editor first labeled [[Legality of cannabis]] as top-importance for this group, and after I removed the rating, has [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Legality_of_cannabis&diff=prev&oldid=1247813728 changed it] to high-importance. Please decide for yourselves how you'd like to have it assessed.
I've seen a couple of editors "upgrade" their favorite subjects, perhaps in the mistaken belief that this will result in more editors working on the articles. I specifically suggest taking a look at what's in [[:Category:Top-importance neuroscience articles]] ([[CLARITY]]? [[Hebbian theory]]? [[Tractography]]?) and [[:Category:High-importance neuroscience articles]] to see whether it reflects your group's goals and preferences. [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 04:43, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
:Thanks for the note. I changed it down to low for neuro. I don't mind leaving it at high for pharmacology. As for checking the other ratings, I'll leave that to other editors. --[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 21:42, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
::WPMED set a standard years ago of 100 top-priority and 1,000 high-priority articles. The high-priority group has crept up a bit over the years. I glanced through about half the list, fixed some obvious errors, and posted a list of some others for discussion. I'll probably to the same for the rest of the list later. I thought it might be easier if one person organized it. If everyone has a look at "some", there's a risk that we'll all carefully review the articles at the start of the alphabet and nobody will look at the ones towards the end. [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 22:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
| |||