Content deleted Content added
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
Close discussion- it has been inactive for over a month now; no consensus |
||
Line 2:
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=Biology|class=B}}
{{WikiProject Arthropods|B|Top}}
{{Old merge
| result = '''no consensus'''
}}
==Source check on even number of pairs of legs==
Line 48 ⟶ 51:
== Proposed merge of [[Orders of centipedes]] into [[Centipede]] ==
{{Discussion top|result=The result of this discussion was no consensus (1 in favour, 3 against). [[User:Edward-Woodrow|Edward-Woodrow]] ([[User talk:Edward-Woodrow|talk]]) 21:19, 4 January 2023 (UTC)}}
Unnecessary content split. Material on [[Orders of centipedes]] was previously covered easily in [[Centipede]]. [[User:Animalparty|--Animalparty!]] ([[User talk:Animalparty|talk]]) 20:18, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Line 61 ⟶ 65:
::: Er, they don't belong. You would think it very odd, aka ridiculous, if the article on the class Birds for no obvious reason contained a list if sections detailing the attributes of the individual Orders of Hawks, Seagulls, Owls, Passerines, Cuckoos, etc. Subtopics, each for their separate articles, or perhaps, um, a list. This list of Centipede Orders, by the way, already has substantial content, and could plainly be expanded with drawings and photographs and accounts of their distinct anatomies, habitats, distributions and so on. They don't belong in the Centipede article. [[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] ([[User talk:Chiswick Chap|talk]]) 05:22, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
{{Discussion bottom}}
| |||