Content deleted Content added
SiberianCat (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
SiberianCat (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 55:
::{{Re|SiberianCat}} - I'm reluctant to continue reading your full talk page posts. A scan of this page shows them to very long. Your argument would be stronger if you could articulate your points more succinctly.
::It's a journalist's opinion that Tommy is trying to stir up "nostalgia" for the past. You can call it "a non-editorial, non-commentary news article" as much as you want, but the comment itself is, well, commentary and an opinion, but you're presenting it as fact. That's not how wikipedia works. --[[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] ([[User talk:Merbabu|talk]]) 07:54, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
:::Hi {{Re|Merbabu}}, thanks for your response. I feel your own arguments would be stronger if you could back them up. The news article, and others like it, quotes party officials as stating the attempt to appeal for a return to the Suharto era: "still yearned for the stability and the robust economic growth and development ... of the Suharto era" and "we want to develop and continue are the good things that were carried out by the New Order”. This is not commentary, it is a fact. Your labeling of it as a journalist's opinion (actually two journalists wrote that news article) does not make it opinion. Also, looking at your recent edit explanations, I don't feel that terms such as "crappy writing" and "wishy washy rubbish" are within the spirit of the fourth pillar of Wikipedia "that editors should treat each other with respect and civility". I think it's important to maintain a level of civility to foster a spirit of constructive collaboration. Thanks. [[User:SiberianCat|SiberianCat]] ([[User talk:SiberianCat|talk]]) 09:39, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
| |||