Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Alter: title, url. URLs might have been anonymized. Removed parameters. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Philoserf | #UCB_toolbar |
→Legal significance: step move of move to see also section |
||
Line 35:
The case attracted much attention as it demonstrated that the possibilities of [[third party reproduction]] raise novel legal and social questions about the meaning of parenthood and the possibility of contracting around issues of pregnancy and childbirth. Among other points of contention, feminists argued about whether a woman's basic human right to make decisions about her own body implied the ability to contract away parental rights to a child born to her, or whether recognizing such a right would entail too great risks of exploitation.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Mehren|first=Elizabeth|date=1987-07-31|title=Feminists Fight Court Ruling in Baby M Decision : Steinem, Friedan, Chesler, French Among Supporters|url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1987-07-31-vw-147-story.html|access-date=2023-01-13|website=Los Angeles Times|language=en-US}}</ref>
The New Jersey court's finding that no contract can alter the legal position of a woman who bears a child as that child's mother seemed to settle the question of the status of surrogacy contracts in America, at least until technological advances permitting gestational surrogacy—in which a woman can bear and birth a child to whom she has no genetic relation—reopened the question in many jurisdictions.
At least in New Jersey, however, the Baby M. ruling continues as precedent. In 2009, New Jersey Superior Court ruled that ''In re Baby M'' applies to gestational surrogacy as well as traditional surrogacy cases, in ''[[A.G.R. v. D.R.H & S.H.]]''. The intended parents were a homosexual male couple. They created an [[embryo]] using an anonymous donor ovum and the sperm of one of the husbands. The sister of the other husband carried the embryo to term and originally delivered the child to her brother and his husband, but a year later asserted her own parental rights even though she was not genetically related to the child. Judge Francis Schultz relied on ''In re Baby M'' to recognize the gestational mother as the child's legal mother. However, a later ruling in 2011 awarded full custody to the biological father.<ref>{{Cite web|last=NJ.com|first=Ted Sherman | NJ Advance Media for|date=2011-12-20|title=N.J. gay couple fight for custody of twin 5-year-old girls|url=https://www.nj.com/news/2011/12/nj_gay_couple_fight_for_custod.html|access-date=2023-01-13|website=nj|language=en}}</ref>
| |||