Pyxis Solitary

::::Except your rephrasing means something ''different'', not "more clear". The original phrasing, ''"can contribute to LGBT trauma"'', suggests that experiencing lesbophobia is one of the possible contributing factors. Your rephrase, ''"... who experience lesbophobia may experience LGBT trauma"'', is not as open to other possible contributing factors.<br>In either case, this is text for the lede paragraph, which is typically unfootnoted. The wikilink to [[LGBT trauma]] takes the reader to an article with numerous footnotes discussing the experiences that contribute. That seems a more concise approach than arguing a single sentence in the lede paragraph of [[Lesbophobia]], even in the footnotes. &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:.Raven|<big>'''.'''</big>Raven]]&nbsp;<small>[[User talk:.Raven|&nbsp;'''''.'''talk'']]</small> 10:51, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

:::::The lead summarizes what's found in the body of the article. If it's not somewhere in the text, where it's supported with reliable sources, then it cannot be a statement in the lead because as I said before, without RS it's just an editor's personal opinion, POV, original research -- and to add, [[WP:FORUM]]. <br /> I don't care how you interpret it, I don't care how I interpret it ... I only care that conclusive or surmising statements have RS to back them up. Now, let this be the full stop to this back-and-forth. [[User:Pyxis Solitary|<span style="background-color: #eadff5; color: #6e02db;">'''Pyxis Solitary'''</span>]] [[User talk:Pyxis Solitary| <span style="color:#FF007C;">(yak yak)</span>]]. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:black">Ol' homo.</span> 10:21, 11 June 2023 (UTC)