Content deleted Content added
BobKilcoyne (talk | contribs) Six markets model: "claim" has negative implications; Berry |
HeyElliott (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 29:
In contrast, relationship marketing is cross-functional, organised around processes that involve all aspects of an organization.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Hutt |first=Michael D. |date=1995 |title=Cross-functional working relationships in marketing |url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF02893875 |journal=Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science |language=en |volume=23 |issue=4 |pages=351–357 |doi=10.1007/BF02893875 |s2cid=189888025 |issn=0092-0703}}</ref> In fact, some commentators prefer to call relationship marketing 'relationship management' because it involves much more than that which is included in normal marketing.
Because of its broad scope, relationship marketing can be effective in many contexts. As well as being relevant to 'for profit' businesses, research indicates that relationship marketing can be useful for organizations in the voluntary sector<ref>Bussell, H.,
Martin Christopher, Adrian Payne and David Ballantyne at the [[Cranfield School of Management]] claim that relationship marketing has the potential to forge a synthesis between quality management, customer service management and marketing.<ref name="Christopher M., Payne, A. and Ballantyne, D. 1991 264">{{cite book | title = Relationship Marketing | publisher=Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford | year = 1991 | page = 264 |
==Approaches==
|