Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Discussion: Reply |
|||
Line 614:
*::::::Given that the party employing that rationale was [[WP:INVOLVED]] in this RFC and voted 3/[[WP:GUNREL]], I wonder: if you don't understand what it is you're voting for, is the vote valid? [[User:Void if removed|Void if removed]] ([[User talk:Void if removed|talk]]) 18:58, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
*::Yellow doesn't mean attribution is required nor does it mean Green source beats Yellow source. Instead it means we need to use caution when deciding if the material is being given undue weight by the source in question (which can effect how much weight it should be given on Wikipedia). It also means we shouldn't take interpretations as always correct. However, it doesn't mean we should question basic facts taken from the source. If they say 500 people attended or the topics were X, we should assume they are correct. This by the way is a general issue issue with RSP's buckets, not specific to this topic. [[User:Springee|Springee]] ([[User talk:Springee|talk]]) 17:15, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
*::[[WP:MREL]] is questionable as it stands because it is unable to distinguish "no consensus on whether a source should be used" from "consensus that it's unclear when a source is used". <span class="nowrap">[[User:Chess|Chess]] ([[User talk:Chess|talk]]) <small>(please [[Help:Talk pages#Notifications|mention]] me on reply)</small></span> 00:31, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
* Are RfC participants supposed to reply in the Non-participants section, or should they keep comments in their own section and/or §Discussion? [[User:Firefangledfeathers|Firefangledfeathers]] ([[User talk:Firefangledfeathers|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Firefangledfeathers|contribs]]) 16:51, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
*: I’ve never seen a close appeal where it doesn’t happen, so I assume they are allowed to. [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 16:57, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
| |||