Talk:Recursion: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 246:
:::::Although Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, many articles like WP:UA have some fun and entertain the reader. A small bullet in the "See also" section that says "Recursion - the article you're on right now" wouldn't ruin the reader experience while having some lighthearted fun. [[User:IxNoah|IxNoah]] ([[User talk:IxNoah|talk]]) 18:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 
[[User:Paul August]] has been a consistent killjoy throughout all these years. Instead of giving undue weight to a few in vocal opposition we should broaden the scope of "consensus" to a true representative audience.
And so what if this one little edit goes against the "style" of this encyclopedia? Are you going to be purists to an encyclopedia that is inherently impossible to be truly pure? overOver one harmless edit in what is basically a footnote section? [[WP:IGNORE|Create an exception for this page specifically]] if it makes things better. That's the argument made by the proponents.
[[WP:IGNORE|Create an exception for this page specifically]] if it makes things better. That's the argument made by the proponents. [[Special:Contributions/2600:1012:A021:670:55F0:816E:CED2:AE4F|2600:1012:A021:670:55F0:816E:CED2:AE4F]] ([[User talk:2600:1012:A021:670:55F0:816E:CED2:AE4F|talk]]) 03:55, 21 September 2024 (UTC)