Content deleted Content added
Line 145:
:::::::::::::::::Assange's work was published in the Observer, so this still stands too.
:::::::::::::::::Does anyone disagree with my rationale - if so, why and please can I have my content back? [[User:Nothing-nothing-at-all|Nothing-nothing-at-all]] ([[User talk:Nothing-nothing-at-all|talk]]) 21:15, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::::::::::Leaving aside the question of whether the Berlin Times is reliable, the article you found doesn't appear to contain the first of the quotes from the talk that you added to the article (and certainly not your version with "The Observer" added in).
::::::::::::::::::As for the Assange material, here's a portion of what you added: {{tq|''The Guardian'' has neither retracted nor apologised for the story about the meeting. Stella Morris, Assange's wife, said ''The Guardian'' failed in its responsibility to Assange and its "negligence has created such a problem that if Julian dies or is extradited, that will forever blot the reputation of the ''Guardian''".}} Why would that belong in an article about the Observer when it's all about the Guardian? The rest of the text is similar. [[User:Cordless Larry|Cordless Larry]] ([[User talk:Cordless Larry|talk]]) 21:33, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
| |||