Ashurbanipal: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Navadda (talk | contribs)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit App section source
Navadda (talk | contribs)
→‎Legacy: commas, clarity
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit App section source
 
Line 200:
{{Main|Sardanapalus}}
[[File:Dream of Sardanapalus 1871 Ford Madox Brown.jpg|upright=1.15|thumb|''Dream of Sardanapalus'' (1871) by [[Ford Madox Brown]]]]
Tales of Ashurbanipal survived in the cultural memory of the Near East for centuries after the decline of Assyrian power in the region. He is almost certainly identifiable with the figure "Asnappar", mentioned in the Biblical [[Book of Ezra]] ([[Ezra 4#Verse 10|4:10]]).{{Sfn|Rosa|2019|p=328}} It is also either [[Esarhaddon]] or Ashurbanipal who is the "king of Assyria" mentioned in the [[Book of 2 Chronicles]] ([[2 Chronicles 33#Verse 11|33:11]]).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://biblearchaeologyreport.com/2021/02/12/king-manasseh-an-archaeological-biography/ |title=King Manasseh: An Archaeological Biography|date=12 February 2021 }}</ref> Ashurbanipal has also been most commonly identified as the Assyrian king, "[[Book of Judith#Identification of Nebuchadnezzar with Ashurbanipal|Nebuchadnezzar]]", in the [[Book of Judith]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/eng/hcc/judith.html |title=Introduction to the Book of Judith by Rev. George Leo Haydock}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.drbo.org/chapter/18001.htm |title=Douay-Rheims Bible Book of Judith Chapter 1}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|url=https://play.google.com/books/reader?id=KSpRAAAAcAAJ&pg=GBS.PA338&hl=en|title=Commentaire littéral sur tous les livres de l'ancien et du nouveau testament by Antoine Augustin Calmet - Sur Le Livre De Judith|date=1712 |publisher=Pierre Emery }}</ref> Ashurbanipal and other ancient Assyrian kings and figures continued to appear in the folklore and literary tradition of northern Mesopotamia.{{Sfn|Kalimi|Richardson|2014|p=5}} The most prominent later legend concerning Ashurbanipal was the long-lived Greco-Roman Sardanapalus legend. The Sardanapalus of legend was accordingAccording to the Assyriologist Maria de Fátima Rosa, the Sardanapalus of legend was conceived as "more [[Effeminacy|effeminate]] than a woman, a lascivious and idle man, a governor who loathed all expressions of militarism and war". This view stemmed from ancient Greek views on Mesopotamia in general; ancient Mesopotamian kings were typically seen by the Greeks as effeminate and dull despots incapable of securing the welfare for the people of their empires. The earliest known reference to Sardanapalus comes from the 5th-century BCE ''[[Histories (Herodotus)|Histories]]'' of [[Herodotus]], which includes a reference to the riches of Sardanapalus, king of Nineveh. Legendary tales in [[Aramaic]], based on the civil war between Ashurbanipal ("Sarbanabal") and Shamash-shum-ukin ("Sarmuge"), are attested from the 3rd century BC.{{Sfn|Rosa|2019|pp=328–330}}
 
The most elaborate and lengthy ancient text concerning Sardanapalus comes from the 1st-century BCE ''[[Bibliotheca historica]]'' of [[Diodorus Siculus]]. Siculus's portrayal of Sardanapalus was endowed with ancient Greek [[orientalism]]; the king was stated to have lived among women, dressed like them, used a soft voice and engaged in other activities viewed as unnatural for Greek men. In Siculus's account, Sardanapalus's [[satrap]] of Media, [[Arbaces]], saw him mingling with women in the palace and quickly revolted, assaulting Nineveh together with the Babylonian priest [[Belesys]]. After failing to urge his soldiers to defend the city, Sardanapalus locked himself in his palace chamber, with treasures and concubines, and lit up a pyre, burning down the entire capital city and ending the Assyrian Empire. It is clear from the narrative that Siculus's Sardanapalus is based not only on Ashurbanipal, but also on Shamash-shum-ukin and Sinsharishkun.{{Sfn|Rosa|2019|pp=330–331}}
[[File:Eugène Delacroix - La Mort de Sardanapale.jpg|upright=1.15|left|thumb|''[[The Death of Sardanapalus]]'' (1827) by [[Eugène Delacroix]]]]
The Greek account of ancient Assyria transformed historical perception of the ancient empire and set the image of it in Western Europe for centuries. Since concrete evidence of Assyria and Babylonia was lacking, authors and artists during the [[Renaissance]] and [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment]] based their interpretations of ancient Mesopotamia on classical Greco-Roman writings. In late 17th-century Italy, the composer Domenico Freschi wrote and performed the opera ''Sardanapalo'', a [[comedic tragedy]] wherein Sardanapalus was portrayed as a woman-like and sex-eager king. In the opera, Sardanapalus, after watching Nineveh crumble, decides to light fire to his palace so that the Assyrian Empire did not fall without a show. In 1821, [[Lord Byron]] launched the historical tragedy play ''[[Sardanapalus (play)|Sardanapalus]]'', which pairs Sardanapalus with the legendary character [[Myrrah]], often Sardanapalus's counterpart in later tales as well. MyrrahIn wasByron's instory, theMyrrah storywas a female Greek slave and loyal supporter of Sardanapalus. In Byron's version, it was Myrrah who lit the palace on fire after Sardanapalus gave his last words, "Adieu, Assyria! I loved thee well!". Many operas, inspired by Byron, included similar storylines. It was typical to portray the fall of Nineveh and Assyria as a consequence of Assyria's supposed lack of moral values, combined with its ostentation and pomp.{{Sfn|Rosa|2019|pp=328, 331–332}}
 
Even after archaeologists and historians began to uncover the true history of ancient Assyria in the 19th century, the perception rooted in Greco-Roman tradition proved to be enduring. When the British archaeologist [[Austen Henry Layard]] found evidence of a major fire in the ruins of [[Nimrud]] (which he believed to be Nineveh) in 1845, his colleagues suggested that this was proof of the Sardanapalus legend. Even after discoveries made it clear that the Sardanapalus of legend was far from a perfect match of the Ashurbanipal of history, the legend was not forgotten. Instead, plays and films featuring Sardanapalus simply began to mix the legendary tale with historical details. Many plays began to incorporate Assyrian architectural details, such as ''[[lamassu]]s''. Two films based on the Sardanapalus legend have been produced in Italy; [[Giuseppe de Liguoro]]'s ''[[Sardanapalo re dell'Assiria]]'' (1910) and [[Silvio Amadio]]'s ''[[Le sette folgori di Assur]]'' (1962), both heavily influenced by Byron's play. Both follow Sardanapalus's relationship with Myrrah. In Amadio's film, the narrative is also inspired by Ashurbanipal's conflict with Shamash-shum-ukin, who appears in the film under the shortened name Shamash.{{Sfn|Rosa|2019|pp=331–332}}
Line 212:
==== Rediscoveries and assessments ====
[[File:Exhibition I am Ashurbanipal king of the world, king of Assyria, British Museum (44157123820).jpg|upright=1.15|thumb |Ashurbanipal's reliefs exhibited at the [[British Museum]] as part of the exhibition ''I am Ashurbanipal'' (2018–2019)]]
The North Palace of Nineveh, constructed by Ashurbanipal, was rediscovered by the British-funded Assyrian archaeologist [[Hormuzd Rassam]] in December 1853.{{Sfn|Reade|2018|p=292}} Rassam's excavations were a somewhat strange episode in Assyriology, as his efforts were also marked by an intense rivalry with the French archaeologist [[Victor Place]]; despite agreements as to who should excavate where, Ashurbanipal's palace was found by Rassam during the night, when he sent out a team of excavators under the cover of darkness to dig in the French portion of the Nineveh excavation.{{Sfn|Trolle Larsen|2017|p=|pp=588–590}} Excavations were conducted in the palace in 1853–1854. Among other discoveries, Rassam recovered the reliefs making up the ''[[Lion Hunt of Ashurbanipal]]'', which were taken from the palace and transported to the [[British Museum]], reaching England in March 1856.{{Sfn|Reade|2018|p=294}} Because of scholarly disagreements and rivalries, as well as issues of funding, studies and publications of the finds from Ashurbanipal's palace were produced slowly, with the first detailed analyses and studies not being published until the 1930s and 1940s.{{Sfn|Reade|2018|p=298}}
 
Ashurbanipal's reign was the last time when Assyrian armies campaigned all across the Middle East.{{Sfn|Frahm|2017|p=189}} He is consequently typically regarded to have been the "last great king of Assyria".{{Sfn|Chaliand|2014|p=52}}{{Sfn|Frahm|2017|p=189}} Ashurbanipal's reign is sometimes considered the apogee of the Neo-Assyrian Empire,{{Sfn|Rosa|2019|p=328}} though many scholars instead consider the preceding reign of Esarhaddon as such.{{Sfn|Frahm|2017|p=187}} Whether Ashurbanipal is to blame for the fall of the Assyrian Empire relatively quickly after his death is disputed. J. A. Delaunay, author of the ''[[Encyclopædia Iranica|Encyclopaedia Iranica]]'' entry on Ashurbanipal, writes that the Neo-Assyrian Empire under Ashurbanipal had already begun "exhibiting clear symptoms of impending dislocation and fall",{{Sfn|Delaunay|1987|pages=805-806|ignore-err=yes}} while [[Donald John Wiseman]], in the ''[[Encyclopaedia Britannica]]'' article on Ashurbanipal, holds that "It is no indictment of his rule that his empire fell within two decades after his death; this was due to external pressures rather than to internal strife".{{Sfn|Encyclopaedia Britannica|p=}} [[Gérard Chaliand]] holds that the fall of the Assyrian Empire should be blamed on Ashurbanipal's "mediocre heirs" rather than Ashurbanipal himself;{{Sfn|Chaliand|2014|p=52}} there is however no evidence that his heirs were incompetent rulers. Sinsharishkun, under whom the empire collapsed, was a militarily competent ruler, utilizing the same tactics as his predecessors.''{{Sfn|Melville|2011|p=|pp=21, 27}}'' Eckart Frahm believes the seeds of Assyria's fall were sown in Ashurbanipal's reign, in particular through the disconnect between the king and the traditional elite and through Ashurbanipal's sack of Babylon.{{Sfn|Frahm|2017|p=190}}