Content deleted Content added
m Reverted 1 edit by 2409:4070:4019:2430:84B9:9F9D:AA80:741E (talk) to last revision by Sock |
|||
Line 511:
*:A request has been made at CR. [[User:InfiniteNexus|InfiniteNexus]] ([[User talk:InfiniteNexus|talk]]) 18:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' All of these repeated and failed proposals are indicative of the fact that wikipedians are not working towards a consensus and there should never be a moratorium on working towards a consensus. If editors are abusing the process that it is an AN/I or behavior issue but otherwise it should be up to the more sane and moderate editors to proposal an organizational scheme for a company with a history of this density and length. It is already split into two articles and we should just pick the most [[WP:COMMONNAME]] for both of them and be done with it and it is my wish that rational heads and good sources can prevail. [[User:Jorahm|Jorahm]] ([[User talk:Jorahm|talk]]) 16:46, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
*'''Strong Oppose''' It is a very [[WP:CRYSTALBALL]] behaviour to predict that Twitter's [[WP:COMMONNAME]] won't become X within one year. [[User:Félix An|Félix An]] ([[User talk:Félix An|talk]]) 04:04, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
*:A moratorium doesn't prevent consensus being reached, it prevents disruption and repetitive [[WP:DEADHORSE]] discussions that go nowhere. We need to wait for a reasonable amount of time to allow for [[WP:CCC|consensus to change]] before another potential RM. Otherwise, we are just going to have one of these every other month, as has been the case for the past year. This cycle is tiring and unproductive. [[User:InfiniteNexus|InfiniteNexus]] ([[User talk:InfiniteNexus|talk]]) 18:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
<!-- NOTE: This is the end of the sub-discussion regarding a proposed moratorium on future move requests. To comment on the current move request, scroll up. -->
| |||