Content deleted Content added
→waste of time.: new section |
|||
Line 55:
== Old pictures ==
Who cares? Get rid of them, I tell ya! I done this, rv it if you can't sleep without obsolete picture haunting whole page. --[[User:80.51.70.116|80.51.70.116]] 11:22, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
== waste of time. ==
Why does NASA insist on sending
another rover to mars? Wht you really want
is a blimp. There is less pressure on mars, which mean less lifting gas
is needed, because it doesnt burn in CO2 hydrogen can be the lifting gas,
CO2 is heavier than air so hydrogen would be relativly lighter, which means less lifting gas
and there is less gravity on mars so less lifting gas is needed. So, you dont need a big gas bag to keep the probe aloft. On top of the gas bag solar cells would be situated, If there is a dust storm the probes can just sit at a higher altitude above it. Altitude can be controlled by using ballonets. Propulsion would be provided by two ducted fans, driven electrically. The advantages: the probes are more mobile whic means they can vist sites like: vallis marianris,
volcanic calderas and the polar caps. [[User:T.Neo|T.Neo]] 15:52, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
| |||