Revision as of 16:28, 15 April 2008 edit Warren (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 23,232 edits →‎See Also - ODF?: comment ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:38, 16 April 2008 edit undo Yesudeep (talk \| contribs) 14 edits →‎This reads like Microsoft propaganda Next edit →
Line 208: [[Special:Contributions/82.24.42.7\|82.24.42.7]] ([[User talk:82.24.42.7\|talk]]) 11:33, 11 April 2008 (UTC)11/4/2008 cybervegan I agree with this. A standard with not even a single complete implementation and only one vendor does not make sense. The term "standard" seems abused, simply because the specification is not vendor-neutral. Standardization ideally occurs when there are several competing implementations varying to different degrees and interoperability becomes a major headache. I would prefer to call this a pseudo-standard. [[User:Yesudeep\|Yesudeep]] ([[User talk:Yesudeep\|talk]]) 03:38, 16 April 2008 (UTC) == Size of the OOXML specification ==

Talk:Office Open XML: Difference between revisions