Content deleted Content added
Line 204:
:I strongly disagree. That is a current event... it's news, it's not encyclopedic. It's also based on media reports which are usually sensationalized when they are of that nature. I think information of that sort becomes encyclopedic when it becomes the trend or the norm, and when harder data is available for reference. Anomalous statistical information such as a sudden and quite possibly temporary crime spree should be left out I think. --[[User:Arch26|Arch26]] 05:53, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
::That's true. At the moment it's "shock, horror" but in a year's time it's likely to be "ho-hum". -- [[User:Derek Ross|Derek Ross]] | [[User talk:Derek Ross|Talk]] 18:09, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
:::Care to reasses that opinion, Mezmo the Magnificent? In light of the recent wave of violence a year later? :-) [[Special:Contributions/139.48.25.61|139.48.25.61]] ([[User talk:139.48.25.61|talk]]) 20:05, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
== protection ==
| |||