Gricean maxims: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
→‎Flouting the Maxims: the quantity of information is sufficient, but the amount of milk is not related to the order. This is because of the qty of the milk, but not the qty of info!
Sinatra (talk | contribs)
Line 59:
Gricean Maxims generate [[implicature]]s. If the overt, surface meaning of a sentence does not seem to be consistent with the Gricean maxims, and yet the circumstances lead us to think that the speaker is nonetheless obeying the [[cooperative principle]], we tend to look for other meanings that could be [[Implication (pragmatics)|implicated]] by the sentence.
 
Grice did not, however, assume that all people should constantly follow these maxims. Instead, he found it interesting when these were not respected, namely either "flouted" (with the listener being expected to be able to understand the message) or "violated" (eitherwith purposefullythe orlistener unintentionally)being byexpected speakers,to not note this). whichFlouting would imply some other, hidden meaning. The importance was in what was ''not'' said. For example: "''It's raining"'' is at first sight in violation of quality and quantity of spoken language; however, in a context (e.g.such whenwhere someone has suggested a game of tennis), the reasoning behind this 'fragment' sentence becomes clear (the maxim is just "flouted").
 
==Criticism of the Gricean Maxims and the Cooperative Principle==