Revision as of 13:58, 13 January 2013 edit 87.243.112.203 (talk) No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:00, 16 January 2013 edit undo BanRay (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 13,154 edits →Breach of contract saga: misleading sentence, both Matuzalem and Zaragoza still have to pay the ordered amount, the court merely overturned the decision regarding the possible ban which Shakhtar could have imposed according to FIFA Next edit →
Line 60: On 19 May 2009, following a Shakhtar lawsuit, the CAS ordered Matuzalém to pay €11,858,934 to Shakhtar for breach of contract.<ref>{{cite news\|url= http://shakhtar.com/en/news/9537\|title=Shakhtar win "Matuzalem Case"\|date=19 May 2009\|accessdate=9 May 2009\|publisher=shakhtar.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite news\|url=http://www.fifa.com/aboutfifa/federation/administration/news/newsid=1059709.html\|title=FIFA takes note of Matuzalem decision\|date=19 May 2009\|accessdate=20 May 2009\|publisher=FIFA.com}}</ref> On 28 March 2012, the Swiss Federal Court decided that FIFA DRC (Dispute Resolution Chamber - the FIFA's organ that deals with this kind of issues) and CAS (Court of Arbitration for Sport) had done a "serious and manifest" attack on the rights of Brazilian footballer Matuzalem, and the Swiss court annulled the decision because "it is incompatible with the public order,".<ref>{{cite news\|url=http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/03/29/uk-soccer-fifa-matuzalem-idUKBRE82S0TR20120329 \| agency=Reuters \| title=FIFA and CAS rapped by Swiss court over Matuzalem case ~~\| date=29 March 2012\|accessdate=4 January 2013}}</ref>~~ ===Lazio===

Matuzalém: Difference between revisions