Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
→‎Section break for convenience: A more detailed plan of action.
NSLE (talk | contribs)
Line 268:
:::*Scenario 3: If nothing new is revealed, and HRE does not posts in his talk page (since he is blocked) for three days: I will close the RfA early and archive it.
:::I am not assuming any of the scenarios to be true at this point, simply because I have no evidence to support any of them beyond the shadow of a doubt. The three-day period of time is only because we can't let the uncertainty last forever, and since HRE is a fairly active user, a three-day absence, during an active RfA, would be extremely unlikely, and that would provide us with a minimum degree of assurance to shut down his RfA.<br>I agree that, save for an extraordinary situation, the hacking of the account may be resolved by changing passwords. It is also worth noticing that the community would no doubt demand from HRE reassurance as to the status of his account before granting him sysophood. [[User:Redux|Redux]] 02:50, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
::::Would '''support''' this suggestion. [[User_talk:NSLE|NSLE]] 02:54, 4 July 2006 (UTC)